FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Eye for an Eye (Is it going too far?)

Jump to newest
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)

The Saudi Arabian justice system often times punishes criminals using the ancient "an eye for an eye" system. But what do you do with a defendant whose attack left a man paralyzed? Well, you try to paralyze him too, apparently.

A Saudi judge has asked several hospitals whether they would conduct surgery on a man's spinal cord so he's left paralyzed, just like he left his victim paralyzed when he attacked him with a cleaver.

At least one hospital has refused to do it on ethical grounds, saying, "inflicting such harm is not possible." The other hospitals either haven't responded yet, or their responses were not made public.

The victim in this case is the one who asked the judge that his attacker suffers as he has -- a request that is allowed under what is called "Sharia law." The most common and famous example of this law is cutting off the hands of thieves, at the request of the theft victim.

Putting aside the punishment phase, a human rights group say the actual trials in Saudi Arabia fall far below international standards. They usually take place behind closed doors and without adequate legal representation.

Those who are sentenced to death are often not informed of the progress of legal proceedings against them or of the date of execution -- until the morning on which they are taken out and beheaded.

The headless body can then be crucified in a public place as a way to set an example, according to the kingdom's strict interpretation of Islam.

I read this a little while back and the bike accident thread made me think again about retribution against the criminals opposed to community service.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Oh good gawd! im going to take cover now

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"Oh good gawd! im going to take cover now "

Well it is Thursday

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Law exists to punish the perpetrators and appease the victims with one single judgement. An eye-for-an-eye leaves another 'victim' - his or her family who have to look after him because he has no hands/eyes/legs etc..

I've said it before on other threads. I do not agree with execution in any capacity, and nor do I agree with legalised maiming in the name of fair play. I much prefer to see criminals locked away in a cell where there only view of the world they will never again rejoin is though a 3-barred window.

That would appease me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unky monkeyMan
over a year ago

in the night garden


"I read this a little while back and the bike accident thread made me think again about retribution against the criminals opposed to community service."

LOL It depends on the community service.

If they were made to clean up body parts and blood from motorway crashes day in day out for say 5 years that would appeal.

I'm confident the majority of these sort of criminals would have committed suicied by year 3.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"The Law exists to punish the perpetrators and appease the victims with one single judgement. An eye-for-an-eye leaves another 'victim' - his or her family who have to look after him because he has no hands/eyes/legs etc..

I've said it before on other threads. I do not agree with execution in any capacity, and nor do I agree with legalised maiming in the name of fair play. I much prefer to see criminals locked away in a cell where there only view of the world they will never again rejoin is though a 3-barred window.

That would appease me."

What about say a crim causes someone to lose an arm. Now we have the technology to do transplants. Should the victim have the option of demanding the crim's arm?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What about say a crim causes someone to lose an arm. Now we have the technology to do transplants. Should the victim have the option of demanding the crim's arm?"

I wouldn't want it - I'd hate the thing to touch my cock.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

..or my wife.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"I read this a little while back and the bike accident thread made me think again about retribution against the criminals opposed to community service.

LOL It depends on the community service.

If they were made to clean up body parts and blood from motorway crashes day in day out for say 5 years that would appeal.

I'm confident the majority of these sort of criminals would have committed suicied by year 3."

Thats a good one but i figure the do gooders would say you were putting the perp in danger being around blood that could be potentially contaminated. I think it would make the offenders think twice though.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"What about say a crim causes someone to lose an arm. Now we have the technology to do transplants. Should the victim have the option of demanding the crim's arm?

I wouldn't want it - I'd hate the thing to touch my cock. "

Who are you trying to kid!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"What about say a crim causes someone to lose an arm. Now we have the technology to do transplants. Should the victim have the option of demanding the crim's arm?

I wouldn't want it - I'd hate the thing to touch my cock.

Who are you trying to kid! "

I wouldn't want a fookin murderer's arm trying to choke MY bishop tyvm.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"*

They DO say that there's VERY little crime in Saudi though...

"

Looks like it works then Oooerrr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

They DO say that there's VERY little crime in Saudi though...

"

S'cos they're all rich fuckers from the oil WE taught them to get out the fookin ground so they didn't have to wander around the desert anymore squabbling amongst themselves over an oasis with a couple of fookin coconut trees in it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ig bad OP   Man
over a year ago

Up North :-)


"What about say a crim causes someone to lose an arm. Now we have the technology to do transplants. Should the victim have the option of demanding the crim's arm?

I wouldn't want it - I'd hate the thing to touch my cock.

Who are you trying to kid!

I wouldn't want a fookin murderer's arm trying to choke MY bishop tyvm. "

Naaa he isn't a murderer he only caused you to loose an arm. What about if he had a huge cock and made you loose yours?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Hehehehehe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind"

-- Gandhi

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 09/09/10 14:36:33]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If he had a bigger cock than mine WAs I'd campaign for it to be transplanted but I'd want to know it's past history too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Retribution is never the answer but repeatedly you hear stories of the punishments of offenders in this country not fitting the crime. All I ever wanted from the person that hit me and killed my baby with their moped was a show of remorse an apology and a fitting punishment. However the person chose to plead not guilty put me through the horrors of appearing in court after which he and his family cheered loudly at his lack of a custodial sentence.

I'm wondering if these people actually had to see the results of the damage they cause have to clear up the guts spilled on the floor and the children and babies in the morgue they might think twice about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

Posts have been removed, the first one was very offensive to another poster and others if you quoted the post.

If people carry on with the snide and downright offensive remarks about another poster then you will be banned without any further reminders.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uss PussWoman
over a year ago

east cheshire


"Posts have been removed, the first one was very offensive to another poster and others if you quoted the post.

If people carry on with the snide and downright offensive remarks about another poster then you will be banned without any further reminders."

hoovering again hun?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Posts have been removed, the first one was very offensive to another poster and others if you quoted the post.

If people carry on with the snide and downright offensive remarks about another poster then you will be banned without any further reminders."

I take back what I said about you being Wyatt Earp..... more like Genghis bleedin Khan!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

lol not yet fuss

Oooo wishy, I love it when you talk dirty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

Well whether we agree or not, its their laws and the criminals know the punishment before they commit the crime.

Hardly any crime compared to over here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uton_coupleCouple
over a year ago

luton

you have sharia law in parts of the UK allready , especially the prisons

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7428933/Muslim-gangs-imposing-sharia-law-in-British-prisons.html

its only a matter of time before that is the only law there is

fortunately for me i wont be around in 30 years or so to see it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"you have sharia law in parts of the UK allready , especially the prisons

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/7428933/Muslim-gangs-imposing-sharia-law-in-British-prisons.html

its only a matter of time before that is the only law there is

fortunately for me i wont be around in 30 years or so to see it "

Just read the articel and you've bought into the scaremongering sensationalism of the media. It's topical to quote the word 'sharia' as it sells papers, but the reality of this particular article is that those so called 'muslims' are in prison because they are nothing more than scumbags who broke not only our laws, but their own 'sharia' laws too, or they wouldn't be where they are now. The intimidation detailed in the Telegraph article is nothing more than one bunch of bullies imposing their will on a lesser bunch of bullies. Prison life is very different from life on the outside where the pettiest thing can result in a damn good hiding in the showers - or far worse.

These particular 'muslims' are ruling by majority & fear, as has always been the case, right across the ages.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I personally don't give a Thomas Tit what they do to each other in their own country, as long as that's where it stays. Saudi Arabia certainly wouldn't be amongst my top 10 holiday destinations - as the song says -"if you have breasts, a vagina, clitoris and labia, stay the hell away from Saudi Arabia

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualfire88Man
over a year ago

Edinburgh


"I personally don't give a Thomas Tit what they do to each other in their own country, as long as that's where it stays. Saudi Arabia certainly wouldn't be amongst my top 10 holiday destinations - as the song says -"if you have breasts, a vagina, clitoris and labia, stay the hell away from Saudi Arabia "

This song is by whom?

*sits in corner quietly*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's written by Seth MacFarlane, sung by the character of Francine in "Stan of Arabia".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top