Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
" I always find the argument that their is something wrong with people doing what is in their own best interest totally bazar. Surely if every one does what is in their own best interests then the best interests of the majority are being served? Are you really saying that people should not do what is in their own best interests. How does that work? If every only did what was in the best interests of someone else surly we would end up with only the best interests of a minority being served? Please explain to me exactly what you mean. " To which I recieved the folloing reply from priapus " By only doing what is in your own best interests, you will inevitably shit on others. Then someone will be shitting on you. Everyone is antagonised. Why? Just so you can say "this is mine all mine"? " So my question is "Would it really produce a better sociaty if everyone always acted in the best interests of someone else rather than themselves?" And my answer to Priapus's comment. Why would I believe that shitting on other people, either literally or metaphorically, was in my own best interests. Do you believe that your best interests would be served by shitting on other people? And if so why? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not leave it in the other thread instead of starting a new one." | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why not leave it in the other thread instead of starting a new one." Because it ran out of space | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people and our lives are best when we live within the bounds of working for the common good. It doesn't stop people doing what they, if there is no harm to others, but is supportive of all. " But is not the common good also the good of the majority and therefor be best served by the each serving their own best interests? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people and our lives are best when we live within the bounds of working for the common good. It doesn't stop people doing what they, if there is no harm to others, but is supportive of all. But is not the common good also the good of the majority and therefor be best served by the each serving their own best interests?" What you are suggesting that each individual acting in their own best interests will cumulatively be in the common good. Unfortunately what is in my best interests will not necessarily be in yours ad infinitum. The common good is best served by a policy of 'do as you would be done by' not (as you seem to suggest) by 'do as you will'. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people and our lives are best when we live within the bounds of working for the common good. It doesn't stop people doing what they, if there is no harm to others, but is supportive of all. But is not the common good also the good of the majority and therefor be best served by the each serving their own best interests? What you are suggesting that each individual acting in their own best interests will cumulatively be in the common good. Unfortunately what is in my best interests will not necessarily be in yours ad infinitum. The common good is best served by a policy of 'do as you would be done by' not (as you seem to suggest) by 'do as you will'." Or 'Do on to others as you would have them do onto you' even. And I would agree that that is a good approach to take. I also think it is in my best interests to take that approach, so should I not now take that approach because it's in my best interest to take it. I really am totally confused by what people are saying. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people and our lives are best when we live within the bounds of working for the common good. It doesn't stop people doing what they, if there is no harm to others, but is supportive of all. But is not the common good also the good of the majority and therefor be best served by the each serving their own best interests? What you are suggesting that each individual acting in their own best interests will cumulatively be in the common good. Unfortunately what is in my best interests will not necessarily be in yours ad infinitum. The common good is best served by a policy of 'do as you would be done by' not (as you seem to suggest) by 'do as you will'. Or 'Do on to others as you would have them do onto you' even. And I would agree that that is a good approach to take. I also think it is in my best interests to take that approach, so should I not now take that approach because it's in my best interest to take it. I really am totally confused by what people are saying." The common good and what is good for the majority are not always the same. Example: Hitler gained power at the hands of the majority who clearly felt (at that time) that he was the best option. Just because a majority decide something is in their best interest does not make it what is best for the common good. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think people and our lives are best when we live within the bounds of working for the common good. It doesn't stop people doing what they, if there is no harm to others, but is supportive of all. But is not the common good also the good of the majority and therefor be best served by the each serving their own best interests? What you are suggesting that each individual acting in their own best interests will cumulatively be in the common good. Unfortunately what is in my best interests will not necessarily be in yours ad infinitum. The common good is best served by a policy of 'do as you would be done by' not (as you seem to suggest) by 'do as you will'. Or 'Do on to others as you would have them do onto you' even. And I would agree that that is a good approach to take. I also think it is in my best interests to take that approach, so should I not now take that approach because it's in my best interest to take it. I really am totally confused by what people are saying. The common good and what is good for the majority are not always the same. Example: Hitler gained power at the hands of the majority who clearly felt (at that time) that he was the best option. Just because a majority decide something is in their best interest does not make it what is best for the common good." Well I agree that, while people may think what they are doing (ie voting for Hitler) is in their best interests it may turn out that they were wrong but I think that is a different point. And, maybe, what happened in Germany was that every one voted for what they thought was the common, or other peoples best interests and that's how they got Hitler. We'll never know. But either way it doesn't answer my question. Is it more likely that the common, or majorities, best interests are served by people serving their own best interests or by serving the best interests of someone else? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So; nipping next door & ripping off my neighbour's sound system is in my own interest, so that's fine then? Interesting thread...... " How is ripping of your neighbour's sound system in your best interests? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" But either way it doesn't answer my question. Is it more likely that the common, or majorities, best interests are served by people serving their own best interests or by serving the best interests of someone else?" The reason you cannot get an answer to your question is because you are asking if serving the best interests of one individual or serving the best interests of another individual would produce the best interests for all. There is simply no answer as the interests of either individual could harm society as a whole. The common, or majorities, best interests are served by people serving the best interests of others rather than the best interests of any specific individual. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Google the desederata you will be enlightened by its wise words. " Was hung on the entrance wall of the holiday let I stayed in this summer. "Speak your truth quietly and clearly and listen to others..." Apt! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Google the desederata you will be enlightened by its wise words. Was hung on the entrance wall of the holiday let I stayed in this summer. "Speak your truth quietly and clearly and listen to others..." Apt!" It's a fantastic guide to how to conduct yourself throughout life. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I always liked the saying that your energy is best served by building your own castles, than wasted by ripping other people's down " Wow I love this saying ... its a new one for me Thank you. xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |