FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

No more heroes anymore

Jump to newest
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

"

Or does it offer the opportunity to find out about a wider range of people and their endeavours? ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ire_bladeMan
over a year ago

Manchester

I've got that tune in my head now thanks lick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"I've got that tune in my head now thanks lick "

Sorry, I've been singing it under my breath since Friday.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

Or does it offer the opportunity to find out about a wider range of people and their endeavours? ? "

There is that but do they make it to hero status?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't you understand the question lmfao

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *obbytupperMan
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley

I do feel that the word 'Hero' is overused and it means genuine acts of heroism are not always properly recognised.

Multi millionaire footballers winning a game are far from hero's.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"I do feel that the word 'Hero' is overused and it means genuine acts of heroism are not always properly recognised.

Multi millionaire footballers winning a game are far from hero's."

I see nothing heroic about being rich from playing a game. They are role models to some.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

"

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"I don't you understand the question lmfao "

Someone who inspires you and that you admire then?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's."

Good for you.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By * and LCouple
over a year ago

deeside


"I do feel that the word 'Hero' is overused and it means genuine acts of heroism are not always properly recognised.

Multi millionaire footballers winning a game are far from hero's."

But they are. Not to everybody I agree but you ask my 9 year old who his hero is and next to Iron Man it would be a footballer. What defines a hero? Who decides who a hero is?

It depends on the individual. Some see Nelson Mandela as a hero. Some see him as a terrorist.

Just remember that opinions are like arseholes!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There are still Hero's - Most genuine ones are the unsung ones. The Meals on Wheels lady who makes an elderly person's day by spending time chatting to them. The scientists looking for cures for diseases and finding little break throughs that help. The patients volunteering for trials even though it probably won't help them as it will help someone in the future. The real ones - don't make a song and dance about it - they just are one!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Good for you.

"

Very strange response.

Care to expand. You stated because off access to information we no longer have hero's I provided to men who have recently (past decade) have proven themselves hero's.

If you wish to disprove that go for it.

But I'm not sure what your point is any more.

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"I do feel that the word 'Hero' is overused and it means genuine acts of heroism are not always properly recognised.

Multi millionaire footballers winning a game are far from hero's.

But they are. Not to everybody I agree but you ask my 9 year old who his hero is and next to Iron Man it would be a footballer. What defines a hero? Who decides who a hero is?

It depends on the individual. Some see Nelson Mandela as a hero. Some see him as a terrorist.

Just remember that opinions are like arseholes!"

It was a discussion about Mandela and Gandhi a few weeks ago that led to me pondering heroes, heroic deeds and the difference between those things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I do feel that the word 'Hero' is overused and it means genuine acts of heroism are not always properly recognised.

Multi millionaire footballers winning a game are far from hero's.

But they are. Not to everybody I agree but you ask my 9 year old who his hero is and next to Iron Man it would be a footballer. What defines a hero? Who decides who a hero is?

It depends on the individual. Some see Nelson Mandela as a hero. Some see him as a terrorist.

Just remember that opinions are like arseholes!"

Yeah I never got the Nelson Mandela thing I mean his organisation and supporters once raped a 8 year old girl with a broken bottle before burning her alive because they suspected (wrongly) she had told the police about a landmine they had planted and so stopped their civilian targets being killed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Good for you.

Very strange response.

Care to expand. You stated because off access to information we no longer have hero's I provided to men who have recently (past decade) have proven themselves hero's.

If you wish to disprove that go for it.

But I'm not sure what your point is any more.

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies."

Merely, good for you that you have heroes. I'm sorry you find that obscure or odd.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Good for you.

Very strange response.

Care to expand. You stated because off access to information we no longer have hero's I provided to men who have recently (past decade) have proven themselves hero's.

If you wish to disprove that go for it.

But I'm not sure what your point is any more.

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies.

Merely, good for you that you have heroes. I'm sorry you find that obscure or odd.

"

Fair enough just I have never heard "good for you" used in a non sarcastic way in a debate especially when ignoring the point entirely.

But good for you on your novel debating style

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't you understand the question lmfao

Someone who inspires you and that you admire then?

"

Ok errrrr ill just put my tin hat on

Ok Axl rose will always be my hero

Ok tin hat removed

My dad is also my hero just because as are my late granddads

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"There are still Hero's - Most genuine ones are the unsung ones. The Meals on Wheels lady who makes an elderly person's day by spending time chatting to them. The scientists looking for cures for diseases and finding little break throughs that help. The patients volunteering for trials even though it probably won't help them as it will help someone in the future. The real ones - don't make a song and dance about it - they just are one! "

There are those and I have met some remarkable ordinary people who quietly practice everyday heroism.

Even with some of those though you get the odd story of one of these wonderful people turning out to be something heinous in another part of their lives. All the good is stripped back and forgotten with the information that they did something horrible, maybe a long time in their past.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I've got that tune in my head now thanks lick "

Here you are Bladey, try this one instead

I, I will be king

And you, you will be queen

Though nothing will drive them away

We can beat them, just for one day

We can be Heroes, just for one day

And you, you can be mean

And I, I'll drink all the time

'Cause we're lovers, and that is a fact

Yes we're lovers, and that is that

Though nothing, will keep us together

We could steal time,

just for one day

We can be Heroes, for ever and ever

What d'you say?

I, I wish you could swim

Like the dolphins, like dolphins can swim

Though nothing,

nothing will keep us together

We can beat them, for ever and ever

Oh we can be Heroes,

just for one day

I, I will be king

And you, you will be queen

Though nothing will drive them away

We can be Heroes, just for one day

We can be us, just for one day

I, I can remember (I remember)

Standing, by the wall (by the wall)

And the guns shot above our heads

(over our heads)

And we kissed,

as though nothing could fall

(nothing could fall)

And the shame was on the other side

Oh we can beat them, for ever and ever

Then we could be Heroes,

just for one day

We can be Heroes

We can be Heroes

We can be Heroes

Just for one day

We can be Heroes

We're nothing, and nothing will help us

Maybe we're lying,

then you better not stay

But we could be safer,

just for one day

Oh-oh-oh-ohh, oh-oh-oh-ohh,

just for one day

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Good for you.

Very strange response.

Care to expand. You stated because off access to information we no longer have hero's I provided to men who have recently (past decade) have proven themselves hero's.

If you wish to disprove that go for it.

But I'm not sure what your point is any more.

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies.

Merely, good for you that you have heroes. I'm sorry you find that obscure or odd.

Fair enough just I have never heard "good for you" used in a non sarcastic way in a debate especially when ignoring the point entirely.

But good for you on your novel debating style "

Just Sunday evening pondering with a mad brain that has too many thoughts tonight.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"I don't you understand the question lmfao

Someone who inspires you and that you admire then?

Ok errrrr ill just put my tin hat on

Ok Axl rose will always be my hero

Ok tin hat removed

My dad is also my hero just because as are my late granddads "

I know someone who had a one-nighter with Axl Rose, but she didn't know who he was at the time and didn't care after she found out. I have a lot of admiration for that woman.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does the access to so much information about people, past and present, mean we no longer have any heroes?

The two men, one who was awarded the Victoria cross for driving his apc back into heavy fire to recover wounded comrades and the man who was awarded the George cross (same standard as the Victoria but not in the face of the enemy or if you aren't in the armed forces) for diving on a grenade released from a booby trap to save his team mates in the room.

They are hero's no amount of silly d*unk Facebook posts will ever detract from their actions.

So no I disagree we still have hero's.

Good for you.

Very strange response.

Care to expand. You stated because off access to information we no longer have hero's I provided to men who have recently (past decade) have proven themselves hero's.

If you wish to disprove that go for it.

But I'm not sure what your point is any more.

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies.

Merely, good for you that you have heroes. I'm sorry you find that obscure or odd.

Fair enough just I have never heard "good for you" used in a non sarcastic way in a debate especially when ignoring the point entirely.

But good for you on your novel debating style

Just Sunday evening pondering with a mad brain that has too many thoughts tonight.

"

That was me last night. It didn't go down well with people who misunderstood me. C'est la vie

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bbandflowCouple
over a year ago

South Devon

Heroes are a part of humanity they are everywhere.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Heroes are a part of humanity they are everywhere."

I like that thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplits OP   Woman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"

As you don't seem to want to debate you've just made a very obscure statement and now even more obscure replies.

Merely, good for you that you have heroes. I'm sorry you find that obscure or odd.

Fair enough just I have never heard "good for you" used in a non sarcastic way in a debate especially when ignoring the point entirely.

But good for you on your novel debating style

Just Sunday evening pondering with a mad brain that has too many thoughts tonight.

That was me last night. It didn't go down well with people who misunderstood me. C'est la vie"

It's very easy to be misunderstood on here. Umbrage is popular.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Heroes are a part of humanity they are everywhere.

I like that thought.

"

Maybe we're all on a hero's archetypal journey through life, just taking different paths depending on our own archetypes. The difficulty could be that many remain unaware that they are....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top