Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around....." What do you mean by that? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" It would be nice to use the bbc for your bashing narrative..... But it was actually the Washington post that broke that story... The bbc just were the first to report it... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? " I think we both know where this is going....... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think you can blame the BBC, his name has been known for at least a year now and it was only a matter of time before it came out. I thought that the security agencies released the name as they knew it was on the verge of being made public anyway. I don't think the BBC was the first news agency to broadcast it. I have also read that his family is now in Kuwait (though apparently still receiving UK benefits)" when the home office were asked whether the name out there was correct the home office refused to accept or deny it so I therefore on this occasion I don't think the leek came from that source. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv??? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going......." No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic " Guilty by association | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic " Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight" You mean their own son? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" one wonders which part of the murdoch press has come up with this headline ? more being led by the nose by an un elected austra oh wait a min american tycoon | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nicecouple,I have quoted your post thinking it was the person I asked the question too " but can you carry on thinking of me as mysterious and cryptic no one ever called me that before | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? It would be nice to use the bbc for your bashing narrative..... But it was actually the Washington post that broke that story... The bbc just were the first to report it..." First report it to us the masses then thanks for collaborating bbc breaking the story | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We shouldn't pay to protect any terrorists family. Our country disgusts me" Echoes and sentiments | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect" yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" It was on line long before the BBC and don't you think its a good excuse for the powers that be who were already watching the family have a good reason to justify continuing to do so. The cost for watching has been there for many months it is just different government agency's doing it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv???" No. Im not sure why you ask though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now " Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? It would be nice to use the bbc for your bashing narrative..... But it was actually the Washington post that broke that story... The bbc just were the first to report it... First report it to us the masses then thanks for collaborating bbc breaking the story " You do know the Washington post is one of the most respected newspapers in the world don't you.... What were the likes of bbc, Sky, and any other suppose to do.... Scream la la la we are not listening | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers" or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight You mean their own son?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer." Your post is a perfect example of why they need protecting | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight You mean their own son? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. Your post is a perfect example of why they need protecting " In that case can you pay the 5k? in these times of osterity I just don't see how his family are worth it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. Your post is a perfect example of why they need protecting In that case can you pay the 5k? in these times of osterity I just don't see how his family are worth it " You having a bad day Mrs scrooge. Hope your family don't do aanything illegal. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We shouldn't pay to protect any terrorists family. Our country disgusts me" I know,every single member of his family are clearly guilty just by association. the police should pull back so the lynch mob can string em all up! Fucking liberals ruining this country,it would be much better with mob rule.we could all decide we want your money and house and just come take it off you..this is how I want British society to be.fuck justice and fairness,and equality. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC" Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? " your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh....and not being able to imagine the pain suffered by the Jordanian pilot...........once skinned I would be tempted to roll him in salt too.....then send the video to ISIS." All very commendable but do you have an opinion about the actual thread subject? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv???" Being forced to pay the BBC license fee is what sickens me. Especially as much of the reporting/programmes they do is politically correct and bias. If i had the freedom of choice no way would i willingly contribute to the funding of the BBC. There is light at the end of the tunnel it seems, as i read an article in a newspaper a while ago that said that the BBC license fee could soon become a thing of the past. Sooner the better as far as i'm concerned! Its about time the BBC modernised and got itself into the 21st century. Scrap the license fee and either fund itself through advertisements like ITV, channel 4, channel 5, etc, or become a subscription based sevice like Discovery channel, sky sports, etc (in all honesty though who would want to subscribe to it is beyond me?). | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around....." By that logic , you should be punished for every wrong that anyone related to you has committed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv??? Being forced to pay the BBC license fee is what sickens me. Especially as much of the reporting/programmes they do is politically correct and bias. If i had the freedom of choice no way would i willingly contribute to the funding of the BBC. There is light at the end of the tunnel it seems, as i read an article in a newspaper a while ago that said that the BBC license fee could soon become a thing of the past. Sooner the better as far as i'm concerned! Its about time the BBC modernised and got itself into the 21st century. Scrap the license fee and either fund itself through advertisements like ITV, channel 4, channel 5, etc, or become a subscription based sevice like Discovery channel, sky sports, etc (in all honesty though who would want to subscribe to it is beyond me?). " and that relates to the thread where it has already been stated that the washington post were the people who did the reporting and the confirmation and the bbc reported that information ...... how???? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nicecouple,I have quoted your post thinking it was the person I asked the question too " I knew you'd done that. I tittered. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be " I like nothing more than beheading christians, and praying five times a day to a god that does not exist on a Saturday morning..sign me up | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? " What do you suppose the licence is for ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? " because the op WRONGLY STATED that if was the bbc that revealed Jihadi Johns identity ... where is was the washington post who got it confirmed by US government sources...... but like we said.... doesn't fit the narrative and I won't hold my breath for a retraction | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nicecouple,I have quoted your post thinking it was the person I asked the question too I knew you'd done that. I tittered. " Titter ye not lady! This is a serious thread don't you know | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ?" Programme making? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" I don't mind if we all club together. It'll be a bit of a bastard if I have to pay it all. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? " They're shit though Evie.... except for the voice. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? They're shit though Evie.... except for the voice." I like the sewing bee | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" This is what I love about forums. Misquotes, misinformation and misunderstanding. Long live free speech! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I like the Sewing Bee too, it's such a guilty pleasure. And Bake Off, and QI, and... and... I don't think the BBC are to blame in response to the OP. The internet makes a fool of secrets. " I bet you watched the Big Painting Competition without yawning ! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv??? Being forced to pay the BBC license fee is what sickens me. Especially as much of the reporting/programmes they do is politically correct and bias. If i had the freedom of choice no way would i willingly contribute to the funding of the BBC. There is light at the end of the tunnel it seems, as i read an article in a newspaper a while ago that said that the BBC license fee could soon become a thing of the past. Sooner the better as far as i'm concerned! Its about time the BBC modernised and got itself into the 21st century. Scrap the license fee and either fund itself through advertisements like ITV, channel 4, channel 5, etc, or become a subscription based sevice like Discovery channel, sky sports, etc (in all honesty though who would want to subscribe to it is beyond me?). and that relates to the thread where it has already been stated that the washington post were the people who did the reporting and the confirmation and the bbc reported that information ...... how????" Suppose you had better ask "atmybeckandcall" who asked the question earlier in the thread if we are the only country who have to pay to watch television. My post was in direct reply to his post and that was why i quoted him. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? " Yes in many cases politically correct and bias programme making. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? Yes in many cases politically correct and bias programme making. " I know, they've become the Tory spokesmachine. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? They're shit though Evie.... except for the voice." No, the voice is shit aswel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? They're shit though Evie.... except for the voice. No, the voice is shit aswel. " Not if you watch it on Sunday with all the judging cut out. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? Yes in many cases politically correct and bias programme making. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? Yes in many cases politically correct and bias programme making. " glad you came back to this thread.... still waiting on an apology for the untrue and misinformed Opening Post..... are we going to get one? or are you just going to slink behind other statements........ | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be I like nothing more than beheading christians, and praying five times a day to a god that does not exist on a Saturday morning..sign me up " wow you really are an isis sympathiser and have just stated you enjoy beheading Christians ? I somehow don't think the family of Alan Henning and all the other victims are going to find your particular sense of "jovial humour" all that funny ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer." But by association you are saying they are bad people, shouldn't Fred Wests children be called the same? As far as I know, his parents have not got anything to do with what their son is doing, so why should they be threatened for it, so much so that they need protection ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Nicecouple,I have quoted your post thinking it was the person I asked the question too I knew you'd done that. I tittered. " We will have no tittering on a Saturday morning thankyou !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"OK, I'm confused. Why do the BBC have to pay to protect the family? What do you suppose the licence is for ? Programme making? Yes in many cases politically correct and bias programme making. glad you came back to this thread.... still waiting on an apology for the untrue and misinformed Opening Post..... are we going to get one? or are you just going to slink behind other statements........" I'm puzzled as to why you think the OP would have to make an apology Fabio? They never said in the Opening post that the BBC were first to release the real name of Jihadi John (before the Washington Post), you just made that assumption. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be I like nothing more than beheading christians, and praying five times a day to a god that does not exist on a Saturday morning..sign me up wow you really are an isis sympathiser and have just stated you enjoy beheading Christians ? I somehow don't think the family of Alan Henning and all the other victims are going to find your particular sense of "jovial humour" all that funny ?" Are you taking the piss?I certainly hope you are...if you believe anything I have posted relates to my beliefs then you may well be very daft indeed... I was initially winding up the guy who'd like to see someone skinned alive on the bbc! I've clearly confused you so my apologies!..or not | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm puzzled as to why you think the OP would have to make an apology Fabio? They never said in the Opening post that the BBC were first to release the real name of Jihadi John (before the Washington Post), you just made that assumption. " oooh.... lets try this ..... slooooowly... the op said "well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. " the BBC didn't make the name public.... the Washington Post did!! who got it confirmed from senior US sources....... the bbc, well in fact... the bbc, sky, itv, guardian, daily mail, cnn, sun, mirror, and every other media outlet (yes, again... even the daily mail) picked up the news story based on the Washington Post reporting.......... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I'm puzzled as to why you think the OP would have to make an apology Fabio? They never said in the Opening post that the BBC were first to release the real name of Jihadi John (before the Washington Post), you just made that assumption. oooh.... lets try this ..... slooooowly... the op said well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. the BBC didn't make the name public.... the Washington Post did!! who got it confirmed from senior US sources....... the bbc, well in fact... the bbc, sky, itv, guardian, daily mail, cnn, sun, mirror, and every other media outlet (yes, again... even the daily mail) picked up the news story based on the Washington Post reporting.........." Yes and lets try this slooooowwwwwllllllly, lol...... the OP never said the BBC released/made his name public first (before the Washington Post). The BBC did make his name public along with all the other news channels/media outlets which you mentioned. It was just that the Washington Post happened to be the first ones to do it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If we are being pedantic, we didn't get the news from The Washington post. We would have heard the news from one of the above mentioned news channels etc" It was on BBC news 24 channel i first heard it from. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If we are being pedantic, we didn't get the news from The Washington post. We would have heard the news from one of the above mentioned news channels etc" of which then you can't blame aunty beeb for naming him.... if the ethical arguement is "why did ANYONE name him publically" then thats a fair discussion..... there have been cases where some of the ISIS hostages not being named straight away because the home office asked broadcasters not to whilst they talked to the families first but if a blanket ban is whats being advocated, the rest of the world knowing and his name being bandied around the internet... but home papers/broadcasters going la la la... they was never going to work because this is so high profile | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If we are being pedantic, we didn't get the news from The Washington post. We would have heard the news from one of the above mentioned news channels etc" Dunno about pedantic but there some cracking patronising going on in here lol always make me disagree with the post even if it's right when it has a patronising edge to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"If we are being pedantic, we didn't get the news from The Washington post. We would have heard the news from one of the above mentioned news channels etc of which then you can't blame aunty beeb for naming him.... if the ethical arguement is "why did ANYONE name him publically" then thats a fair discussion..... " Yes, it would probably have been better worded differently. I am still not sure why you would need an apology though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't watch the BBC and don't pay a license so doesn't affect me at all." I'm opposed to the BBC license fee so i'm thinking of doing away with television until the license fee is abolished/phased out. The future is the internet anyway. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories" If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Don't judge a group of people on the action of the few uneducated twats " this.. and for anyone popping in to view the site please dont take the same stance of the majority of folks on here based on the usual minority of ignorant types.. right, off to find my skinning knife as i saw Mrs Scoggins son drop a sweet wrapper and that has to be worth mindless retribution on the parents surely..?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trial by fire. Lets bring that back too. And witch hunts. Man's inhumanity to man shows no limits at times." is the irony in this post lost on you ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? " what goes around comes around means karma or like attracts like..jihad john has become infamous because he has butchered people and has flaunted it to the world and now his family has been named.. jihad john now will be shitting himself incase somebody here in this country butchers one of his family or hurts them in some way..? now people are going to say that his family are innocent and have nothing to do with jihad johns murder spree..but the folk that jihad john murdered were innocent also..jj has now set off a chain of events that has unfortunately led to his family needing protection..jj has only himself to blame as he has brought this bad energy down on his own head and his familys heads also..so its called karma or what goes around..etc etc.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. " Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread" nearly as not biased ever as fox.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread" No just less unbiased than the BBC are. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? what goes around comes around means karma or like attracts like..jihad john has become infamous because he has butchered people and has flaunted it to the world and now his family has been named.. jihad john now will be shitting himself incase somebody here in this country butchers one of his family or hurts them in some way..? now people are going to say that his family are innocent and have nothing to do with jihad johns murder spree..but the folk that jihad john murdered were innocent also..jj has now set off a chain of events that has unfortunately led to his family needing protection..jj has only himself to blame as he has brought this bad energy down on his own head and his familys heads also..so its called karma or what goes around..etc etc.. " I doubt he gives a shit about his family tbh | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trial by fire. Lets bring that back too. And witch hunts. Man's inhumanity to man shows no limits at times. is the irony in this post lost on you ?" No it was lost on you. But that too is ironic. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trial by fire. Lets bring that back too. And witch hunts. Man's inhumanity to man shows no limits at times. is the irony in this post lost on you ? No it was lost on you. But that too is ironic." lol, think you'll find i got the irony so this is a double ironic post | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. " You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Trial by fire. Lets bring that back too. And witch hunts. Man's inhumanity to man shows no limits at times. is the irony in this post lost on you ? No it was lost on you. But that too is ironic. If you got that I was being sarcastic why would you call it ironic? lol, think you'll find i got the irony so this is a double ironic post " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ?" So they should be, and the people who want to hurt them are no better than those they are protesting against His name should never have been a released | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. " It was a NO vote to keep the union. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. It was a NO vote to keep the union. " So it was. I'm sure you are aware of the protest that was held outside BBC's headquarters in Scotland because of the biased reporting that was going on at the time though? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"9p* a year to protect a family from ignoramuses? I reckon I can afford that. *Conservative estimate." indeed ...i did a quick sum and got it to less than that actually and am at an absolute loss as to why anyone would begrudge paying that | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. " I don't think unbalanced is the same as biased, no. I don't know how the BBC determine what's newsworthy and what isn't so I have no way of knowing. There are daily terrorist attacks in Afghanistan and West Africa, they aren't reported in the news. But just one attack in the USA or Australia will have rolling coverage. That displays an unbalanced media, where some things are given priority over another, but it doesn't have implicit biases in my opinion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't watch the BBC and don't pay a license so doesn't affect me at all. I'm opposed to the BBC license fee so i'm thinking of doing away with television until the license fee is abolished/phased out. The future is the internet anyway. " From The Independent, March 2015 (other comics/newspapers ran this story too) "Last week the parliamentary Culture, Media and Sport Committee said the £145.50 annual licence fee should ultimately be replaced by a German-style “broadcasting levy” that would apply to every household. The change would allow the BBC to collect funds from the estimated 500,000 households which claim not to have a television or only watch programmes on-demand through platforms like the BBC iPlayer." They're gonna getcha whether you like it or not | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't watch the BBC and don't pay a license so doesn't affect me at all. I'm opposed to the BBC license fee so i'm thinking of doing away with television until the license fee is abolished/phased out. The future is the internet anyway. From The Independent, March 2015 (other comics/newspapers ran this story too) "Last week the parliamentary Culture, Media and Sport Committee said the £145.50 annual licence fee should ultimately be replaced by a German-style “broadcasting levy” that would apply to every household. The change would allow the BBC to collect funds from the estimated 500,000 households which claim not to have a television or only watch programmes on-demand through platforms like the BBC iPlayer." They're gonna getcha whether you like it or not " I read a report in a newspaper a while ago (forgot which one) which said the license fee was going to be phased out eventually, and the BBC would have to get its funding by other means? Guess only time will tell and we'll have to see which way it goes? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread nearly as not biased ever as fox.. " Fox is sky | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"well done aunty beeb for making public jihadi johns real name. So now its out there how do you all feel contributing 5k a day to provide protection to his family ? are we the only country to have to pay to watch tv??? Being forced to pay the BBC license fee is what sickens me. Especially as much of the reporting/programmes they do is politically correct and bias. If i had the freedom of choice no way would i willingly contribute to the funding of the BBC. There is light at the end of the tunnel it seems, as i read an article in a newspaper a while ago that said that the BBC license fee could soon become a thing of the past. Sooner the better as far as i'm concerned! Its about time the BBC modernised and got itself into the 21st century. Scrap the license fee and either fund itself through advertisements like ITV, channel 4, channel 5, etc, or become a subscription based sevice like Discovery channel, sky sports, etc (in all honesty though who would want to subscribe to it is beyond me?). " Simple solution is just don't pay the fee. Call them up and tell them you no longer need a license and that's it for 3 years until you get a letter, at which point just repeat! I've not paid the governments broadcasting company for 20ish years now and i never will | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be I like nothing more than beheading christians, and praying five times a day to a god that does not exist on a Saturday morning..sign me up wow you really are an isis sympathiser and have just stated you enjoy beheading Christians ? I somehow don't think the family of Alan Henning and all the other victims are going to find your particular sense of "jovial humour" all that funny ? Are you taking the piss?I certainly hope you are...if you believe anything I have posted relates to my beliefs then you may well be very daft indeed... I was initially winding up the guy who'd like to see someone skinned alive on the bbc! I've clearly confused you so my apologies!..or not " No not at all I don't think I am being daft but then again my sincere apologies for not seeing the funny side to your alleged joke about beheading Christians. I guess because I completely missed the joke I therefore must indeed be daft. In relation to you stating you only mentioned beheading Christians to wind somebody up. As you have pointed out ime a bit daft but isn't that to use your own words "taking the piss." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread nearly as not biased ever as fox.. Fox is sky" yes i am aware.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't pay a t.v licence....so I don't pay a penny. also....who the hell is jihadi john?....I've no idea..... " perhaps if you paid the fee you would be better informed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't pay a t.v licence....so I don't pay a penny. also....who the hell is jihadi john?....I've no idea..... perhaps if you paid the fee you would be better informed" Why would I pay the licence when i dont have a telly? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"We shouldn't pay to protect any terrorists family. Our country disgusts me" Yet, why protect the families. I mean parents, brothers and sisters are always responsible for what their siblings or kids do. And it would definitely solve the whole problem if we just had a few vigilantes going round the country dragging innocent people into the streets a killing them. Problem solved. Great!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight You mean their own son?" Probably from him and his friends to actually. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC" I'd like to see him brought to justice for his crimes. I no more want to any body skinned alive on TV than I want to see people beheaded on TV. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does jihad john not hold most of the responsibility for endagering his family through his own actions" No. The family of criminals do not deserve to be punished. If you had a sibling who killed someone would you be happy for people to attack you for it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"what goes around comes around means karma or like attracts like..jihad john has become infamous because he has butchered people and has flaunted it to the world and now his family has been named.. jihad john now will be shitting himself incase somebody here in this country butchers one of his family or hurts them in some way..? now people are going to say that his family are innocent and have nothing to do with jihad johns murder spree..but the folk that jihad john murdered were innocent also..jj has now set off a chain of events that has unfortunately led to his family needing protection..jj has only himself to blame as he has brought this bad energy down on his own head and his familys heads also..so its called karma or what goes around..etc etc.. " Fucking disgusting. It is not acceptable to punish the family of criminals for what they did. Utterly horrible to think it is. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer." But they don't support his views, do they? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. Your post is a perfect example of why they need protecting In that case can you pay the 5k? in these times of osterity I just don't see how his family are worth it " Who would you consider worth protecting at 5k? Or do we just let the mon rule now? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh....and not being able to imagine the pain suffered by the Jordanian pilot...........once skinned I would be tempted to roll him in salt too.....then send the video to ISIS." You've known better than him. Just as evil, vile and inhuman. I think you should go join ISIS, you clearly think the same way they do. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I hope hos family stay safe but would really love to see JJ being skinned alive on the BBC Oh,and me...even better if he was then beheaded,and set on fire in a cage..they could make it a slick production like ISIS,and put it on at primetime for top quality family entertainment,and we could use it as a recruiting tool to get more people to join the army! Glad to see us Brits hold the moral high ground over these ISIS savages.... Would you personally like to skin him alive?I bet it would be fun doing that to another human being.especially when he's screaming like a little bitch,and begging to stop.do you think that would spur you on even more ? your not going to run away to join isis are ? I have heard there more cracked up than there reported to be I like nothing more than beheading christians, and praying five times a day to a god that does not exist on a Saturday morning..sign me up wow you really are an isis sympathiser and have just stated you enjoy beheading Christians ? I somehow don't think the family of Alan Henning and all the other victims are going to find your particular sense of "jovial humour" all that funny ?" And I doubt they'd have much sympathy or support for people who want to murder or have tortured other innocent people either. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. " Ever thought that it just might be you who's biased not the BBC. Just because it's not saying what you like doesn't mean it's biased. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they?" No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Ever thought that it just might be you who's biased not the BBC. Just because it's not saying what you like doesn't mean it's biased." All those Scots who protested outside BBC headquarters in Scotland during the referendum clearly though the BBC was biased, so sorry to burst your bubble its not just me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. " That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. " The UKIP crystal ball is working overtime tonight. It's a pity the parents aren't Polish then they could get really stuck in. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? what goes around comes around means karma or like attracts like..jihad john has become infamous because he has butchered people and has flaunted it to the world and now his family has been named.. jihad john now will be shitting himself incase somebody here in this country butchers one of his family or hurts them in some way..? now people are going to say that his family are innocent and have nothing to do with jihad johns murder spree..but the folk that jihad john murdered were innocent also..jj has now set off a chain of events that has unfortunately led to his family needing protection..jj has only himself to blame as he has brought this bad energy down on his own head and his familys heads also..so its called karma or what goes around..etc etc.. " As his family opposed him joining ISIS what makes you think he gives 2 shits what happens to them. In fact his family probably need as much protection from ISIS as they do from those, like you, who seem to think that murdering innocent people is OK. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either" Your talking about immigration in general, i was talking about Jihadi Johns family. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either" Two words for you.....Wage Compression. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread No just less unbiased than the BBC are. " Or just more in agreement with what you believe. Don't get me wrong. I actually like both Sky and Fox news. Confirms all my actual beliefs very nicely. But I don't kid myself that they're not biased, especially Fox. And definitely way more biased than either BBC or ITV. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression." Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression. Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide" It's more of his direct propaganda feed from UKIP central office | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression. Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide" I work in the building trade/construction industry so i've seen wage compression happening first hand, believe me it is very real. Its happened in many sectors of the employment industry so lets not kid anyone. Sounds like you've been fed some propoganda yourself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? " Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? " Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? " Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. " I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. " Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples?" You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression. Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide I work in the building trade/construction industry so i've seen wage compression happening first hand, believe me it is very real. Its happened in many sectors of the employment industry so lets not kid anyone. Sounds like you've been fed some propoganda yourself. " So working in the building trade/industry how are you qualified to asses the root cause of this wage compression beyond builders talk? Are you a hobby economist? Or even have qualifications in that area to substantiate your claims beyond heatsay and reports in the sun? Have you conducted a study yourself to fully satisfy you of your opinions being fact? I don't mean to be harsh, or offensive. I find it rather irrational for people to make claims they can't substantiate with hard proven fact, and it's the blame others mentality that's an issue with society as a whole. The government sold us out to their buds in business, that's why there's wage compression, that's why councils are cutting services left right and far right. And so on and so forth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . " ALLEGED biased reporting. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression. Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide I work in the building trade/construction industry so i've seen wage compression happening first hand, believe me it is very real. Its happened in many sectors of the employment industry so lets not kid anyone. Sounds like you've been fed some propoganda yourself. So working in the building trade/industry how are you qualified to asses the root cause of this wage compression beyond builders talk? Are you a hobby economist? Or even have qualifications in that area to substantiate your claims beyond heatsay and reports in the sun? Have you conducted a study yourself to fully satisfy you of your opinions being fact? I don't mean to be harsh, or offensive. I find it rather irrational for people to make claims they can't substantiate with hard proven fact, and it's the blame others mentality that's an issue with society as a whole. The government sold us out to their buds in business, that's why there's wage compression, that's why councils are cutting services left right and far right. And so on and so forth." One of the companies i worked for (private company) tried to cut certain employees wages, (not the office staff, just the workmen on the tools). Some men refused to take a pay cut, they did'nt last long much after that and were soon replaced by Bulgarians who were happy to work for the lower wage. Friends and relatives in the Haulage industry, again, being undercut or losing their jobs in favour of cheap foreign labour. Its happening, really sounds like you've been reading the guardian too much. I agree with you that the government have sold us out, they have sold us out to the EU. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Are you trying to say that sky are unbiased? The most laughable statement on this thread nearly as not biased ever as fox.. Fox is sky" No, actually it's not. Although they do, or is it did now, have the same major share holder which I believe is News International. It only controls, or controlled, about 40% of sky. The BBC also had a stake in Sky from it's original investment in British Satellite Broadcasting, which merged with Sky in the mid or early 90's | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting." Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . " Ah yes. It was reported on a Major news channel. The BBC. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting. Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it." According to the police, 1000 people. Not exactly an overwhelming number is it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting. Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it. According to the police, 1000 people. Not exactly an overwhelming number is it?" Big enough to make headline television news at 6 o clock and 10 o clock the day it happened. Have 1000 people rock up outside your house, i bet you'll soon be on the phone to the police. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . Ah yes. It was reported on a Major news channel. The BBC. " Sky, ITV, channel 4, channel 5, various radio stations....take your pick. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"how can we pay that just think what he has done and how he has made other people feel" But it was him, not his parents or siblings. What's the justice in punishing them? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting. Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it. According to the police, 1000 people. Not exactly an overwhelming number is it? Big enough to make headline television news at 6 o clock and 10 o clock the day it happened. Have 1000 people rock up outside your house, i bet you'll soon be on the phone to the police. " It may be a big demonstration where you live but in London its an snp picnic in the park. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . Ah yes. It was reported on a Major news channel. The BBC. Sky, ITV, channel 4, channel 5, various radio stations....take your pick. " I chose the bbc. Got unbiased and accurate reporting too. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does jihad john not hold most of the responsibility for endagering his family through his own actions" He surly does but it's still not their fault or their responsibility, is it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting. Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it. According to the police, 1000 people. Not exactly an overwhelming number is it? Big enough to make headline television news at 6 o clock and 10 o clock the day it happened. Have 1000 people rock up outside your house, i bet you'll soon be on the phone to the police. It may be a big demonstration where you live but in London its an snp picnic in the park. " Really, i thought you lived at going round in circles? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . ALLEGED biased reporting. Certainly enough to cause a very large protest though was'nt it. According to the police, 1000 people. Not exactly an overwhelming number is it? Big enough to make headline television news at 6 o clock and 10 o clock the day it happened. Have 1000 people rock up outside your house, i bet you'll soon be on the phone to the police. It may be a big demonstration where you live but in London its an snp picnic in the park. Really, i thought you lived at going round in circles? " Fair point. We still get tv, radio, the Internet and papers here. It's just there's a bit of a delay | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Ever thought that it just might be you who's biased not the BBC. Just because it's not saying what you like doesn't mean it's biased. All those Scots who protested outside BBC headquarters in Scotland during the referendum clearly though the BBC was biased, so sorry to burst your bubble its not just me. " I didn't say 'it might just be you' I said 'it just might be you' but if it's nor clear to you what the difference is between 'might just' and 'just might' feel free to drop the 'just' you'll get the general meaning without it. As for the Scots who claimed biased I'd say the same to them, just because someone is saying something you don't believe in does not mean they are biased. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"His family need protection from total idiots so full of hatred that they can't think straight What goes around comes around..... What do you mean by that? I think we both know where this is going....... No I don't or I wouldn't havn't have asked But carry on being mysterious and cryptic Apparently blaming the sins of the child on the rest of the family...... Funny enough don't hear the same this used for the families of Fred west... Or Ian Huntley ect ect ect yes ..but us the taxpayer are not paying to protect fred wests children are we now Possibly because they havn't been threatened to be torn apart by vigilante 'justice' seekers or it could simply be that fred west children turned out to be decent people unlike jihadis john parents who spawned a western hating murdering butcherer. But they don't support his views, do they? No they just go back to Kuwait to work for a couple of weeks and think sod this for a game of soldiers too much like hard work, then they come back to Britain to carry on living on benefits at the taxpayers expense. That's ok though because immigrants pay more in taxes than they take out in benefits. They also don't take your jobs either Two words for you.....Wage Compression. Here's another two Bull shit. If you bother to research you'll find that immigration has in fact very recently been shown to not cause wage compression, a lack of jobs or a burden in the benefits system. You've been fed propaganda designed to divide I work in the building trade/construction industry so i've seen wage compression happening first hand, believe me it is very real. Its happened in many sectors of the employment industry so lets not kid anyone. Sounds like you've been fed some propoganda yourself. " What's wage compression got to do with Jihadi John. Or do you just look for any reason to have ago at anyone who looks or says anything different from what you think it should be. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think the BBC is biased. But it sure is a good sound bite for those who need to feel persecuted. You don't think the way the BBC report the Palestine/Israel conflict is biased on one sides favour then? Which side do you think it's biased on Palestine or Israeli? Or the way they reported the recent referendum in Scotland (and the long run up to the referendum) which was biased in favour of the yes vote to keep the union? Was it? You must have not been listening very well. The 'Yes' campaign was actually 'Yes' to devolution. The 'No' campaign was the one in favour of keeping the Union. I don't feel persecuted in any of these matters but looking at them from a neutral stand-point the bias is obvious for all to see. Well I don't see it in any of those examples. Do you have any better examples? You did'nt see the protests outside the BBC headquarters in Scotland then during the referendum? Purpose of the protest.....Bias BBC reporting. It was on most of the major news channels at the time . " So some Scot Nats claim the BBC is biased. Could it be that when reporting the facts it was not what those people wanted to hear. Just like you. Just because you don't agree with what someone says it does not mean they are being biased. I don't know why you have such a problem with that. Could it be that you, like those Scot Nats, only want your own point of view to be put forward and anything else suppressed. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ah I just realised you're a ukip man centaur :D I'll not bother debating any further with you, it's a waste of time " PMSL. Pity we're on the same side of this thread, I'd enjoy a good debate with you on other issues sometime. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Does the OP work for sky? They are always spinning anti Bbc stories If the BBC had unbiased, fair, and balanced reporting then Sky would have nothing to spin. Ever thought that it just might be you who's biased not the BBC. Just because it's not saying what you like doesn't mean it's biased. All those Scots who protested outside BBC headquarters in Scotland during the referendum clearly though the BBC was biased, so sorry to burst your bubble its not just me. I didn't say 'it might just be you' I said 'it just might be you' but if it's nor clear to you what the difference is between 'might just' and 'just might' feel free to drop the 'just' you'll get the general meaning without it. As for the Scots who claimed biased I'd say the same to them, just because someone is saying something you don't believe in does not mean they are biased." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |