Im not swayed here by others, have not read any replies. I assume a 5ft 9 to 11 guy with a 32 waist is slim and should be average. We have an obesity epidemic, but I dont let that increase the 'average' body type description to now mean borderline very over weight. A 6 foot guy can get away with 36 inch waist, imo, if he has a hulking frame to match, otherwise could still be overweight. Id put the op, without scrutinising his photos, as overweight, unless he has a very large frame and is exceptionally muscled - though those muscles dont usually cluster around the waist. Unless trousers are worn too high, with the waist by your rib cage, because leg length was not available below 32 inches, and they werent shortened, then I think your waist carries an inch or so more than is ideally defined as slim. But my definition of slim is not the median or mean average for our population, so I will differ from some. The only description I am assuming could be wrong is skinny. You can always leave your own adjective out, and just use photos and written measurements to let your potential partners decide if you fit their needs. |