FabSwingers.com forum: 40 kids by 20 women

By *uby0000 OP Woman
over a year ago

hertfordshire

words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illyrocCouple
over a year ago

north west

And what a bunch of lookers they all are

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Did I miss a Jeremy Kyle episode?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uessWhosBackAgainMan
over a year ago

London

"words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?"

who's gonna stop them?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Are the kids poorly cared for?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?"

I think he should be made to pay for them all

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Are the kids poorly cared for? "

Just read the story it says a lot of them have been removed by social services and are in care

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

I know the Jamaican in it...lol no I never had sex with him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?

who's gonna stop them?

Exactly this.

What we are lucky to have here in the UK is freedom of choice, the flip side to that is there are fucking idiots who will take that to the extreme without a second thought about the consequences of exercising THAT freedom of choice.

This is an example of that.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Slacker!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *illyrocCouple
over a year ago

north west

[Removed by poster at 31/03/15 22:36:31]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oward1978Man
over a year ago

Rotherham

What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ain n MableWoman
over a year ago

Milton Keynes

Could be worse, could be 20 kids by 40 women!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uessWhosBackAgainMan
over a year ago

London

" In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth."

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

"What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth."

I wonder what pre or post natal checks would determine whether or not a man will be a 'wastrel'?!!?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's like picking the teams at school footie, you always end up with the same team-mates.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I like the way he says he dont believe in birth control but he does believe in having that many kids they can't be looked after and have to grow up in care

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

One word ~ Irresponsible.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm sorry but if a guy told me he had multiple kids by multiple men well Id be saying cya ...... How do these women fall for it .....

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Here's a couple revolutionary thoughts.

Yeah, it's a fact of modern life that every individual can do just exactly as they please, yeah?

But how many of these women would have knocked out those poor sprogs if they didn't receive a penny from the State?

Or alternatively, the poor sprogs appear to have dual nationality. Send half the benefit/care bill to the other nation?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

My cousin had about 17 kids before he was 20, he fucked a lot of very fertile women it seems. Or maybe some were lying and just said he was the dad? Was 20 years ago so not really any DNA tests then.

He's always worked, and always taken an interest in all his kids, but obviously never had enough money to look after them all (or time).

Can't really force anyone to keep their legs shut or not have kids or be forcibly sterilised. I don't think we should either.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

Saw the guys pic on the news, first thought was Frank Gallagher from Shameless.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As stated in here, its both parties fault here, theres 1 man, who's obviously showing attrocious behaviour, but there's also 20 women who will have unprotected sex when they aren't on contraception, or just want a baby.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"As stated in here, its both parties fault here, theres 1 man, who's obviously showing attrocious behaviour, but there's also 20 women who will have unprotected sex when they aren't on contraception, or just want a baby."

And its the children who suffer for their selfish and irresponsible behaviour

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is this the lad from the North East? I vaguely registered this being made into a programme or something, on social media earlier. If it is, the sadly he is like a local "hero" "news item" "dickhead" quite regularly. Words fail me. They really do.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?"

40 kids by 20 women = 2 each, doesn't it?

But haven't been up to date with tabloid stuff since I was a wee nipper (from a large family), sorry

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just watched it now, can't believe one guy had most of his 40 kids end up in care, that's scary.

At least a couple of the guys do bother with all their kids and seem to always have done, shame for the kids that a couple of the guys couldn't be bothered.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"words fail me do you think they should be allowed to carry on producing? what about the kids?

who's gonna stop them?

Trained marksmen?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

"What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth."

Pray tell how they'd test for the wastrel gene.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

"What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth.

I wonder what pre or post natal checks would determine whether or not a man will be a 'wastrel'?!!?

Indeed!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth.

Pray tell how they'd test for the wastrel gene.

I imagine given he said in an ideal world the wastrel-testotron 5000!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *oward1978Man
over a year ago

Rotherham

"What a bunch of wastrel's! I don't know who's the thickest, the men or the women for letting these braindead's anywhere near them. In an ideal world these 'men' would have been drowned at birth.

I wonder what pre or post natal checks would determine whether or not a man will be a 'wastrel'?!!?

Indeed!

Sadly there is no test. Usually a combination of poor upbringing, poor education and a lack of love will produce the said wastrel. By this point it's too late, the damage is done and society and these poor children will suffer.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *radleyandRavenCouple
over a year ago

Herts

There's nothing really to say about it.

If you cut benefits, it's the children who will suffer, people will do what they want and keep sleeping with this man despite knowing his track record - in fact, maybe some of these women knew his reputation and saw him as a sure-fire sperm donor.

However, it is sickening that most of his children have ended up in care. Even if contraception goes against your personal beliefs, how fucking selfish can you get?

But until you can force these low-lives, who constantly reproduce without a hope in Hell of providing for their Sprogs, to get the snip, what can you do?

Free will is a wonderful thing but it also means the system is very open to abuse.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Bloke around or not, why have a kid as a woman if you aren't set up to care for it? Without support around? Let alone more than one kid?

Whoever said this guy is probably a product of poor care as a kid himself, I agree, and it's likely a lot of his kids will go the same way. Very sad.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *udistnorthantsMan
over a year ago

Desborough

Cut Child Benefit to just the first two offspring. After that you provide for them without State assistance.

The Wastrel Test? Go for a pint with him, That is usually a pretty good indicator of a Blake's character.

Disclaimer - I have just done a 12 hr Night shift followed by two glasses of wine, I may not be at my most charitable or lucid

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *udistnorthantsMan
over a year ago

Desborough

Blokes test, damn auto type

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bloke around or not, why have a kid as a woman if you aren't set up to care for it? Without support around? Let alone more than one kid?

Whoever said this guy is probably a product of poor care as a kid himself, I agree, and it's likely a lot of his kids will go the same way. Very sad.

The free house.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Bloke around or not, why have a kid as a woman if you aren't set up to care for it? Without support around? Let alone more than one kid?

Whoever said this guy is probably a product of poor care as a kid himself, I agree, and it's likely a lot of his kids will go the same way. Very sad.

And the cycle continues.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uby0000 OP Woman
over a year ago

hertfordshire

cutting child benefit to two children is a good idea I knew a woman years ago who had so many kids we used to joke she would need Securicor to collect it lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *radleyandRavenCouple
over a year ago

Herts

"Cut Child Benefit to just the first two offspring. After that you provide for them without State assistance.

That's all very well but I'm pretty sure it would be based on the women's circumstances, not his. As I doubt they all live with him? (Sorry, I didn't actually watch the documentary).

So 40 kids, 20 women, so lets say that averages out at 2 kids per woman (especially if the father isn't mentioned - if they don't live together, they don't have to) Each woman applies for their own two children, all of his kids would still be getting full state assistance? (I think).

So, in this case, it doesn't really change anything.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

As much as they are wasters, I couldn't care less about them, it's the upbringing of the child that matters and they have been let down by the irresponsible pricks. Court sanctioned vasectomy should be an option especially when care and welfare comes into play to stop the dickheads from repeating this.

Although the guy that said all the fair ground workers were always shagging......they must have been some right classy ladies

And yes I know it's not just the guys to blame. The ladies are just as much at fault!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *carineMan
over a year ago

Armthorpe, Doncaster

Mumsnet has let itself go lately, hasn`t it?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"cutting child benefit to two children is a good idea I knew a woman years ago who had so many kids we used to joke she would need Securicor to collect it lol"

All that would happen then is the newspapers will be full of women with 3 children in rags saying how they can't afford to feed them and the government is starving her children.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

He can't remember the names of all his kids and wouldn't recognise the other half yet he finds women to knock up.

Think he should join Fab, purely to post a "how to get a meet" guide for the single men struggling!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

"cutting child benefit to two children is a good idea I knew a woman years ago who had so many kids we used to joke she would need Securicor to collect it lol"

But then people will still have the Kids and then not afford to feed them. So the kids will suffer. Anyway child benefit Is £20 a week roughly for the first child. Then about £13 a week for each further child. Hardly an incentive to keep popping them out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *andeCouple
over a year ago

Bognor area

Having just handed out over £600 to a couple in benefits who have never worked and gave no intention of working it riles me to hear them say the only way we can get a better house is to have another kid (( sigh))))

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Having just handed out over £600 to a couple in benefits who have never worked and gave no intention of working it riles me to hear them say the only way we can get a better house is to have another kid (( sigh))))"

there's no bigger houses for them anyway so they won't get one. if they live in social housing already i'm not sure why they think they have a chance of getting something else without swapping?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

Silly man

Silly women having children with him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *immy2xMan
over a year ago

aberdeen/inverness/ highlands

Even he couldnt get a meet on here.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Quite simple. The moment the women are confirmed pregnant by someone like him the baby when born is immediately adopted. The father of that many children should have a means test they can afford to provide for that child. If unable or unwilling bye bye baby and the cost of child benefit. There are more than enough childless couples that want children. Plus the child has less chance of being fucked up and taken into care. The adoption process is so strict it will benefit every child to have loving parents. Also potential adoptive parents are not as keen on the older children.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London

"Silly man

Silly women having children with him

In a nutshell!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Quite simple. The moment the women are confirmed pregnant by someone like him the baby when born is immediately adopted. The father of that many children should have a means test they can afford to provide for that child. If unable or unwilling bye bye baby and the cost of child benefit. There are more than enough childless couples that want children. Plus the child has less chance of being fucked up and taken into care. The adoption process is so strict it will benefit every child to have loving parents. Also potential adoptive parents are not as keen on the older children."

That would be utterly unenforceable... You couldn't force any woman to give up her child... Nor do I believe it's the right thing to do. Unless there is a.risk to the child and I mean a serious risk

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

People need to get the idea of child benefit being this massive amount of money. It's not, it's like £20 the first child and £12 or £13 for any others. It's the income support lone parent and child tax credits that's the big amounts.

Just remember that the government want people's attentions fixed on the welfare state so it seems like that's the biggest problem. Takes attention away from bankers bonus' tax avoidance blah blah blah

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"People need to get the idea of child benefit being this massive amount of money. It's not, it's like £20 the first child and £12 or £13 for any others. It's the income support lone parent and child tax credits that's the big amounts.

And their 11% pay rise.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icky999Man
over a year ago

warrington

Was this an april fools? Dont look much of a romeo like

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uby0000 OP Woman
over a year ago

hertfordshire

he wants more children!!! im speechless

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *dwalu2Couple
over a year ago

Bristol

Amazing to think that someone actually typed this all out, read it back to themselves, and didn't just delete the whole lot when they realised it was complete nonsense.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Twenty women thought it was ok to have unprotected sex with this fellow!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread