Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If both parties are aware of what their particular arrangement is & both agree to it, good luck to them both." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If anyone wants to be my sugar daddy just message me and ignore everything on my profile as my requirements can change haha" I'm too old | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If anyone wants to be my sugar daddy just message me and ignore everything on my profile as my requirements can change haha I'm too old " Me too. Any sugar Grandads out there? I could spice up your cocoa...lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Isnt this just glorified prostitution ?" Nope, glorious polite prostitution. Still, if it helps advance Feminist agendas. oops i mean studies, then i'm all for it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Isnt this just glorified prostitution ?" Nah its just plain old prostitution but the women don't want to have to call themselves prostitutes | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently some university students are approaching "rich, older men" to fund their university education. One of the girls inter_iewed said that her Sugar Daddy paid her £1,000 a night for sex and that another paid her 1 to 2,000 as an allowance. I've been approached on this site by younger women to be a Sugar Daddy and wondered if others had similar experiences and what your reaction would be if your daughter came home and told her she had her tuition fees sorted this way!" what's wrong with dating a well off older man or woman? No one is under any illusion when they enter into those kind of arrangements. I had a sugar daddy and he gave me £1k per month for my uni fees. I didn't date anyone else. Just him. So it's not like escorting at all. No one bats an eyelid when a rich guy hands over ££££'s to his wife or girlfriend. And that's a potential nagging hassle kind of relationship lol. So a sugar baby arrangement / dating shouldn't be seen as any difficult | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently some university students are approaching "rich, older men" to fund their university education. One of the girls inter_iewed said that her Sugar Daddy paid her £1,000 a night for sex and that another paid her 1 to 2,000 as an allowance. I've been approached on this site by younger women to be a Sugar Daddy and wondered if others had similar experiences and what your reaction would be if your daughter came home and told her she had her tuition fees sorted this way! what's wrong with dating a well off older man or woman? No one is under any illusion when they enter into those kind of arrangements. I had a sugar daddy and he gave me £1k per month for my uni fees. I didn't date anyone else. Just him. So it's not like escorting at all. No one bats an eyelid when a rich guy hands over ££££'s to his wife or girlfriend. And that's a potential nagging hassle kind of relationship lol. So a sugar baby arrangement / dating shouldn't be seen as any difficult " it's actually a friend with benefits arrangement. We went out to restaurants, bars, shopping, cinema, holidays and stayed in for romantic meals and hugs on sofa watching films without any sex at all some times. So no not prostitution at all!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Apparently some university students are approaching "rich, older men" to fund their university education. One of the girls inter_iewed said that her Sugar Daddy paid her £1,000 a night for sex and that another paid her 1 to 2,000 as an allowance. I've been approached on this site by younger women to be a Sugar Daddy and wondered if others had similar experiences and what your reaction would be if your daughter came home and told her she had her tuition fees sorted this way! what's wrong with dating a well off older man or woman? No one is under any illusion when they enter into those kind of arrangements. I had a sugar daddy and he gave me £1k per month for my uni fees. I didn't date anyone else. Just him. So it's not like escorting at all. No one bats an eyelid when a rich guy hands over ££££'s to his wife or girlfriend. And that's a potential nagging hassle kind of relationship lol. So a sugar baby arrangement / dating shouldn't be seen as any difficult it's actually a friend with benefits arrangement. We went out to restaurants, bars, shopping, cinema, holidays and stayed in for romantic meals and hugs on sofa watching films without any sex at all some times. So no not prostitution at all!!" Ever go for an Egyptian cruise down de Nile? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what if it's prostitution? All work is prostitution at the end of the day, there's just no sex involved (and yes that doesn't make actual sense but it does). " lol you mean your boss fucks you over everyday and pays you every week/month?? Lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what if it's prostitution? All work is prostitution at the end of the day, there's just no sex involved (and yes that doesn't make actual sense but it does). lol you mean your boss fucks you over everyday and pays you every week/month?? Lol " Yeah pretty much is that as well, but if anyone hires you for a fee then they hire you and they own you for that time. Slaves, prostitutes, workers, employees, call it what you want but it's all the same really. Your boss used to be called a user but now we gave that name to drug addicts cox it's a derogatory word. Wonder why? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No its not something I had or would ever consider. I also _iew it as prostitution and I have respect for myself and achieved what I have by myself. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No its not something I had or would ever consider. I also _iew it as prostitution and I have respect for myself and achieved what I have by myself. " may I ask if you've ever had a one night stand? Hmm well in my opinion it's worse giving yourself away like that or to a guy in a club or where ever and all due to him buying the girl a few drinks! . Yet society accepts this | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. " did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. " Nope. And that's why it's stigmatised. You aren't allowed to do anything without giving some government, that you didn't vote for, your money. Can't be taking from the system or your scum, but being rich scum is ok. Pay in only, for the commoners. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. Nope. And that's why it's stigmatised. You aren't allowed to do anything without giving some government, that you didn't vote for, your money. Can't be taking from the system or your scum, but being rich scum is ok. Pay in only, for the commoners." brilliant lady. I like you! . Happily buy you a drink. Don't worry I don't expect a service in return. Lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. " That comment is so wrong I don't know where to begin, you must be saying those things just get mugs like us to react??!? But if not, any housekeeping cash will have already been taxed if Hubby received it from his employer in your scenario. An also I'd expect she runs the house an in this contract he knows to use a coaster for his cups 'or else' lol so kicks the nonsense slave thing I to touch...geez some right berty Bassett's here! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. Nope. And that's why it's stigmatised. You aren't allowed to do anything without giving some government, that you didn't vote for, your money. Can't be taking from the system or your scum, but being rich scum is ok. Pay in only, for the commoners. brilliant lady. I like you! . Happily buy you a drink. Don't worry I don't expect a service in return. Lol" haha thanks. i'll have a diet pepsi. All shame is wrong, imo, and it's usually not for good reasons except to keep the status quo. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. " Only so much is allowed as a gift even between spouses also as it's basically an employment arrangement (would you still see this man if he didn't pay you?) It's taxable income. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. Only so much is allowed as a gift even between spouses also as it's basically an employment arrangement (would you still see this man if he didn't pay you?) It's taxable income." Usually, only for Inheritance Tax purposes ie following death, and only within 7 years of said event. Income Tax wise there is no limit of a "gift". There again, if someone can't determine what is, what is not prostitution, then one can hardly expect them to understand the intricacies of the various tax systems. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. Only so much is allowed as a gift even between spouses also as it's basically an employment arrangement (would you still see this man if he didn't pay you?) It's taxable income." honestly I would yes. He was a rare gentleman. He was only helping me pay my uni fees. They wouldn't last forever and he helped me to prevent thousands of pounds of student debt. Each to their own though. I hate seeing girls sleeping around having one night stands with guys in club's etc but that's their way of living their life | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. That comment is so wrong I don't know where to begin, you must be saying those things just get mugs like us to react??!? But if not, any housekeeping cash will have already been taxed if Hubby received it from his employer in your scenario. An also I'd expect she runs the house an in this contract he knows to use a coaster for his cups 'or else' lol so kicks the nonsense slave thing I to touch...geez some right berty Bassett's here!" I agree with her. A marriage contract is basically a legal agreement between two people to share everything, and recieve tax benefits. Under law, under a governments laws who already control your money and how much of it they get to take from you. Why pay tax on goods when your money has already been taxed? Even your heating, food, clothing and basic needs, are taxed. Says it all really. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. Only so much is allowed as a gift even between spouses also as it's basically an employment arrangement (would you still see this man if he didn't pay you?) It's taxable income. Usually, only for Inheritance Tax purposes ie following death, and only within 7 years of said event. Income Tax wise there is no limit of a "gift". There again, if someone can't determine what is, what is not prostitution, then one can hardly expect them to understand the intricacies of the various tax systems. " When she swallows a load she becomes a consumer an will pay VAT on it...fact! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. did your wife or gf declare what money you gave her per month or year?? Hmm I think not. Yet housewives still provide their hubby a service and receive money or gifts for it. Yet that's OK because you have a slave contract.... sorry marriage certificate that "makes" it OK. Only so much is allowed as a gift even between spouses also as it's basically an employment arrangement (would you still see this man if he didn't pay you?) It's taxable income. Usually, only for Inheritance Tax purposes ie following death, and only within 7 years of said event. Income Tax wise there is no limit of a "gift". There again, if someone can't determine what is, what is not prostitution, then one can hardly expect them to understand the intricacies of the various tax systems. " yes sir I agree you should educate yourself more with this subject. Good luck and happy studying | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Once a pro always a pro. There's a guy down the golf club, has to bet on every hole, if not every shot. " excellent. I'm sure he does it all with a smile on his face. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Would be interesting to know if all such arrangements were fully and scrupulously declared for taxation/benefits purposes. I somehow doubt it. " There's no legal requirement to declare gifts from friends below a certain value. I don't declare the clothes, food or gas that my current partner buys me. Why would I have declared the books my previous partner bought me? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If both parties are aware of what their particular arrangement is & both agree to it, good luck to them both. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder." Yes. Not all arrangements include sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"sugar babies offs, I have heard it all now" It's the term from the site. Not one I made up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder." I actually didn't have sex with my sugar daddy. However your post implies that there is something wrong with prostitution. I don't believe that there is anything wrong with prostitution. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder. Yes. Not all arrangements include sex. " I am not sure you can answer "yes" unless you asked every person who is in that game the question. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married." Additionally, why does a bit of paper make it suddenly 'not prostitution' in your eyes? Are you saying if someone married their sugar daddy (it's not a bad tax break) then it becomes ok? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" However your post implies that there is something wrong with prostitution. ." It doesn't. You are reading into my post something that isn't there. BUT if I wanted to think prostitution is wrong...I could. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" However your post implies that there is something wrong with prostitution. . It doesn't. You are reading into my post something that isn't there. BUT if I wanted to think prostitution is wrong...I could." Perhaps. But the statement seems to imply that it's ok to give someone money or gifts ("housekeeping") as part of a marriage, but not outside of a marriage. It's a well known fact that many people get married in return for an easier life (there are plenty of young women like that on my course) so I personally don't see how many marriages, sugar-relationships or prostitution are particularly different. Except that prostitution and sugar-relationships seem more up front about the fact it's a financial arrangement. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. Additionally, why does a bit of paper make it suddenly 'not prostitution' in your eyes? ?" To be fair, I never get into discussions with anyone who using extreme comparisons to get their point across, and I think that is an extreme comparison. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder. Yes. Not all arrangements include sex. I am not sure you can answer "yes" unless you asked every person who is in that game the question." Maybe I misread / misunderstood your post. My point was that not all arrangements involve sex. From my admittedly limited experience it's a mutual agreement by both involved. Therefore if sex was agreed and it stopped then the arrangement would probably stop. Likewise if sex wasn't agreed and then requested the arrangement would probably stop. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder. Yes. Not all arrangements include sex. I am not sure you can answer "yes" unless you asked every person who is in that game the question. Maybe I misread / misunderstood your post. My point was that not all arrangements involve sex. " My question was about the ones that involved sex though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. Additionally, why does a bit of paper make it suddenly 'not prostitution' in your eyes? ? To be fair, I never get into discussions with anyone who using extreme comparisons to get their point across, and I think that is an extreme comparison. " After seeing your next post I am glad I don't get into that discussion | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. Additionally, why does a bit of paper make it suddenly 'not prostitution' in your eyes? ? To be fair, I never get into discussions with anyone who using extreme comparisons to get their point across, and I think that is an extreme comparison. After seeing your next post I am glad I don't get into that discussion " My point might seem extreme, but I am shocked at the amount of young women I have met in the past two years who are planning to marry almost exclusively for money. This is, apparently, the future of marriage. Not an extreme set of edge cases, but quite a large proportion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" All shame is wrong, imo, and it's usually not for good reasons except to keep the status quo. " Shame is just something that others have taught us to learn and is wrong, just from that principle alone - it's wrong on all levels anyway. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing that bothers me is if these sugar daddies can really afford it or do there families suffer as a consequence." Probably both! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only thing that bothers me is if these sugar daddies can really afford it or do there families suffer as a consequence." I suppose they could always be single? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. Additionally, why does a bit of paper make it suddenly 'not prostitution' in your eyes? ? To be fair, I never get into discussions with anyone who using extreme comparisons to get their point across, and I think that is an extreme comparison. After seeing your next post I am glad I don't get into that discussion My point might seem extreme, but I am shocked at the amount of young women I have met in the past two years who are planning to marry almost exclusively for money. This is, apparently, the future of marriage. Not an extreme set of edge cases, but quite a large proportion." I don't know any young women who are looking to marry for money. They all work hard and earn for themselves. I suppose it's the social circles you mix in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"sugar babies offs, I have heard it all now It's the term from the site. Not one I made up " I appreciate that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"sugar babies offs, I have heard it all now It's the term from the site. Not one I made up I appreciate that " I quite like it though lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"sugar babies offs, I have heard it all now It's the term from the site. Not one I made up I appreciate that I quite like it though lol" It's horrendous but we are all different | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder. I actually didn't have sex with my sugar daddy. However your post implies that there is something wrong with prostitution. I don't believe that there is anything wrong with prostitution." If you think prostitution is ok you clearly haven't seen the amount of drug addicts doing it to feed a habit they was forced into doing!if a man pays a girl for her time and there is no pressure or being forced by a third party that is her business so no one can judge but when girls are forced into sex for money that is wrong on every level, too many people have watched 50 shades of grey and now think it's all laa de laa land and exciting well it's not reality | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"wouldn't bother me if any of my kids got their education this way, doubt they'll ever afford it by working a real job and i can't pay. in fact if they make money outside of the exploitation of the poor system then i'd be happier than them making money by being part of it." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. " The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"No matter how much twisting people do, having an income / gifts in exchange for sex is prostitution and not the same as a male / female paying for the bills when married. If the sex stopped, would people still get the gifts/ payments I wonder. Yes. Not all arrangements include sex. I am not sure you can answer "yes" unless you asked every person who is in that game the question. Maybe I misread / misunderstood your post. My point was that not all arrangements involve sex. From my admittedly limited experience it's a mutual agreement by both involved. Therefore if sex was agreed and it stopped then the arrangement would probably stop. Likewise if sex wasn't agreed and then requested the arrangement would probably stop. " If sex wasn't agreed and then requested I don't think the arrangement would stop, I think the seller's fees would go up accordingly | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol " Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. " Sssssh! Don't tell Macavity | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. Sssssh! Don't tell Macavity" lol. i had to google that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. " s The difference is I type on a computer there is nothing personal about that and know they give me a wage they don't own me, a lot of suga daddies don't want the other person speaking and sleeping with other men Etc and without love that to me seems like owning. I also said there is nothing wrong with prostituion as long as both parties get what they want and there's nothing pressuring one or another. After all it's your body do what you want but don't sugar coat it to make you feel ok if you have to do that then you aren't ok with doing it as you are justifying what you are doing | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. " There's many different aspects to a sugar daddy relationship. For example, a widowed man in his late 50's who was unable to have children wants to spend some of his wealth helping a girl through university. All he wants in return is for her to join him at a nice restaurant once every few weeks. Where's the harm and where's the prostitution? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. There's many different aspects to a sugar daddy relationship. For example, a widowed man in his late 50's who was unable to have children wants to spend some of his wealth helping a girl through university. All he wants in return is for her to join him at a nice restaurant once every few weeks. Where's the harm and where's the prostitution?" That would be escorting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. There's many different aspects to a sugar daddy relationship. For example, a widowed man in his late 50's who was unable to have children wants to spend some of his wealth helping a girl through university. All he wants in return is for her to join him at a nice restaurant once every few weeks. Where's the harm and where's the prostitution? That would be escorting " I give in. You seem intent on labelling this as something it isn't. What must you think of people who work in care homes and give a resident a biscuit. They must be a sexual predator!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. There's many different aspects to a sugar daddy relationship. For example, a widowed man in his late 50's who was unable to have children wants to spend some of his wealth helping a girl through university. All he wants in return is for her to join him at a nice restaurant once every few weeks. Where's the harm and where's the prostitution? That would be escorting I give in. You seem intent on labelling this as something it isn't. What must you think of people who work in care homes and give a resident a biscuit. They must be a sexual predator!!" Yup that is exactly what I'm saying lol your labelling escorting/prostituion as a man being a Good Samaritan and you think I'm deluded take your blinkers off | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. s The difference is I type on a computer there is nothing personal about that and know they give me a wage they don't own me, a lot of suga daddies don't want the other person speaking and sleeping with other men Etc and without love that to me seems like owning. I also said there is nothing wrong with prostituion as long as both parties get what they want and there's nothing pressuring one or another. After all it's your body do what you want but don't sugar coat it to make you feel ok if you have to do that then you aren't ok with doing it as you are justifying what you are doing " That's what happens when you take paid work though, you agree to the terms between yourself and the employer. If a sugar daddy wants exclusivity and their client agrees then i think that's fair enough. I feel selling your body for sex or just companionship is the same thing as working, and i'm not sugar coating anything, i really feel like all work is slavery - even if you enjoy it. When we didn't used to get paid for working (apart from a tiny bit of food) people got angry and rebelled, so people get money now and worked hard to get workers rights. The industrial age brought about a lot of changes to society that didn't favour the worker at all and workers have spent all the time since trying to get something decent for themselves, and in the western world it was getting there but we're seeing rights being taken back whenever opportunity arises (by huge corporations mainly). Wages are basically the same thing as getting paid for sex, you're getting paid to provide a service for someone else. If there's nothing wrong with selling your mental skills, or your body for physical labour (which some people do look down on manual workers), then selling your fanny is ok too. And it's fine that you think it's ok to do this stuff, just saying i see it as work. And like any job you can enjoy it or not, but if someone is paying you then you're owned by them for that time they pay you. You have to do your work during work hours, most people would get a warning or sacked for not doing their work so they do own you and make you do the work they want you to do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. " Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Well, where are the sugar mummy?" In the tombs of Egypt | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. s The difference is I type on a computer there is nothing personal about that and know they give me a wage they don't own me, a lot of suga daddies don't want the other person speaking and sleeping with other men Etc and without love that to me seems like owning. I also said there is nothing wrong with prostituion as long as both parties get what they want and there's nothing pressuring one or another. After all it's your body do what you want but don't sugar coat it to make you feel ok if you have to do that then you aren't ok with doing it as you are justifying what you are doing That's what happens when you take paid work though, you agree to the terms between yourself and the employer. If a sugar daddy wants exclusivity and their client agrees then i think that's fair enough. I feel selling your body for sex or just companionship is the same thing as working, and i'm not sugar coating anything, i really feel like all work is slavery - even if you enjoy it. When we didn't used to get paid for working (apart from a tiny bit of food) people got angry and rebelled, so people get money now and worked hard to get workers rights. The industrial age brought about a lot of changes to society that didn't favour the worker at all and workers have spent all the time since trying to get something decent for themselves, and in the western world it was getting there but we're seeing rights being taken back whenever opportunity arises (by huge corporations mainly). Wages are basically the same thing as getting paid for sex, you're getting paid to provide a service for someone else. If there's nothing wrong with selling your mental skills, or your body for physical labour (which some people do look down on manual workers), then selling your fanny is ok too. And it's fine that you think it's ok to do this stuff, just saying i see it as work. And like any job you can enjoy it or not, but if someone is paying you then you're owned by them for that time they pay you. You have to do your work during work hours, most people would get a warning or sacked for not doing their work so they do own you and make you do the work they want you to do. " Prostituion is one of the oldest trades and I think it's fine but I don't like to see it labeled as something it isn't. I can look back on my jobs and think fuck that was a horrible job but when you've slept with people for money it will have a longer lasting effect (not for everyone obviously) and my company doesn't "own" I can still do what I want if I turn in late that's up to me they can't control that and if I'm sacked then I've lost that income but I'll get another. I've known girls forced into sexual jobs so I'm fully aware of its consequences like I said though prostituion is fine as long as everyone is safe and are aware it will effect them later on some more than others | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. s The difference is I type on a computer there is nothing personal about that and know they give me a wage they don't own me, a lot of suga daddies don't want the other person speaking and sleeping with other men Etc and without love that to me seems like owning. I also said there is nothing wrong with prostituion as long as both parties get what they want and there's nothing pressuring one or another. After all it's your body do what you want but don't sugar coat it to make you feel ok if you have to do that then you aren't ok with doing it as you are justifying what you are doing That's what happens when you take paid work though, you agree to the terms between yourself and the employer. If a sugar daddy wants exclusivity and their client agrees then i think that's fair enough. I feel selling your body for sex or just companionship is the same thing as working, and i'm not sugar coating anything, i really feel like all work is slavery - even if you enjoy it. When we didn't used to get paid for working (apart from a tiny bit of food) people got angry and rebelled, so people get money now and worked hard to get workers rights. The industrial age brought about a lot of changes to society that didn't favour the worker at all and workers have spent all the time since trying to get something decent for themselves, and in the western world it was getting there but we're seeing rights being taken back whenever opportunity arises (by huge corporations mainly). Wages are basically the same thing as getting paid for sex, you're getting paid to provide a service for someone else. If there's nothing wrong with selling your mental skills, or your body for physical labour (which some people do look down on manual workers), then selling your fanny is ok too. And it's fine that you think it's ok to do this stuff, just saying i see it as work. And like any job you can enjoy it or not, but if someone is paying you then you're owned by them for that time they pay you. You have to do your work during work hours, most people would get a warning or sacked for not doing their work so they do own you and make you do the work they want you to do. " Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. " This is true | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not all agreements include sex!!!! Have you never been taken out for a nice meal buy a guy who has paid the full bill?" By and older man who I'm only talking to because of money no sorry I havent | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I would like to know if the daddy giving the money wanted to just be a friend without the money would these young women even entertain the idea. The money being the only attraction reinforces the prostitution argument for me. The fact they started talking to them because of money is prostituion, buying their body and "emotions" for time is and it isn't the same as working for a company unless your boss hands you your wage and expects a blowjob lol Would you work your job without a wage though? Pretty much is the same thing. You allow someone to purchase you when you work for someone else. Even if you work for yourself you allow clients to purchase your time and skills. I find it weird that when sex is brought into it then people think there's something wrong with that? Like you're pussy is worthless and nobody is allowed near it unless it's for free. Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. " That's nice of you, about paying for someone for nothing in return, not many people aren't reciprocal. Although i feel if most people had the money for anything they would help out anyone. I think i feel the way about regular employment as you do about prostitution and that working a regular job is depressing, takes up too much of my life as well. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? " Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But what if they have diabetes? " If Tina has 12 cakes in one hand and 24 cakes in the other hand - what does Tina have?..... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But what if they have diabetes? " Then injections are the only way forward | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But what if they have diabetes? If Tina has 12 cakes in one hand and 24 cakes in the other hand - what does Tina have?....." Great Titz | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. " Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers)." You sound like you don't value yourself at all,it isn't just a vagina where is your self respect | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers)." Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If both parties are aware of what their particular arrangement is & both agree to it, good luck to them both." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool" Some parts of China they sell dead babies this doesn't make it right?!?! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"But what if they have diabetes? If Tina has 12 cakes in one hand and 24 cakes in the other hand - what does Tina have?....." An invite to any party I want | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool Some parts of China they sell dead babies this doesn't make it right?!?! " There are some parts ins Asia where they sell live babies; that is not right either This is a very depressing thread | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool Some parts of China they sell dead babies this doesn't make it right?!?! There are some parts ins Asia where they sell live babies; that is not right either This is a very depressing thread " The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that." Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker." Soneone had there weetabix this Morning lol that's sharp x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool Some parts of China they sell dead babies this doesn't make it right?!?! There are some parts ins Asia where they sell live babies; that is not right either This is a very depressing thread The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy " I was making the same point and also that some people have a very skewed definition of prostitution Whilst one should not be judgemental, it is nevertheless wrong to redefine everything else in life as prostitution just to justify oneself | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Because a body is something that shouldn't be owned or rented out,due to it belonging to a human being with emotions. If you want sex give it away for free. If you want money or gifts in exchange for sex,it's prostitution,no matter the money buys or the gifts are. If I had money I'd happily help someone through Uni,(although going by what someone said on here this week a student loan is more than sufficient to get you through) without the need for company or sex. Why is a body any different to a mind? My client owns the content of my mind because I'm a writer. They own the intellectual property that I produce. Why is it any less valid to sell my vagina than sell my mind? Why are vaginas considered somehow sacred and special? They're not. They're just another part of the human body - one that can be used for making money if one wishes. Just like my hands can be sold to make money (jobs that use hands, like painters). My eyes can be sold to make money (photographers). And my mind can be bought (writers). Yep, and people sell their kidneys; all kool Some parts of China they sell dead babies this doesn't make it right?!?! There are some parts ins Asia where they sell live babies; that is not right either This is a very depressing thread The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy I was making the same point and also that some people have a very skewed definition of prostitution Whilst one should not be judgemental, it is nevertheless wrong to redefine everything else in life as prostitution just to justify oneself" Yeah sorry that was my point also but you have worded it a lot better than I have x | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy " Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker. Soneone had there weetabix this Morning lol that's sharp x" Not you it seems. If you have read all the thread you may realise why I said it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex." Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People can't really change the definition of a prostitute. It says having sex for money. Having dates or being married is not the same thing, no matter how much people try to use it as a comparison and if I am honest, is making me cringe at the posts " The point I'm trying to get across is sex is not always included. The date argument is weak and I agree but I'm struggling to get people to see that. The escorting label is closer but I don't see why something that both people are happy with needs labelling | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex." There are plenty of young girls working part time jobs. Selling your body is easier and pays better. Boys do it to and are called rent boys. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker. Soneone had there weetabix this Morning lol that's sharp x Not you it seems. If you have read all the thread you may realise why I said it. " I read and agreed with what you said.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it " I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People can't really change the definition of a prostitute. It says having sex for money. Having dates or being married is not the same thing, no matter how much people try to use it as a comparison and if I am honest, is making me cringe at the posts The point I'm trying to get across is sex is not always included. The date argument is weak and I agree but I'm struggling to get people to see that. The escorting label is closer but I don't see why something that both people are happy with needs labelling" There isn't anything wrong if both are happy and get what they want. But it shouldn't be sugar coated so girls/women go into it knowing full well the effects of what's happening and going to happen | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site." I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker. Soneone had there weetabix this Morning lol that's sharp x Not you it seems. If you have read all the thread you may realise why I said it. I read and agreed with what you said...." Sorry,I didn't have my Weetabix this morning | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok " So - by your logic - me saying that I had a good outcome from my sugar-relationship means that other people will blindly do it without thinking it through? That sounds a bit... I don't know. It sounds a bit... unlikely. I mean when I was a teenager plenty of musicians said how good cocaine was, but we didn't all go and get smacked off our faces every night just because someone else said it worked for them. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok So - by your logic - me saying that I had a good outcome from my sugar-relationship means that other people will blindly do it without thinking it through? That sounds a bit... I don't know. It sounds a bit... unlikely. I mean when I was a teenager plenty of musicians said how good cocaine was, but we didn't all go and get smacked off our faces every night just because someone else said it worked for them." So your saying you done really well out of it and you telling someone that you don't think that will have an effect??grow up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People can't really change the definition of a prostitute. It says having sex for money. Having dates or being married is not the same thing, no matter how much people try to use it as a comparison and if I am honest, is making me cringe at the posts The point I'm trying to get across is sex is not always included. The date argument is weak and I agree but I'm struggling to get people to see that. The escorting label is closer but I don't see why something that both people are happy with needs labelling There isn't anything wrong if both are happy and get what they want. But it shouldn't be sugar coated so girls/women go into it knowing full well the effects of what's happening and going to happen " In my experience this is exactly what happens. I've spoke to a few guys and knew exactly what the deal was from both sides. Some offers included sex some didn't. I met with one guy socially but decided not to continue for s couple of reasons. Not every sugar daddy relationship is the same, the same not everyone on her wants the same sort of meets | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities?" It's not lack of opportunities, it's lack of education. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People can't really change the definition of a prostitute. It says having sex for money. Having dates or being married is not the same thing, no matter how much people try to use it as a comparison and if I am honest, is making me cringe at the posts The point I'm trying to get across is sex is not always included. The date argument is weak and I agree but I'm struggling to get people to see that. The escorting label is closer but I don't see why something that both people are happy with needs labelling There isn't anything wrong if both are happy and get what they want. But it shouldn't be sugar coated so girls/women go into it knowing full well the effects of what's happening and going to happen In my experience this is exactly what happens. I've spoke to a few guys and knew exactly what the deal was from both sides. Some offers included sex some didn't. I met with one guy socially but decided not to continue for s couple of reasons. Not every sugar daddy relationship is the same, the same not everyone on her wants the same sort of meets " This is totally agreeable but it is still escorting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok So - by your logic - me saying that I had a good outcome from my sugar-relationship means that other people will blindly do it without thinking it through? That sounds a bit... I don't know. It sounds a bit... unlikely. I mean when I was a teenager plenty of musicians said how good cocaine was, but we didn't all go and get smacked off our faces every night just because someone else said it worked for them. So your saying you done really well out of it and you telling someone that you don't think that will have an effect??grow up" 4 of my friends know I'm on here and that I enjoy it. None have joined because it's not for them. Same applies to a sugar daddy relationship. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok So - by your logic - me saying that I had a good outcome from my sugar-relationship means that other people will blindly do it without thinking it through? That sounds a bit... I don't know. It sounds a bit... unlikely. I mean when I was a teenager plenty of musicians said how good cocaine was, but we didn't all go and get smacked off our faces every night just because someone else said it worked for them." Do you mean you got a good income from your sugar relationship? That's what it was about for you,regardless of no sex. You were the one saying you always pay half for a hotel room even though you're only a student. It seems students are quite highly paid as I can't afford hotel rooms and was called a prostitute because men offer to pay. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"People can't really change the definition of a prostitute. It says having sex for money. Having dates or being married is not the same thing, no matter how much people try to use it as a comparison and if I am honest, is making me cringe at the posts The point I'm trying to get across is sex is not always included. The date argument is weak and I agree but I'm struggling to get people to see that. The escorting label is closer but I don't see why something that both people are happy with needs labelling There isn't anything wrong if both are happy and get what they want. But it shouldn't be sugar coated so girls/women go into it knowing full well the effects of what's happening and going to happen In my experience this is exactly what happens. I've spoke to a few guys and knew exactly what the deal was from both sides. Some offers included sex some didn't. I met with one guy socially but decided not to continue for s couple of reasons. Not every sugar daddy relationship is the same, the same not everyone on her wants the same sort of meets This is totally agreeable but it is still escorting " Maybe. And maybe I'm wrong but prostitution and escorting are completely different, in a legal sense as much as anything. I personally don't _iew it as escorting as escorts potentially will meet different guys each time where as a sugar daddy would be longer term and 'exclusive' but that just my thoughts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The point I was making was just because it happens it doesn't make it right. Too many 16-17 year olds trying to get with older men with money to get them things because it's become trendy Perhaps we should look at why so many 16-17 year old women feel that they have to follow this path? Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? Or perhaps we should look at why people think it's a problem to sell time or sex. Because we don't live in a free country we have to pay for our living and if people do it for escorting/prostituion then that's their business but working at a keyboard or labouring or whatever is not the same as being an escort/prostitute and perhaps its people like you telling other girls it's good to do it if your skint which is morally wrong how ever ou say it I don't consider prostitution to be morally wrong. Why do you think it's morally wrong? There are plenty of people who believe that swinging is morally wrong - yet here you are on a swinging site. I didn't say it was morally wrong read my other posts also I answered a question you said saying perhaps we should think about why women think it's ok to go into it and I said because people like you saying its Ok So - by your logic - me saying that I had a good outcome from my sugar-relationship means that other people will blindly do it without thinking it through? That sounds a bit... I don't know. It sounds a bit... unlikely. I mean when I was a teenager plenty of musicians said how good cocaine was, but we didn't all go and get smacked off our faces every night just because someone else said it worked for them. So your saying you done really well out of it and you telling someone that you don't think that will have an effect??grow up 4 of my friends know I'm on here and that I enjoy it. None have joined because it's not for them. Same applies to a sugar daddy relationship. " This is a swinging site not an escorting/prostituion site big difference | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Never given it much thought as ive never needed a sugar daddy, if I want something I work to get it myself, I wouldn't want to be in a position where it can be thrown in my face if I refuse to something for said sugar daddy. " Having it shoved in your face is a bit of an extreme form of this relationship | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do you mean you got a good income from your sugar relationship? That's what it was about for you,regardless of no sex. You were the one saying you always pay half for a hotel room even though you're only a student. It seems students are quite highly paid as I can't afford hotel rooms and was called a prostitute because men offer to pay." Initially I started studying with the Open University - when the fee structure was different to how it is now. I couldn't afford the fees, yet earned more than the threshold for getting it free. So I entered a sugar daddy relationship, and he paid for my tuition fees. What I learnt from several years of Open University study has enabled me to become a freelance writer while completing my studies as a 'brick' university (where the government pay my tuition fees up front). This means that I now have no need for a sugar daddy relationship, because I'm now earning quite a bit of money. Certainly I'm earning more now, as a student, than I have ever earned before. I'm also living in a lower cost part of the country (rent is far, far lower here than where I was previously) which means that yes, I can afford to pay halves whenever I decide to go out. Do you always assume that someone's current situation is the same as their past situation? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" This is a swinging site not an escorting/prostituion site big difference" It's not a political site, a car site, a music site or a sports site either. And yet there are popular threads about those things here too. Can we not discuss things that fall outside of swinging? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? It's not lack of opportunities, it's lack of education. " I disagree. Most sugar daddies who are interested in sponsoring education are only interested in the top end of the grades spectrum. Often there are conditions attached. One friend of mine has a sugar daddy who pays towards the costs of her studying, but a condition of the payments are that she maintains a 1st. The money means that she doesn't have to take a part time job, and therefore can spend more time studying to get better results. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? It's not lack of opportunities, it's lack of education. I disagree. Most sugar daddies who are interested in sponsoring education are only interested in the top end of the grades spectrum. Often there are conditions attached. One friend of mine has a sugar daddy who pays towards the costs of her studying, but a condition of the payments are that she maintains a 1st. The money means that she doesn't have to take a part time job, and therefore can spend more time studying to get better results." Which has nothing to do with 16-17 year olds getting with older men because they want to get bought things, which was the message you initially replied to. That has a lot more to do with a lack of education. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go " You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Perhaps we should look at why there seem to be a lack of other opportunities? It's not lack of opportunities, it's lack of education. I disagree. Most sugar daddies who are interested in sponsoring education are only interested in the top end of the grades spectrum. Often there are conditions attached. One friend of mine has a sugar daddy who pays towards the costs of her studying, but a condition of the payments are that she maintains a 1st. The money means that she doesn't have to take a part time job, and therefore can spend more time studying to get better results. Which has nothing to do with 16-17 year olds getting with older men because they want to get bought things, which was the message you initially replied to. That has a lot more to do with a lack of education." I think that is *hugely* in the minority. Although when I was 15/16 I just liked older men. I didn't get paid by them or anything, I just found them more attractive. That's continued throughout my life and I generally date people at least ten years older than myself. I don't think as many 16-17 year old women are looking for older men to buy them stuff as you think might be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts " Above £3k a year you do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts " It's an income if it is a regular payment for a service provided | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts It's an income if it is a regular payment for a service provided " And if it's irregular? And what constitutes a service? Going for a nice meal with a guy? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts It's an income if it is a regular payment for a service provided And if it's irregular? And what constitutes a service? Going for a nice meal with a guy?" If that is what the agreement says, I will give you this amount for an hour/night | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Do it, enjoy it, declare it, pay the taxes on it Good to go You don't need to declare or pay taxes on gifts It's an income if it is a regular payment for a service provided And if it's irregular? And what constitutes a service? Going for a nice meal with a guy? If that is what the agreement says, I will give you this amount for an hour/night" That's not how I've seen it happen. One guy offered to pay my rent and we would go for meals when he was in town. Another offered to pay my college course etc. no offer was a cash per date | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Isnt this just glorified prostitution ? Nah its just plain old prostitution but the women don't want to have to call themselves prostitutes" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Isnt this just glorified prostitution ? Nah its just plain old prostitution but the women don't want to have to call themselves prostitutes" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Are you saying that having a sugar daddy who you have sex with is just like having a job? Yeah it is. You're doing something for someone else and getting paid for that. Then it's declarable income and has a job title. Prostitute,escort,sex worker." Possibly. Exchange of money, rent paid, fees paid etc are financial transactions, but thing is these are personal transactions and if you choose not to tell anyone about them then who's gonna know? Think the law changed years ago so that the government can make up an estimate of how much tax they think you should have paid and then make you pay that, which is wrong imo. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |