FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

The Beatles - A Grammy Award

Jump to newest
 

By *ordonBennett OP   Man
over a year ago

dover

How timeless the talent.

Younger groups are playing these fabulous Beatles songs in this TV award ceremony, displaying their enduring genius. How sad only two of them survive...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How timeless the talent.

Younger groups are playing these fabulous Beatles songs in this TV award ceremony, displaying their enduring genius. How sad only two of them survive... "

If it done right I love other musicians singing classic songs

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ordonBennett OP   Man
over a year ago

dover


"How timeless the talent.

Younger groups are playing these fabulous Beatles songs in this TV award ceremony, displaying their enduring genius. How sad only two of them survive...

If it done right I love other musicians singing classic songs"

Paul and Ringo were visibly enjoying the tributes of the younger, highly talented performers, and I hope the whole show revealed their genius to an appreciative new audience as well as to those of us that grew up with them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uke olovingmanMan
over a year ago

Gravesend

i thought youd put they d got a granny award

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wings were better!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wings were better!"

lolololol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be honest i just dont get peoples fascination with the beatles

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ichaelangelaCouple
over a year ago

notts

Still wish mark chapman had missed lennon and got yoko instead.

She is seriously weird

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound


"Wings were better!"

When they put wings on sanitary towels it was a huge improvement.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford

I can remember my parents having an argument with one of my peers (who was big into the Beatles during their late '90s/early 00s 'revival' phase) that basically, the Beatles were music your granny liked and if you were cool you liked the Stones or the Yardbirds.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ordonBennett OP   Man
over a year ago

dover


"I can remember my parents having an argument with one of my peers (who was big into the Beatles during their late '90s/early 00s 'revival' phase) that basically, the Beatles were music your granny liked and if you were cool you liked the Stones or the Yardbirds. "

Well yes that's true, but let's face it, if you were an original fan of The Stones or Yardbirds, you might well be a granny now in any case...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"I can remember my parents having an argument with one of my peers (who was big into the Beatles during their late '90s/early 00s 'revival' phase) that basically, the Beatles were music your granny liked and if you were cool you liked the Stones or the Yardbirds.

Well yes that's true, but let's face it, if you were an original fan of The Stones or Yardbirds, you might well be a granny now in any case..."

I know both of my parents are now grandparents in the literal sense.

I believe my mother once likened the Beatles to the "Take That" of the 60s.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How sad only two of them survive... "

Mainly sad that it's not the two who were actually decent at music

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things... "

I feel exactly the same!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Never been my cup of tea ,preferred them as solo artists ...Paul no ...don't get it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"Never been my cup of tea ,preferred them as solo artists ...Paul no ...don't get it "

Wot no frog song?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Never been my cup of tea ,preferred them as solo artists ...Paul no ...don't get it

Wot no frog song?"

Rather watch Thomas the tank

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things... "

A COUPLE OF GOOD SONGS!

That statement alone shows that you know absolutely nothing about them, and you really shoudn't comment about things you know fuck all about

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things...

A COUPLE OF GOOD SONGS!

That statement alone shows that you know absolutely nothing about them, and you really shoudn't comment about things you know fuck all about "

Bit extreme

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things...

A COUPLE OF GOOD SONGS!

That statement alone shows that you know absolutely nothing about them, and you really shoudn't comment about things you know fuck all about "

Okay, they had one good song.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things...

A COUPLE OF GOOD SONGS!

That statement alone shows that you know absolutely nothing about them, and you really shoudn't comment about things you know fuck all about

Okay, they had one good song. "

And, to clarify, that song is: "Lovely Rita"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Now I'm not trying to covert anyone here, we all like what we like and that's fair enough, but the amount of tosh I'm reading on this thread,shows that most of you posting have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

You may not like the guy, but you're a fool if you mock his musical talent, and PLEASE don't mention the fucking olympics! He plays

hundreds of gigs every year and fuck ups are virtually non existant.

Now if you don't like, or don't get The Beatles fair enough, but please refrain from spouting the same old stereotypical bullshit.

Thank you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"They had a couple of good songs.But honestly I think they are, in the round, overrated.

But hey, if we all liked the same things...

A COUPLE OF GOOD SONGS!

That statement alone shows that you know absolutely nothing about them, and you really shoudn't comment about things you know fuck all about

Okay, they had one good song. "

Hahahaha

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *dsindyTV/TS
over a year ago

East Lancashire

Bloody hell, a bit OTT. Some like them, some don't. Some think they are musically talented, some think musically talentless. No need to drop on them like a tonne of clay and straw blocks.....

BTW, I liked them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *imiUKMan
over a year ago

Hereford


"

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

"

I've listened to them, and I don't like them.

It was my mother who made the Take That comparison. I'm not old enough to remember the Beatles when they were current (although I am old enough to remember Take That), My parents, however have seen both.

Maybe the reason that the output was poorer from 1966 on is preciseley because Lennon couldn't write and it was "Mull of Kintyre" Mc Cartney that was writing for them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Now I'm not trying to covert anyone here, we all like what we like and that's fair enough, but the amount of tosh I'm reading on this thread,shows that most of you posting have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

You may not like the guy, but you're a fool if you mock his musical talent, and PLEASE don't mention the fucking olympics! He plays

hundreds of gigs every year and fuck ups are virtually non existant.

Now if you don't like, or don't get The Beatles fair enough, but please refrain from spouting the same old stereotypical bullshit.

Thank you "

Just because you love them, doesn't mean that we all have to.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Now I'm not trying to covert anyone here, we all like what we like and that's fair enough, but the amount of tosh I'm reading on this thread,shows that most of you posting have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

You may not like the guy, but you're a fool if you mock his musical talent, and PLEASE don't mention the fucking olympics! He plays

hundreds of gigs every year and fuck ups are virtually non existant.

Now if you don't like, or don't get The Beatles fair enough, but please refrain from spouting the same old stereotypical bullshit.

Thank you

Just because you love them, doesn't mean that we all have to.

"

I think I just said that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Now I'm not trying to covert anyone here, we all like what we like and that's fair enough, but the amount of tosh I'm reading on this thread,shows that most of you posting have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

You may not like the guy, but you're a fool if you mock his musical talent, and PLEASE don't mention the fucking olympics! He plays

hundreds of gigs every year and fuck ups are virtually non existant.

Now if you don't like, or don't get The Beatles fair enough, but please refrain from spouting the same old stereotypical bullshit.

Thank you

Just because you love them, doesn't mean that we all have to.

I think I just said that. "

You also said that those who have posted dont know what we are talking about and have spouted bullshit. We all have different musical tastes, thank god. My fave band in the world are The Stone Roses. I'm pretty sure lots of people think they are shit and that's fine with me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

I've listened to them, and I don't like them.

It was my mother who made the Take That comparison. I'm not old enough to remember the Beatles when they were current (although I am old enough to remember Take That), My parents, however have seen both.

Maybe the reason that the output was poorer from 1966 on is preciseley because Lennon couldn't write and it was "Mull of Kintyre" Mc Cartney that was writing for them. "

I don't care whether you like them or not, the point I was making was about your comparison with Take That. Show me a TT number like Helter Skelter and I'll conceed your point, but you won't because yo can't.

So you think their output went downhill after 1966? Revolver? Sgt Pepper? the White Album? Abbey Road? all after 66.

Anyway, I've had my say, so I'll leave you to it and do something worthwhile

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Now I'm not trying to covert anyone here, we all like what we like and that's fair enough, but the amount of tosh I'm reading on this thread,shows that most of you posting have absolutely no Idea what you are talking about.

Try listening to Helter Skelter, or I want you, or why don't we do it in the road, and then come back and tell me they were like Take That. They were eclectic, they did just about every genre you could mention.

Paul McCartney, while undoubtedly a bit of an arse,, was by far the most talented musician in the band. He was a fabulous and influential bass player, and a very good pianp player as well...and he can play drums and guitar pretty well too.

From 1966 on, while Lennon was out of it on drugs, he was the most prolific songwriter, and a lot of songs people give credit to Lennon for were actually written by McCartney.

You may not like the guy, but you're a fool if you mock his musical talent, and PLEASE don't mention the fucking olympics! He plays

hundreds of gigs every year and fuck ups are virtually non existant.

Now if you don't like, or don't get The Beatles fair enough, but please refrain from spouting the same old stereotypical bullshit.

Thank you

Just because you love them, doesn't mean that we all have to.

I think I just said that.

You also said that those who have posted dont know what we are talking about and have spouted bullshit. We all have different musical tastes, thank god. My fave band in the world are The Stone Roses. I'm pretty sure lots of people think they are shit and that's fine with me. "

I like the Stone Roses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Betsywilcox, has it completely correct. eg the output from 1966 was undoubtedly better than previously, McCartney was the more accomplished musician (though i prefer Lennon and Harrison over him).

Whether you like their songs, music or not, it is accepted fact in all popular music circles that they are the MOST influential band ever. Without question.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How sad only two of them survive...

Mainly sad that it's not the two who were actually decent at music"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Bloody hell, a bit OTT. Some like them, some don't. Some think they are musically talented, some think musically talentless. No need to drop on them like a tonne of clay and straw blocks.....

BTW, I liked them."

I like em but in small doses

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *xpresMan
over a year ago

Elland


"How timeless the talent.

Younger groups are playing these fabulous Beatles songs in this TV award ceremony, displaying their enduring genius. How sad only two of them survive... "

Most overrated band EVER what a load of tosh

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ordonBennett OP   Man
over a year ago

dover


"How timeless the talent.

Younger groups are playing these fabulous Beatles songs in this TV award ceremony, displaying their enduring genius. How sad only two of them survive...

Most overrated band EVER what a load of tosh"

Oh dear! I had no intention of drawing out this kind of poison but I guess there are all sorts on Fab...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top