FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Foreskin

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I see alot of girls love cut cock, but wheres the girls who are more uncut? can't be the only one, surely? :P so much more to tease

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It honestly does not both me either way, its not something I even think about to me honest

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

cut cock is potentially and generally cleaner i guess, not an expert but thats what i gather lol, but i suppose it also depends on the type of person

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I honestly do not think a foreskin or not makes for a clean cock, that's down to the person, a clean person will clean their cock regardless where as a dirty one won't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yh very true, was abit of a silly thing to say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"cut cock is potentially and generally cleaner i guess, not an expert but thats what i gather lol, but i suppose it also depends on the type of person"

That's actually a false statement that some live by. There both as unhygenic as each other if not kept clean. I just think uncut looks alot prettier lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod
over a year ago

I like the look of a cut cock but thats because its different to what Im used to at home

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A"

Totally agree. and, when tis done to a female its illegal. but, do it to a newborn baby boy, its legal... backwards logic eh?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A"

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

There has been a growing movement against circumcision of children, who obviously cannot give informed consent. I find that refreshing, as there are adult males who wish that they weren't cut.

They're all only as clean as the individual who is responsible for washing them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"cut cock is potentially and generally cleaner i guess, not an expert but thats what i gather lol, but i suppose it also depends on the type of person"

Not true.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin "

I agree. Doesn't mean male circumcision isn't abuse too though.

A

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin

I agree. Doesn't mean male circumcision isn't abuse too though.

A"

I also agree

I think genitals should just be left alone unless they have medical issues

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't like the idea of cut cock purely because my stomach churns at the thought of this being done to newborn baby boys for no medical reason.

Makes me gut-wrenchingly sad.

So I'd never prefer cut over uncut. I wouldn't want to perpetuate something as an "ideal" when I consider it to be fairly barbaric.

But in terms of aesthetics or hygiene I have no preference either way. And as the guy themselves didn't chose to have it done as a baby I don't hold it against them.

So no preference either way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

couldnt care less really..find it quite strange that men seem very concerned by it....and think that maybe now is a good time to stop doing pointless circumcision...we dont even allow dogs tails to be loped nowadays..seems oddly medieval to cut babies!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree that to be circumcised for no reason is barbaric but if medically nessasary like in my case it is justified.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A"

An ex of mine had phimosis so natural isn't always best.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

What did I cause :P Well, I'm glad I'm not on my own with my views. Thought I was the only one :P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hortieWoman
over a year ago

Northampton

I don't mind the useless bit of skin on the end of a cock. Foreskin doesn't bother me either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I don't mind the useless bit of skin on the end of a cock. Foreskin doesn't bother me either "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lwaysup4it69Couple
over a year ago

Kirkby in Ashfield


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A"

Couldn't agree more. Well said

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eforfuncplCouple
over a year ago

Morecambe


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A"

I've had mine done due to a medical issue x so it looks good lol time will tell lol x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"cut cock is potentially and generally cleaner i guess, not an expert but thats what i gather lol, but i suppose it also depends on the type of person"

I shower.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *mm_n_ZedCouple
over a year ago

Fareham


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin "

This! You cannot compare the two procedures. The intention of FGM is to remove the possibility of any sexual pleasure. Circumcised males are still capable of achieving orgasm.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Have stil have my foreskin girl like it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 28/02/15 20:53:16]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh yes cut for me...x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I still have my foreskin and wash it every day at the gym .and girls like rolling it back to se my head.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin

This! You cannot compare the two procedures. The intention of FGM is to remove the possibility of any sexual pleasure. Circumcised males are still capable of achieving orgasm."

FGM is so wrong, but they will continue to do it until someone declares it illegal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There has been a growing movement against circumcision of children, who obviously cannot give informed consent. I find that refreshing, as there are adult males who wish that they weren't cut.

They're all only as clean as the individual who is responsible for washing them. "

I'm totally with you regarding consent.

crystal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If cocks weren't meant to have foreskins we wouldn't be born with them.

No medical/aesthetic benefit in removing it (ok there are potential issues in later life that warrant surgical intervention but certainly not at birth!) and I'm sure society would be in uproar if a similar practice was performed on newborn girls.

Just my 2p.

A

What they do to female children's genitals in some cultures goes way beyond removing a foreskin

This! You cannot compare the two procedures. The intention of FGM is to remove the possibility of any sexual pleasure. Circumcised males are still capable of achieving orgasm.

FGM is so wrong, but they will continue to do it until someone declares it illegal. "

I thought it was illegal. In England at least.

crystal

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think it's a shame in this day and age, genital mutilation is so acceptable in the name of religion or a social norm like in the US. I obviously understand if it's for medical reasons.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"There has been a growing movement against circumcision of children, who obviously cannot give informed consent. I find that refreshing, as there are adult males who wish that they weren't cut.

They're all only as clean as the individual who is responsible for washing them.

I'm totally with you regarding consent.

crystal"

it should be a consented procedure unless of course, medical reasons to why it needs to be removed. I think of myself as a pro foreskin ally.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I think it's a shame in this day and age, genital mutilation is so acceptable in the name of religion or a social norm like in the US. I obviously understand if it's for medical reasons. "

Exactly. Female or not, if there is no reason for it to be done, its mutilation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have heard it said that the foreskin has around 20000 nerve endings. Seems like the circumcised among us are missing out on heightened pleasure.

Who knows.

I like my foreskin though. Yay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"pro foreskin ally. "

I'll get the t-shirts and bumper stickers printed up now!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *arry247Couple
over a year ago

Wakefield

There is a good explanation about the foresking at

http://tinyurl.com/2wc726

The foreskin represents at least a third of the penile skin. It protects the glans from abrasion and contact with clothes. The foreskin also increases sexual pleasure by sliding up and down on the shaft, stimulating the glans by alternately covering and exposing it. This can occur during masturbation or intercourse. Friction is minimized, and supplementary lubrication is not needed. Without the foreskin, the glans skin, which is normally moist mucous membrane, becomes dry and thickens considerably in response to continued exposure. This change reduces its sensitivity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I agree, foreskins should only be removed for medical reasons. I can understand both sides of the argument for hygiene reasons, but I can't help but think some women go by the appearance of a penis.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"pro foreskin ally.

I'll get the t-shirts and bumper stickers printed up now! "
'Don't forsake your foreskin' lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"I have heard it said that the foreskin has around 20000 nerve endings. Seems like the circumcised among us are missing out on heightened pleasure.

Who knows.

I like my foreskin though. Yay.

"

explains why guys love it when i flick my tounge over it now and again :P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I see alot of girls love cut cock, but wheres the girls who are more uncut? can't be the only one, surely? :P so much more to tease "

Love uncut. But don't really mind in a swinging sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkxRabbitWoman
over a year ago

Mostly in GU24


"There is a good explanation about the foresking at

http://tinyurl.com/2wc726

The foreskin represents at least a third of the penile skin. It protects the glans from abrasion and contact with clothes. The foreskin also increases sexual pleasure by sliding up and down on the shaft, stimulating the glans by alternately covering and exposing it. This can occur during masturbation or intercourse. Friction is minimized, and supplementary lubrication is not needed. Without the foreskin, the glans skin, which is normally moist mucous membrane, becomes dry and thickens considerably in response to continued exposure. This change reduces its sensitivity. "

Totally. I prefer uncut. If I'm honest I find it difficult to stimulate a circumcised guy. I'm never sure how to wank them and sucking the glans is no fun. They definitely don't feel the tiny, exquisite sensations that intact guys do.

Having said that, if it's not kept scrupulously clean I'm going nowhere near it. Stinky cock is a no no

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nysladMan
over a year ago

Anglesey


"There is a good explanation about the foresking at

http://tinyurl.com/2wc726

The foreskin represents at least a third of the penile skin. It protects the glans from abrasion and contact with clothes. The foreskin also increases sexual pleasure by sliding up and down on the shaft, stimulating the glans by alternately covering and exposing it. This can occur during masturbation or intercourse. Friction is minimized, and supplementary lubrication is not needed. Without the foreskin, the glans skin, which is normally moist mucous membrane, becomes dry and thickens considerably in response to continued exposure. This change reduces its sensitivity.

Totally. I prefer uncut. If I'm honest I find it difficult to stimulate a circumcised guy. I'm never sure how to wank them and sucking the glans is no fun. They definitely don't feel the tiny, exquisite sensations that intact guys do.

Having said that, if it's not kept scrupulously clean I'm going nowhere near it. Stinky cock is a no no "

Your not the first to say that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top