Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. " It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We do pay a fee. It's called National Insurance. Many of us pay it even when we don't use the service." Unfortunately it is not ring and even if it was, it would not pay for the NHS. I think that in mist of the rest of Europe, health care contributions are ring fenced and there is a mandatory cost of access as well. This simply reflects the realities of the cost of modern healthcare. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We do pay a fee. It's called National Insurance. Many of us pay it even when we don't use the service." No, NI is a tax, and if we were honest about that, and combined it with income tax, think of the savings that could be made in civil servants... I meant new fees, we already have them for teeth, eyesight and pills, in addition to our taxes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay!" It just is so far removed from the initial NHS mission. It's unkind to reserve treatment for just the absurdly rich. I'm not claiming poverty or anything, but for ongoing acute health problems it's just unreasonable to expect people to pay more. The NHS is meant to save lives, not pick and choose who deserves treatment. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay!" Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We do pay a fee. It's called National Insurance. Many of us pay it even when we don't use the service. No, NI is a tax, and if we were honest about that, and combined it with income tax, think of the savings that could be made in civil servants... I meant new fees, we already have them for teeth, eyesight and pills, in addition to our taxes. " It seems to have become a tax, to pave the way for charging us but it didn't used to be and wasn't supposed to be. The name is a clue. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? " Because it's a real risk that's what we'll end up with! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? " Hold on - you missed my point. Do you seriously expect me to pay each time I'm receiving treatment/see a doctor? I contribute quite a large amount in tax as it is, in comparison to the general population, but I know I'd struggle if your idea was introduced. Why would you want to make life harder for people who are already ill? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! It just is so far removed from the initial NHS mission. It's unkind to reserve treatment for just the absurdly rich. I'm not claiming poverty or anything, but for ongoing acute health problems it's just unreasonable to expect people to pay more. The NHS is meant to save lives, not pick and choose who deserves treatment." You are not wrong. But the world has changed considerably since the NHS mission was identified. Nothing can cope with the progression of time without change. The NHS has to cope with people living twenty more years and with paying for medical treatments that could never gave beeb envisaged. All of these things cost more and more money and successive governments gave not addressed the problem. Labour, Conservative, Liberal, Green or UKIP - the NHS will not exist as we know it in ten years time because we are all living longer and healthcare is more and more expensive. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems to have become a tax, to pave the way for charging us but it didn't used to be and wasn't supposed to be. The name is a clue." The name is a left-wing fallacy, because they were too dishonest to call it a tax. If you don't pay for you car insurance, your car won't be mended. Regardless of whether or not you pay NI, the tax-payer will fund your treatment. (Which is as it should be) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. " I have a similar problem to you, i need to see my doctor frequently at times to monitor my health, if i have to pay each time i see the doc then i simply won't be able to afford it so wouldn't be checked and then would end up in a hospital ward wasting more NHS money and time ! I earn just above minimum wage but get no help at all in the form of benefits, i pay my own way for everything. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unless it involves teeth, eyes or any pills, obviously So, in order to provide more funding, is it time to extend charging to another random part of the body? How about toes? Do we really need 10 of them? Mr ddc" Why not, Sexual health should be charged for. Some never use this service whilst others take the piss and use it monthly depending whether they have been gangbanged or not | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! It just is so far removed from the initial NHS mission. It's unkind to reserve treatment for just the absurdly rich. I'm not claiming poverty or anything, but for ongoing acute health problems it's just unreasonable to expect people to pay more. The NHS is meant to save lives, not pick and choose who deserves treatment. You are not wrong. But the world has changed considerably since the NHS mission was identified. Nothing can cope with the progression of time without change. The NHS has to cope with people living twenty more years and with paying for medical treatments that could never gave beeb envisaged. All of these things cost more and more money and successive governments gave not addressed the problem. Labour, Conservative, Liberal, Green or UKIP - the NHS will not exist as we know it in ten years time because we are all living longer and healthcare is more and more expensive." I think you're looking at privatisation then, instead of enforcing double charges. However, even other countries provide free healthcare for acute illnesses so it's a little barbaric/draconian to suggest people pay each time or not receive care. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? Hold on - you missed my point. Do you seriously expect me to pay each time I'm receiving treatment/see a doctor? I contribute quite a large amount in tax as it is, in comparison to the general population, but I know I'd struggle if your idea was introduced. Why would you want to make life harder for people who are already ill? " But you have an identified illness and you have an ongoing treatment plan. I am not trying to rewrite the NHS business plan, just stating the obvious. We can't afford the NHS as it stands and unless the model is changed it will eventually bankrupt the nation. It is about funding the NHS, not persecuting people and I am sure there are people elsewhere in Europe who gave the same condition that you have and who do not feel persecuted. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp" This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp" Same for me ..... then my health would get so bad i could end up in hospital which would cost the NHS far more. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh." Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems to have become a tax, to pave the way for charging us but it didn't used to be and wasn't supposed to be. The name is a clue. The name is a left-wing fallacy, because they were too dishonest to call it a tax. If you don't pay for you car insurance, your car won't be mended. Regardless of whether or not you pay NI, the tax-payer will fund your treatment. (Which is as it should be) " National Insurance cannot be spent on general government expenditure. It funds some types of welfare expenditure. It was introduced as a form of insurance against sickness and unemployment and is still used to pay for welfare. It's not just a tax. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? Hold on - you missed my point. Do you seriously expect me to pay each time I'm receiving treatment/see a doctor? I contribute quite a large amount in tax as it is, in comparison to the general population, but I know I'd struggle if your idea was introduced. Why would you want to make life harder for people who are already ill? But you have an identified illness and you have an ongoing treatment plan. I am not trying to rewrite the NHS business plan, just stating the obvious. We can't afford the NHS as it stands and unless the model is changed it will eventually bankrupt the nation. It is about funding the NHS, not persecuting people and I am sure there are people elsewhere in Europe who gave the same condition that you have and who do not feel persecuted." So I pay just the once, and that's fine? So I don't pay each time I see a doctor? What about when I'm referred to different specialists due to complications? The NHS still has a duty of care and enforcing this kind of thing will only reduce the level of care poor people receive. It's surely better to look at our NHS contributions than to expect lump sum payments before individual treatments. I don't really care about other people in Europe though as their situation is irrelevant when it comes to treatment within the NHS. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? " Because we tend to follow suit with the US rather than our EU associates | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? " Now it seems like you're encouraging segregation of the classes. People deserve health care and it's vital. In my opinion, you're looking at the NHS in the wrong light. You've not commented on the funding or salaries of specialists or unnecessary research. You've just said the end user is responsible, which isn't really fair. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. I've a medical issue which requires treatment two or three times a week. If I had to pay each time I saw a doctor, I'd be severely in debt. I don't see how it would help. It would help the ones who can afford to pay and bugger the rest of us, just like in the US. After all, the poor are quite literally worthless and don't deserve treatment. And we already pay! Like many others you are comparing one extreme ours, with another extreme in the USA. Why not compare to France or Germany? Hold on - you missed my point. Do you seriously expect me to pay each time I'm receiving treatment/see a doctor? I contribute quite a large amount in tax as it is, in comparison to the general population, but I know I'd struggle if your idea was introduced. Why would you want to make life harder for people who are already ill? But you have an identified illness and you have an ongoing treatment plan. I am not trying to rewrite the NHS business plan, just stating the obvious. We can't afford the NHS as it stands and unless the model is changed it will eventually bankrupt the nation. It is about funding the NHS, not persecuting people and I am sure there are people elsewhere in Europe who gave the same condition that you have and who do not feel persecuted. So I pay just the once, and that's fine? So I don't pay each time I see a doctor? What about when I'm referred to different specialists due to complications? The NHS still has a duty of care and enforcing this kind of thing will only reduce the level of care poor people receive. It's surely better to look at our NHS contributions than to expect lump sum payments before individual treatments. I don't really care about other people in Europe though as their situation is irrelevant when it comes to treatment within the NHS. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? " ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
".No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change!" Wasn't it something about little fish getting gobbled up by bigger fish? Maybe a reference to the cost to the NHS of treating obesity? Stomachs, I choose Stomachs! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We do pay a fee. It's called National Insurance. Many of us pay it even when we don't use the service." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change!" I think they're misusing a quote about being more successful by adapting to change. Having a fascist regime as a government would be a change, too. Not all changes are good. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change! I think they're misusing a quote about being more successful by adapting to change. Having a fascist regime as a government would be a change, too. Not all changes are good. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We do pay a fee. It's called National Insurance. Many of us pay it even when we don't use the service. " yes . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems to have become a tax, to pave the way for charging us but it didn't used to be and wasn't supposed to be. The name is a clue. The name is a left-wing fallacy, because they were too dishonest to call it a tax. If you don't pay for you car insurance, your car won't be mended. Regardless of whether or not you pay NI, the tax-payer will fund your treatment. (Which is as it should be) " right analogy but wrong thought process. Car insurance is compulsory like ni , pedestrians and bicycle riders who don't have insurance get paid out by the car insurance pool! We paid in a little bit to cover those without. Nobody gets paid out by the tax payer, the gov put your ni contributions in when you can't/be arsed afford to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is time for us all to be big girls and boys and pay a fee to see the GP or go into hospital A&E. They do this in most civilised countries and it had not resulted in sudden onset civil mayhem. " Absolute rubbish! Sorry, but we all pay NI and the NHS is one of the most amazing things about the UK. Try asking an American. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" It seems to have become a tax, to pave the way for charging us but it didn't used to be and wasn't supposed to be. The name is a clue. The name is a left-wing fallacy, because they were too dishonest to call it a tax. If you don't pay for you car insurance, your car won't be mended. Regardless of whether or not you pay NI, the tax-payer will fund your treatment. (Which is as it should be)I believe that is true but also the government can barrow from the NI fund which if is the case do they ever repay those loans There have been times when there was a surplus in NI contributions National Insurance cannot be spent on general government expenditure. It funds some types of welfare expenditure. It was introduced as a form of insurance against sickness and unemployment and is still used to pay for welfare. It's not just a tax." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unless it involves teeth, eyes or any pills, obviously So, in order to provide more funding, is it time to extend charging to another random part of the body? How about toes? Do we really need 10 of them? Mr ddc" Eyes should be free - can't help being bound as a bat | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unless it involves teeth, eyes or any pills, obviously So, in order to provide more funding, is it time to extend charging to another random part of the body? How about toes? Do we really need 10 of them? Mr ddc Eyes should be free - can't help being bound as a bat " *blind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unless it involves teeth, eyes or any pills, obviously So, in order to provide more funding, is it time to extend charging to another random part of the body? How about toes? Do we really need 10 of them? Mr ddc Eyes should be free - can't help being bound as a bat *blind" That's okay, we'd already made allowances for your poor eyesight £10 opticians voucher in the post Thank god they still treat fat thumbs for free! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I have no desire to live in a society that excludes people based on wealth - the UK does not do this, and rightly so. Have you ever been to places where they have no health care and seen the devastation it does to peoples lives? We all pay into the NHS, FOR EACH OTHER. It's not about the individual, it's about looking out for each other and looking after society as a whole Ggrrrrr. " Absolutely. Do you also think there's a case for better education for obesity, alcohol and smoking related matters? Just a thought since due to lifestyle choices some people take out disproportionately more from the NHS than they should be entitled to. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I have no desire to live in a society that excludes people based on wealth - the UK does not do this, and rightly so. Have you ever been to places where they have no health care and seen the devastation it does to peoples lives? We all pay into the NHS, FOR EACH OTHER. It's not about the individual, it's about looking out for each other and looking after society as a whole Ggrrrrr. Absolutely. Do you also think there's a case for better education for obesity, alcohol and smoking related matters? Just a thought since due to lifestyle choices some people take out disproportionately more from the NHS than they should be entitled to. " Absolutely. Education surrounding health is a huge problem, and people need much more of it. Obesity rates are sky high, and being massively overweight is not something people should promote or celebrate (plenty do). Lifestyle I believe is being taught in schools in some places now, which is a great thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"stop hiring contractors " I remember the NHS laid off loads of nurses about 10 years ago, less than 18 months later held a recruitment drive in Singapore, Thailand etc | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In my professional field, contractors are only there to fill in gaps until they find permanent staff. Its the other way round unfortunately in the healthcare. And you should all know contractors are a rip off for what they charge." Is that Contractors in general or just in the NHS If so its bollocks, Contractors bid for a contract, and usually the lowest bid that wins. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"permanent nhs contractors" There is no such thing A contract is a fixed term thing | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"permanent nhs contractors There is no such thing A contract is a fixed term thing" There are people on rolling contracts being paid a contract rate. I think that's what he means. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change!" He said species that adapt to their environment are most likely to survive. I kind of like the idea of going back to the old days of of plagues and things like that though to test the human race and how it would survive now...ebola epidemic anyone? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"NHS should be free. But not a free for all. If you're a foreign tourist,outdoor of the EU you should pay. As should all the pissed up idiots who drink too much. " ..Surely people who get pisssed all the time pay the most and therefore should get better and quicker treatment! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change! He said species that adapt to their environment are most likely to survive. I kind of like the idea of going back to the old days of of plagues and things like that though to test the human race and how it would survive now...ebola epidemic anyone? " Darwin and his book the origin of the species is widely misquoted. He wrote one paragraph on survival of the fittest! but several chapters on species that band together usually outperform others that like to go it alone!. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"if I had to pay and didn't have any spare I just wouldn't be able to go to see a gp This is my point. For some people, it's a life or death choice. To enforce charges is too harsh. Change is inevitable. Remember what Darwin said about change? ..No, is it possible you could tell us what Darwin said about change! He said species that adapt to their environment are most likely to survive. I kind of like the idea of going back to the old days of of plagues and things like that though to test the human race and how it would survive now...ebola epidemic anyone? Darwin and his book the origin of the species is widely misquoted. He wrote one paragraph on survival of the fittest! but several chapters on species that band together usually outperform others that like to go it alone!." Not read that much about him tbh. Think he had some messed up ideas and i didn't wanna pollute my head any more so stopped looking into him, and instead research the latest stuff in science. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |