Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"if you set a meet and they let you down the should be a post or forum were you can name them and shame them will help everyone who are genuine. just to help" There's a button for that somewhere...Under report profile I believe? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are waisters like hipsters? " Hipsters have beards....oh wait. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"if you set a meet and they let you down the should be a post or forum were you can name them and shame them will help everyone who are genuine. just to help" It seems like a good idea at first but people with a grudge would name and shame innocent people. It wouldn't work in practice. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"[Removed by poster at 20/04/15 11:13:23]" Ignore this "removed by poster" | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. " How? A | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. " it would still be abused by people when turned down. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. " How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? " Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section." Except when life gets in the way and one party has to cancel (work, childcare, illness etc.) the other may throw their toys out of the pram and label you a timewaster. There's no foolproof system. Hence better not to have one. A | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section." Bloody hell I'm here for sex not to arrange a conference call!! Too formal | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section." No strings drink arranged, both meet, one party keen to move to the next level, the other party thinks 'they're not my type' so no bedroom offer ensues. First party ego hurt, presses 'no show' in spite. So good idea, but system is still flawed. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are waisters like hipsters? " I thought the op was being 'fattist'! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section." You beat me to it, shot me down in my prime, curse you! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section." Agreed but what if there are genuine reasons that the person you're meeting doesn't accept? Eg many of us have children - and if cancel because your child's I'll, the other party could get sour grapes and click the no show button! However - I've been messed about/stood up as often as most people on here - and I'd love it if there was a way of getting rid of those who say they'll meet and cancel/don't turn up! Xx | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The best way would be an arrange meet function under the profile, both parties click it on each other and set the date and the system logs the meet. After the meet date you get some options. 1. User attended, leave veri. 2. User attended, don't wish to leave veri. 3. User did not attend, notified in advance. (this would give them a yellow flag) 4. User did not attend, did not notify (red flag, three red flags = ban) The beauty of this is you can't really set people up by making profiles and naming and shaming as both parties need to confirm there will be a meet. Wow that actually makes sense, damn I'm good " Many, many (and again!) many people manage to meet without a bunch of 'tools' on a website. If you need any of the site systems to be able to plan meets apart from messages then you're putting too much reliance on the site and absolving yourself from common sense and responsibility. How did people ever meet before the Internet! A | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The best way would be an arrange meet function under the profile, both parties click it on each other and set the date and the system logs the meet. After the meet date you get some options. 1. User attended, leave veri. 2. User attended, don't wish to leave veri. 3. User did not attend, notified in advance. (this would give them a yellow flag) 4. User did not attend, did not notify (red flag, three red flags = ban) The beauty of this is you can't really set people up by making profiles and naming and shaming as both parties need to confirm there will be a meet. Wow that actually makes sense, damn I'm good " What about the 'user attended but wouldn't lie back and open their legs when I wanted them to, so I'll give them a red flag' option? Damn, not quite so good as you think!? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Are waisters like hipsters? " It is either... A. Jackspeak (Naval term) for a hopeless rating only competent to work the waist of the ship. All useful sailors worked the complicated jobs. B. A misspelled waster... which is a corruption of the naval term. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The best way would be an arrange meet function under the profile, both parties click it on each other and set the date and the system logs the meet. After the meet date you get some options. 1. User attended, leave veri. 2. User attended, don't wish to leave veri. 3. User did not attend, notified in advance. (this would give them a yellow flag) 4. User did not attend, did not notify (red flag, three red flags = ban) The beauty of this is you can't really set people up by making profiles and naming and shaming as both parties need to confirm there will be a meet. Wow that actually makes sense, damn I'm good " bloody hell lol do we get marked down if we're a shit shag maybe a black flag? | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The best way would be an arrange meet function under the profile, both parties click it on each other and set the date and the system logs the meet. After the meet date you get some options. 1. User attended, leave veri. 2. User attended, don't wish to leave veri. 3. User did not attend, notified in advance. (this would give them a yellow flag) 4. User did not attend, did not notify (red flag, three red flags = ban) The beauty of this is you can't really set people up by making profiles and naming and shaming as both parties need to confirm there will be a meet. Wow that actually makes sense, damn I'm good What about the 'user attended but wouldn't lie back and open their legs when I wanted them to, so I'll give them a red flag' option? Damn, not quite so good as you think!? " | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section. Agreed but what if there are genuine reasons that the person you're meeting doesn't accept? Eg many of us have children - and if cancel because your child's I'll, the other party could get sour grapes and click the no show button! However - I've been messed about/stood up as often as most people on here - and I'd love it if there was a way of getting rid of those who say they'll meet and cancel/don't turn up! Xx" There is...report the profile, let Admin deal with it and move on | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The best way would be an arrange meet function under the profile, both parties click it on each other and set the date and the system logs the meet. After the meet date you get some options. 1. User attended, leave veri. 2. User attended, don't wish to leave veri. 3. User did not attend, notified in advance. (this would give them a yellow flag) 4. User did not attend, did not notify (red flag, three red flags = ban) The beauty of this is you can't really set people up by making profiles and naming and shaming as both parties need to confirm there will be a meet. Wow that actually makes sense, damn I'm good What about the 'user attended but wouldn't lie back and open their legs when I wanted them to, so I'll give them a red flag' option? Damn, not quite so good as you think!? " That's where personal judgement comes into it, no system is perfect. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"Why not have a 'no show' count on verification summaries? No other arbitrary details or comments. How would you stop anyone I've said 'not interested' to, from using the function out of spite? Or those who tell me I'm out of order for having preferences? Quite easily - a "meet" is arranged - both parties "accept" that meet by clicking on the button. A "No Show" can then be done in the same section. No strings drink arranged, both meet, one party keen to move to the next level, the other party thinks 'they're not my type' so no bedroom offer ensues. First party ego hurt, presses 'no show' in spite. So good idea, but system is still flawed." Or if I say 'let's meet for social first', other party thinks they're irresistible and it will turn into a play meet. They click the 'no show' button when they realise I do actually mean 'it's just a social'! Has happened on more than one occasion! I think such a system would be rather crass anyway. I'm here to make friends, not offer a service! | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Name & Shame forum room is only available to Platinum Members. You wouldn't belive the bitch session we have! lolz " You should hear what there saying about thingy. I didn't realise that was possible. | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
"The Name & Shame forum room is only available to Platinum Members. You wouldn't belive the bitch session we have! lolz You should hear what there saying about thingy. I didn't realise that was possible. " Just checked! Sweet baby Jesus thats is some sick shit!!! *faps* | |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(thread closed by moderator) |
Reply privately |
back to top |