FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Should Julian Blank be banned?

Jump to newest
 

By *ratty_Damsel OP   Woman
over a year ago

Greater London

The guy sounds like an absolute creep that does 'pick up' lessons for sad or vulnerable men.

Is this enough to have him banned though from the UK?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

There's another one running on this subject.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Over 120,000 people have signed an online petition to ban him from entering the country so he has pissed a fair few people off

And they have given him huge amounts of free publicity by doing so which in turn makes him more marketable in a twisted way

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I have no idea who this guy is!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ahh, you mean Julien Blanc!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No he shouldn't. Though I would hope venues won't book him. But allowing him here it prompts debate and discussion and that;s good. Banning him turns him in to a martyr

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ratty_Damsel OP   Woman
over a year ago

Greater London

Oops, thanks Lickity & Prof.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ratty_Damsel OP   Woman
over a year ago

Greater London


"No he shouldn't. Though I would hope venues won't book him. But allowing him here it prompts debate and discussion and that;s good. Banning him turns him in to a martyr"

That's my thought too. Surely it would be an abuse of law to actually ban him too? However much of a misygnostic (shit, my spelling has gone to pot tonight!) disgusting man he is?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No he shouldn't. Though I would hope venues won't book him. But allowing him here it prompts debate and discussion and that;s good. Banning him turns him in to a martyr

That's my thought too. Surely it would be an abuse of law to actually ban him too? However much of a misygnostic (shit, my spelling has gone to pot tonight!) disgusting man he is? "

Free speech comes at a price. We have to hear things that we don't necessarily want too

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

he's an abhorrent arse but even abhorrent arses are allowed free speech in this country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 15/11/14 22:07:17]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've signed the petition it's upto 130 000 at the mo, don't want do give him anymore publicity ....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He may be a repugnant little shit, but there still exists the illusion of free speech in this country, and being a repugnant shit is not enough to deny him entry...

Now, if the shit he's peddling can be classified as 'hate speech' then yes, ban him...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"He may be a repugnant little shit, but there still exists the illusion of free speech in this country, and being a repugnant shit is not enough to deny him entry...

Now, if the shit he's peddling can be classified as 'hate speech' then yes, ban him..."

Sadly, misogyny isn't deemed hate speech.

Everyone signing petitions on this consider doing something that garners less publicity but may help more people: sign the SOS petition to save women's refuges.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"He may be a repugnant little shit, but there still exists the illusion of free speech in this country, and being a repugnant shit is not enough to deny him entry...

Now, if the shit he's peddling can be classified as 'hate speech' then yes, ban him..."

It's sailing pretty close to it.

I wonder how many people would be influenced by him?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *1paljungMan
over a year ago

Richmond

If you can ban Snoop Dog, then this area can deffo be on that list...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *1paljungMan
over a year ago

Richmond

Area???

Arse!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Ban him, he's a prat.

Anyone advocating putting there hand round a strangers neck and so is breaking the law really so shouldn't be allowed in!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top