FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Child benefit to be phased out (*) by 2013

Jump to newest
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

Act fast. Beat the deadline.

Place your orders for new kids here

(*) for higher rate tax payers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ah, see, it won't apply to us cos we're both earning under £44k but jointly c.£60k so we're safe. Phew!

... note to boss:

No pay rise this year please. It would only be £500 cos you're stingy bastards and I don't wanna go above the threshold. Ta.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX"

Because it's universal and they've contributed to the system. If the last govt hadn't stuffed things up we wouldn't be seeing these changes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *amschwingerzCouple
over a year ago

West


"About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX"

Cos they have worked, paid tax and deserve it in many cases..

But it pisses me off no end when families get it and spunk it up the wall on Bingo, fags and booze etc...a woman opposite us mentioned that we used to give our kids Walkers chrisps...saying about how expensive they were and she used to give her kids the cheapest of the cheap shit ones...at a time when her and her husband smoked 40 a day each!...cue one fucking major league mouthful from me...needless to say she doesnt talk to me anymore...

Good!

They should be given vouchers for food etc...not money...some people genuiely need it..and some are just poncers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX

Because it's universal and they've contributed to the system. If the last govt hadn't stuffed things up we wouldn't be seeing these changes."

Whether they've contributed or not,benefits are there to help the poorer members of society,not just to top up pin money for those that don't need it.

There was once a documentary about it some years ago.

A rich woman with the house,cars and lifestyle that went with it,said that she recieved it but felt she didn't need it and couldn't understand why it was paid to people with their income.

She thought the system was all wrong.

XXXX

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo


"About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX

Because it's universal and they've contributed to the system. If the last govt hadn't stuffed things up we wouldn't be seeing these changes."

Frigging hell Wishy, you will be blaming them for not getting a BJ a week next Thursday next !!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"About time too,I think it was Princess Michael who said she gave all her benefit to Barnardo's or N.S.P.C.C.

Fair play to her but why are people on that sort of income receiving it in the first place?

XXXX

Because it's universal and they've contributed to the system. If the last govt hadn't stuffed things up we wouldn't be seeing these changes.

Frigging hell Wishy, you will be blaming them for not getting a BJ a week next Thursday next !!

"

Good point. Thanks for reminding me!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Will wait for the thread started about the lack of BJ on the 14th October

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

Oi you lot, bugger off back to the existing political/economic thread.

This is for me to help with the creation of new claimables.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Will wait for the thread started about the lack of BJ on the 14th October "

Give em time, they'll have taxed it by then and Siren will glue her fookin lips shut to avoid paying it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Oi you lot, bugger off back to the existing political/economic thread.

This is for me to help with the creation of new claimables."

That comes under 'Productivity' and is subject to tax. Come on, fess up, how many already?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford

Orders taken for 6 this evening alone.

I'm on bonus if i produce twins or triplets.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You're only doing this to go halveses on the child benefit before it's scrapped. I see through you. tsk.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford


"You're only doing this to go halveses on the child benefit before it's scrapped. I see through you. tsk. "

NO. NO. NO. They can have the children and the cash. I just want the procreative benefit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"You're only doing this to go halveses on the child benefit before it's scrapped. I see through you. tsk.

NO. NO. NO. They can have the children and the cash. I just want the procreative benefit."

Isn't that called a marriage/mortgage!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ushroom7 OP   Man
over a year ago

Bradford


"You're only doing this to go halveses on the child benefit before it's scrapped. I see through you. tsk.

NO. NO. NO. They can have the children and the cash. I just want the procreative benefit.

Isn't that called a marriage/mortgage!"

Tut, you're thinking of divorce.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top