Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read an interesting article about how IQ tests are irrelevant. Einstein was a genius. But scored relatively poorly on his IQ test, especially for some one so far head of everyone in terms of intelligence. There was a massive paper published on people that score high on an IQ test are simply good at taking tests. It was actually a great read " Einsteins never taken an IQ test. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read an interesting article about how IQ tests are irrelevant. Einstein was a genius. But scored relatively poorly on his IQ test, especially for some one so far head of everyone in terms of intelligence. There was a massive paper published on people that score high on an IQ test are simply good at taking tests. It was actually a great read Einsteins never taken an IQ test." He must have at some point seeing as they have it recorded! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read an interesting article about how IQ tests are irrelevant. Einstein was a genius. But scored relatively poorly on his IQ test, especially for some one so far head of everyone in terms of intelligence. There was a massive paper published on people that score high on an IQ test are simply good at taking tests. It was actually a great read " They tell you at how good a person is at placing things into abstract categories that humans have invented. For example, when asked the question "what is the relationship between a dog and a rabbit?" a higher IQ answer would be that they are both mammals whereas a lower Iq one would be that the dog chases the rabbit. Both are correct, and I would say that the latter is possibly a more useful answer in the real world. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read an interesting article about how IQ tests are irrelevant. Einstein was a genius. But scored relatively poorly on his IQ test, especially for some one so far head of everyone in terms of intelligence. There was a massive paper published on people that score high on an IQ test are simply good at taking tests. It was actually a great read They tell you at how good a person is at placing things into abstract categories that humans have invented. For example, when asked the question "what is the relationship between a dog and a rabbit?" a higher IQ answer would be that they are both mammals whereas a lower Iq one would be that the dog chases the rabbit. Both are correct, and I would say that the latter is possibly a more useful answer in the real world. " In theory an IQ test should show a persons ability to identify and resolve an issue. This resuires the test itself to be abstract and not utilise existing knowledge. So the dog and rabit answers of being mammals versus one chasing the other only shows that one individual has different knowledge ratehr than either one having higher or lower IQ. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Surely, the intelligent ones would ask what sex are the dog and rabbit? It may make a difference to their relationship? " Then there is orientation, personal tastes and aditional dressings to account for as well | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Surely, the intelligent ones would ask what sex are the dog and rabbit? It may make a difference to their relationship? Then there is orientation, personal tastes and aditional dressings to account for as well " I would have said not a good relationship,dogs eat rabbits | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" 3.3333 dot ( ie recurring) tenths likewise 6.666666etc" . That's not written as a fraction that's numerical | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" 3.3333 dot ( ie recurring) tenths likewise 6.666666etc. That's not written as a fraction that's numerical" You don't say. Oh you did. The question was "What is 1/3 in tenths." It never ceased to amaze me how many times the kids brought home Maths ( well, arithmetic) question sheets where either the Question or the Teachers answer was a load of shite. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I read an interesting article about how IQ tests are irrelevant. Einstein was a genius. But scored relatively poorly on his IQ test, especially for some one so far head of everyone in terms of intelligence. There was a massive paper published on people that score high on an IQ test are simply good at taking tests. It was actually a great read They tell you at how good a person is at placing things into abstract categories that humans have invented. For example, when asked the question "what is the relationship between a dog and a rabbit?" a higher IQ answer would be that they are both mammals whereas a lower Iq one would be that the dog chases the rabbit. Both are correct, and I would say that the latter is possibly a more useful answer in the real world. In theory an IQ test should show a persons ability to identify and resolve an issue. This resuires the test itself to be abstract and not utilise existing knowledge. So the dog and rabit answers of being mammals versus one chasing the other only shows that one individual has different knowledge ratehr than either one having higher or lower IQ. " Yup, in my understanding they are a test of the ability to use logic to solve a novel problem - and, in their purest form, in a way that does not depend on extant knowledge. You can test animal IQ and that has nothing to do with use of language or retained trivia! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can test animal IQ and that has nothing to do with use of language or retained trivia!" How about 15 to 1 for critters? Everything from magpies to border collies to dolphins forming the famous semicircle so we can see which does retain trivia best. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You can test animal IQ and that has nothing to do with use of language or retained trivia! How about 15 to 1 for critters? Everything from magpies to border collies to dolphins forming the famous semicircle so we can see which does retain trivia best." Crows - dems clever critters. And honeybadgers! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |