FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

SMOKING

Jump to newest
 

By *ony Hardcock OP   Man
over a year ago

Shepperton

Smoking in the car with kids in the back I think it should be band!

Just been to my mates house (yes I have mates) and they both smoke in the house with there little daughter in the same room. Is that not the same?

Ps I smoke after a few drinks but always outside

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Have a big pat on the back

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Have a big pat on the back"

Yeah good for you op

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Smoking in cars with kids in was banned in October '14 I believe. I'd like to see who is going to uphold this law. It's like mobile phone use, they have to catch you!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avebi48Man
over a year ago

Lordswood


"Smoking in cars with kids in was banned in October '14 I believe. I'd like to see who is going to uphold this law. It's like mobile phone use, they have to catch you!! "

what if your kid is old enough and smokes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Smoking in cars with kids in was banned in October '14 I believe. I'd like to see who is going to uphold this law. It's like mobile phone use, they have to catch you!!

what if your kid is old enough and smokes?"

Then they are not a kid???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ony Hardcock OP   Man
over a year ago

Shepperton


"Smoking in cars with kids in was banned in October '14 I believe. I'd like to see who is going to uphold this law. It's like mobile phone use, they have to catch you!! "

Don't get me started on mobile phones!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Smoking in cars with kids in was banned in October '14 I believe. I'd like to see who is going to uphold this law. It's like mobile phone use, they have to catch you!!

what if your kid is old enough and smokes?"

It applies to under 18 year olds

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Smoking in the car with kids in the back I think it should be band!

Just been to my mates house (yes I have mates) and they both smoke in the house with there little daughter in the same room. Is that not the same?

Ps I smoke after a few drinks but always outside "

Problem is you can't tell people what to do in their own homes and even if you could who's going to know if somebody is smoking behind closed doors?

For me not smoking in front of your kids shouldn't be a law it should be something any loving parent would choose not to do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *avebi48Man
over a year ago

Lordswood


"Smoking in the car with kids in the back I think it should be band!

Just been to my mates house (yes I have mates) and they both smoke in the house with there little daughter in the same room. Is that not the same?

Ps I smoke after a few drinks but always outside

Problem is you can't tell people what to do in their own homes and even if you could who's going to know if somebody is smoking behind closed doors?

For me not smoking in front of your kids shouldn't be a law it should be something any loving parent would choose not to do

"

was only playing devil's advocate with my earlier remark

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ELLONS AND CREAMWoman
over a year ago

stourbridge area

You silly boy OP !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ony Hardcock OP   Man
over a year ago

Shepperton


"You silly boy OP !! "

Xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hello all,

I would post the link if it was allowed, but it's not on this forum.

Here is an extract, specifically paragraph two:-

The article in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute details a study of 76,000 women over more than a decade, which found the usual link between smoking and cancer. Lung cancer was 13 times more common in current smokers, and four times more common in former smokers, than in non-smokers.

The study found no statistically significant relationship between lung cancer and exposure to passive smoke, however. Only among women who had lived with a smoker for 30 years or more was there a relationship that the researchers described as “borderline statistical significance.” Over at the Velvet Glove, Iron Fist blog, however, journalist Christopher Snowden notes “there’s no such thing as borderline statistical significance. It’s either significant or it’s not,” and the reported hazard ratio was not.

Alec

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *avebi48Man
over a year ago

Lordswood


"Hello all,

I would post the link if it was allowed, but it's not on this forum.

Here is an extract, specifically paragraph two:-

The article in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute details a study of 76,000 women over more than a decade, which found the usual link between smoking and cancer. Lung cancer was 13 times more common in current smokers, and four times more common in former smokers, than in non-smokers.

The study found no statistically significant relationship between lung cancer and exposure to passive smoke, however. Only among women who had lived with a smoker for 30 years or more was there a relationship that the researchers described as “borderline statistical significance.” Over at the Velvet Glove, Iron Fist blog, however, journalist Christopher Snowden notes “there’s no such thing as borderline statistical significance. It’s either significant or it’s not,” and the reported hazard ratio was not.

Alec

"

ah good ol statistics, so often manipulated to make a point or justify something so its good to see someone step up and refute such dubious conclusions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top