Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In short, no. Your employer would need your consent to access your medical records. There were some concerns that the data would be made available (sold?!) to insurance companies and the like but this will be in an aggregated format if at all. A lot of it was scare mongering by the media." Actually, they have already sold it to many such companies and from reports, they manages to identify about 80% of the records by cross indexing with other databases they had so unless you want various firms knowing all about you, don't allow your records to be shared. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In short, no. Your employer would need your consent to access your medical records. There were some concerns that the data would be made available (sold?!) to insurance companies and the like but this will be in an aggregated format if at all. A lot of it was scare mongering by the media. Actually, they have already sold it to many such companies and from reports, they manages to identify about 80% of the records by cross indexing with other databases they had so unless you want various firms knowing all about you, don't allow your records to be shared." I don't believe that the figure would be anywhere as near as high as 80%. To have a figure that high you'd be expecting both datasets to be damn near identical. I would find it hard to understand how selling a complete data extract could be justified to anyone who wasn't an NHS or Public Health body. It's also worth noting that linking datasets in that way would be illegal unless you made it clear to that was your intention (in which case you wouldn't be given access to the care.data info) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In short, no. Your employer would need your consent to access your medical records. There were some concerns that the data would be made available (sold?!) to insurance companies and the like but this will be in an aggregated format if at all. A lot of it was scare mongering by the media. Actually, they have already sold it to many such companies and from reports, they manages to identify about 80% of the records by cross indexing with other databases they had so unless you want various firms knowing all about you, don't allow your records to be shared. I don't believe that the figure would be anywhere as near as high as 80%. To have a figure that high you'd be expecting both datasets to be damn near identical. I would find it hard to understand how selling a complete data extract could be justified to anyone who wasn't an NHS or Public Health body. It's also worth noting that linking datasets in that way would be illegal unless you made it clear to that was your intention (in which case you wouldn't be given access to the care.data info)" The initial proposal was that the data could be sold to researchers, leading to improvements in medicine and care. That could include insurance companies developing policies for health insurance. It was a wide range of companies and institutions able to access the data sets. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In short, no. Your employer would need your consent to access your medical records. There were some concerns that the data would be made available (sold?!) to insurance companies and the like but this will be in an aggregated format if at all. A lot of it was scare mongering by the media. Actually, they have already sold it to many such companies and from reports, they manages to identify about 80% of the records by cross indexing with other databases they had so unless you want various firms knowing all about you, don't allow your records to be shared." Exactly this, and it is why I opted out immediately. I would recommend everyone does the same. I checked out the list of private companies that were approved for purchasing the data and it was very scary. Yes, insurance companies and the like will be able to get hold of these data, cross reference it with other databases and identify you personally and your medical history, enabling them to discriminate or levy punitive premiums. And that's just the least sinister of the possible scenarios. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |