FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

who should vote in In/Out Referendum?

Jump to newest
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

If we get this referendum, who should be eligible to vote?

British nationals resident here plus abroad? Any resident here, including EU citizens etc? The results could have massive consequences for all of them, uprooting their homes, financial losses etc.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone on the electoral register?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone who is normally eligible to vote in a general election. It will affect people who live and work here, they are the ones who should have their say on it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Any one who is eligible and on the electoral register as in all elections

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Uk nationals, where they live is irrelevant.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lik and PaulCouple
over a year ago

cahoots

I'm still wondering why the English didn't get a vote regarding independence from Scotland.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Everyone over 16

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eithoWoman
over a year ago

Chatham

I think it should be extended to those Britons who live in the wider EU as it will affect them too.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

"

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Those on the electoral role, or hold a uk passport.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

"

if they live in spain for example and plan to stay there, its not going to affect them is it

thats why i said no

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?"

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view."

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To have the electorate vote on matters of such dense gravity would be a debacle. The majority of citizens are ill-informed to make a credible decision. The resulting vote would be based on views swayed by emotive, sensationalist rhetoric and fickle judgement. The democratically elected spokespersons have to decide, for they have that duty of care to the citizens.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm still wondering why the English didn't get a vote regarding independence from Scotland."

Because its bugger all to do with the English,irish,peruvian,,dutch,etc

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?"

it has nothing to do with southerners being bad or good and its NOT anti English.

its about scots wanting to govern themselves

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *eithoWoman
over a year ago

Chatham


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

if they live in spain for example and plan to stay there, its not going to affect them is it

thats why i said no"

But it might not depend on what they plan to do. It would depend on their being granted a visa to stay, which may or may not happen? Given the animosity of the Spanish levied at elderly Brits in Spain, we may indeed see them being returned home.

I have friends living in mainland Europe. If we leave the EU they may be forced to return home, especially those who don't own property in their country of residence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That's democracy for you.

We all have a stake in the uk, it's upto people to educate themselves and vote.

The ancient Greeks declared it a"civil duty"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm still wondering why the English didn't get a vote regarding independence from Scotland."

Same here.

Suspect that Salmond perhaps was of the belief that if 5 Million Scots voted, he'd get the 'Yes' he was after, but if 65 million Brits (English, Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish) voted he'd be less likely to get that result.

Despite him being a hugely divisive figure.

I've never had a problem with the Scots, but due to Alex Salmonds comments and behaviour alone, I would have voted for Scotland to be given independence had I been given a say in the referendum.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Whichever way the voting is cut, it could have a major influence upon the decision.

EU nationals who live here, for example, are a fairly large group and I'd assume that they'd vote UK to stay in the EU.

Likewise, British citizens living abroad are another sizeable group.

Some of these people may lose their businesses, their homes and of course their dreams.

It's unlikely to be as simple as who could normally vote in an election. Plus the Scots have had voting at 16 for referendums, so should the UK have all above 16, for equality?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icky999Man
over a year ago

warrington

Anybody who has got the stones for a civil war if some f***er tries to take over my country. Vote away, fill your boots.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Some figures -

almost 2 million British live abroad.

probably a few million EU nationals living here, possibly some with British partners, such as Farage's wife.

In the recent election, British citizens, and qualifying Commonwealth citizens and citizens of the Republic of Ireland resident in the UK were, if registered, eligible to vote.

There are some sizeable numbers involved, that will have a heavy influence upon the result.

Will the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic become a closed border, if ROI continues as part of the EU - and there's no plan there to change it. An open border could mean easy access for any person in the EU to get into the UK. Lots of complexities.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *icky999Man
over a year ago

warrington


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!"

nobody can vote to give my country away. I aint selling!!!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!"

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby

As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups."

.

I understand what your saying but that was their decision, if they applied for UK citizenship they get a vote, if they didn't they don't.

If I work in Dubai I wouldn't expect to make in roads on their affairs in just living by their rules to make a livelihood.

If owning property gives you a right to vote, then do we let Vladimir Putin vote, do we let corporations vote, the list would be endless!.

Citizenship can be the only criteria,residency is a temporary transition which means you have interests elsewhere!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *exymatcplMan
over a year ago

doncaster


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?"

?yes

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!"

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/05/15 14:20:58]

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ethnmelvCouple
over a year ago

Cardiff

Anyone registered to vote in a UK General Election - it is as important. And we would both vote to be in the EU if anyone asked

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If we're using it as an example, the following were allowed to vote in the Scottish referendum as well as extending the vote to people 16 and over:

•British citizens resident in Scotland.

•Commonwealth citizens resident in Scotland who have leave to remain in the UK or do not require such leave.

•Citizens of the Republic of Ireland and other EU countries resident in Scotland.

•Members of the House of Lords resident in Scotland.

•Service personnel serving in the UK or overseas with the armed forces who are registered to vote in Scotland.

•Crown personnel serving outside the UK with HM Government who are registered to vote in Scotland.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I thought no it should be anyone over age of 16 who has or is entitled to, a British passport and who's permanent address in in the UK.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups..

----------------------------------------

...If I work in Dubai I wouldn't expect to make in roads on their affairs in just living by their rules to make a livelihood.

Citizenship can be the only criteria,residency is a temporary transition which means you have interests elsewhere!"

I don't know Dubai's state of affairs, but currently British citizens can live in the EU, so it's a legal entitlement, alongside whatever voting principles operate in those countries - I imagine it's quite different in Dubai!

What some are saying, is that British citizens who legally went to live abroad, could have their lives there curtailed by others - but not them - who would vote, which could potentially cut short their investments and lives in another country, where they went, very legally, to live. On such an important measure, surely they get a right to vote?

These are going to be viewpoints that various parties will be proclaiming in coming months.

Wouldn't it have been right for the Conservatives to have been absolutely clear, before the election, upon who was going to be able to vote upon all or our interests and future lives?

Will an influx of expats, forced to return, if they no longer hold rights to live in an EU country, change things here? The NHS, housing/prices etc? Will they be richer than many hereand hold large asset bases, thus pushing up house prices here? Would they forgive the Conservatives, for holding a referendum, on which they had no say, that forced them to return here?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A"

.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups..

----------------------------------------

...If I work in Dubai I wouldn't expect to make in roads on their affairs in just living by their rules to make a livelihood.

Citizenship can be the only criteria,residency is a temporary transition which means you have interests elsewhere!

I don't know Dubai's state of affairs, but currently British citizens can live in the EU, so it's a legal entitlement, alongside whatever voting principles operate in those countries - I imagine it's quite different in Dubai!

What some are saying, is that British citizens who legally went to live abroad, could have their lives there curtailed by others - but not them - who would vote, which could potentially cut short their investments and lives in another country, where they went, very legally, to live. On such an important measure, surely they get a right to vote?

These are going to be viewpoints that various parties will be proclaiming in coming months.

Wouldn't it have been right for the Conservatives to have been absolutely clear, before the election, upon who was going to be able to vote upon all or our interests and future lives?

Will an influx of expats, forced to return, if they no longer hold rights to live in an EU country, change things here? The NHS, housing/prices etc? Will they be richer than many hereand hold large asset bases, thus pushing up house prices here? Would they forgive the Conservatives, for holding a referendum, on which they had no say, that forced them to return here?

"

.

That's why I stated that all UK citizens should vote regardless of where they live!

Residency is a poor way to allocate voting rights as like I said in my mind residency is a temporary transit and therefore you could have interests elsewhere

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland. "

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *lik and PaulCouple
over a year ago

cahoots


"I'm still wondering why the English didn't get a vote regarding independence from Scotland.

Because its bugger all to do with the English,irish,peruvian,,dutch,etc"

I think breaking up the United Kingdom would have something to do with the English personally.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU"

Yep.

But by logic the Scottish leaving would have affected the rest of the UK - therefore why shouldn't we have had a say?

A

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum."

I largely support your position. But, I think the politicians will slice and dice the potential voter eligibility, in order to get the result that they want.

There's a differential of approaching 8 million voters, depending upon which way eligibility is decided. Such a difference is going to have a massive likely change to the result.

EU citizens living here, I'm thinking, would vote for the UK to stay in Europe.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU

Yep.

But by logic the Scottish leaving would have affected the rest of the UK - therefore why shouldn't we have had a say?

A"

.

No technically speaking the UK would have stayed exactly the same minus the country of Scotland.

Same as the European union would stay exactly the same minus the state of the UK.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum.

I largely support your position. But, I think the politicians will slice and dice the potential voter eligibility, in order to get the result that they want.

There's a differential of approaching 8 million voters, depending upon which way eligibility is decided. Such a difference is going to have a massive likely change to the result.

EU citizens living here, I'm thinking, would vote for the UK to stay in Europe. "

It's not my position it's the law.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

if they live in spain for example and plan to stay there, its not going to affect them is it

thats why i said no"

? Well what if they're not allowed to stay or work there? Surely it affects them more than you?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum.

I largely support your position. But, I think the politicians will slice and dice the potential voter eligibility, in order to get the result that they want.

There's a differential of approaching 8 million voters, depending upon which way eligibility is decided. Such a difference is going to have a massive likely change to the result.

EU citizens living here, I'm thinking, would vote for the UK to stay in Europe. "

.

That's why I disagree with citizens of other countries voting in UK matters.

It's a difficult one but in my mind citizenship is more permanent than residency! And that's why I'd discount residency.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *UNKIEMan
over a year ago

south east

Anyone eligible to vote under our current selection system also extending to 16 and 17 yr olds as its their future we're gambling with if the scottish referendum taught this country anything its 16 n 17 yr olds are not the daft little kids some thought they were ..they were VERY engaged throughout the whole process

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"Anyone eligible to vote under our current selection system also extending to 16 and 17 yr olds as its their future we're gambling with if the scottish referendum taught this country anything its 16 n 17 yr olds are not the daft little kids some thought they were ..they were VERY engaged throughout the whole process "

That's the only change I think will happen.

It doesn't seem fair to have 90 year old who won't be around much longer to live with the changes yet deny a younger person the vote who will have to live with those changes for decades.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU

Yep.

But by logic the Scottish leaving would have affected the rest of the UK - therefore why shouldn't we have had a say?

A.

No technically speaking the UK would have stayed exactly the same minus the country of Scotland.

Same as the European union would stay exactly the same minus the state of the UK."

Exactly the same?

Apart from new border controls, exonomic issues, employment issues, property ownership issues, business movements and migrations, currency issues, arguments over who owns the oil and who owes what proportion of prior debts........

Yeah.

Exactly the same.

A

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI

It would be interesting to see the figures of people seeking naturalisation over the next year or so.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Who will enjoy waiting in the longer waiting lines, for non EU citizens, when visiting EU countries?

Will Eurostar travel differ significantly, with immigration checks?

I see the whole referendum as complex, and just voting eligibility is very complex and largely to cause a lot of consternation.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU

Yep.

But by logic the Scottish leaving would have affected the rest of the UK - therefore why shouldn't we have had a say?

A.

No technically speaking the UK would have stayed exactly the same minus the country of Scotland.

Same as the European union would stay exactly the same minus the state of the UK.

Exactly the same?

Apart from new border controls, exonomic issues, employment issues, property ownership issues, business movements and migrations, currency issues, arguments over who owns the oil and who owes what proportion of prior debts........

Yeah.

Exactly the same.

A"

.

Your being extremely finicky.

The uk is a union of four countries.

One can vote to leave of it wishes without it effecting the rest of the union.

What you would want, would give the right of three nations to hold one nation in that union against their wishes, you either have sovereign states or you don't.

Like Texas can't leave the usa because Texas isn't a sovereign state, it's one country

Unions are totally different and I'm not a fan of either a union or federal state!

What we know is power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, why would I want to give even more powers to people I know it would only corrupt!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who will enjoy waiting in the longer waiting lines, for non EU citizens, when visiting EU countries?

Will Eurostar travel differ significantly, with immigration checks?

I see the whole referendum as complex, and just voting eligibility is very complex and largely to cause a lot of consternation."

.

Do you enjoy standing in the line for US holidays or Caribbean ones what about holiday makers to Australia or new Zealand?

Do they get into the union just to get rid of the line at an airport?

Small matters should not override large matters!

To me countries should be as small as possible, there governments tend to be much better than the big ones

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone

Haven't folk been moving abroad for years, before all this free movement bollocks, why would suddenly everyone be forced to come back? If people wanted to stay, i imagine they could just do it through proper channels, if we were to leave the eu

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum."

Point taken, almost anyone living in Scotland had the vote. My mistake. But my point still stands, only those in Scotland had a say on Scotland leaving the UK. So the same criteria should be applied to the UK vote on leaving the EU. Though I do think those from other EU countries should be excluded.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum.

Point taken, almost anyone living in Scotland had the vote. My mistake. But my point still stands, only those in Scotland had a say on Scotland leaving the UK. So the same criteria should be applied to the UK vote on leaving the EU. Though I do think those from other EU countries should be excluded. "

Firstly, because Scotland is not it's own country, in the sense that it cannot confer citizenship, it was impossible to administer a referendum for citizens only.

Secondly, Scotland's policy was that anyone who was living in Scotland at the time of the referendum was considered to be a Scottish citizen if independence won.

Therefore your rights to live in Scotland stopped being enshrined in the Union but by defacto citizenship of Scotland.

There is no such plan for European countries to offer citizenship to British emigrants living in those countries if the UK votes to leave the EU.

What you're saying is that you only want resident citizens to have the vote - that's not going to fly.

Non-resident British citizens have the right to vote in national elections, I don't see how that can feasibly not include a national referendum.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Any one who is eligible and on the electoral register as in all elections "

EU citizens are aloud to register to vote but are not aloud to vote in General Elections. So should they be aloud to vote in referendum?

For the record I would say Yes they should.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"Any one who is eligible and on the electoral register as in all elections

EU citizens are aloud to register to vote but are not aloud to vote in General Elections. So should they be aloud to vote in referendum?

For the record I would say Yes they should."

I thought they couldn't register - thanks for that.

But that begs the question of why they're allowed to register but not to vote! Are they allowed to vote only in local elections?

Non-resident citizens can't vote in local elections but can vote in national elections - so maybe it's the reverse for resident non-citizens.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?"

I don't know where you found them but that's not my experience. Most northerners would no sooner want to be part of Scotland than they would want to be part of France or Germany. Nothing against the Scots but the people of northern England are English, probably more English than the people of Southern England.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

if they live in spain for example and plan to stay there, its not going to affect them is it

thats why i said no"

But if we left the EU those people would no longer have the right to live in Spain unless the UK government came to an arrangement with the Spanish government.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups."

Very strange what you are saying in this statement. So does that mean all citizens of the EEC such as the citizens of Switzerland, Iceland and Norway may not live in let us say Germany France Spain and elsewhere...

Pardon but this is not the case at all. It is up to a country in example Italy to determine who lives in their boarders and I (m) presume from my relatives in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland that they would prefer a British citizen living in their country paying tax then some one from a different country drawing benefits.

If you are all so worried about this issue look up at the Swiss people's vote of last February 2014 in which the citizens of Switzerland voted with 51% "yes" to limit the number of foreign nationals moving into Switzerland.

Switzerland has had no negative issues staying outside the EU and is a main export of products to Germany (74.24%). All this scare mongering from parties that Britain would close down if leaving the EU is incorrect. For example how would an Airbus fly without wings from Wales? Or would BWM cut off their noses by closing down the Mini production ? Would Deutsche Bank close down their biggest profit center in the world by shutting their offices in London ?

The answer is no - speak to Germans and most will say they understand the issues the British have

The BBC paints an one sided picture to the whole issue and debate on Europe..

Listen to the debates on Radio Luxemburg or TV France and you see the same issues we have, they have and it is not black or white but a big shade of grey (No you perv's NOT that Grey ...sighs Fabbers and their dirty thoughts...)

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think it can and will be very strongly argued that those British who live abroad should get the right to vote on this. I can imagine they'd vote for us to stay in, so it will partly depend upon what outcome the government would like to get from the vote.

I'm in favor of us remaining in, but that's another thread.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"To have the electorate vote on matters of such dense gravity would be a debacle. The majority of citizens are ill-informed to make a credible decision. The resulting vote would be based on views swayed by emotive, sensationalist rhetoric and fickle judgement. The democratically elected spokespersons have to decide, for they have that duty of care to the citizens. "

I actually agree. It should be the job of government to govern, not pass the buck on to the citizenship. However the decision to have a referendum has been all but made. All we can do is hope we get the right result.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups.

Very strange what you are saying in this statement. So does that mean all citizens of the EEC such as the citizens of Switzerland, Iceland and Norway may not live in let us say Germany France Spain and elsewhere...

Pardon but this is not the case at all. It is up to a country in example Italy to determine who lives in their boarders and I (m) presume from my relatives in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland that they would prefer a British citizen living in their country paying tax then some one from a different country drawing benefits.

If you are all so worried about this issue look up at the Swiss people's vote of last February 2014 in which the citizens of Switzerland voted with 51% "yes" to limit the number of foreign nationals moving into Switzerland.

Switzerland has had no negative issues staying outside the EU and is a main export of products to Germany (74.24%). All this scare mongering from parties that Britain would close down if leaving the EU is incorrect. For example how would an Airbus fly without wings from Wales? Or would BWM cut off their noses by closing down the Mini production ? Would Deutsche Bank close down their biggest profit center in the world by shutting their offices in London ?

The answer is no - speak to Germans and most will say they understand the issues the British have

The BBC paints an one sided picture to the whole issue and debate on Europe..

Listen to the debates on Radio Luxemburg or TV France and you see the same issues we have, they have and it is not black or white but a big shade of grey (No you perv's NOT that Grey ...sighs Fabbers and their dirty thoughts...)

"

They Swiss outcome is yet unknown - I don't know how you can make definitive declarations.

There is a 3 year gap from 2014 until quotas are to be introduced.

The EU has said that agreements to meet both Swiss and EU law need to be taken into account but that the referendum result could restrict Swiss access to the single market.

They have until 2017 to make those arrangements.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view."

Isn't Manchester getting a Mayor & some devolved power from London?

So it is happening slowly!!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland. "

Actually I think it was for anybody resident in Scotland. Not sure of the full details but English people resident in Scotland could vote.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A.

The Scottish were voting to leave the uk.

The welsh, Irish and English would have remained in the UK, therefore we didn't get a vote.

Using your logic the entire of Europe would be voting as to whether the UK should leave the EU

Yep.

But by logic the Scottish leaving would have affected the rest of the UK - therefore why shouldn't we have had a say?

A"

For a similar reason that if your partner wants to leave you you don't get the right to veto that choice.

If Scotland can't be persuaded to stay in the Union, like it or not, we'd have to let it go.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway."

I think that's why they will vote for it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway."

Wouldnt matter anyway, Scottish MP's are outnumbered 591-59 by non Scots MP's.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *kin BohnerMan
over a year ago

derby


"As it will be a vote about UK membership of the EU it should only be UK passport holders living in the UK. Exactly the same as the Scottish referendum a few months ago was only for Scotts living in Scotland.

It was for anyone living in Scotland, not just Scots, who met the criteria.

We allow citizens who live abroad to vote in elections so I imagine they'd be allowed to vote in the referendum.

Point taken, almost anyone living in Scotland had the vote. My mistake. But my point still stands, only those in Scotland had a say on Scotland leaving the UK. So the same criteria should be applied to the UK vote on leaving the EU. Though I do think those from other EU countries should be excluded.

Firstly, because Scotland is not it's own country, in the sense that it cannot confer citizenship, it was impossible to administer a referendum for citizens only.

Secondly, Scotland's policy was that anyone who was living in Scotland at the time of the referendum was considered to be a Scottish citizen if independence won.

Therefore your rights to live in Scotland stopped being enshrined in the Union but by defacto citizenship of Scotland.

There is no such plan for European countries to offer citizenship to British emigrants living in those countries if the UK votes to leave the EU.

What you're saying is that you only want resident citizens to have the vote - that's not going to fly.

Non-resident British citizens have the right to vote in national elections, I don't see how that can feasibly not include a national referendum. "

Try telling a Scott that Scotland is not its own country. Having lived in two European countries I could not give a stuff who they give citizenship to and I also saw no mention of none British being given Scottish citizenship if the referendum had gone the other way! I also do not accept that those living abroad should have a vote in any election or referendum in their native country unless they are considered as domicile like the armed forces. They took the choice to leave, end of story.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway.

Wouldnt matter anyway, Scottish MP's are outnumbered 591-59 by non Scots MP's. "

Which is entirely proportionate with the population of the country...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Vote on in/out???? Anyone with a belly button! more seriously these days citizenship or passport means nothing as they've been given away kik smartys but all governments to all and sundry! Who should vote? Anyone who thinks this country should stand up for itself,have a trading,but not ruled by eu,relationship with Europe as originally intended then we can take control of our borders,make better use of the fifty million£s a day!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

I don't know where you found them but that's not my experience. Most northerners would no sooner want to be part of Scotland than they would want to be part of France or Germany. Nothing against the Scots but the people of northern England are English, probably more English than the people of Southern England.

"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

"

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Who will enjoy waiting in the longer waiting lines, for non EU citizens, when visiting EU countries?

Will Eurostar travel differ significantly, with immigration checks?

I see the whole referendum as complex, and just voting eligibility is very complex and largely to cause a lot of consternation..

Do you enjoy standing in the line for US holidays or Caribbean ones what about holiday makers to Australia or new Zealand?

Do they get into the union just to get rid of the line at an airport?

Small matters should not override large matters!

To me countries should be as small as possible, there governments tend to be much better than the big ones"

I agree, and standing in longer lines at airports is just scaremongering rubbish. As is saying all Brits will be forced to come back to the UK. Even if i did have to stand in a longer line at the airport i would be happy to do it if it meant we had taken back control of our own borders from the EU.

UKIP have said they would not send EU citizens already here back to their own countries in the event of us leaving the EU, i don't think the conservatives would either. Likewise other EU countries would not force British citizens who work or settle abroad back here to the UK. Did'nt people live and work abroad before the EU was even invented?

People go and live and work and settle all over the world outside of the EU, so why do people think they have to be in the EU to do such a thing in europe?

There is no logic in it at all.

People call UKIP little englanders, but the pro-EU brigade are all in fact Little EU'ers, they can't seem to think outside of the EU, they need to realise there is a whole wide world out there beyond the borders of the EU. Brits go to live and work and settle in countries outside of the EU perfectly fine, why can't they do the same in europe, when we leave the EU?

We don't need to be in a close political union with them for these things to happen, and outside the EU we can manage our own affairs much better.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"It's got nothing to do with anyone except UK citizens. In effect we are the stakeholders of uk PLC, the old saying of the buck stops here applies to every citizen

Democracy must take place whether we like the answer or not!

But, if EU residents can vote here, as they may be home owners, partners to British citizens etc (and any non EU partners of British citizens who live here).

The ramifications of us pulling out of the EU are such that millions of Brits who live abroad will potentially have to return to live here. They could be said to have a much larger impact on their lives, due to this vote, than others who might potentially vote.

I'm unsure about it, I see the pros and cons of most of these groups.

Very strange what you are saying in this statement. So does that mean all citizens of the EEC such as the citizens of Switzerland, Iceland and Norway may not live in let us say Germany France Spain and elsewhere...

Pardon but this is not the case at all. It is up to a country in example Italy to determine who lives in their boarders and I (m) presume from my relatives in Germany, France, Italy and Switzerland that they would prefer a British citizen living in their country paying tax then some one from a different country drawing benefits.

If you are all so worried about this issue look up at the Swiss people's vote of last February 2014 in which the citizens of Switzerland voted with 51% "yes" to limit the number of foreign nationals moving into Switzerland.

Switzerland has had no negative issues staying outside the EU and is a main export of products to Germany (74.24%). All this scare mongering from parties that Britain would close down if leaving the EU is incorrect. For example how would an Airbus fly without wings from Wales? Or would BWM cut off their noses by closing down the Mini production ? Would Deutsche Bank close down their biggest profit center in the world by shutting their offices in London ?

The answer is no - speak to Germans and most will say they understand the issues the British have

The BBC paints an one sided picture to the whole issue and debate on Europe..

Listen to the debates on Radio Luxemburg or TV France and you see the same issues we have, they have and it is not black or white but a big shade of grey (No you perv's NOT that Grey ...sighs Fabbers and their dirty thoughts...)

"

The fact is is that if we leave the EU them British Citizens will no longer have the right to live and work within the EU as EU citizens. Whether they are all kicked out or not is another matter. Each individual state within the EU will have to come to it's own arrangement with the UK government as to what status British Citizens would have in each country. I would guess that most would treat British Citizens the same way Britain would treat others EU citizens. Which basically means that if we treat them the same as we treat them now them they will treat us the same as we do now, if we don't they won't either. So we either kick about 2 million EU citizens out of Britain and get back about 2 million British Citizens from the EU (which to me seems like a lot of unnecessary moving people around again their will with little if any benefit for anyone) or we allow them all to stay, have no change in British immigration policy and hope the EU lets British Citizens stay with in the EU. Basically this removes one of the main arguments for leaving.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

Isn't Manchester getting a Mayor & some devolved power from London?

So it is happening slowly!!"

The argument for devolved powers for the regions of Britain should not be seen as support for either Scottish devolution or independence from the Northern regions. In fact quite the opposite. The further devolution or independence for Scotland would me a total disaster for the whole of middle Britain causing major interruptions to simple every day business that currently goes on on both sides of the border.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'll give old Thatcher that!

She certainly didn't want those Germans reuniting for nothing

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen."

And the kind hearted, selfless Labour will give them one with out a thought to fact that they rely on Northern votes to have chance of getting into government where the real power and wealth is, southern England.

Get real mate.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro "

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Who will enjoy waiting in the longer waiting lines, for non EU citizens, when visiting EU countries?

Will Eurostar travel differ significantly, with immigration checks?

I see the whole referendum as complex, and just voting eligibility is very complex and largely to cause a lot of consternation..

Do you enjoy standing in the line for US holidays or Caribbean ones what about holiday makers to Australia or new Zealand?

Do they get into the union just to get rid of the line at an airport?

Small matters should not override large matters!

To me countries should be as small as possible, there governments tend to be much better than the big ones

I agree, and standing in longer lines at airports is just scaremongering rubbish. As is saying all Brits will be forced to come back to the UK. Even if i did have to stand in a longer line at the airport i would be happy to do it if it meant we had taken back control of our own borders from the EU.

UKIP have said they would not send EU citizens already here back to their own countries in the event of us leaving the EU, i don't think the conservatives would either. Likewise other EU countries would not force British citizens who work or settle abroad back here to the UK. Did'nt people live and work abroad before the EU was even invented?

People go and live and work and settle all over the world outside of the EU, so why do people think they have to be in the EU to do such a thing in europe?

There is no logic in it at all.

People call UKIP little englanders, but the pro-EU brigade are all in fact Little EU'ers, they can't seem to think outside of the EU, they need to realise there is a whole wide world out there beyond the borders of the EU. Brits go to live and work and settle in countries outside of the EU perfectly fine, why can't they do the same in europe, when we leave the EU?

We don't need to be in a close political union with them for these things to happen, and outside the EU we can manage our own affairs much better. "

You may be right, maybe the EU won't send all British Citizens back, you probably are but currently ALL British Citizens have the absolute right to live and work anywhere in the EU because, as British Citizens, they are also EU citizens. If Britain is no longer a member of the EU then they will not have the right as EU citizens to live and work in the EU. That us irrefutable and undeniable fact, not scare mongering

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you. "

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really."

.

Hey up back from Benidorm with the orders from HQ mate

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you. "

And of course 28 million didn't agree with UKIP at all - some of them will have agreed with you too, so there's no need to feel completely alone.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really."

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro "

Yet another? What are the other giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosities that have upset you so much?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andS66Couple
over a year ago

Derby


"To have the electorate vote on matters of such dense gravity would be a debacle. The majority of citizens are ill-informed to make a credible decision. The resulting vote would be based on views swayed by emotive, sensationalist rhetoric and fickle judgement. The democratically elected spokespersons have to decide, for they have that duty of care to the citizens. "

Are they not Ill-informed to make a credible decision in general elections then? I know very few, if any, people who actually read any of the manifestos, but I know lots of people who voted for...... because their parents/ grandparents etc did.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

Yet another? What are the other giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosities that have upset you so much?"

.

The USA

The USSR

The people republic of China

The British empire

The Napoleonic empire....

There's a whole host of previous people with good intentions on a path to disaster

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think it should be extended to those Britons who live in the wider EU as it will affect them too."

But NOT any non UK born/passport holders or other EU nationals who live here!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

Yet another? What are the other giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosities that have upset you so much?.

The USA

The USSR

The people republic of China

The British empire

The Napoleonic empire....

There's a whole host of previous people with good intentions on a path to disaster

"

Basically you're out of salts with the whole world. You need a good holiday

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah I'm thinking of three days in Brussels

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andS66Couple
over a year ago

Derby

All the British I know, including several family members, who live abroad (France and Spain) would all vote to stay in the EU... however, were they living in the UK, they would ALL vote to come out of the EU.

Their reasoning is that being in the EU suits them in their circumstances, but does not suit the UK as a whole.

We would both vote to come out of the EU, but would want the UK to keep its trading relationships... this is what the EU was originally intended for.... the European Common Market.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out? "

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"All the British I know, including several family members, who live abroad (France and Spain) would all vote to stay in the EU... however, were they living in the UK, they would ALL vote to come out of the EU.

Their reasoning is that being in the EU suits them in their circumstances, but does not suit the UK as a whole.

We would both vote to come out of the EU, but would want the UK to keep its trading relationships... this is what the EU was originally intended for.... the European Common Market."

I agree, i would like a trade agreement with europe, but nothing more. This ever closer political union bollocks has got out of hand and needs knocking on the head.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job. "

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you. "

The only thing I worry about is UKIP head offices ability to add up if that's what they've told you to think .

UKIP have 24 MEPs, labour 20, tories 19, other parties 10 seats. 4 million people voted for labour so by your reasoning at the very best it was a draw, but you keep on dreaming .

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you. "

Why did they not win the general election if they won the euro elections a year before?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you.

Why did they not win the general election if they won the euro elections a year before? "

While you're thinking about that, where did the UKIP voters go between last year and this.

In the European elections 4.38 million voted for UKIP on a turn out of 34%. When 66% of people voted, they got 3.88 million votes not the 4 million that it's conveniently rounded up to.

So they've lost half a million voters in the last year.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you.

Why did they not win the general election if they won the euro elections a year before?

While you're thinking about that, where did the UKIP voters go between last year and this.

In the European elections 4.38 million voted for UKIP on a turn out of 34%. When 66% of people voted, they got 3.88 million votes not the 4 million that it's conveniently rounded up to.

So they've lost half a million voters in the last year."

I know some UKIP voters who switched to vote Tory, mainly because the tories were offering an EU referendum, and they thought they would have more chance of getting that than by voting UKIP. The other reason was to stop the nightmare scenario that was a Labour/SNP coalition happening. Seemed to have worked seeing as the tories got a majority, and UKIP got what they wanted which was an EU referendum, so everyones a winner.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've spent too many years fighting politicians at local and national level to have any belief left in them!

There's great local councillors that really get on your side when they look into the issue and many many times they've gone from being pro issue to anti issue through local opposition, but what I've found is these local councillors are nearly always censored and controlled by their leader be they Tory labour or libdem.

Usually local councillors live locally and are connected to the community in many ways, you get some that live in the next town along and there that little bit more disconnected, the council leader is nearly always from the next town, the mp from miles away and works in London.

The further the gap the bigger the disconnection, sending representatives to Brussels will only make things worse!.

I've got no easy answers for the state of politics! It's not just this country the whole of Europe is full of bent politicians, giving them more power in my mind won't make things any better, we'll just be sat here in twenty years moaning about dodgy dealings and expenses in Brussels instead of Westminster!

The only possible way I can ever foresee politics getting better, is if we realise that politicians are human and will be corrupt unless we implement a system that stops them being corrupt.

That means transparency at every level and every document and now not in twenty years if they decide it's in the public interest.

There was a thread on the ttip the other week!.

I'm all for free trade but what we'll actually get is protectionism for corporate giants, as somebody pointed out the other week the vast majority of people work for small companies, these giant corporations know there biggest threat is small companies and every few trade agreement nearly always turns into corporate protectionism because our chosen representatives are courted by their power and held unaccounted by anonymity and disconnection.

Take something I've worked very hard in protesting over several years fracking.

Could it be done safe or safer yes it could, but will it, well if the petro giants get what they want with exemptions from environmental legislation, oversight of regulations done in house by their own employees! What sort of regulation do you think they would have pushed for if it wasn't for thousands of local protesters?.

People get what people deserve and quite frankly if all you've ever done is stick a cross on a piece of paper, your sort of asking to be screwed

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"To have the electorate vote on matters of such dense gravity would be a debacle. The majority of citizens are ill-informed to make a credible decision. The resulting vote would be based on views swayed by emotive, sensationalist rhetoric and fickle judgement. The democratically elected spokespersons have to decide, for they have that duty of care to the citizens.

Are they not Ill-informed to make a credible decision in general elections then? I know very few, if any, people who actually read any of the manifestos, but I know lots of people who voted for...... because their parents/ grandparents etc did."

Regrettably, I believe that to be the case. If referendum maketh one decision, then logic dictates. all decisions should follow suit.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's funny if you'd asked me in 1995 you'd have found the biggest eu supporter you'd ever come across, I've lost the belief that the eu promised!

It's turned into yet another giant monolithic sycophantic Napoleonic monstrosity!

It still does great admirable things and I hope it has the ability to change but I don't hold much hope for it!. The Germans have pointed out when push comes to shove it's every state for itself.

The really funny thing is, in 1995 I was the only pro eu person, now I'm anti eu and everyone else is pro

No you are not the only one, 4 million people who voted UKIP in the general election definately agree with you.

Umm, I wonder how many in 'safe labour seats' voted UKIP to try and keep Labour out. I know a few personally and they're not Europhobes really.

....and the number which was around 4 million again who voted UKIP in last years european election. Did they vote to keep Labour out or did they vote UKIP because they wanted to send a cear message to the EU that we wanted out?

The 10.5 million who didn't vote for UKIP were also sending a clear message along with the 49 MEPs they sent to the European parliament to do a proper job.

My word, you don't sound bitter that UKIP won the european election at all do you.

Why did they not win the general election if they won the euro elections a year before?

While you're thinking about that, where did the UKIP voters go between last year and this.

In the European elections 4.38 million voted for UKIP on a turn out of 34%. When 66% of people voted, they got 3.88 million votes not the 4 million that it's conveniently rounded up to.

So they've lost half a million voters in the last year.

I know some UKIP voters who switched to vote Tory, mainly because the tories were offering an EU referendum, and they thought they would have more chance of getting that than by voting UKIP. The other reason was to stop the nightmare scenario that was a Labour/SNP coalition happening. Seemed to have worked seeing as the tories got a majority, and UKIP got what they wanted which was an EU referendum, so everyones a winner. "

That's a relief because the heartland of UKIP voters is older people. With the latest worries about increases in strokes, I was concerned that your core voters were dying off. I hope a few of them can hang on for that referendum, though I'll enjoy feeling feel sad for their disappointment after it

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

British citizens only should vote on this. Many new people here have become British citizens so I see no xenophobia or racism in this.

It's a British issue and should only be decided by the British in the same way the Scottish issue was only decided by Scots.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"British citizens only should vote on this. Many new people here have become British citizens so I see no xenophobia or racism in this.

It's a British issue and should only be decided by the British in the same way the Scottish issue was only decided by Scots."

Which it wasn't - it was British people, Irish people, citizens of EU countries and commonwealth people resident in Scotland who could vote.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"British citizens only should vote on this. Many new people here have become British citizens so I see no xenophobia or racism in this.

It's a British issue and should only be decided by the British in the same way the Scottish issue was only decided by Scots.

Which it wasn't - it was British people, Irish people, citizens of EU countries and commonwealth people resident in Scotland who could vote.

"

I can't believe how many non-truths there are.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That's Maxist doctrine which is just equal opp Nazi doctrine.

This is a British issue no one else has the right to make the choice on it.

If we don't get a right to vote on the basics of our nation we have no democracy. That means we live under a foreign dictatorship and I would not stand for that along with many others. We have never kicked off nor got organised to do so but this would be the Rubicon for me.

Not all pro independence people are "old" I live next to housing estates full of marginalized and ignored British people in their teens. They know they are regarded as "chav's" by the intellectual elite and the hatred is mutual but there are far more of them. They could spit on the LSE and drown everyone in it.

Inform the people of the REAL truths involved with no doctrinal agenda and we will make the right choice for us.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen.

And the kind hearted, selfless Labour will give them one with out a thought to fact that they rely on Northern votes to have chance of getting into government where the real power and wealth is, southern England.

Get real mate."

South of England is based on banking and that is finished, just look at the stock prices of the crap banks we bought.

Those banks were crap then and they are still crap now. Britain can't repay the size of the debt for bailing out the crap banks so we are printing money and this will finish us off. Just look at what happened to Germany after the first world war! Their currency was as valuable as toilet paper because they printed too much money.

The real power may be in the south, but what is the point being in command of a country that is crap and finished. I am certainly not impressed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"That's Maxist doctrine which is just equal opp Nazi doctrine.

This is a British issue no one else has the right to make the choice on it.

If we don't get a right to vote on the basics of our nation we have no democracy. That means we live under a foreign dictatorship and I would not stand for that along with many others. We have never kicked off nor got organised to do so but this would be the Rubicon for me.

Not all pro independence people are "old" I live next to housing estates full of marginalized and ignored British people in their teens. They know they are regarded as "chav's" by the intellectual elite and the hatred is mutual but there are far more of them. They could spit on the LSE and drown everyone in it.

Inform the people of the REAL truths involved with no doctrinal agenda and we will make the right choice for us."

man4you trying to paint a picture that all UKIP voters are old pensioners about to pop their cloggs, lol. I'm only 37 and don't plan on having a heart attack anytime soon.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's Maxist doctrine which is just equal opp Nazi doctrine.

This is a British issue no one else has the right to make the choice on it.

If we don't get a right to vote on the basics of our nation we have no democracy. That means we live under a foreign dictatorship and I would not stand for that along with many others. We have never kicked off nor got organised to do so but this would be the Rubicon for me.

Not all pro independence people are "old" I live next to housing estates full of marginalized and ignored British people in their teens. They know they are regarded as "chav's" by the intellectual elite and the hatred is mutual but there are far more of them. They could spit on the LSE and drown everyone in it.

Inform the people of the REAL truths involved with no doctrinal agenda and we will make the right choice for us.

man4you trying to paint a picture that all UKIP voters are old pensioners about to pop their cloggs, lol. I'm only 37 and don't plan on having a heart attack anytime soon. "

Now, now, no finger pointing is allowed! Anyway that's a relief, I wouldn't wish that on anyone though heart attacks among younger people are not unknown. Meanwhile if you google "who is voting UKIP" you'll find things like this:

"It is clear that, demographically, Ukip supporters are more likely to be male, and to be older. Those aged 45 or older - and particularly those aged 65 and above - are more likely than average to support Ukip".

I'll see you down at the Derby and Joan club

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *andS66Couple
over a year ago

Derby


"That's Maxist doctrine which is just equal opp Nazi doctrine.

This is a British issue no one else has the right to make the choice on it.

If we don't get a right to vote on the basics of our nation we have no democracy. That means we live under a foreign dictatorship and I would not stand for that along with many others. We have never kicked off nor got organised to do so but this would be the Rubicon for me.

Not all pro independence people are "old" I live next to housing estates full of marginalized and ignored British people in their teens. They know they are regarded as "chav's" by the intellectual elite and the hatred is mutual but there are far more of them. They could spit on the LSE and drown everyone in it.

Inform the people of the REAL truths involved with no doctrinal agenda and we will make the right choice for us.

man4you trying to paint a picture that all UKIP voters are old pensioners about to pop their cloggs, lol. I'm only 37 and don't plan on having a heart attack anytime soon.

Now, now, no finger pointing is allowed! Anyway that's a relief, I wouldn't wish that on anyone though heart attacks among younger people are not unknown. Meanwhile if you google "who is voting UKIP" you'll find things like this:

"It is clear that, demographically, Ukip supporters are more likely to be male, and to be older. Those aged 45 or older - and particularly those aged 65 and above - are more likely than average to support Ukip".

I'll see you down at the Derby and Joan club "

What's the saying...? "older and wiser".

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen."

It doesn't need its own parliament, it needs more devolution of powers e.g. Planning, skills, transport, economic development, with power over the funding that comes with that (grant settlements of more than a year would be a good start) to a regional level. Not "the North" because that is dominated by the North West. And to be fair to the Coalition there have been more moves towards this in the past few years than the previous government.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *arry247Couple
over a year ago

Wakefield


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!"

If that is the case then why where Scottish nationals who live in England excluded from the devolution referendum.

Exclude everyone who does not live in the UK at the time of the referendum

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple
over a year ago

Derbyshire


"Anyone on the electoral register? "

Plus possibly 16 -18 yr olds like they did in Scotland?

(Unless they're all heavily anti, in which case fuck em)

Mr ddc

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's Maxist doctrine which is just equal opp Nazi doctrine.

This is a British issue no one else has the right to make the choice on it.

If we don't get a right to vote on the basics of our nation we have no democracy. That means we live under a foreign dictatorship and I would not stand for that along with many others. We have never kicked off nor got organised to do so but this would be the Rubicon for me.

Not all pro independence people are "old" I live next to housing estates full of marginalized and ignored British people in their teens. They know they are regarded as "chav's" by the intellectual elite and the hatred is mutual but there are far more of them. They could spit on the LSE and drown everyone in it.

Inform the people of the REAL truths involved with no doctrinal agenda and we will make the right choice for us.

man4you trying to paint a picture that all UKIP voters are old pensioners about to pop their cloggs, lol. I'm only 37 and don't plan on having a heart attack anytime soon.

Now, now, no finger pointing is allowed! Anyway that's a relief, I wouldn't wish that on anyone though heart attacks among younger people are not unknown. Meanwhile if you google "who is voting UKIP" you'll find things like this:

"It is clear that, demographically, Ukip supporters are more likely to be male, and to be older. Those aged 45 or older - and particularly those aged 65 and above - are more likely than average to support Ukip".

I'll see you down at the Derby and Joan club

What's the saying...? "older and wiser"."

Well from a personal point of view, thank you. Of course for the others there's always "there's no fool like an old fool"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway.

Wouldnt matter anyway, Scottish MP's are outnumbered 591-59 by non Scots MP's. "

I'm not sure which MP's would vote, of course, and they'll presumably be free to take a personal stance. But, with other non-Tory parties, if the SNP MP's voted against, it may prevent the legislation being approved. Someone with some political maths would have to look at it.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"I think Scotland will want to stay in the EU, so can't see their mps voting for this to happen anyway.

Wouldnt matter anyway, Scottish MP's are outnumbered 591-59 by non Scots MP's.

I'm not sure which MP's would vote, of course, and they'll presumably be free to take a personal stance. But, with other non-Tory parties, if the SNP MP's voted against, it may prevent the legislation being approved. Someone with some political maths would have to look at it."

The tories have a majority, the SNP could join with Labour, Greens, Plaid Cymru, and other independents and it still would'nt be enough, the tories can in effect now do what they like.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen.

And the kind hearted, selfless Labour will give them one with out a thought to fact that they rely on Northern votes to have chance of getting into government where the real power and wealth is, southern England.

Get real mate.

South of England is based on banking and that is finished, just look at the stock prices of the crap banks we bought.

Those banks were crap then and they are still crap now. Britain can't repay the size of the debt for bailing out the crap banks so we are printing money and this will finish us off. Just look at what happened to Germany after the first world war! Their currency was as valuable as toilet paper because they printed too much money.

The real power may be in the south, but what is the point being in command of a country that is crap and finished. I am certainly not impressed."

My point was was that you said it was the 'dirty selfish tories' who were stopping the north from having its own devolved assembly when in fact it's in Labour's interests to block devolution not the Tories.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"Appenrently a lot of northerners would like to join Scotland and go independent, are we really that bad down South?

Some northerners might. This northerner wouldn't. It's more a reaction to the dominance of London at the expense of the northern regional economies in my view.

That's good to hear, and do have sympathy with that view!

The north should have it's own parliament like Scotland, but the dirty selfish torries won't let that happen.

And the kind hearted, selfless Labour will give them one with out a thought to fact that they rely on Northern votes to have chance of getting into government where the real power and wealth is, southern England.

Get real mate.

South of England is based on banking and that is finished, just look at the stock prices of the crap banks we bought.

Those banks were crap then and they are still crap now. Britain can't repay the size of the debt for bailing out the crap banks so we are printing money and this will finish us off. Just look at what happened to Germany after the first world war! Their currency was as valuable as toilet paper because they printed too much money.

The real power may be in the south, but what is the point being in command of a country that is crap and finished. I am certainly not impressed.

My point was was that you said it was the 'dirty selfish tories' who were stopping the north from having its own devolved assembly when in fact it's in Labour's interests to block devolution not the Tories. "

Labour offered a referendum on devolved power in the regions of England. They started with the North East and the people rejected it so they scrapped the plans.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Labour offered a referendum on devolved power in the regions of England. They started with the North East and the people rejected it so they scrapped the plans. "

people here saw it as another layer of government on top on what we have in the councils....

I think if you said to people now we could have a regional assembly based on the model they have for london... i think they would snap your hand off now

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *anchestercubMan
over a year ago

manchester & NI


"

Labour offered a referendum on devolved power in the regions of England. They started with the North East and the people rejected it so they scrapped the plans.

people here saw it as another layer of government on top on what we have in the councils....

I think if you said to people now we could have a regional assembly based on the model they have for london... i think they would snap your hand off now"

What were the big differences between the two? I don't know the specifics.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"NO to British who live abroad as they live and abroad and not in the UK

But what if the vote forces them to have to return to the UK? Isn't it fair that they should have a say in their destiny?

if they live in spain for example and plan to stay there, its not going to affect them is it

thats why i said no"

It is if we vote to leave and Spain goes "whelp sorry no visa, no free moment you'll have to go home"

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

we found out today what is going to be proposed over who is allowed to vote... basically anyone who can vote in a general election

UK, Ireland and Commonwealth citizens (including cypriot uk and maltese uk) UK Nationals who have been overseas for less than 15 years

EU citizens living here in the UK, who would normally be allowed to vote in the European elections will not be allowed to vote.....

over 18's only... although you are going to see a huge push from labour/snp and all to get this reduced to 16... but the conservatives are dead against this...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rank_SimoneCouple
over a year ago

Bideford

Personally no one should get a vote on the EU, I don't believe in it and for these reasons.

The powers to be are sitting and watching, so when DC goes cap in hand and asks for concessions they will say fk off, you might not be here next year so we aint going to give you anything.

They will wait until the outcome, and if its a No vote we will still get fk all.

They will then say fk off you lost the vote we have the power, so you voted to except it.

We will weaken our position in the EU with this referendum.

This decision I am afraid should be left to the party in charge, and before any one says I am not a Tory and have never voted for them in my 38 years of being able to vote.

But they have been elected to govern whether we like it or not so let them get on with it.

Internal suabbling will only weaken our position.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"we found out today what is going to be proposed over who is allowed to vote... basically anyone who can vote in a general election

UK, Ireland and Commonwealth citizens (including cypriot uk and maltese uk) UK Nationals who have been overseas for less than 15 years

EU citizens living here in the UK, who would normally be allowed to vote in the European elections will not be allowed to vote.....

over 18's only... although you are going to see a huge push from labour/snp and all to get this reduced to 16... but the conservatives are dead against this...

"

.

Huh I actually agree with everything that Cameron has purposed for once

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"we found out today what is going to be proposed over who is allowed to vote... basically anyone who can vote in a general election

UK, Ireland and Commonwealth citizens (including cypriot uk and maltese uk) UK Nationals who have been overseas for less than 15 years

EU citizens living here in the UK, who would normally be allowed to vote in the European elections will not be allowed to vote.....

over 18's only... although you are going to see a huge push from labour/snp and all to get this reduced to 16... but the conservatives are dead against this...

.

Huh I actually agree with everything that Cameron has purposed for once "

i think 16 and 17 year olds should get the chance to vote on this... its their immediate future on the line and this is going to be one of those "chances in a generation" things to vote on

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"we found out today what is going to be proposed over who is allowed to vote... basically anyone who can vote in a general election

UK, Ireland and Commonwealth citizens (including cypriot uk and maltese uk) UK Nationals who have been overseas for less than 15 years

EU citizens living here in the UK, who would normally be allowed to vote in the European elections will not be allowed to vote.....

over 18's only... although you are going to see a huge push from labour/snp and all to get this reduced to 16... but the conservatives are dead against this...

.

Huh I actually agree with everything that Cameron has purposed for once

i think 16 and 17 year olds should get the chance to vote on this... its their immediate future on the line and this is going to be one of those "chances in a generation" things to vote on"

.

Its a tricky one but I think 18 is about right, I mean we withhold cigarettes and alcohol and a driving licence from them for a reason I guess,I don't doubt there's plenty of 16-18 who would be mature enough to grasp it.

Like I said it's tricky but I think 18 is about right

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

The conservatives are restricting votes from those who have lived abroad 15 years or more. Even though these may be most affected, if they have to move back here, due to loss of rights to live in their foreign country.

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The conservatives are restricting votes from those who have lived abroad 15 years or more. Even though these may be most affected, if they have to move back here, due to loss of rights to live in their foreign country.

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere."

18 makes more sense 16 it's just too easily lead.

Which is the whole reason the snp wanted them voting.

For me if rather see a renegotiation of terms than an exit. But then my company is very integrated to the EU to the point either special circumstances would have to be set up for us to continue to operate or we may be screwed.

So I'd personal vote to stay in because it's very important to my work.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally no one should get a vote on the EU, I don't believe in it and for these reasons.

The powers to be are sitting and watching, so when DC goes cap in hand and asks for concessions they will say fk off, you might not be here next year so we aint going to give you anything.

They will wait until the outcome, and if its a No vote we will still get fk all.

They will then say fk off you lost the vote we have the power, so you voted to except it.

We will weaken our position in the EU with this referendum.

This decision I am afraid should be left to the party in charge, and before any one says I am not a Tory and have never voted for them in my 38 years of being able to vote.

But they have been elected to govern whether we like it or not so let them get on with it.

Internal suabbling will only weaken our position."

When you say "cap in hand" you mean "with that years giant sack of money to give" right?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree with the terms that have been set out, it seems right that it should be for people normally registered to vote in a General Election here. I don't think we should extend it to 16. If the voting age is to be lowered to 16 in future I think it ought to be on the back of a more considered approach than just "Scotland did it". Now the wrangling over the date and the phrasing of the question can begin!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere."

not quite true

that was a special part of the referendum bill that allowed the voting age to be reduced to 16.... and they are going to legistlate for it as part of the next scottish elections

other than that all "normal" elections are still 18...

however.... see how much it engaged 16-17 year olds in politics in scotland, i would love to see the same thing happen in the rest of the uk... and i think they should get to vote in the uk....

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I agree with the terms that have been set out, it seems right that it should be for people normally registered to vote in a General Election here. I don't think we should extend it to 16. If the voting age is to be lowered to 16 in future I think it ought to be on the back of a more considered approach than just "Scotland did it". Now the wrangling over the date and the phrasing of the question can begin!"

Yes it's funny how it's pushed on these referendums but never thought about for general elections.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *rank_SimoneCouple
over a year ago

Bideford


"Personally no one should get a vote on the EU, I don't believe in it and for these reasons.

The powers to be are sitting and watching, so when DC goes cap in hand and asks for concessions they will say fk off, you might not be here next year so we aint going to give you anything.

They will wait until the outcome, and if its a No vote we will still get fk all.

They will then say fk off you lost the vote we have the power, so you voted to except it.

We will weaken our position in the EU with this referendum.

This decision I am afraid should be left to the party in charge, and before any one says I am not a Tory and have never voted for them in my 38 years of being able to vote.

But they have been elected to govern whether we like it or not so let them get on with it.

Internal suabbling will only weaken our position.

When you say "cap in hand" you mean "with that years giant sack of money to give" right?"

I mean we will have less bargaining power with a referendum hanging over the country, so Yes DC will not be able to reduce the money we give to the EU for nothing, or bring in tighter immigration rules for EU members etc.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *arry247Couple
over a year ago

Wakefield

Only UK Nationals living in the UK.

People born in Scotland but living in England were not given the chance to vote in the Referendum, why should those people living outside of the UK be given the rightto vote in an in out EU referendum?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *landAnnCouple
over a year ago

Inverness


"Where you live is irrelevant.

It's a decision that effects all UK nationals, the uk belongs to UK citizens everywhere!

So why didn't the English, Welsh and Northern Irish get a say in the Scottish independence vote?

If - as you say - the UK belongs to UK citizens everywhere?

A"

__________________________________

So... by the same reckoning, are you suggesting that ALL countries in the EU should be given a vote on whether the UK remains part of the EU...??

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone who's a UK citizen and is eligible to work. Seems only right that if you pay your taxes you should be able to vote on issues like this

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central


"... why should those people living outside of the UK be given the rightto vote in an in out EU referendum?"

What about because they may only have the ability to live in a European country because we're an EU member? They could lose their right to live in their new home, sell their house, lose job etc, because of this vote? That's potentially a bigger financial and life burden than many here may face.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *inkyHnSCouple
over a year ago

The Council of Elrond


"

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere.

not quite true

that was a special part of the referendum bill that allowed the voting age to be reduced to 16.... and they are going to legistlate for it as part of the next scottish elections

other than that all "normal" elections are still 18...

however.... see how much it engaged 16-17 year olds in politics in scotland, i would love to see the same thing happen in the rest of the uk... and i think they should get to vote in the uk...."

I totally agree its there futures too just as much as everyone in UK so they should have the right to vote.

Although with this EU referendum it has to be fair because unless

England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland each vote to leave the EU, then the UK should remain a member state.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere.

not quite true

that was a special part of the referendum bill that allowed the voting age to be reduced to 16.... and they are going to legistlate for it as part of the next scottish elections

other than that all "normal" elections are still 18...

however.... see how much it engaged 16-17 year olds in politics in scotland, i would love to see the same thing happen in the rest of the uk... and i think they should get to vote in the uk....

I totally agree its there futures too just as much as everyone in UK so they should have the right to vote.

Although with this EU referendum it has to be fair because unless

England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland each vote to leave the EU, then the UK should remain a member state."

If 16 year olds are allowed to work and pay taxes they should be allowed to vote.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Personally no one should get a vote on the EU, I don't believe in it and for these reasons.

The powers to be are sitting and watching, so when DC goes cap in hand and asks for concessions they will say fk off, you might not be here next year so we aint going to give you anything.

They will wait until the outcome, and if its a No vote we will still get fk all.

They will then say fk off you lost the vote we have the power, so you voted to except it.

We will weaken our position in the EU with this referendum.

This decision I am afraid should be left to the party in charge, and before any one says I am not a Tory and have never voted for them in my 38 years of being able to vote.

But they have been elected to govern whether we like it or not so let them get on with it.

Internal suabbling will only weaken our position.

When you say "cap in hand" you mean "with that years giant sack of money to give" right?

I mean we will have less bargaining power with a referendum hanging over the country, so Yes DC will not be able to reduce the money we give to the EU for nothing, or bring in tighter immigration rules for EU members etc.

"

We will have more bargaining power because they will be wanting to soften up the population.

You don't piss off the people who are about to vote to fuck your entire system up if they choose to leave.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out."

It would be very unlikely that any eu country wouldn't grant visas to uk citizens during the several years it took to sort out the with drawl.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out."

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"

Seems unfair to Scots residents who could vote from 16. Id make it 16 everywhere.

not quite true

that was a special part of the referendum bill that allowed the voting age to be reduced to 16.... and they are going to legistlate for it as part of the next scottish elections

other than that all "normal" elections are still 18...

however.... see how much it engaged 16-17 year olds in politics in scotland, i would love to see the same thing happen in the rest of the uk... and i think they should get to vote in the uk....

I totally agree its there futures too just as much as everyone in UK so they should have the right to vote.

Although with this EU referendum it has to be fair because unless

England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland each vote to leave the EU, then the UK should remain a member state.

If 16 year olds are allowed to work and pay taxes they should be allowed to vote."

Should they be allowed to buy alcohol? Where do you draw the line?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm still wondering why the English didn't get a vote regarding independence from Scotland."

Because there was never any vote on England getting independence from Scotland..hard to register a vote under such circumstances, however if your referring to Scotlands referendum on independence from England,then the reason they didn't get to vote is because they aren't Scottish..pretty self explanatory really

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If 16 year olds are allowed to work and pay taxes they should be allowed to vote.

Should they be allowed to buy alcohol? Where do you draw the line?"

If you pay taxes you should have the right to say how those taxes are spent. I can't see how alcohol relates to that central issue... unless you're hoping to make even more tax off em

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"If we get this referendum, who should be eligible to vote?

British nationals resident here plus abroad? Any resident here, including EU citizens etc? The results could have massive consequences for all of them, uprooting their homes, financial losses etc."

It does not matter anyway. We will remain in the EU and in my opinion the vote will not even be close. As for the points based immigration system that is often talked about.... How many points would be needed to be a waitress, barman or hotel cleaner? Indeed how many points would be needed to do the jobs that native Brits just won't do?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If we get this referendum, who should be eligible to vote?

British nationals resident here plus abroad? Any resident here, including EU citizens etc? The results could have massive consequences for all of them, uprooting their homes, financial losses etc.

It does not matter anyway. We will remain in the EU and in my opinion the vote will not even be close. As for the points based immigration system that is often talked about.... How many points would be needed to be a waitress, barman or hotel cleaner? Indeed how many points would be needed to do the jobs that native Brits just won't do?

"

jobs that native brits just wont do..? lol iv heard that one 1000s of times..its bollocks

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"If we get this referendum, who should be eligible to vote?

British nationals resident here plus abroad? Any resident here, including EU citizens etc? The results could have massive consequences for all of them, uprooting their homes, financial losses etc.

It does not matter anyway. We will remain in the EU and in my opinion the vote will not even be close. As for the points based immigration system that is often talked about.... How many points would be needed to be a waitress, barman or hotel cleaner? Indeed how many points would be needed to do the jobs that native Brits just won't do?

jobs that native brits just wont do..? lol iv heard that one 1000s of times..its bollocks"

So you don't remember when Britains service sector was just a complete joke? EU immigration has transformed service standards in the bar/restaurant/hotel sector and as for cleaning....

If a native Brit is not getting a job in a bar or a restaurant because someone from another country got it instead, then they must just be crap. What other reason would there be to give someone the job who has not been in the country five minutes and who doesn't speak the language properly? Hospitality jobs have always been low paid do it is nothing to do with low wages.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

It would be very unlikely that any eu country wouldn't grant visas to uk citizens during the several years it took to sort out the with drawl. "

It may or may not be unlikely but it won't be guaranteed.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nleashedCrakenMan
over a year ago

Widnes


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders. "

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU."

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

It would be very unlikely that any eu country wouldn't grant visas to uk citizens during the several years it took to sort out the with drawl.

It may or may not be unlikely but it won't be guaranteed."

Of course it won't be but during the year + negotiation they will be more than able to apply through the countries visa system and unless they're absolute wasters they will succeed.

People seem to think it will be "right votes are in throw everyone out at once!!!" It's going to be a very long process.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If 16 year olds are allowed to work and pay taxes they should be allowed to vote.

Should they be allowed to buy alcohol? Where do you draw the line?

If you pay taxes you should have the right to say how those taxes are spent. I can't see how alcohol relates to that central issue... unless you're hoping to make even more tax off em "

Children pay taxes though if they do a paper round and buy some sweets they've paid vat.

If they spend thier pocket money on some toys they've paid tax ...

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system. "

What's wrong with the existing UK points based immigration system?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system.

What's wrong with the existing UK points based immigration system?"

The problem is with the EU as we are in it we have to abide by free movement of people rules, which in effect means we have no control of our borders.

Cameron is just skirting around the key issue with the proposals he is putting forward, the key issue with the EU is free movement of people, he needs to face upto it and thats what he needs a new deal on.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system.

What's wrong with the existing UK points based immigration system?

The problem is with the EU as we are in it we have to abide by free movement of people rules, which in effect means we have no control of our borders.

Cameron is just skirting around the key issue with the proposals he is putting forward, the key issue with the EU is free movement of people, he needs to face upto it and thats what he needs a new deal on. "

That's not the question. What's wrong with our own UK points based immigration system? More than half of of migrants get in with it, so why would we need another one from Australia?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system.

What's wrong with the existing UK points based immigration system?

The problem is with the EU as we are in it we have to abide by free movement of people rules, which in effect means we have no control of our borders.

Cameron is just skirting around the key issue with the proposals he is putting forward, the key issue with the EU is free movement of people, he needs to face upto it and thats what he needs a new deal on.

That's not the question. What's wrong with our own UK points based immigration system? More than half of of migrants get in with it, so why would we need another one from Australia?"

I would suggest the UK one needs tightening up, as the immigration figures that came out this week were an embarrassment for the government. Immigration from outside the EU needs to come down, and the free movement of people in the EU issue needs dealing with. We cannot continue to take in 300,000 plus new arrivals every year, there is limited space here and limited infrastructure.

The tories want to bring immigration down to less than 100,000 per annum, the current system won't allow them to do that.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Funny how I started this thread a couple of weeks ago and now the tories bring it up: are they scanning Fab, alongside Sydney?

Before the election, the Conservative chairman had said voting should be open to all Brits living abroad. It's now watered down to 15 years. Funny how things get changed, once in power

Any Brits forced to repatriate to the UK won't be voting Conservative so readily in future.

It does seem sensible to get the referendum out of the way quickly, as it being uncertain will negatively affect our economy.

In the meantime, anyone looking at those queues for non EU citizens, after landing at airports in passport control, might consider how you'd like to queue in them, if the vote goes for out.

I'd be happy to que in them if it means getting back control of our own borders.

Which we wont because in order to sign up for EFTA (European Free Trade Area), which is UKIP's policy, you have to implement the same or similar trade and immigration rules as the EU.

That would have to be negotiated in a new deal. Ukip's policy is to implement an Australian points based immigration system.

What's wrong with the existing UK points based immigration system?

The problem is with the EU as we are in it we have to abide by free movement of people rules, which in effect means we have no control of our borders.

Cameron is just skirting around the key issue with the proposals he is putting forward, the key issue with the EU is free movement of people, he needs to face upto it and thats what he needs a new deal on.

That's not the question. What's wrong with our own UK points based immigration system? More than half of of migrants get in with it, so why would we need another one from Australia?

I would suggest the UK one needs tightening up, as the immigration figures that came out this week were an embarrassment for the government. Immigration from outside the EU needs to come down, and the free movement of people in the EU issue needs dealing with. We cannot continue to take in 300,000 plus new arrivals every year, there is limited space here and limited infrastructure.

The tories want to bring immigration down to less than 100,000 per annum, the current system won't allow them to do that. "

That's a pity, because the UK's points based system is based on the Australian system. So going back to Australia and borrowing exactly the same thing from them again isn't going to do the trick. It's already busting that immigration target wide open before we even start to think of EU migrants.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West

Whilst I understand why some people perceive that immigration is a great danger to our society.... I don't see it that way. I understand that there are as many Brits living and working abroad as their are foreign workers in the EU.

If the country is doing well and creating jobs, why would we not want people taking those jobs and expanding the economy? We have imported a good couple of million workers from the EU over the last decade and by all accounts these people are net contributors to the economy. The last thing we need is people leaving because there are no jobs!

On a more local level where I live, a corner of a traffic light junction has been derelict for the last twenty years and over the last two years Polish people have bought up the property and transformed it into a large supermarket and a furniture store with flats above. I like the cultural differences that are developing and I appreciate the great, great variety of cured meats that I can now buy just around the corner.

Personally, I believe that it is perceived benefits/welfare abuse that winds people up and that should be easy to fix. I would personally have no problem retaining the free movement of goods and people that comes with continued membership of the EU. I think it is a tremendous privilege that any Brit can rock up in Amsterdam, Nice, Barcelona or Berlin and live and work there without any let or hinderence.

I understand that a significant number of Brits could never countenance the thought of living in a country where people don't speak English... But many people do cherish that right and they act on it and enrich their lives as a consequence.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Whilst I understand why some people perceive that immigration is a great danger to our society.... I don't see it that way. I understand that there are as many Brits living and working abroad as their are foreign workers in the EU.

If the country is doing well and creating jobs, why would we not want people taking those jobs and expanding the economy? We have imported a good couple of million workers from the EU over the last decade and by all accounts these people are net contributors to the economy. The last thing we need is people leaving because there are no jobs!

On a more local level where I live, a corner of a traffic light junction has been derelict for the last twenty years and over the last two years Polish people have bought up the property and transformed it into a large supermarket and a furniture store with flats above. I like the cultural differences that are developing and I appreciate the great, great variety of cured meats that I can now buy just around the corner.

Personally, I believe that it is perceived benefits/welfare abuse that winds people up and that should be easy to fix. I would personally have no problem retaining the free movement of goods and people that comes with continued membership of the EU. I think it is a tremendous privilege that any Brit can rock up in Amsterdam, Nice, Barcelona or Berlin and live and work there without any let or hinderence.

I understand that a significant number of Brits could never countenance the thought of living in a country where people don't speak English... But many people do cherish that right and they act on it and enrich their lives as a consequence. "

^^This

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"If we get this referendum, who should be eligible to vote?

British nationals resident here plus abroad? Any resident here, including EU citizens etc? The results could have massive consequences for all of them, uprooting their homes, financial losses etc.

It does not matter anyway. We will remain in the EU and in my opinion the vote will not even be close. As for the points based immigration system that is often talked about.... How many points would be needed to be a waitress, barman or hotel cleaner? Indeed how many points would be needed to do the jobs that native Brits just won't do?

jobs that native brits just wont do..? lol iv heard that one 1000s of times..its bollocks

So you don't remember when Britains service sector was just a complete joke? EU immigration has transformed service standards in the bar/restaurant/hotel sector and as for cleaning....

If a native Brit is not getting a job in a bar or a restaurant because someone from another country got it instead, then they must just be crap. What other reason would there be to give someone the job who has not been in the country five minutes and who doesn't speak the language properly? Hospitality jobs have always been low paid do it is nothing to do with low wages."

Low paid is nothing to do with low wages???????

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Let's get some reality on the situation.

Before the eu freedom of movement act (the principle I'm in favour of) people still went on holiday, people still worked abroad, people still emigrated and immigrated and if we leave the eu, that will still go on.

This notion that somehow were erecting a iron curtain is ridiculous, 9 hour queues at airports for a weekend away, my God get a grip.

The real crux of the issue is whether the freedom of movement for 400 million people is realistic and sustainable!

Personally I don't think it is unless you have complete integration monetarily and politically!

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Let's get some reality on the situation.

Before the eu freedom of movement act (the principle I'm in favour of) people still went on holiday, people still worked abroad, people still emigrated and immigrated and if we leave the eu, that will still go on.

This notion that somehow were erecting a iron curtain is ridiculous, 9 hour queues at airports for a weekend away, my God get a grip.

The real crux of the issue is whether the freedom of movement for 400 million people is realistic and sustainable!

Personally I don't think it is unless you have complete integration monetarily and politically!

"

No iron curtain? Where are the sentry towers going then?

As for 9 hour queues at airports - are you suggesting that average delays will be reduced?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

Is it the plan that those already here who wouldn't pass the points test should be sent home?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nobody would be sent home.

I think Cameron has the 15 year rule for people living abroad because after that period you'd be considered for naturalisation anyhow so our vote wouldn't really bother you!

You could find that net immigration would be just as high regardless of controls on it, after all it was government policy to encourage it or why else didn't they impose the same exclusions as Germany did?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

If nobody is to be sent home, the 'problem' of "too many bloody foreigners" is just going to continue and, in the minds of some Brits, get worse.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *razedcatMan
over a year ago

London / Herts


"

The real crux of the issue is whether the freedom of movement for 400 million people is realistic and sustainable!

Personally I don't think it is unless you have complete integration monetarily and politically!

"

I could not have said it better myself. And the European Union is the first step towards total integration.

On the substantive issue of whether or not we should remain in the EU, I think a lot of people fail to appreciate the importance of integration throughout human history. We now live in an era of supranational and pseudo-Federalist institutions, unthinkable a few centuries ago. And looking further back still, we were once made up of nomadic tribes, failing to unite even under national banners.

Our increasingly globalised world demands integration. However, religious and socio-economic tensions are obstacles. Before we fully integrate, we must overcome the problems of religious fundamentalism and the disparities of wealth across the world.

The European Union is a perfectly serviceable institution fit for our times.

On a legal note, I would also add that even if we did leave the EU, our obligations to asylum seekers and refugees under international human rights law would remain the same. I mention them because they tend to be brought up in anti-integration rhetoric.

What's more, The European Convention on Human Rights, and the legislation that transposes it into domestic law, the Human Rights Act, would still be in operation (unless we do end up with this so-called "British Bill of Rights").

I feel people often associate our membership with the EU with these wholly separate issues.

On the procedural issue of who should vote, anyone who is substantially affected by the result of such a referendum should be allowed to vote. The British citizen watermark seems fair to me, as citizenship indicates a (wait for it) great level of integration into the United Kingdom.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *oo hotCouple
over a year ago

North West


"If nobody is to be sent home, the 'problem' of "too many bloody foreigners" is just going to continue and, in the minds of some Brits, get worse."

Don't worry. Britain will not leave the EU

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I agree, we wont be leaving the EU. Theres too much big money around that wont want us out.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By *ophieslut OP   TV/TS
over a year ago

Central

How come the Tories hijacked my thread idea? Open for 2 weeks and they jump on the bandwagon. Do they monitor the forum as the voice of the people?

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If nobody is to be sent home, the 'problem' of "too many bloody foreigners" is just going to continue and, in the minds of some Brits, get worse.

Don't worry. Britain will not leave the EU"

.

I know it ruins your favourite line of "the great British public" but to be fair to northern Ireland it's the UK.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They managed to break one of their manifesto promises without even a hint of embarrassment:

We will complete the electoral register, by working to include more of the five million Britons who live abroad. We will introduce votes for

life, scrapping the rule that bars British citizens who have lived abroad for more than 15 years from voting.

 (closed, thread got too big)

Reply privately
back to top