FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Spider Letters

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

It seems the twenty or so letters written by the Prince of Wales to government ministers (of the time) will be released today.

The Palace tried to get the publication of the letters stopped. If you or I were to write to a public official the correspondence becomes a public document under the Freedom of information Act.

Legal fees incurred by the Government in trying to stop the publication are estimated to be £300k. Is this one law for the Royals and one for the great unwashed?

Lets see whats in the letters which will be heavily redacted no doubt!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. "
Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vgloryholebs16TV/TS
over a year ago

Bristol.

Cos he's a prince.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Cos he's a prince....."
Ah got it now.................silly (republican) me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Why 'spider'?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Why 'spider'? "
His hand writing looks like a spider has crawled across the page, evidently!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They should print all the stuff about peadophile ministers...oh yeah it disappeared. Surprised the royals haven't used the same secrecy laws as the cover-ups.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?"

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel n tedCouple
over a year ago

maidstone


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days"

these, sorry, i'm not smeagol really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days

these, sorry, i'm not smeagol really "

wish there was more smeagols on here though, that made me laugh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?"

They are not being treated differently , they are being published.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?"
To highlight that a non elected future head of state was trying to influence government policy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

They are not being treated differently , they are being published. "
They are now but the government wanted to suppress information that should be made available.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

They are not being treated differently , they are being published. They are now but the government wanted to suppress information that should be made available."

But they couldn't , so no one is being treated differently.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Agreed.

The issue is I believe why the future monarch is trying to influence government policy which is out side his constitutional role?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top