FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

page three banned

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Just heard on the telly news that page three glamour models have been removed , due to pressure from the bra burning brigade ! WHAT NEXT ???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

Damn, I'll just have to perve more boobies on here then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ackspopCouple
over a year ago

Wymondham

Next thing it'll be votes for women!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

According to Murdochs lates tweet....he thought it was getting "old fashioned"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That's The Daily & Sunday sport fucked then

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Only a few more pages to go then eh then we can be rid of that shite rag altogether.

I'd love to ban Murdoch

/carry on tits

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah shame that, especially as you can't see bare tits anywhere else.

Nobody wants to buy the sun, murdoch is trying to sell stuff. Tits aren't banned, he made an economic decision to remove them to see if sales go up. You can guarantee if he makes less sales they'll be back.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *empting Devil.Woman
over a year ago

Sheffield

It hasn't been banned, they chose to stop publishing it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *he tactile technicianMan
over a year ago

the good lands, the bad lands, the any where you may want me lands


"It hasn't been banned, they chose to stop publishing it."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
Forum Mod
over a year ago

I thought page 3 boobs had gone years ago!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Still will be woman but have there bits not on show . Maybe we will get men cocks on show now . lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icefellatwoMan
over a year ago

hastings


"Just heard on the telly news that page three glamour models have been removed , due to pressure from the bra burning brigade ! WHAT NEXT ??? "

I think I read somewhere they will still be showing them on there website

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We lost page three months ago over here, apparently there was no market for it..

like irish lads don't like tits :/

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who really buys a newspaper just for page 3? I suspect it will make no difference to sales and it will be back in a few weeks...

Anyway. Why are they called models when they aren't modelling anything?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *izzy RascallMan
over a year ago

Cardiff


"It hasn't been banned, they chose to stop publishing it."

The heading is completely wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Mmmm that's a strange decision!.

I would have thought that was one of the most popular pages amongst its readers.

Not many companies cut popular stuff?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I hope it's not come from outside influence, if so I'll be very disappointed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who really buys a newspaper just for page 3? "

Yeaaahh who would EVER do that?...

I wouldn't...really I wouldn't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can he get rid of Katie Hopkins and Tony Parsons as well ?They are far more offensive to my delicate sensibilities.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Can he get rid of Katie Hopkins and Tony Parsons as well ?They are far more offensive to my delicate sensibilities."
.

I personally think it's not you there not trying to offend, but other people!.

That's the trouble once you start down the slippery slope of what people find offensive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom

[Removed by poster at 20/01/15 09:26:02]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom


"Who really buys a newspaper just for page 3?

Yeaaahh who would EVER do that?...

I wouldn't...really I wouldn't. "

Pmsl...

My god what will all those poor models do for a living now?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Yeah the sun banned it but have the star an sunday midweek weekend sport

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We lost page three months ago over here, apparently there was no market for it..

like irish lads don't like tits :/"
still get sunday sport in belfast as i have a lady there sends me hers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Can he get rid of Katie Hopkins and Tony Parsons as well ?They are far more offensive to my delicate sensibilities..

I personally think it's not you there not trying to offend, but other people!.

That's the trouble once you start down the slippery slope of what people find offensive."

I remember when Tony parsons wrote for the name. He was so " right on" with his painfully correct views it wound everybody up. The man went out with Julie birchall ffs! That speaks volumes. Such a left leaning anarchic proto Marxist Zeitgeist surfing old punk, and he goes and writes for the sun. Well he can just fuck right off. He's a cunt.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

NME!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who really buys a newspaper just for page 3?

Yeaaahh who would EVER do that?...

I wouldn't...really I wouldn't.

Pmsl...

My god what will all those poor models do for a living now?"

Well a fair few have been known to do escort work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits"
.

Near enough every newspaper loses money hand over first, rich people don't run newspapers to make money!.

And I don't think this decision was Rupert Murdochs or certainly not one based on business.

I can't see feminazis or lefties suddenly rushing out to buy it, so that means he can only lose readers.

I think the timing is the best clue!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Can he get rid of Katie Hopkins and Tony Parsons as well ?They are far more offensive to my delicate sensibilities..

I personally think it's not you there not trying to offend, but other people!.

That's the trouble once you start down the slippery slope of what people find offensive.

I remember when Tony parsons wrote for the name. He was so " right on" with his painfully correct views it wound everybody up. The man went out with Julie birchall ffs! That speaks volumes. Such a left leaning anarchic proto Marxist Zeitgeist surfing old punk, and he goes and writes for the sun. Well he can just fuck right off. He's a cunt. "

Didn't like him then (I was a Sounds man!), didn't like his shitty, overly sentimental, look how new man I am books and I can't stand the cunt now...so I'm up to 40 years of not liking Tony Parsons!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Where politics mix with bingo and tits.

Where they offer you a feature

On stockings and suspenders

Next to a call for stiffer penalties for sex offenders

If this does not reflect your view you should understand

That those who own the papers also own this land

And they'd rather you believe

In Coronation Street capers

In the war of circulation, it sells newspapers

Could it be an infringement

Of the freedom of the press

To print pictures of women in states of undress

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"Where politics mix with bingo and tits.

Where they offer you a feature

On stockings and suspenders

Next to a call for stiffer penalties for sex offenders

If this does not reflect your view you should understand

That those who own the papers also own this land

And they'd rather you believe

In Coronation Street capers

In the war of circulation, it sells newspapers

Could it be an infringement

Of the freedom of the press

To print pictures of women in states of undress"

Love Billy!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Where politics mix with bingo and tits.

Where they offer you a feature

On stockings and suspenders

Next to a call for stiffer penalties for sex offenders

If this does not reflect your view you should understand

That those who own the papers also own this land

And they'd rather you believe

In Coronation Street capers

In the war of circulation, it sells newspapers

Could it be an infringement

Of the freedom of the press

To print pictures of women in states of undress

Love Billy! "

No need to Bragg.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley

Wahay!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

its cool. i had my fun with it back in my younger days

havent read a paper in years

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hands up who cut the page 3 girls out and stuck them on their bedroom wall?

My mum hated that my dad did that, dunno why he would do that either, it's kind of weird...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits"

funny enough the bird who started the campagin had her hair all nice , good make up neatly done, made herself look really attractive then moaned that 6 year old girls are coming up to their mums stating do we have to look attractive when we grow up.

the feminist fuckers can piss off

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

my fave page 3 girl was Nicola T

i was actually inlove with her ass

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hands up who cut the page 3 girls out and stuck them on their bedroom wall?

My mum hated that my dad did that, dunno why he would do that either, it's kind of weird..."

Our lockers at work used to be full of them, One site i was on the one girl used to have the page 7 fella pics

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits

funny enough the bird who started the campagin had her hair all nice , good make up neatly done, made herself look really attractive then moaned that 6 year old girls are coming up to their mums stating do we have to look attractive when we grow up.

the feminist fuckers can piss off

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS"

I didn't realise Murdoch was a feminist.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's about time they pulled the plug. It was out of date in the 70s. But I see their newly found moral position doesn't extend to the Internet, as the online version of the paper will still have tits and arse.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits

funny enough the bird who started the campagin had her hair all nice , good make up neatly done, made herself look really attractive then moaned that 6 year old girls are coming up to their mums stating do we have to look attractive when we grow up.

the feminist fuckers can piss off

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

I didn't realise Murdoch was a feminist. "

He bowed down to them.

funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's about time they pulled the plug. It was out of date in the 70s. But I see their newly found moral position doesn't extend to the Internet, as the online version of the paper will still have tits and arse."

what does `out of date ` mean skez ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

I've always thought it a bit naff to be honest.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits

funny enough the bird who started the campagin had her hair all nice , good make up neatly done, made herself look really attractive then moaned that 6 year old girls are coming up to their mums stating do we have to look attractive when we grow up.

the feminist fuckers can piss off

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

I didn't realise Murdoch was a feminist.

He bowed down to them.

funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper"

Do you really think Murdoch bows down to anyone ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's about time they pulled the plug. It was out of date in the 70s. But I see their newly found moral position doesn't extend to the Internet, as the online version of the paper will still have tits and arse.

what does `out of date ` mean skez ?

"

Out-of-date (adjective): no longer useful or acceptable. Not modern or current.

Let me know if I can advise on any other expressions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It's a win win for Murdoch, he gets to present his rag as slightly more progressive while at the same time using the 'feminazi/pc gone mad' excuse. I think the long term plan is to do away with the print edition and migrate his readership to an online only publication.

Incidentally saw one of those no to page three birds on the news this morning, she had a cracking pair of tits

funny enough the bird who started the campagin had her hair all nice , good make up neatly done, made herself look really attractive then moaned that 6 year old girls are coming up to their mums stating do we have to look attractive when we grow up.

the feminist fuckers can piss off

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

I didn't realise Murdoch was a feminist.

He bowed down to them.

funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Do you really think Murdoch bows down to anyone ? "

No, he only cares about commercial reality, and stopping tits on page 3 is all about appealing to a new generation of readers. There's no victory for feminists here.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/01/15 13:25:02]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper"

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, and having other women (yeah many of us on here are guilty) propagate the fact that our tits are for looking at and women are a lovely pair of tits, from an initial view of us anyway. Some women want to be taken seriously rather than be objectified.

Tbh i don't think a tabloid is the best place for tits, it's for news, oh ffs i can't even make an argument for it coz the news isn't really news any more it's all shit...

Let them shove the newspapers in a bag on the top shelf like people asked for in the first place. Let people buy some propaganda bits of paper with tits in and everyone is happy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

Boobs dont harm anyone. They are loved by babies , lusted over by spotty teenagers and adored by us Men ( and some wonem i dare say).

This is a classic example of if people keep shouting something long enough others will join in

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, .

...

."

That why we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of chioce in this argument is to buy another paper

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

Boobs dont harm anyone. They are loved by babies , lusted over by spotty teenagers and adored by us Men ( and some wonem i dare say).

This is a classic example of if people keep shouting something long enough others will join in "

Why are they your boobs ? you don't own them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"BRING BACK OUR BOOBS

Boobs dont harm anyone. They are loved by babies , lusted over by spotty teenagers and adored by us Men ( and some wonem i dare say).

This is a classic example of if people keep shouting something long enough others will join in

Why are they your boobs ? you don't own them. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, .

...

.

That why we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of chioce in this argument is to buy another paper"

Go ahead and buy another paper then and stop trying to convince yourself that anyone but Murdoch has made this decision, for anything other than commercial reasons.

To be honest, the tits will be back soon anyway as the rest of the paper is misogynistic, racist and homophobic, so it's unlikely to get many new converts just because you can't see a pair of tits on page 3 anymore.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've heard to make up for the lack of tits on page three they are getting back Littlejohn and Clarkson.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper"

You think models earn a 'decent living' from being on Page 3? Get real. Half of them don't get paid for it.

There's so many other things that are wrong in peoples assumptions above, but people would be best reading the FAQ on the No More Page 3 website.

But then again, I'm a radical feminist. What would I know?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rtemisiaWoman
over a year ago

Norwich

I couldn't afford to burn my bras, but a newspaper is not the place to show tits. Then again, the Sun isn't really a newspaper.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper."

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, .

...

.

That why we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of chioce in this argument is to buy another paper

Go ahead and buy another paper then and stop trying to convince yourself that anyone but Murdoch has made this decision, for anything other than commercial reasons.

To be honest, the tits will be back soon anyway as the rest of the paper is misogynistic, racist and homophobic, so it's unlikely to get many new converts just because you can't see a pair of tits on page 3 anymore."
.

You kinda answered his question that you were berating him for having and that was, why would he remove it if you and he knows it won't increase sales? But certainly lose him sales.

Not that he's bothered about sales as he's run it and many others at a loss for years and years.

Newspapers aren't news and haven't been for years, there used to coerce public opinion!.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything. "
.

You don't know that though!.

We've just come out of a year long parliamentary investigation which showed exactly how close politics is with the papers.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything. .

You don't know that though!.

We've just come out of a year long parliamentary investigation which showed exactly how close politics is with the papers."

Maybe I should have worded it better.

Feminists haven't forced Murdoch to do anything.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust_for_laughsCouple
over a year ago

Hinckley


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, .

...

.

That why we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of chioce in this argument is to buy another paper

Go ahead and buy another paper then and stop trying to convince yourself that anyone but Murdoch has made this decision, for anything other than commercial reasons.

To be honest, the tits will be back soon anyway as the rest of the paper is misogynistic, racist and homophobic, so it's unlikely to get many new converts just because you can't see a pair of tits on page 3 anymore..

You kinda answered his question that you were berating him for having and that was, why would he remove it if you and he knows it won't increase sales? But certainly lose him sales.

Not that he's bothered about sales as he's run it and many others at a loss for years and years.

Newspapers aren't news and haven't been for years, there used to coerce public opinion!."

I was merely berating his use of 'freedom of choice', pointing out that it works both ways.

As for the sales, he's killing two birds with one stone; he's shutting up the anti-page 3 lobby (for now) and running a market research program at the same time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"funny thing is feminist stand for equal rights for women and want pay and conditions like us men which i fully agree with but then they wanted to stop women earning a decent living by looking fantastic in a paper

Even funnier is some women don't want to be ornaments for people to look at, .

...

.

That why we have the freedom of choice and the freedom of chioce in this argument is to buy another paper"

Ah-ah you took that out of context. They don't want other people (the media) making objectification look normal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything. "

this..

Murdoch does what he wants..

its business..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything. .

You don't know that though!.

We've just come out of a year long parliamentary investigation which showed exactly how close politics is with the papers.

Maybe I should have worded it better.

Feminists haven't forced Murdoch to do anything. "
.

Lol yeah that's definitely true.

Five years ago before the phone bugging scandal, I used to have a terrible opinion of newspapers and imagined them to be quite unscrupulous..... What I realised after it was my imagination was not quite imaginative enough

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything.

this..

Murdoch does what he wants..

its business.."
.It's not though is it.

As a business they would have all gone bust 30 years ago, they've been propped up with billionaires money no different than Chelsea or city.

So if it's not a business to make money, what's it there for!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *reacher and TartCouple
over a year ago

High Peak

They will only have dropped it to help sales hard cash talks.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They will only have dropped it to help sales hard cash talks."
.

Except when you've got billions.

The one thing I know about Murdoch is when he does things, it's rarely for the reason you think it as the time.

I mean when they sacked Andy gray and Richard Keane from sky sorts it looked like a simple case of sexism and it was in a way, but with hindsight you realise they were the scapegoats of the whole phone hacking scandal.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *carineMan
over a year ago

Armthorpe, Doncaster

I am gutted cos i can no longer know what Nicola thinks about fracking...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The Sun has a circulation of over 2 million, the anti page 3 lobby managed to get 215 000 to sign a petition, in our so called democratic country, that means the petition should be dead in the water, but once again, minority get it's way. I don't read the Sun, far too much football and BS stories to be called a newspaper.

No one has forced Murdoch to do anything.

this..

Murdoch does what he wants..

its business...It's not though is it.

As a business they would have all gone bust 30 years ago, they've been propped up with billionaires money no different than Chelsea or city.

So if it's not a business to make money, what's it there for!"

murdoch's empire is quite profitable..

the sun is just one small part of it..

page three is even smaller..

he hasn't dropped page 3 for any other reason than business..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"That's The Daily & Sunday sport fucked then "
sport newspapers here to stay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Boobies are available on page 3 of today's Sun.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

Isn't it good to know that the puritans are still shaping our society

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The Boobs are back. ..just so you know...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top