Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Pointless, leave things as they are. Site supporter status is optional............." As a couple they would stay as they are, but thanks for your input, I didn't think a couple would be arsed with this thread | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do the men pay,women don't in clubs. Paying doesn't guarantee you will have more chance of having sex. There are plenty of single men on here who are having sex with women on here. Men blame the numbers when it's more a case of not being what people want " No my point is, to cut down on the morons and bring more quality into the squad (football manager speak lol) I think there would be less of the guys that come on here to waste people's time and more genuine guys | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How would making men pay £10 being down the ratio? If think if most blokes can afford a fiver they can afford 10" It's more a question of if they WILL pay 10 quid, as things are any fool with an Internet connection can get on here and piss single women off. I don't say I've got all the answers, like I said if anyone has any suggestions I would love to hear them. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has anyone got any thoughts on how to bring down the single male to female ratio so there is a closer amount of single women to single men, I think this site would be untouchable if this were the case, I would sugest. Single men pay £10 for site supporter status, single women (once verified) get it for free, couples stay the same, once a single guy has used up his site supporter status he can use the site as we use it now, fake pics, fake profiles and fake marital status, gets you banned from the site with no refunds, no exceptions, ladies get discounts at local swingers clubs. Any thoughts/ideas?" I'm more of a fan of "last in, first out"...... Since you have only been here 6 weeks, I hope you do the honourable thing and place yourself upon the sword | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Change because of change or because its hard to meet ladies ? Stand out..be genuine..dont moan (not directed at the op ) and dont expect a queue of ladies to appear " hitting, nail and head come to mind | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How would making men pay £10 being down the ratio? If think if most blokes can afford a fiver they can afford 10 It's more a question of if they WILL pay 10 quid, as things are any fool with an Internet connection can get on here and piss single women off. I don't say I've got all the answers, like I said if anyone has any suggestions I would love to hear them." Ten quid won't stop it. I'm not sure why you say couples won't be concerned with this thread, we meet single men. The only thing that can be done is to establish your own selection process, it takes a little time to do that and isn't fool proof...mistakes are made and you can sometimes misjudge either way. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has anyone got any thoughts on how to bring down the single male to female ratio so there is a closer amount of single women to single men, I think this site would be untouchable if this were the case, I would sugest. Single men pay £10 for site supporter status, single women (once verified) get it for free, couples stay the same, once a single guy has used up his site supporter status he can use the site as we use it now, fake pics, fake profiles and fake marital status, gets you banned from the site with no refunds, no exceptions, ladies get discounts at local swingers clubs. Any thoughts/ideas? I'm more of a fan of "last in, first out"...... Since you have only been here 6 weeks, I hope you do the honourable thing and place yourself upon the sword " is that a polite way of saying fo fuck yourself lmao | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I did say about verification, I'm not looking to cut down the numbers to get more meets, it's more so that when messages are received there is a better chance that it's from someone genuine, I've yet to see anyone put forward an idea on how to tackle this other than me, so if anyone has any ideas? " There is only one way that I can see, face to face interview and a contract that's enforceable by law. This is the internet, there will be dreamers, chancers and sometimes dangerous people no amount of verification, payment up front etc will stop that....interviews and contracts wouldn't either, its an impossible task. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Has anyone got any thoughts on how to bring down the single male to female ratio so there is a closer amount of single women to single men, I think this site would be untouchable if this were the case, I would sugest. Single men pay £10 for site supporter status, single womens (once verified) get it for free, couples stay the same, once a single guy has used up his site supporter status he can use the site as we use it now, fake pics, fake profiles and fake marital status, gets you banned from the site with no refunds, no exceptions, ladies get discounts at local swingers clubs. Any thoughts/ideas?" Maybe stand out from the crowd rather than eliminate the opposition? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do the men pay,women don't in clubs. Paying doesn't guarantee you will have more chance of having sex. There are plenty of single men on here who are having sex with women on here. Men blame the numbers when it's more a case of not being what people want No my point is, to cut down on the morons and bring more quality into the squad (football manager speak lol) I think there would be less of the guys that come on here to waste people's time and more genuine guys " Easy, site doesn't accept any morew single female profile until the ratio is one for every male, or female if they are into women! hah hah I am of course joking | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right, I think that this thread has been taken as a why can't I get any meets thread, I know why I don't get any meets, it's cos I've messaged like 3 people in six weeks, I'm not trying, but that's not the point, and as for what could I do better, probably loads but I'm happy with who I am and I'm comfortable in my own skin, but I digress, this is no I repeat NOT a look at me or why can't I get a meet thread, it was just to encourage a debate about what could be done better. " I wasn't suggesting it was hun. Xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"As a selfish bitch with the 'gift' of a vagina - may I say that I love the huge choice of sexy guys on here - even though about 50% of them seem to be time wasters! xx Some single guys on here are in huge demand - and not always the most attractive ones. As a single guy you have to have a U.S.P. to be successful, whether thats a great body/great cock/fantastic personality/ability to host parties etc - or just the confidence to get to the clubs and socials! As single women we were born with our U.S.P - a vigina - which unfortunately means that many women think that they can demand lots and give little in return. There's a stigma to swinging for single fems in society - we're often perceived as slags whereas a single male swinging is simply 'between relationships'. That stigma would put many women off joining a site like fab - that and many haven't even heard of it! I knew nothing about swinging/swingers clubs until a friend recommended it to me in February - I've never looked back!! Xxx" And there it is the kind if response I was looking for thank you | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually..... Rather than blaming the ratios... Why don't you find a way for you to stand out from the others..... Sometimes the hardest thing to do is to look yourself in the mirror and say "what can I do better?"" Too many single guy's look in the mirror and take pathetic selfies...and think they look great. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I did say about verification, I'm not looking to cut down the numbers to get more meets, it's more so that when messages are received there is a better chance that it's from someone genuine, I've yet to see anyone put forward an idea on how to tackle this other than me, so if anyone has any ideas? There is only one way that I can see, face to face interview and a contract that's enforceable by law. This is the internet, there will be dreamers, chancers and sometimes dangerous people no amount of verification, payment up front etc will stop that....interviews and contracts wouldn't either, its an impossible task. " I haven't got a vigina | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No my point is, to cut down on the morons " Morons have money too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I tend not to read verifications posted. I prefer to make my own mind up about who I see. My judgement is my own. And lets face it, 99.999% of verifications are going to sound positive. If I wanted casual sex there are better ways of getting it than emailing loads of people on here. Better filters would make it easier to cut down on the bulk of unwanted emails. Just reviewing updates to the news feed shows daily comments asking people to read the profiles first before banging out emails by the truck full. Even a filter restricting contact by people who are within a certain mileage from you if you want to activate it. Give people the option to set more. Also make photo verification standard within a week of joining. I understand people who want to be discrete but a private photo is just that. Would help cut down the fakes etc. All imho of course x " I like your thinking, way better than my idea fbf | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not trying, " In that case, why not just get rid of all the single men who are not trying? No point in them being here really is there Sorted | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not trying, In that case, why not just get rid of all the single men who are not trying? No point in them being here really is there Sorted " I'm not quite ready, I'm not going into it again, but I'm getting back on the horse so to speak. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I did say about verification, I'm not looking to cut down the numbers to get more meets, it's more so that when messages are received there is a better chance that it's from someone genuine, I've yet to see anyone put forward an idea on how to tackle this other than me, so if anyone has any ideas? There is only one way that I can see, face to face interview and a contract that's enforceable by law. This is the internet, there will be dreamers, chancers and sometimes dangerous people no amount of verification, payment up front etc will stop that....interviews and contracts wouldn't either, its an impossible task. I haven't got a vigina " Buggroff!! I spelled it right at the top! xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Right I did say about verification, I'm not looking to cut down the numbers to get more meets, it's more so that when messages are received there is a better chance that it's from someone genuine, I've yet to see anyone put forward an idea on how to tackle this other than me, so if anyone has any ideas? There is only one way that I can see, face to face interview and a contract that's enforceable by law. This is the internet, there will be dreamers, chancers and sometimes dangerous people no amount of verification, payment up front etc will stop that....interviews and contracts wouldn't either, its an impossible task. I haven't got a vigina Buggroff!! I spelled it right at the top! xx" I don't think anyone noticed lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not trying, In that case, why not just get rid of all the single men who are not trying? No point in them being here really is there Sorted I'm not quite ready, I'm not going into it again, but I'm getting back on the horse so to speak. " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do the men pay,women don't in clubs. Paying doesn't guarantee you will have more chance of having sex. There are plenty of single men on here who are having sex with women on here. Men blame the numbers when it's more a case of not being what people want " I don't blame anything....I get plenty meets. My only real restriction is my own time and the fact that I spend most weekends with a very good friend in her caravan. It's bad enough that clubs discriminate payment wise....let's not bring it here....really dumbass idea if you ask me! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No my point is, to cut down on the morons Morons have money too " I was going to say that genuine men can be morons too | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sorry your point is,your not going to change ratios unless you made men pay £50 to be members and all that does is get rid of the young and out of work leaving the average swingers 45 to 70s am sure the ladies will love that " Or the rich twits who think they have rights because they paid | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"How would making men pay £10 being down the ratio? If think if most blokes can afford a fiver they can afford 10 It's more a question of if they WILL pay 10 quid, as things are any fool with an Internet connection can get on here and piss single women off. I don't say I've got all the answers, like I said if anyone has any suggestions I would love to hear them." Here is a suggestion: The ratio is what the ratio is....live with it or leave. Stop blaming others for your lack of success...the rest of us who do have plenty meets face the same ratio! My suggestion is leave things well alone....if it ain't broke then don't fix it. If you don't like it then you know where the exit is! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They do the men pay,women don't in clubs. Paying doesn't guarantee you will have more chance of having sex. There are plenty of single men on here who are having sex with women on here. Men blame the numbers when it's more a case of not being what people want I don't blame anything....I get plenty meets. My only real restriction is my own time and the fact that I spend most weekends with a very good friend in her caravan. It's bad enough that clubs discriminate payment wise....let's not bring it here....really dumbass idea if you ask me!" You don't blame anything but plenty of others do. They think they don't get noticed because they get lost in lots of messages. They don't get noticed because they aren't making themselves noticeable. Some are just too young,some the wrong race,some too bi,there are threads by men bemoaning all these reasons. I'm going by what I see on the site and the bottom line is women will meet the men they find attractive regardless of how many are on here. Reducing the number of men won't make them more attractive,not to me anyway and I'm easier to please than some of the women with lists of wants and don't wants | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You know what never mind as you were, I was kind of looking for suggestions, found criticising to be the order of the day, still never mind eh. Oh and some people don't read previous comments, that is clear" If the thread is long with lots of quotes I don't read everything. I apologise. I was putting across why I didn't think your suggestions would work from my point of view | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"You know what never mind as you were, I was kind of looking for suggestions, found criticising to be the order of the day, still never mind eh. Oh and some people don't read previous comments, that is clear If the thread is long with lots of quotes I don't read everything. I apologise. I was putting across why I didn't think your suggestions would work from my point of view " That's fine, there was more than one, it's not like if it was a long profile or anything, who reads those lol, I hold nothing against anyone on this thread by the way, just thought I would point that out | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |