Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought HSBC were moving their HQ from London to Birmingham, in a a report last month? " That's what I read. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's nothing more than blustet because they want to influence people's votes. " What a coincidence that this comes to light less than 2 weeks before the election. The letter from 100 business people (Tory stooges) was in the same vein. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1, considering we had to bail out banks at vast expense, I'm not convinced them moving to another jurisdiction is a total disaster. 2, you post a lot of Tory related stuff, OP, but I'm suspecting it is merely a clever smokescreen and you are in reality a member of The Worker's revolutionary Party " 'Some' banks. HSBC wasn't one of them. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought HSBC were moving their HQ from London to Birmingham, in a a report last month? " Londoners think that Birmingham is abroad lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the straw has now broken the camels back and the UK wide anti-banking rhetoric has finally resulted in a bank taking action and looking to move to a more bank friendly jurisdiction. This under a relatively bank friendly conservative led coalition government! Is this the beginning of the end of London being a worldwide financial centre? I personally hope not as the taxes paid into UK coffers by the baks and their fat cats makes up an irrecoverable amount of money that gets paid to the Treasury. Unfortunately with expressions like "tax on bankers bonuses" and "bank levy's" being bandied around during this campaign - I suspect that the days of London as a major financial centre will be numbered. Ah, well never mind. We can always go back to sending 15 year old boys hundreds of feet underground to get coal. " . The success of banks is important to all of us . The amounts paid as a bonus to Directors are totally irrelevant in the overall scheme of things . Unto recently , dividends from banks were an important part of income for most pension funds . Let's all hope for a substantial recovery in the share prices of banks . Many peoples pensions are partly dependant on this. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's nothing more than blustet because they want to influence people's votes. What a coincidence that this comes to light less than 2 weeks before the election. The letter from 100 business people (Tory stooges) was in the same vein. " Yes of course. Todays shareholder meeting by a public company to discuss this is nothing more than a ploy to affect the election.... Yeh right. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the straw has now broken the camels back and the UK wide anti-banking rhetoric has finally resulted in a bank taking action and looking to move to a more bank friendly jurisdiction. This under a relatively bank friendly conservative led coalition government! Is this the beginning of the end of London being a worldwide financial centre? I personally hope not as the taxes paid into UK coffers by the baks and their fat cats makes up an irrecoverable amount of money that gets paid to the Treasury. Unfortunately with expressions like "tax on bankers bonuses" and "bank levy's" being bandied around during this campaign - I suspect that the days of London as a major financial centre will be numbered. Ah, well never mind. We can always go back to sending 15 year old boys hundreds of feet underground to get coal. . The success of banks is important to all of us . The amounts paid as a bonus to Directors are totally irrelevant in the overall scheme of things . Unto recently , dividends from banks were an important part of income for most pension funds . Let's all hope for a substantial recovery in the share prices of banks . Many peoples pensions are partly dependant on this. " . Most peoples pensions were ruined by the crap debt rolled up into "assets" by hsbc and sold to pension companies! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought HSBC were moving their HQ from London to Birmingham, in a a report last month? Londoners think that Birmingham is abroad lol" Is it not? They all talk funny there. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1, considering we had to bail out banks at vast expense, I'm not convinced them moving to another jurisdiction is a total disaster. 2, you post a lot of Tory related stuff, OP, but I'm suspecting it is merely a clever smokescreen and you are in reality a member of The Worker's revolutionary Party " 1) HSBC was not bailed out. It is the largest bank in the world and last year the bank paid £1.1billion in Corporation tax alone. Let alone direct taxes from employees working at its Corporate HQ. 2) This decision has been taken under a conservative led government so I can hardly be accused of only putting spin on pro conservative stories. The point is that there has been incrreasing anti banking rhetoric over recent years and it shows no sign of slowing down. London's financial centre contributes massively to UK tax receipts and many peoples pensions and savings are linked directly and indirectly to big banks so we just need to be careful what we wish for. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1, considering we had to bail out banks at vast expense, I'm not convinced them moving to another jurisdiction is a total disaster. 2, you post a lot of Tory related stuff, OP, but I'm suspecting it is merely a clever smokescreen and you are in reality a member of The Worker's revolutionary Party 1) HSBC was not bailed out. It is the largest bank in the world and last year the bank paid £1.1billion in Corporation tax alone. Let alone direct taxes from employees working at its Corporate HQ. 2) This decision has been taken under a conservative led government so I can hardly be accused of only putting spin on pro conservative stories. The point is that there has been incrreasing anti banking rhetoric over recent years and it shows no sign of slowing down. London's financial centre contributes massively to UK tax receipts and many peoples pensions and savings are linked directly and indirectly to big banks so we just need to be careful what we wish for. " . There corporation tax bill is nothing compared to there fines for illegal activities. There fine by the us for money laundering was 2 billion! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There moving to colmore buissness park in brum " And that is when we are likely to see HSBC UK go back to being Midland Bank. The story is about the proposal being discussed by shareholders today about re-locating the cosproate HQ outside of the UK. Reuters "All HSBC has officially said on the future of its UK retail business is that the ‘ring-fenced’ operations are to move to Birmingham, shifting around 1,000 jobs from London to the second city by 2017. Observers believe the decamping is a precursor to spinning them out as a separate entity. Given the Midland’s roots in Birmingham – its precursor was set up on Union Street in 1836 – the shift is also deeply symbolic. The speculation comes at a time when there is already a question mark over whether HSBC will maintain its headquarters in this country. This has become more and more uncomfortable because of the levy on bank balance sheets which falls disproportionately on HSBC. The current cost is $1.1billion (£730million)– and that could rise by as much as 20 per cent due to an increase in the recent budget. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"1, considering we had to bail out banks at vast expense, I'm not convinced them moving to another jurisdiction is a total disaster. 2, you post a lot of Tory related stuff, OP, but I'm suspecting it is merely a clever smokescreen and you are in reality a member of The Worker's revolutionary Party 1) HSBC was not bailed out. It is the largest bank in the world and last year the bank paid £1.1billion in Corporation tax alone. Let alone direct taxes from employees working at its Corporate HQ. 2) This decision has been taken under a conservative led government so I can hardly be accused of only putting spin on pro conservative stories. The point is that there has been incrreasing anti banking rhetoric over recent years and it shows no sign of slowing down. London's financial centre contributes massively to UK tax receipts and many peoples pensions and savings are linked directly and indirectly to big banks so we just need to be careful what we wish for. . There corporation tax bill is nothing compared to there fines for illegal activities. There fine by the us for money laundering was 2 billion!" . Oh and I forgot the 2.6 billion the five banks paid for rigging libor of which hsbc was the ring leader! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" 1) HSBC was not bailed out. It is the largest bank in the world and last year the bank paid £1.1billion in Corporation tax alone. Let alone direct taxes from employees working at its Corporate HQ. " Strange, HSBC Holdings plc results show a corporation tax payment to the UK of $69m, $15m of which were adjustments for previous years, in 2014. I can see that they paid £1.1bn for the period of 4 years from 2009 to 2012 from Thisismoney. Do you have a link by any chance for the £1.1bn in 2014? I could be looking at the wrong thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" 1) HSBC was not bailed out. It is the largest bank in the world and last year the bank paid £1.1billion in Corporation tax alone. Let alone direct taxes from employees working at its Corporate HQ. Strange, HSBC Holdings plc results show a corporation tax payment to the UK of $69m, $15m of which were adjustments for previous years, in 2014. I can see that they paid £1.1bn for the period of 4 years from 2009 to 2012 from Thisismoney. Do you have a link by any chance for the £1.1bn in 2014? I could be looking at the wrong thing. " You are correct, I misread the "this is money" article. £1.1 billion over a four year period. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the straw has now broken the camels back and the UK wide anti-banking rhetoric has finally resulted in a bank taking action and looking to move to a more bank friendly jurisdiction. This under a relatively bank friendly conservative led coalition government! Is this the beginning of the end of London being a worldwide financial centre? I personally hope not as the taxes paid into UK coffers by the baks and their fat cats makes up an irrecoverable amount of money that gets paid to the Treasury. Unfortunately with expressions like "tax on bankers bonuses" and "bank levy's" being bandied around during this campaign - I suspect that the days of London as a major financial centre will be numbered. Ah, well never mind. We can always go back to sending 15 year old boys hundreds of feet underground to get coal. " Goodness, you can't even tell a fib straight, can you? Anti-bank rhetoric, you say! What you consider to be anti-bank rhetoric, most reasonable people consider to be observing criminality. From the BBC: 'HSBC's profit dropped 17% in 2014. HSBC blamed its "challenging year" on the $2.4bn it was forced to pay in fines and settlements in relation to foreign exchange manipulation and mis-selling of payment protection insurance. The scandal-hit bank has also faced allegations that it helped people evade UK tax using hidden HSBC accounts in Geneva.' We must try harder to be nicer to these rich criminals! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The papers will be dropping bombs over the next couple of weeks. If HSBC want to fuck off, I'm happy to drive them to the airport. This is just election blah blah. " As a matter of interest. What has it got to do with the election? You are not the first person to say it but I cant see any connection whatsoever to the election. It is a non political story. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I thought HSBC were moving their HQ from London to Birmingham, in a a report last month? " To be fair, to Londoners, Birmingham IS another country. Mrs ddc once uttered the immortal words (when coming home from visiting her family) "It's amazing how far north Watford Gap actually is" HSBC started as an Asian bank, and are worried more about the implications about leaving the EU. So their review is actually a feint against Cameron rather than Milliband. (According to the press I read) Mr ddc | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It is a non political story." I don't think that's clear yet. The levy on bank balance sheets seems to be one of the biggest possible reasons for the move. For all I know, the shareholders could feel their ROI is best served from outside the UK if the banks will be made to pay more. Not all political statements have to be overt, but that doesn't mean they're not being made. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks like the straw has now broken the camels back and the UK wide anti-banking rhetoric has finally resulted in a bank taking action and looking to move to a more bank friendly jurisdiction. This under a relatively bank friendly conservative led coalition government! Is this the beginning of the end of London being a worldwide financial centre? I personally hope not as the taxes paid into UK coffers by the baks and their fat cats makes up an irrecoverable amount of money that gets paid to the Treasury. Unfortunately with expressions like "tax on bankers bonuses" and "bank levy's" being bandied around during this campaign - I suspect that the days of London as a major financial centre will be numbered. Ah, well never mind. We can always go back to sending 15 year old boys hundreds of feet underground to get coal. Goodness, you can't even tell a fib straight, can you? Anti-bank rhetoric, you say! What you consider to be anti-bank rhetoric, most reasonable people consider to be observing criminality. From the BBC: 'HSBC's profit dropped 17% in 2014. HSBC blamed its "challenging year" on the $2.4bn it was forced to pay in fines and settlements in relation to foreign exchange manipulation and mis-selling of payment protection insurance. The scandal-hit bank has also faced allegations that it helped people evade UK tax using hidden HSBC accounts in Geneva.' We must try harder to be nicer to these rich criminals!" Like any business of this size - don't forget it'll be about 1% of employees that are in such positions of power that they benefit from corruption, illegal practices, massive bonuses and huge salaries. The other 99%? Yeah - they deserve tarnishing with the quite frankly disgusting labels that the minority deserve don't they. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think if we get a party governing in coalition that supports a referendum, then the uncertainty in the business world, due to potential EU exit, is going to disrupt investment here. £millions is invested here, for example, by the Japanese - who could, for example, move car production etc over to the mainland. Why there hasn't been closer scrutiny on the potential fallout from a referendum has surprised me." I do agree with you about this. Having said that, I believe that Cameron is pro European and I think that between himself and the opposition parties they would easily influence the referendum result. That said, I doubt that there would be a referendum anyway without a conservative majority and that seems unlikely. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hmm. I don't suppose it would be too fastidious of me to say the General Election is only 3 weeks away. ...." You're right, it's not too fastidious to say that, as it's less than 2 weeks away. Or did you mean obvious? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |