Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It may be (right or wrongly) that swinging is traditionally a couples sport.... it was formally called "wife swapping". Where as what happens between singles used to be just called "shagging"...." Who told you that? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So what about all the couples looking for single bi females? Are they swingers? " In most cases just dreamers...... But to be honest, I believe that the world of swinging isn't so black and white.... Just shades of grey ( although not 50) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It may be (right or wrongly) that swinging is traditionally a couples sport.... it was formally called "wife swapping". Where as what happens between singles used to be just called "shagging"...." What's that got to do with the OP? It doesn't say no single females or TVs | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!!" I've a letter from my mum that lets me go where I want | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It may be (right or wrongly) that swinging is traditionally a couples sport.... it was formally called "wife swapping". Where as what happens between singles used to be just called "shagging".... What's that got to do with the OP? It doesn't say no single females or TVs " It was an answer to the question, not a criticism of anyone. Just highlighting the simplistic definition of swinging. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of annoying when you find the profile of someone who's really nice and you really wanna talk to them and then you see that they're not interested in single guys. It's like falling at the last hurdle haha. Although the worst is when it says 'not interested in single guys', but a fair few of their verifications are from single men and recent too. I know why it's done, to stop having an inbox filled with hundreds of messages everyday. But it is like 'gah! If only I could message you!' lol." But just because you're interested in them doesn't men the feeling is mutual! I agree that it seems odd that there's no similar statement saying "not looking for couples/single females/TV/TS" - if there is one for single men equally there should be the others. But it's not worth worrying about something you can't change. A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it saves wasting a minute of your time on them, not even a nano second.. you see 'not looking for single guys' and move on. it really is that easy, some people take that rejection like the person has refused you their kidney" LMAO | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of annoying when you find the profile of someone who's really nice and you really wanna talk to them and then you see that they're not interested in single guys. It's like falling at the last hurdle haha. Although the worst is when it says 'not interested in single guys', but a fair few of their verifications are from single men and recent too. I know why it's done, to stop having an inbox filled with hundreds of messages everyday. But it is like 'gah! If only I could message you!' lol." If only you could message them just to get ignored/deleted/blocked or told to feck off? Just because someone ticks all your boxes does not mean it's going to be reciprocated, no matter how witty or funny or well crafted the message you wish you could send. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of annoying when you find the profile of someone who's really nice and you really wanna talk to them and then you see that they're not interested in single guys. It's like falling at the last hurdle haha. Although the worst is when it says 'not interested in single guys', but a fair few of their verifications are from single men and recent too. I know why it's done, to stop having an inbox filled with hundreds of messages everyday. But it is like 'gah! If only I could message you!' lol." So basically it should be all about what you want and sod what they want? You may think they are perfect for you but they don't want to chat to you. If they did they'd find you and message you. What would be the point of being able to message and annoy someone not interested? That's a recipe for driving people away from the site. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of annoying when you find the profile of someone who's really nice and you really wanna talk to them and then you see that they're not interested in single guys. It's like falling at the last hurdle haha. Although the worst is when it says 'not interested in single guys', but a fair few of their verifications are from single men and recent too. I know why it's done, to stop having an inbox filled with hundreds of messages everyday. But it is like 'gah! If only I could message you!' lol." I'm here to meet single men but I've set my age range to 98 - 99 so as NOT to receive a box full of messages from men who can't be bothered to read my profile. I wink / message the men I'm interested in now and life is SO much easier. Just because you're interested in them doesn't mean they're interested in you I'm afraid. This is sometimes difficult for some to understand and leads to a lot of unnecessary 'Why not' ping pong messages and more often than not, a block because they were becoming a pain. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is this site so bias towards couples and females to the point where it's almost derogatory? When you block single guys it specifically says "not looking…" on your profile. Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!!" "Trannies" ? That's Derogatory | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it saves wasting a minute of your time on them, not even a nano second.. you see 'not looking for single guys' and move on. it really is that easy, some people take that rejection like the person has refused you their kidney" *casually sharpens axe* That is largely irrelevant to me... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is this site so bias towards couples and females to the point where it's almost derogatory? When you block single guys it specifically says "not looking…" on your profile. Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!! "Trannies" ? That's Derogatory " It's a shortened non-offensive reference to transsexuals and transvestites. No hurt intended. It's like saying I'm going for lunch instead of the correct term "luncheon". When I say this I don't mean to offend lunch | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is this site so bias towards couples and females to the point where it's almost derogatory? When you block single guys it specifically says "not looking…" on your profile. Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!! "Trannies" ? That's Derogatory It's a shortened non-offensive reference to transsexuals and transvestites. No hurt intended. It's like saying I'm going for lunch instead of the correct term "luncheon". When I say this I don't mean to offend lunch " Oh. So today I am spending time with a friend of mine who's family originates in the Indian sub-continent. By your reckoning I can save myself a couple of syllables instead of having to get my tongue around that tricky word Pakistani. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"it saves wasting a minute of your time on them, not even a nano second.. you see 'not looking for single guys' and move on. it really is that easy, some people take that rejection like the person has refused you their kidney" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is this site so bias towards couples and females to the point where it's almost derogatory? When you block single guys it specifically says "not looking…" on your profile. Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!! "Trannies" ? That's Derogatory It's a shortened non-offensive reference to transsexuals and transvestites. No hurt intended. It's like saying I'm going for lunch instead of the correct term "luncheon". When I say this I don't mean to offend lunch " If no hurt is intended, I would suggest a few modifications to the way you use words. Tranny is indeed considered a derogatory term by many people. Most transsexuals consider it extremely offensive. Many TVs don't mind it. Some refer to themselves that way. That's not to say there aren't those that find it derogatory. However, it's absolutely not inoffensive when used to refer to transsexual people. A better response, rather than insisting it's not offensive because you meant no offence would be to say thank you for letting you know, that you hadn't realised and that you meant no offence. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Advanced search - 'looking for a man'? Hey presto - list of profiles looking for men? " This "advanced" technique is only to be used by intelligent gents, not just anyone. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Advanced search - 'looking for a man'? Hey presto - list of profiles looking for men? This "advanced" technique is only to be used by intelligent gents, not just anyone. " Wasn't the original point of the thread questioning why there is a message saying "not looking for single men" but not for any other gender/classification? Or am I not 'advanced' enough to have understood the question correctly? A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Advanced search - 'looking for a man'? Hey presto - list of profiles looking for men? This "advanced" technique is only to be used by intelligent gents, not just anyone. Wasn't the original point of the thread questioning why there is a message saying "not looking for single men" but not for any other gender/classification? Or am I not 'advanced' enough to have understood the question correctly? A" That is how I interpreted it too. Perhaps we are both not advanced enough. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Advanced search - 'looking for a man'? Hey presto - list of profiles looking for men? This "advanced" technique is only to be used by intelligent gents, not just anyone. Wasn't the original point of the thread questioning why there is a message saying "not looking for single men" but not for any other gender/classification? Or am I not 'advanced' enough to have understood the question correctly? A" Thanks for reiterating this point obi. I think it's another case of so called advanced people not being too advanced at all. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Why is this site so bias towards couples and females to the point where it's almost derogatory? When you block single guys it specifically says "not looking…" on your profile. Doesn't do that when you block females, couples and trannies though!! "Trannies" ? That's Derogatory It's a shortened non-offensive reference to transsexuals and transvestites. No hurt intended. It's like saying I'm going for lunch instead of the correct term "luncheon". When I say this I don't mean to offend lunch If no hurt is intended, I would suggest a few modifications to the way you use words. Tranny is indeed considered a derogatory term by many people. Most transsexuals consider it extremely offensive. Many TVs don't mind it. Some refer to themselves that way. That's not to say there aren't those that find it derogatory. However, it's absolutely not inoffensive when used to refer to transsexual people. A better response, rather than insisting it's not offensive because you meant no offence would be to say thank you for letting you know, that you hadn't realised and that you meant no offence." Okay I take your point voluptuous. It's maybe similar to "acceptable" abbreviations to refer to different races 20-30 years ago. If someone has taken offence; that wasn't my intention, I didn't know, I apologise. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's kind of annoying when you find the profile of someone who's really nice and you really wanna talk to them and then you see that they're not interested in single guys. It's like falling at the last hurdle haha. Although the worst is when it says 'not interested in single guys', but a fair few of their verifications are from single men and recent too. I know why it's done, to stop having an inbox filled with hundreds of messages everyday. But it is like 'gah! If only I could message you!' lol." Due to the large amount of single males o here, couples and in fact single ladies ca n pick and choose who they meet. The no single male filter is there to stop the all too common 'I am horny' or 'hi fancy a fuck' messages. Which might work brilliantly at a pub or club are not too successful on here. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It saves time having the not looking message on there. The one issue I have is when people have a filter in place, but then add a meet for the group they have blocked. So in case, the girl who blocked couples but then posted a meet request specifically for couples, but no one could contact her. " That's simply down to people forgetting to remove filters at a given time. As the OP stated (and a few of us seem to have grasped the initial question!) - it simply seems odd that there are options to filter messages (quite rightly and nobody is questioning this!!!) from all groups - single males, single females, MF couples, MM couples, FF couples, TV/TS - and yet the only group where a specific 'not looking to meet.....' statement appears on profiles is single men! Is it any wonder that many seem to think there is a certain pecking order both in swinging and on site? A | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |