FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

TV's and Transsexuals

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

it really is about time this site separated TV's from Transsexuals there is a world of difference,basically transexual WOMEN have breasts TV's dont!! besides other difference's

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

It sounds good, but would be tricky in reality to administer.

Do you go on who has had surgery, who is on hormones, who's got a Dr's note, or who just feels they are in the wrong gender?

Is it the responsibility of the profile holder to decide which box applies to them, or does someone at Fab put the stamp of approval on it?

On Chix, I personally know a lot of girls who label themselves as TS, but aren't, as they feel it applies to them. I can imagine this site being similar.

I think people would just look at the pics and decide if the profile holder fits their idea of what a TS should be.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't forget all the single men pretending to be one

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It sounds good, but would be tricky in reality to administer.

Do you go on who has had surgery, who is on hormones, who's got a Dr's note, or who just feels they are in the wrong gender?

Is it the responsibility of the profile holder to decide which box applies to them, or does someone at Fab put the stamp of approval on it?

On Chix, I personally know a lot of girls who label themselves as TS, but aren't, as they feel it applies to them. I can imagine this site being similar.

I think people would just look at the pics and decide if the profile holder fits their idea of what a TS should be. "

I agree with that

Who does decide who's a TS and who's a TV, I know someone ho lives full time as a woman but has never taken hormones or has boobs would this person be allowed a TS profile?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It would have to be self policed same as there's nothing stopping a single guy making a female or couples profile.

Surely it wouldn't take long for the genuine TS girls to get verified as genuine and the chancers outed

Fully support splitting them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

But would the verification say: 'This person met my idea of what a TS is.'

Or, 'I've seen their doctors note and the hormones they are on.'

Or 'They've had implants and so are TS, in my mind.'

Or, 'I met this lady and they are smooth all over, have a lovely cock and a great figure.'

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A bit of common sense goes a long way.

They way I see it is:

If a TV/TS/CD joins surely they want to be as genuine as possible so will choose the description best fitting. E.g a TS wouldn't choose CD and vice versa

Obviously I understand there will be CDs choosing TS and chancing it but there is no way to police who chooses what profile when they join.

How about we reverse the question and say would you support merging TV/Ts/Cd into one category If they weren't already?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady

Since most of the guys looking for TS will feel let down when they don't look like Kelly Brook, maybe we should grade them.

10 for a Mrs Doubtfire or give them 1 when they look like an escapee from a porn movie!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Since most of the guys looking for TS will feel let down when they don't look like Kelly Brook, maybe we should grade them.

10 for a Mrs Doubtfire or give them 1 when they look like an escapee from a porn movie!"

I'll pay good money for the job of grading them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"A bit of common sense goes a long way.

They way I see it is:

If a TV/TS/CD joins surely they want to be as genuine as possible so will choose the description best fitting. E.g a TS wouldn't choose CD and vice versa

Obviously I understand there will be CDs choosing TS and chancing it but there is no way to police who chooses what profile when they join.

How about we reverse the question and say would you support merging TV/Ts/Cd into one category If they weren't already? "

Why would anyone be "chancing" it saying they're a TS when they're not. TS doesn't necessarily look any different to a TV. It may be a mental difference only.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom

And then it would go further. I'm not full time. But don't class my self as a crossdresser. When Nikki is out to play I'm all woman. The fact that at some point I must revert to a male form is a pain in the ass.(no pun intended)

Trangenderism covers so many shades of grey that they could write a book about it.

At the end of the day line has to be drawn. And the Web development team decided to put TS and Tv's together...... We're not that bad really.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford

why ? a well known tranny site doesnt feel the need to separate them ..why not just leave it..most people on here dont give a shit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford


"

How about we reverse the question and say would you support merging TV/Ts/Cd into one category If they weren't already? "

a transvestite is the same as a crossdresser ..absolutely no difference .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

How about we reverse the question and say would you support merging TV/Ts/Cd into one category If they weren't already?

a transvestite is the same as a crossdresser ..absolutely no difference ."

But a transsexual is completely different........

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allipygousMan
over a year ago

Leicester

For me it's quite simple: someone who psychologically identifies themselves as a woman and lives full time as such, whether on hormones or not, would go in the transsexual category.

Anyone who has a 'man mode' would not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"For me it's quite simple: someone who psychologically identifies themselves as a woman and lives full time as such, whether on hormones or not, would go in the transsexual category.

Anyone who has a 'man mode' would not."

I agree

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"For me it's quite simple: someone who psychologically identifies themselves as a woman and lives full time as such, whether on hormones or not, would go in the transsexual category.

Anyone who has a 'man mode' would not."

.

Well..sometimes it's not that simple.

Some might feel they are a woman inside their manly physique...

and yet, still live as a man - and proud of it.

.

All these labels are like amoeba..they will keep on dividing.

As for this site, people should be able meet whoever they have mutual attraction to.

.

I think some of the posts above are spot-on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *allipygousMan
over a year ago

Leicester


"For me it's quite simple: someone who psychologically identifies themselves as a woman and lives full time as such, whether on hormones or not, would go in the transsexual category.

Anyone who has a 'man mode' would not.

.

Well..sometimes it's not that simple.

Some might feel they are a woman inside their manly physique...

and yet, still live as a man - and proud of it.

.

All these labels are like amoeba..they will keep on dividing.

As for this site, people should be able meet whoever they have mutual attraction to.

.

I think some of the posts above are spot-on.

"

You've just described a transvestite.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We are all Men in Frocks,simple as that, this Trans heirarchy is a Web Invention...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We are all Men in Frocks,simple as that, this Trans heirarchy is a Web Invention..."

Well said, I put on lace knickers & stockings for some guys who happen to like them.

What box do I sit in (not the twat box which is how I sometimes feel)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"Since most of the guys looking for TS will feel let down when they don't look like Kelly Brook, maybe we should grade them.

10 for a Mrs Doubtfire or give them 1 when they look like an escapee from a porn movie!

I'll pay good money for the job of grading them "

Same here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Personally I support splitting them and letting people decide how they identify. Then it's up to them and those wanting to meet them to ensure both are getting what they're looking for.

There is a big difference between TV and TS.

Everyone who meets, well, nearly everyone, has to look at profiles and photos and talk to others on the 'phone/cam/do whatever works for them, in deciding who they should meet. This is no different.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Are there any TS women who don't care if the categories are divided or not?

I'm curious because I know a lot of TVs don't care but I don't recall seeing a TS saying they don't care.

I know some TS women are very offended to be in a category with men. That's no criticism of men - most of them exclusively seek and meet men - they don't feel it represents them. They identify as women, so that's fair enough.

I was fortunate to be born female in a female body. If, for some reason, it was decided that the size of my feet or girth of my thumbs is a male characteristic and I was lumped in a group with men, I'd be unhappy about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford


".

There is a big difference between TV and TS.

"

but for this site i dont feel its important enough to have a separate section.

i mean most guys dont even read profiles anyway so you think they'll be bothered ?

if i guy is specifically looking for a TS then he can go to a TS site

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel_38Woman
over a year ago

Staffs

If you have a penis your a man, don't care how you try to dress it up.

If I wore a white coat and had a stethoscope around my neck dose that make me a doctor ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"it really is about time this site separated TV's from Transsexuals there is a world of difference,basically transexual WOMEN have breasts TV's dont!! besides other difference's "

thats what tvchix is for kentgardener here

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts


"If you have a penis your a man, don't care how you try to dress it up.

If I wore a white coat and had a stethoscope around my neck dose that make me a doctor ? "

I'm noticing a trend in your comments on TG threads.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Beg to differ there on tv an cd being same tv to me is one likes dressing a 90% of there time a cd only dresses for a little of the time an wen an where

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ngel_38Woman
over a year ago

Staffs


"If you have a penis your a man, don't care how you try to dress it up.

If I wore a white coat and had a stethoscope around my neck dose that make me a doctor ?

I'm noticing a trend in your comments on TG threads. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

wow,,is all I can say

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouplekinkCouple
over a year ago

kink town

This thread highlights the fact that whether you separate them or not, people will still have different ideas on what each 'label' means. If the users if fab can't decide then what chance have the admin got.

We couldn't care less whether it is separated as we will make our own minds up from the the profile and contact.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Urm not all transsexuals or MTF's have breasts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_Samantha_LovecockTV/TS
over a year ago

bmth /poole sometimes blandford


"Beg to differ there on tv an cd being same tv to me is one likes dressing a 90% of there time a cd only dresses for a little of the time an wen an where"

well u are entitled to your own definition but here's the actual definition

"Magnus Hirschfeld coined the word transvestism (from Latin trans-, "across, over" and vestitus, "dressed") to refer to the sexual interest in cross-dressing"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There's absolutely nothing to stop a TS lady filling out a female profile if they want to be seen as a woman rather than as a TS (or vice versa for transguys) and then just being selective about meets, just as there would be nothing to stop TV using a TS label.

Being TS has nothing to do with physical appearance, it's just that some are more 'fortunate' than others in how well they conform to the norms of their adopted gender. A 20 stone rugby players could just as easily be transsexual as an 8 stone petit figured guy could feel as, manly as any other guy inside.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree there's a world of difference between enjoying slipping on a pair of frilly knickers and being unable to continue functioning as a person unless you make a change. Cause that's really what the difference is.

It's really not possible for anyone other than the individual, setting up the profile to make the call of where they sit on, the trans spectrum and even they may not know.

In the end there's no simple solution to this and the developers /site owners don't give a fig anyway so why would they make more hassle for themselves by creating additional categories?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There's absolutely nothing to stop a TS lady filling out a female profile if they want to be seen as a woman rather than as a TS (or vice versa for transguys) and then just being selective about meets, just as there would be nothing to stop TV using a TS label.

Being TS has nothing to do with physical appearance, it's just that some are more 'fortunate' than others in how well they conform to the norms of their adopted gender. A 20 stone rugby players could just as easily be transsexual as an 8 stone petit figured guy could feel as, manly as any other guy inside.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree there's a world of difference between enjoying slipping on a pair of frilly knickers and being unable to continue functioning as a person unless you make a change. Cause that's really what the difference is.

It's really not possible for anyone other than the individual, setting up the profile to make the call of where they sit on, the trans spectrum and even they may not know.

In the end there's no simple solution to this and the developers /site owners don't give a fig anyway so why would they make more hassle for themselves by creating additional categories? "

spot on

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS
over a year ago

Durham


"There's absolutely nothing to stop a TS lady filling out a female profile if they want to be seen as a woman rather than as a TS (or vice versa for transguys) and then just being selective about meets, just as there would be nothing to stop TV using a TS label.

Being TS has nothing to do with physical appearance, it's just that some are more 'fortunate' than others in how well they conform to the norms of their adopted gender. A 20 stone rugby players could just as easily be transsexual as an 8 stone petit figured guy could feel as, manly as any other guy inside.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree there's a world of difference between enjoying slipping on a pair of frilly knickers and being unable to continue functioning as a person unless you make a change. Cause that's really what the difference is.

It's really not possible for anyone other than the individual, setting up the profile to make the call of where they sit on, the trans spectrum and even they may not know.

In the end there's no simple solution to this and the developers /site owners don't give a fig anyway so why would they make more hassle for themselves by creating additional categories? "

Absolutely spot on. The difference between a TS and a TV is in the persons mind and has nothing to do with a persons appearance. I thing a lot of people's views on this are influenced by trannie porn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts


"There's absolutely nothing to stop a TS lady filling out a female profile if they want to be seen as a woman rather than as a TS (or vice versa for transguys) and then just being selective about meets, just as there would be nothing to stop TV using a TS label.

Being TS has nothing to do with physical appearance, it's just that some are more 'fortunate' than others in how well they conform to the norms of their adopted gender. A 20 stone rugby players could just as easily be transsexual as an 8 stone petit figured guy could feel as, manly as any other guy inside.

Don't get me wrong, I fully agree there's a world of difference between enjoying slipping on a pair of frilly knickers and being unable to continue functioning as a person unless you make a change. Cause that's really what the difference is.

It's really not possible for anyone other than the individual, setting up the profile to make the call of where they sit on, the trans spectrum and even they may not know.

In the end there's no simple solution to this and the developers /site owners don't give a fig anyway so why would they make more hassle for themselves by creating additional categories? "

I concur.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

I support keeping it as it is, as a transgender individual.

It is an individual's own right to choose and denote their own gender anyway, regardless of whether others feel they are too masculine, big or flimsy for whichever they choose.

If Fab introduced another change, it would mean all existing users to change their listing- and, until we all did, then it would mean that the categorisation was meaningless, as it would not be 100% accurate.

Fab is about meeting others, and most users will spend some time discussing respective needs, prior to arranging a meet. We all know that often profiles are not read, but that still doesn't leave out the opportunity to ask any questions etc, that each may feel is needed.

And some are right, that at a pertinent point, some of us may change our profile gender to female/male etc, without mention of an trans journey. That again is our right.

It's not the responsibility of fab to police our gender identity transition, nor for any service provider to discriminate, which would be illegal, as we have protected characteristics. Think of it like being a listed building - Mz Titz and my own titz being Category 1 Listed Buildings, if we were historic piles. Not saying you've got piles, Tina

So, I say hands off. We're all adults and gender identity is a tough one for many of us, so keep it simple and let users decide between themselves just who they want to meet with.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enny PR9TV/TS
over a year ago

Southport


"I support keeping it as it is, as a transgender individual.

It is an individual's own right to choose and denote their own gender anyway, regardless of whether others feel they are too masculine, big or flimsy for whichever they choose.

If Fab introduced another change, it would mean all existing users to change their listing- and, until we all did, then it would mean that the categorisation was meaningless, as it would not be 100% accurate.

Fab is about meeting others, and most users will spend some time discussing respective needs, prior to arranging a meet. We all know that often profiles are not read, but that still doesn't leave out the opportunity to ask any questions etc, that each may feel is needed.

And some are right, that at a pertinent point, some of us may change our profile gender to female/male etc, without mention of an trans journey. That again is our right.

It's not the responsibility of fab to police our gender identity transition, nor for any service provider to discriminate, which would be illegal, as we have protected characteristics. Think of it like being a listed building - Mz Titz and my own titz being Category 1 Listed Buildings, if we were historic piles. Not saying you've got piles, Tina

So, I say hands off. We're all adults and gender identity is a tough one for many of us, so keep it simple and let users decide between themselves just who they want to meet with."

My sentiments entirely.

Now we that we have that sorted can we go back to the real question. "Why do straight guys keep messaging us"?

Jenny xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i love straight guys lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *now white1000Woman
over a year ago

York

Cat among the pigeons time....

when i first joined i started with a female profile, afterall, all my legal documentation lists me as female, but i also stated in my profile that i was TS and awaiting the cock-chop OP.

Before i even had chance to upload a single picture , my profile was reported and admin changed it to TV/TS, of course admin didn't bother to tell me, so every pic i uploaded for nearly a week was getting rejected 'because it wasn't me in the photo' (i was ticking female in the declaration )

So, TV/CD- pretty much the same, although one will dress far more often and for longer periods of time, sometimes even staying in the female format for a few days before reverting back to male mode, but essentially TV and CD will live part or most of life as a male. Some will dress for sexual kicks, some will dress just because they feel better or more comfortable in female attire, but all will revert to being male.

TS, a whole world of difference, a TS will live their life full time 24/7 as the woman they are, they will have an overwhelming feeling inside that they should have been born female (or male if going the opposite way, FTM).

Depending on their own stage during the transition, they could be anywhere from just starting their transition and therefore not yet be full time or on hormones to someone who is full time , on hormones and waiting for gender realignment surgery (GRS, or the cock-chop OP as i call it) to someone who is post operative and when naked , looks every inch as much a female as they truly are.

Some TS women will decide not to have the surgery, that does not make them male, it does not make them TV either, and at some stage during the transition of ALL TS women, there is a requirement that they change their legal name (unless they choose not to be legally recognised as female in which case my own opinion would be that they are still TV with some TS tendencies )

Complicated?

you bet it is.

can this site, or any other site really split us up into our correct categories?

YES, simply because a TS woman is just that, a woman.

the categories really should be TV/CD

and no category for TS because we belong in the female category.

oh stop panicking, it's never going to happen anyway, but before you whinge and moan about TS and female being in the same category when some TS women still have a cock, just think how many men have a couples profile, and how many times you get messages from couples and arrange meets only to find the 'female' can't meet this time, maybe next time though.

It doesn't matter what categories there are and for who, they will all get abused.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"Cat among the pigeons time....

when i first joined i started with a female profile, afterall, all my legal documentation lists me as female, but i also stated in my profile that i was TS and awaiting the cock-chop OP.

Before i even had chance to upload a single picture , my profile was reported and admin changed it to TV/TS, of course admin didn't bother to tell me, so every pic i uploaded for nearly a week was getting rejected 'because it wasn't me in the photo' (i was ticking female in the declaration )

So, TV/CD- pretty much the same, although one will dress far more often and for longer periods of time, sometimes even staying in the female format for a few days before reverting back to male mode, but essentially TV and CD will live part or most of life as a male. Some will dress for sexual kicks, some will dress just because they feel better or more comfortable in female attire, but all will revert to being male.

TS, a whole world of difference, a TS will live their life full time 24/7 as the woman they are, they will have an overwhelming feeling inside that they should have been born female (or male if going the opposite way, FTM).

Depending on their own stage during the transition, they could be anywhere from just starting their transition and therefore not yet be full time or on hormones to someone who is full time , on hormones and waiting for gender realignment surgery (GRS, or the cock-chop OP as i call it) to someone who is post operative and when naked , looks every inch as much a female as they truly are.

Some TS women will decide not to have the surgery, that does not make them male, it does not make them TV either, and at some stage during the transition of ALL TS women, there is a requirement that they change their legal name (unless they choose not to be legally recognised as female in which case my own opinion would be that they are still TV with some TS tendencies )

Complicated?

you bet it is.

can this site, or any other site really split us up into our correct categories?

YES, simply because a TS woman is just that, a woman.

the categories really should be TV/CD

and no category for TS because we belong in the female category.

oh stop panicking, it's never going to happen anyway, but before you whinge and moan about TS and female being in the same category when some TS women still have a cock, just think how many men have a couples profile, and how many times you get messages from couples and arrange meets only to find the 'female' can't meet this time, maybe next time though.

It doesn't matter what categories there are and for who, they will all get abused."

Excellent post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Now I am confused

What is a CD/TV/TS?

The common factor being woman's clothes, all have a dick, some have boobs, some its just a kink to wear woman's underwear to please themselves or there buddy yet live a heterosexual life. It is all confusing my head hurts

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom


"Cat among the pigeons time....

when i first joined i started with a female profile, afterall, all my legal documentation lists me as female, but i also stated in my profile that i was TS and awaiting the cock-chop OP.

Before i even had chance to upload a single picture , my profile was reported and admin changed it to TV/TS, of course admin didn't bother to tell me, so every pic i uploaded for nearly a week was getting rejected 'because it wasn't me in the photo' (i was ticking female in the declaration )

So, TV/CD- pretty much the same, although one will dress far more often and for longer periods of time, sometimes even staying in the female format for a few days before reverting back to male mode, but essentially TV and CD will live part or most of life as a male. Some will dress for sexual kicks, some will dress just because they feel better or more comfortable in female attire, but all will revert to being male.

TS, a whole world of difference, a TS will live their life full time 24/7 as the woman they are, they will have an overwhelming feeling inside that they should have been born female (or male if going the opposite way, FTM).

Depending on their own stage during the transition, they could be anywhere from just starting their transition and therefore not yet be full time or on hormones to someone who is full time , on hormones and waiting for gender realignment surgery (GRS, or the cock-chop OP as i call it) to someone who is post operative and when naked , looks every inch as much a female as they truly are.

Some TS women will decide not to have the surgery, that does not make them male, it does not make them TV either, and at some stage during the transition of ALL TS women, there is a requirement that they change their legal name (unless they choose not to be legally recognised as female in which case my own opinion would be that they are still TV with some TS tendencies )

Complicated?

you bet it is.

can this site, or any other site really split us up into our correct categories?

YES, simply because a TS woman is just that, a woman.

the categories really should be TV/CD

and no category for TS because we belong in the female category.

oh stop panicking, it's never going to happen anyway, but before you whinge and moan about TS and female being in the same category when some TS women still have a cock, just think how many men have a couples profile, and how many times you get messages from couples and arrange meets only to find the 'female' can't meet this time, maybe next time though.

It doesn't matter what categories there are and for who, they will all get abused.

Excellent post"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Of course you're right.

it must be a bit depressing for a ts to be lumped in with cross dressers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It would be much better to scrap the whole TV/TS, thing and replace it with a "Transgender" label.

It's an umbrella term that fits us all, the HPW's the CD's, TV's and TS.

But of course, some people would still piss and whine about it!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom


"It would be much better to scrap the whole TV/TS, thing and replace it with a "Transgender" label.

It's an umbrella term that fits us all, the HPW's the CD's, TV's and TS.

But of course, some people would still piss and whine about it! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"It would be much better to scrap the whole TV/TS, thing and replace it with a "Transgender" label.

It's an umbrella term that fits us all, the HPW's the CD's, TV's and TS.

But of course, some people would still piss and whine about it! "

Sorry to whine but does transgender not really only apply to TSs? Certainly I wouldn't apply the term to myself

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"But would the verification say: 'This person met my idea of what a TS is.'

Or, 'I met this lady and they are smooth all over, have a lovely cock and a great figure.' "

Happy to get the latter as a verification. I'm defo not TS.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom


"It would be much better to scrap the whole TV/TS, thing and replace it with a "Transgender" label.

It's an umbrella term that fits us all, the HPW's the CD's, TV's and TS.

But of course, some people would still piss and whine about it!

Sorry to whine but does transgender not really only apply to TSs? Certainly I wouldn't apply the term to myself"

No because we're of the Transgender community xx

Don't sell yourself short x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atietvsheffTV/TS
over a year ago

Sheffield


"I support keeping it as it is, as a transgender individual.

It is an individual's own right to choose and denote their own gender anyway, regardless of whether others feel they are too masculine, big or flimsy for whichever they choose.

If Fab introduced another change, it would mean all existing users to change their listing- and, until we all did, then it would mean that the categorisation was meaningless, as it would not be 100% accurate.

Fab is about meeting others, and most users will spend some time discussing respective needs, prior to arranging a meet. We all know that often profiles are not read, but that still doesn't leave out the opportunity to ask any questions etc, that each may feel is needed.

And some are right, that at a pertinent point, some of us may change our profile gender to female/male etc, without mention of an trans journey. That again is our right.

It's not the responsibility of fab to police our gender identity transition, nor for any service provider to discriminate, which would be illegal, as we have protected characteristics. Think of it like being a listed building - Mz Titz and my own titz being Category 1 Listed Buildings, if we were historic piles. Not saying you've got piles, Tina

So, I say hands off. We're all adults and gender identity is a tough one for many of us, so keep it simple and let users decide between themselves just who they want to meet with.

My sentiments entirely.

Now we that we have that sorted can we go back to the real question. "Why do straight guys keep messaging us"?

Jenny xxx"

I don't know about the rest of you gurls but the Vast majority of guys who hit on Katie are married and straight...!!!!! Most say their wives won't wear sexy underwear, stockings and high heels for them any more and won't do anal or swallow. And if Katie goes to any local dogging spots then any male on male activity usually stops and katie is surrounded very quickly with cocks to service, again most of the guys have wedding rings on.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS
over a year ago

London


"This thread highlights the fact that whether you separate them or not, people will still have different ideas on what each 'label' means. If the users if fab can't decide then what chance have the admin got.

We couldn't care less whether it is separated as we will make our own minds up from the the profile and contact."

.

I agree with you.

Someone who decide not to meet just based on 'labels' are not worth meeting in the first place.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"It would be much better to scrap the whole TV/TS, thing and replace it with a "Transgender" label.

It's an umbrella term that fits us all, the HPW's the CD's, TV's and TS.

But of course, some people would still piss and whine about it!

Sorry to whine but does transgender not really only apply to TSs? Certainly I wouldn't apply the term to myself

No because we're of the Transgender community xx

Don't sell yourself short x"

I'm not selling myself short and actually feel that saying I am is quite derogatory.

I enjoy looking like a woman for sex but I feel no connection to woman kind, I do not consider myself transgender or a member of a transgender community. It's not any objection to the term. I just dont see how it applies

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Sorry to whine but does transgender not really only apply to TSs? Certainly I wouldn't apply the term to myself"

No, it literally applies to *anyone* on the transgender spectrum. It's not *my* rule...That's just wot it is!

But Hey ho, if we can't agree on what we are, how the hell is anyone else supposed to!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issyfaggotfayeTV/TS
over a year ago

Bolton

I just want one who will fuck with me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If you have a penis your a man, don't care how you try to dress it up.

If I wore a white coat and had a stethoscope around my neck dose that make me a doctor ?

I'm noticing a trend in your comments on TG threads. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I support keeping it as it is, as a transgender individual.

It is an individual's own right to choose and denote their own gender anyway, regardless of whether others feel they are too masculine, big or flimsy for whichever they choose.

If Fab introduced another change, it would mean all existing users to change their listing- and, until we all did, then it would mean that the categorisation was meaningless, as it would not be 100% accurate.

Fab is about meeting others, and most users will spend some time discussing respective needs, prior to arranging a meet. We all know that often profiles are not read, but that still doesn't leave out the opportunity to ask any questions etc, that each may feel is needed.

And some are right, that at a pertinent point, some of us may change our profile gender to female/male etc, without mention of an trans journey. That again is our right.

It's not the responsibility of fab to police our gender identity transition, nor for any service provider to discriminate, which would be illegal, as we have protected characteristics. Think of it like being a listed building - Mz Titz and my own titz being Category 1 Listed Buildings, if we were historic piles. Not saying you've got piles, Tina

So, I say hands off. We're all adults and gender identity is a tough one for many of us, so keep it simple and let users decide between themselves just who they want to meet with.

My sentiments entirely.

Now we that we have that sorted can we go back to the real question. "Why do straight guys keep messaging us"?

Jenny xxx

I don't know about the rest of you gurls but the Vast majority of guys who hit on Katie are married and straight...!!!!! Most say their wives won't wear sexy underwear, stockings and high heels for them any more and won't do anal or swallow. And if Katie goes to any local dogging spots then any male on male activity usually stops and katie is surrounded very quickly with cocks to service, again most of the guys have wedding rings on. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"

Sorry to whine but does transgender not really only apply to TSs? Certainly I wouldn't apply the term to myself

No, it literally applies to *anyone* on the transgender spectrum. It's not *my* rule...That's just wot it is!

But Hey ho, if we can't agree on what we are, how the hell is anyone else supposed to! "

In effect I wear fancy dress some evenings. I am no more transgender than the girl playing Peter Pan, or the bearded guy playing the dame, in a panto. If I actually wanted people to think I was female it might be a different matter.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Excuse my ignorance, plus are most tv's/ts attracted to men or women? On this site it seems it's mainly men then are attracted to sexually..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Excuse my ignorance, plus are most tv's/ts attracted to men or women? On this site it seems it's mainly men then are attracted to sexually..

"

don't panic,,mostly men,,your safe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ikki ShooterTV/TS
over a year ago

Epsom


"Excuse my ignorance, plus are most tv's/ts attracted to men or women? On this site it seems it's mainly men then are attracted to sexually..

"

Depends on the individual. I myself like both but only play with guys when Nikki is playing. Infact the only time I play is when Nikki is out. But o digress. There is no way to pin it down as most are evolving as they go. I know I am xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Excuse my ignorance, plus are most tv's/ts attracted to men or women? On this site it seems it's mainly men then are attracted to sexually..

"

What do you take me for,,,,its men I aint no lezza

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hahaha I'm not worried! Just intrigued! My brother is gay and I know that he is a "top", and likes more feminine men, but wouldn't like a tv/ts. He also classes himself as a switch I believe.

I wonder how many straight men would also be a switch with a tv/ts? It's interesting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hahaha I'm not worried! Just intrigued! My brother is gay and I know that he is a "top", and likes more feminine men, but wouldn't like a tv/ts. He also classes himself as a switch I believe.

I wonder how many straight men would also be a switch with a tv/ts? It's interesting. "

oh ive never had a gay man chat me up,,they tend not to find my look attractive,some folk are just weird eh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

you only have the one chance in this life to enjoy,so be as you wish to be,and dont worry about labels,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts


"Excuse my ignorance, plus are most tv's/ts attracted to men or women? On this site it seems it's mainly men then are attracted to sexually..

"

I'm into equal opportunities fuckery

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hahaha I'm not worried! Just intrigued! My brother is gay and I know that he is a "top", and likes more feminine men, but wouldn't like a tv/ts. He also classes himself as a switch I believe.

I wonder how many straight men would also be a switch with a tv/ts? It's interesting.

oh ive never had a gay man chat me up,,they tend not to find my look attractive,some folk are just weird eh "

Phew. I'd been worrying I might actually be gay but this confirms I can't be. You know I think you're attractive Mikki

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight?? "

*Warning! Warning! Controversy Alert*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Personally I think labels are over-rated and that straight to bi is a scale rather than two distinct states.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *irtyAndCh33kyCouple
over a year ago

North Wales


"it really is about time this site separated TV's from Transsexuals there is a world of difference,basically transexual WOMEN have breasts TV's dont!! besides other difference's "

There is a difference BUT who has the right to question what gender a person identifies themselves as?!

Being a TS is not all about physical appearance.

Mrs Dirty

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight?? "

Depends who's asking

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *vsnikkiTV/TS
over a year ago

Limavady


"Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight?? "

Probably not as gay unless they only liked guys!

Would you class a woman who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight?? (Or is bisexual an option?)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Straight if they have a cock

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo


"Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight?? "

Could be bi?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would you class a guy who has sex with a tv/ts as gay or straight??

Could be bi? "

Yeah Thats what I'd go for I think. I Wouldn't say they were straight if they were sucking a cock and then fucking them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

No me neither

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iccardaTV/TS
over a year ago

Wallasey


"it really is about time this site separated TV's from Transsexuals there is a world of difference,basically transexual WOMEN have breasts TV's dont!! besides other difference's "

i can understand what you are saying but like others have said where do you draw the line

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ust RachelTV/TS
over a year ago

Horsham

I know what you mean, I am sick and tired of being mistaken for a TS, can't they see I am a CD lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I know what you mean, I am sick and tired of being mistaken for a TS, can't they see I am a CD lol "

I've put it on my profile cos I get asked if I'm TS all the time.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *enny PR9TV/TS
over a year ago

Southport

I like to mix my sexuality up. Say I'm fucking some guys wife, I like him to be fucking me at the same time. I like to be treated feminine by people but I'm quite capable to take charge. I'm not bothered how people see me but I know they can't ignore me. The problem as I see it is that that there are no such thing as women or men in general, only different kinds of women and men. I'm quite happy to subvert or flout normal expectations of gender and if some people can't accept that, well then that's their problem not mine. At the end of the day I think we all have a right, no! an obligation to be happy with whatever gender we assign ourselves.

Jenny xxx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think the issue is with labels is where the boundaries are, for one person you could be a TS, to some one else a TV. Then there is the whole CD, TV thing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top