FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Geek or Hunk

Jump to newest
 

By *horshiper OP   Man
over a year ago

London

I am sure this has been done so i apologise.

Just a thread to show your appreciation for geeks or hunks

I love geeky women

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I prefer a hunk because geeks usually have a chip on their shoulder.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I prefer a hunk because geeks usually have a chip on their shoulder."

What? Us geeks have a chip on our shoulders? How dare you...

Actually I am very balanced (a chip on both shoulders).

But I am partial to geeky women - how would you classify a hunky female?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ha ha I wonder what prompted you to start this thread OP

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horshiper OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"I prefer a hunk because geeks usually have a chip on their shoulder.

What? Us geeks have a chip on our shoulders? How dare you...

Actually I am very balanced (a chip on both shoulders).

But I am partial to geeky women - how would you classify a hunky female? "

Now that is a good question - suppose it would be more a model like equivalent

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horshiper OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"Ha ha I wonder what prompted you to start this thread OP "

Shhhhhhhh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

...I'm about as geeky as you get.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I prefer geeky women.

I guess i am pretty geeky but not the typical nerdy looking either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I am sure this has been done so i apologise.

Just a thread to show your appreciation for geeks or hunks

I love geeky women "

Can't we have both in the same package?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *o30Woman
over a year ago

Lincoln

a good balance of both. I'm bit of a Marvel geek lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

You can have a hunky geek or a geeky hunk. Best of both

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horshiper OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"You can have a hunky geek or a geeky hunk. Best of both "

Hmmmm best get down the gym

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There are hunky geeks in the world you know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And geeky hunks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I design software. I out-geek most of the techies I work with. Can I be both?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I design software. I out-geek most of the techies I work with. Can I be both?"

You are

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *L RogueMan
over a year ago

London

I think I'm both. But am I a hunky geek or geeky hunk?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks "

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can i just be spunk?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *horshiper OP   Man
over a year ago

London


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...) "

Lol do you have spreadsheet analysis

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Geek who has to pretend to be hunk in work.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Both!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittykate84Woman
over a year ago

CHESTER

Hunky geek most def!

I think im a sexy sporty geek rocker

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...) "

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness "

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

Gunk for me please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Gunk for me please "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

We love Greece and the Greek. ??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet? "

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

neither - I like a proper nerd, none of these fakers lol

and before people start - a geek is not a nerd.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm sure everyone here knows that geeks do it beta

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm sure everyone here knows that geeks do it beta "

... Torn between a laugh and a facepalm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object "

I think if we take the distribution of the occurrence of hunks and geeks on Fabs and put that in Z-space on top of the X-Y spatial graph of hunkiness and geekinees, I would posit an an inverse normal distribution with few in the true hunk or true geek extremes. As a 3-dimensional shape it would appear to be a bell shape

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm sure everyone here knows that geeks do it beta

... Torn between a laugh and a facepalm "

I laughed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object

I think if we take the distribution of the occurrence of hunks and geeks on Fabs and put that in Z-space on top of the X-Y spatial graph of hunkiness and geekinees, I would posit an an inverse normal distribution with few in the true hunk or true geek extremes. As a 3-dimensional shape it would appear to be a bell shape "

I think that's what I had in mind. We could then use a 3D laser printer to produce a finished article of our findings. Just for posterity of course

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object

I think if we take the distribution of the occurrence of hunks and geeks on Fabs and put that in Z-space on top of the X-Y spatial graph of hunkiness and geekinees, I would posit an an inverse normal distribution with few in the true hunk or true geek extremes. As a 3-dimensional shape it would appear to be a bell shape

I think that's what I had in mind. We could then use a 3D laser printer to produce a finished article of our findings. Just for posterity of course "

Perfect - and I would of course be very happy to present it to you for safe keeping - I am sure you have somewhere in mind to put it

Been a pleasure collaborating with you, I hope we get to work together again in the future (after I have spent a few months in the gym

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object

I think if we take the distribution of the occurrence of hunks and geeks on Fabs and put that in Z-space on top of the X-Y spatial graph of hunkiness and geekinees, I would posit an an inverse normal distribution with few in the true hunk or true geek extremes. As a 3-dimensional shape it would appear to be a bell shape

I think that's what I had in mind. We could then use a 3D laser printer to produce a finished article of our findings. Just for posterity of course

Perfect - and I would of course be very happy to present it to you for safe keeping - I am sure you have somewhere in mind to put it

Been a pleasure collaborating with you, I hope we get to work together again in the future (after I have spent a few months in the gym "

I will keep it in a very safe place. Gyms are over rated,I wouldn't bother. It's been a pleasure

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I adore gorgeous, geeky hunks!! xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm sure everyone here knows that geeks do it beta

... Torn between a laugh and a facepalm "

So out of my geeky league...even your retort was a binary choice

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"And geeky hunks

You are starting to sound like Donald Rumsfeld - we will be onto hunky hunks and geeky geeks next

So what is the Geek / Hunk measuring spectrum, and how is geekiness and hunkiness quantified (I know, I know, just proved I am a geek...)

You made a valid point. There should be a measure of geek and hunkness. A sliding scale would work but there would have to be two,one for geek and one for hunk. They could then be used to calculate a man's geekhunkiness

I like the way you are thinking - if we put, say geekiness on the x-axis and hunkiness on the y-axis we could turn the sliding scales into a 2 dimensional representation, with the optimal position being in the top right quadrant highlighting both extreme hunkiness and extreme geekiness....

Anyone (else) getting turned on yet?

They probably are but don't want to admit it. Now,if we could turn the 2-dimensional representation into a 3-dimensional solid,given that our input data is of varying degrees of geek/hunkiness,we could end up with a rather interesting object

I think if we take the distribution of the occurrence of hunks and geeks on Fabs and put that in Z-space on top of the X-Y spatial graph of hunkiness and geekinees, I would posit an an inverse normal distribution with few in the true hunk or true geek extremes. As a 3-dimensional shape it would appear to be a bell shape

I think that's what I had in mind. We could then use a 3D laser printer to produce a finished article of our findings. Just for posterity of course

Perfect - and I would of course be very happy to present it to you for safe keeping - I am sure you have somewhere in mind to put it

Been a pleasure collaborating with you, I hope we get to work together again in the future (after I have spent a few months in the gym

I will keep it in a very safe place. Gyms are over rated,I wouldn't bother. It's been a pleasure "

The pleasure has been all mine I will find an alternative to gyms to increase my hunkiness quotient - perhaps the F-plan....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ensualtouch15Man
over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

I'm a hunky geek ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent

Geeky hunk for me please.

Or just matt smith. He would do

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *issHottieBottieWoman
over a year ago

Kent


"...I'm about as geeky as you get."

And pretty hunky too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Is there such a thing as a female hunk?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Something in between nott ttoo geeky but not t too hunky either

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"...I'm about as geeky as you get.

And pretty hunky too "

Awww, thanks

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andybeachWoman
over a year ago

In the middle

A hunk with a brain is the best thing, stimulating to the mind and the body

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Gotta be a hunk I'm afraid - a dating site quiz on 'Your type' once said 'You love real men, you love testosterone, and you know it...' Haha, guilty as charged......!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A bit of both maybe? If I had to choose though then it'd have to be hunk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Something in between nott ttoo geeky but not t too hunky either "

Damn, fail on both counts - too geeky and not hunky enough

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *evaquitCouple
over a year ago

Catthorpe

(her) In real life geeks but hunks for playtime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

A heeky gunk maybe

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I play call of duty ... Am I a geek

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

im abit of a geeky hunk

or maybe im abit of a hunky geek

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How about being a geeky hunk with bed restraints and a magic wand vibrator?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How about being a geeky hunk with bed restraints and a magic wand vibrator? "

...the geek knows how to tie you; the hunk knows what to do with you afterwards

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm a geek. No two ways about it. Lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andybeachWoman
over a year ago

In the middle


"How about being a geeky hunk with bed restraints and a magic wand vibrator?

...the geek knows how to tie you; the hunk knows what to do with you afterwards "

If you insist

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How about being a geeky hunk with bed restraints and a magic wand vibrator? "

That sounds like heaven!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm neither. Slightly geeky (into a bit of scifi and superheroes) but wouldn't describe myself as hunky...... Maybe chunky. Haha.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've never met a hunky woman.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

ok so what have I got to do?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm a geeky hunk so know yourself out!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

I'm a gunk

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'm a hunky geek ? "

You don't appear to be sure. You could be a geeky hunk.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I don't label myself. Its got nothing to do with the fact I'm neither a nerd or a dreamboat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock


"a good balance of both. I'm bit of a Marvel geek lol "

So you'd like someone like Spider-man then? Is he a geek and a hunk?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm a geeky hunk.

Best of both worlds (Part 1)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top