FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Aparently!

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *alandNitaCouple
over a year ago

Scunthorpe

Two wrong don't make a right... I'm sure you don't think that some lynch mob should be allowed to take their revenge?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think with the public feeling the way they do about what happened protection is the only option

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think with the public feeling the way they do about what happened protection is the only option

"

On a seperate matter... amazing profile x

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Apparently he's been named on FB because there was an appeal not to, in case it prejudices the case against him.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ranthamThroatMan
over a year ago

Grantham.


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong."

Or for people to draw attention to the fact the name is there on a social site so they then may google it?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong."

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved."
. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong."

And if it turns out not to be him and a mob rips him limb from limb?

The guilty need to be punished but nobody is guilty till the court pass sentence.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ranthamThroatMan
over a year ago

Grantham.


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong."

You raised 5 points, alas you don't seem able to comprehend any of them.

I am so sorry that all the dogs died but maybe direct your energy elsewhere, a social site isn't doing much apart form the sympathy vote for you.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

And if it turns out not to be him and a mob rips him limb from limb?

The guilty need to be punished but nobody is guilty till the court pass sentence."

Exactly!

Send him to Royal Marine Commando school (whatever that is) because someone has named him of Facebook unbelievable!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him."

i didnt say you did but others have.

they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening.

I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I didnt see it on facebook! Saw it on a new site!.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him.

i didnt say you did but others have.

they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening.

I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people."

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved."

I have no idea about this but how the hell does anyone know for sure it was him?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"I didnt see it on facebook! Saw it on a new site!.

"

so how do you know its right?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him.

i didnt say you did but others have.

they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening.

I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people."
i was thinking more along the lines of they would teach him, control, self discipline, respect, and the difference between right and wrong which he clearly doesnt know.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

The need to grandstand how big they are got the fool into this mess, the need for even bigger fools to grandstand how they deal with it is no answer.

Thank god.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong.

yes it is!

after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently )

Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him.

i didnt say you did but others have.

they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening.

I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people. i was thinking more along the lines of they would teach him, control, self discipline, respect, and the difference between right and wrong which he clearly doesnt know.

"

from what little i know of the military training i think they look for people who already know that bit. The military is not a reformative school for little shits.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ranthamThroatMan
over a year ago

Grantham.

i refused to use the quote button, because I find it unbelievable that an adult names another who has not been charged nor arrested nor charged.

You man have to fucking well man up and realise where you live and know that you are liable for what you post on social comment boards, I hope someone nabs you!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow

Burn the little rat!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

I worry about the amount if vigil antis we have on here....he hasn't been found guilty and it's no different to put another high risk offenders into witness protection such as murders and rapists etc

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ranthamThroatMan
over a year ago

Grantham.

To mysticalbrowneyes!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Fear not, I have just paid HMRC an extra penny to cover all of Fab's members (and future members for the next 10 years) contribution towards this.

You're welcome.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Burn the little rat! "

see..told you....vile!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I worry about the amount if vigil antis we have on here....he hasn't been found guilty and it's no different to put another high risk offenders into witness protection such as murders and rapists etc "

I mean protection not just witness protection

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ranthamThroatMan
over a year ago

Grantham.


"Fear not, I have just paid HMRC an extra penny to cover all of Fab's members (and future members for the next 10 years) contribution towards this.

You're welcome."

Not a regular posters, but may I pretty please beg for " TINA TITZ" insurance?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Burn the little rat! "

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip"

Yes

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

see..told you....vile!"

Ur vile

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

he's under 3 different names on facebook

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Burn the little rat!

see..told you....vile!

Ur vile

"

witty

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

see..told you....vile!

Ur vile

witty "

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *eryBigGirlWoman
over a year ago

East Yorkshire

I actually think its a shame people make assumptions and the vigilantes start to appear

From all the reports I've seen the police have urged the family to move away for protection not that they are protecting them, the boy in question was recently in hospital after a serious attack from a dog which was stabbed to death by a neighbour to get it off him and the police are clear that they understand he is one of a handful of people who played a role in the fire.

I always thought innocent till proven guilty was the case in this country

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

high emotion makes people gut react - none of us know the background of this - might be hes just a baddun if so the law will deal with him -

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes "

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I actually think its a shame people make assumptions and the vigilantes start to appear

From all the reports I've seen the police have urged the family to move away for protection not that they are protecting them, the boy in question was recently in hospital after a serious attack from a dog which was stabbed to death by a neighbour to get it off him and the police are clear that they understand he is one of a handful of people who played a role in the fire.

I always thought innocent till proven guilty was the case in this country "

So he gave back what a dog done to him

In that case get him burnt

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"I actually think its a shame people make assumptions and the vigilantes start to appear

From all the reports I've seen the police have urged the family to move away for protection not that they are protecting them, the boy in question was recently in hospital after a serious attack from a dog which was stabbed to death by a neighbour to get it off him and the police are clear that they understand he is one of a handful of people who played a role in the fire.

I always thought innocent till proven guilty was the case in this country "

me too but this looks like a case of act first ask questions later.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now "

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??"

one is not better than the other.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

one is not better than the other.

"

So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

How many dogs died?

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"How many dogs died?"

60+ only coz 150 were saved so could have been them all had they not been saved

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

one is not better than the other.

So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?"

we are either doing this on here or in PM, you have just asked me the same question there and i have replied.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"How many dogs died?"

60

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

one is not better than the other.

So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?"
. It was 40 dogs not hundreds befor someone says you need to get your facts right. I do think you saying burn him is way too harsh though

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes "

your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already..

take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react..

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"How many dogs died?"

Too many.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already..

take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.."

and then have a think about the irony of it all

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already..

take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.."

So what us punishment for burning all those dogs maybe u should have a pep talk with him

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

one is not better than the other.

So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?. It was 40 dogs not hundreds befor someone says you need to get your facts right. I do think you saying burn him is way too harsh though "

I know my facts pal! U think the fire was started thinkin oh 150 will get saved

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??"

Stop acting so vile, no real need. The bottom line is, he may not have intended to set fire to it with a _iew to killing animals, just been a bored child who for all we know may have had a terrible upbringing and society has thrown him onto the scrapheap. The evidence isn't clear, nothing is known about him - that's what a police investigation is for. Burning someone to death or kicking a child to death, if you think that is the answer then I'd love to know what you've don't to ever change the british justice system or to change the lives of those who aren't privileged.

On a positive note, the dogs home has been inundated with generosity.

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow

Will happily fill up this post with

Burn the rat!!!!!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *othingButCocoChanelWoman
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums?

if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now

Pm me for my address then

Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??

Stop acting so vile, no real need. The bottom line is, he may not have intended to set fire to it with a _iew to killing animals, just been a bored child who for all we know may have had a terrible upbringing and society has thrown him onto the scrapheap. The evidence isn't clear, nothing is known about him - that's what a police investigation is for. Burning someone to death or kicking a child to death, if you think that is the answer then I'd love to know what you've don't to ever change the british justice system or to change the lives of those who aren't privileged.

On a positive note, the dogs home has been inundated with generosity. "

Yes i donated!!

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

O o O oo

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
 
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Burn the little rat!

if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..?

get a grip

Yes

your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already..

take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react..

So what us punishment for burning all those dogs maybe u should have a pep talk with him"

the punishment will be if found guilty as per the law of the land..

same as or you of for I if we were to be under the system for whatever..

 (thread closed by moderator)

Reply privately
back to top