Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols " I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Doesn't sound like a very good instructor" it's OK the instructor is no longer in the gene pool. There is however the parents of a 9 year old who think it's a good idea to show her how to use an Uzi, and a scared 9 year old mind | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... " Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child" All 3 of my kid s shoot on a regular basis | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... " Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child All 3 of my kid s shoot on a regular basis" At what and why | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?"" lol | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child" I taught my kids to shoot from a very early age. We've spent valuable time together bonding, learning about nature, where food comes from and how to find your own food. They've also learned patience, responsibility, respect and it's good training for things like exams in the future. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"An Uzi is not the kind of weapon you use to train a new shooter, let alone a 9yr old new shooter! The instructor was quite obviously an idiot..." And Darwin was right! This is how these idiots are removed from the gene pool. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A nine year-old girl in the US has killed her shooting instructor by accident while being shown how to use a high-powered automatic weapon. The instructor was giving the girl a lesson at a shooting range in Arizona when the recoil from the first shot caused her to lose control of the Uzi. " Well that's a lesson for all of us Don't teach little girls to shoot high powered automatic weapons..... Glad I read this post, always learning! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?"" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child All 3 of my kid s shoot on a regular basis At what and why" Clay pigeon's drop down targets vermin. Because we enjoy it , do we need a reason? My boys love it they have Been brought up around Guns they have and continue learn how to use the guns properly and safely | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. " horrific for the young girl | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"An Uzi is not the kind of weapon you use to train a new shooter, let alone a 9yr old new shooter! The instructor was quite obviously an idiot..." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... " "many valuable lessons"... Such as? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. " I understand all that but wouldn't teaching children be a big risk. I mean they'll have guns in their life from an early age and they'll know how to use them. Who's to say they won't be unfortunate enough to suffer bullying and go on a killing spree and who's to say they won't act on psychopathic tendencies as they grow older. Wouldn't it be safer to not let them come into contact with the guns until they're adults so they can decide for themselves? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... "many valuable lessons"... Such as?" Patience. Responsibility. Focus. Respect. Awareness of their surroundings. Staying calm. Lessons on their local environment. To name just a few. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. I understand all that but wouldn't teaching children be a big risk. I mean they'll have guns in their life from an early age and they'll know how to use them. Who's to say they won't be unfortunate enough to suffer bullying and go on a killing spree and who's to say they won't act on psychopathic tendencies as they grow older. Wouldn't it be safer to not let them come into contact with the guns until they're adults so they can decide for themselves? " Have to agree, making deadly weapons second nature just doesn't seem a wise move | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... "many valuable lessons"... Such as? Patience. Responsibility. Focus. Respect. Awareness of their surroundings. Staying calm. Lessons on their local environment. To name just a few." Should we name all the reasons why it's a bad fucking idea!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... "many valuable lessons"... Such as? Patience. Responsibility. Focus. Respect. Awareness of their surroundings. Staying calm. Lessons on their local environment. To name just a few. Should we name all the reasons why it's a bad fucking idea!! " I can think of much better ways of teaching kids your list of lessons....... Apart from maybe focus! Haha | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. I understand all that but wouldn't teaching children be a big risk. I mean they'll have guns in their life from an early age and they'll know how to use them. Who's to say they won't be unfortunate enough to suffer bullying and go on a killing spree and who's to say they won't act on psychopathic tendencies as they grow older. Wouldn't it be safer to not let them come into contact with the guns until they're adults so they can decide for themselves? " This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... "many valuable lessons"... Such as? Patience. Responsibility. Focus. Respect. Awareness of their surroundings. Staying calm. Lessons on their local environment. To name just a few. Should we name all the reasons why it's a bad fucking idea!! I can think of much better ways of teaching kids your list of lessons....... Apart from maybe focus! Haha" And I have taught my kids lessons in other ways. Guns have benefits and drawbacks the same as many things in life. Sadly some people only focus on the negatives and will not accept the positives. I can respect those who dislike guns, shame the same can't be said vice versa. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. I understand all that but wouldn't teaching children be a big risk. I mean they'll have guns in their life from an early age and they'll know how to use them. Who's to say they won't be unfortunate enough to suffer bullying and go on a killing spree and who's to say they won't act on psychopathic tendencies as they grow older. Wouldn't it be safer to not let them come into contact with the guns until they're adults so they can decide for themselves? This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain." I used to knick my older brothers air riffle when I was about 10 years old till my next door neighbour grassed me up for trying to shoot her in the arse from my bedroom window | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... "many valuable lessons"... Such as? Patience. Responsibility. Focus. Respect. Awareness of their surroundings. Staying calm. Lessons on their local environment. To name just a few. Should we name all the reasons why it's a bad fucking idea!! I can think of much better ways of teaching kids your list of lessons....... Apart from maybe focus! Haha And I have taught my kids lessons in other ways. Guns have benefits and drawbacks the same as many things in life. Sadly some people only focus on the negatives and will not accept the positives. I can respect those who dislike guns, shame the same can't be said vice versa." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc" So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck!" See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck! See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!...." Good idea maybe we should get all our kids having real gun fights when the weather's nice | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi?" In my mind you can't as I previously stated. That being said I have seen 13yr olds shooting them in competitions in the US to an exceptionally high standard of accuracy and safety. But I still firmly believe that sub machine guns have no place in the hands of a civilian. Their initial purpose was for clearing trenches, which they're very good at. They're pretty much useless for most other things. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi?" Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck! See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!...." im worried now ive a balloon filled with water wibbling on the table ,two in fact. im posting them to tina titz im terrified they'll explode now | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck! See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!.... Good idea maybe we should get all our kids having real gun fights when the weather's nice " My post was tongue in cheek. My first rule when teaching someone to shoot is to NEVER point a gun at a person. Whether it's a toy gun or not. It may surprise you that none of my kids have ever owned or played with a toy gun or water pistol as they go against my principles. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain." Safe storage? But if anyone was pissed off enough, child or adult, they'd find a way to get to the guns and ammunition. I think I can safely say I could have used a gun against a person or two when I was growing up if they had been second nature to me even though I'm not a violent person. The problem with teaching children all that stuff is because they're not fully developed and the safest thing would be to take guns out of the way. Everyone is raised differently (which is great) but until a child's brain is fully developed I don't think they should be taught all that stuff about guns. You could easily give 110% safety lessons but the problem would be the child's lack of development. You don't know how they'll behave as they grow older so isn't it a big risk teaching them all that while they're still growing up? I know we all take risks but shouldn't they decide on what risks to take when they're adults? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck! See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!.... Good idea maybe we should get all our kids having real gun fights when the weather's nice My post was tongue in cheek. My first rule when teaching someone to shoot is to NEVER point a gun at a person. Whether it's a toy gun or not. It may surprise you that none of my kids have ever owned or played with a toy gun or water pistol as they go against my principles." No I was being serious I hate kids! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable " Mate, come on. You cannot justify giving a child a sub machine gun. I'm pro-gun but even I cannot defend that decision. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain. Safe storage? But if anyone was pissed off enough, child or adult, they'd find a way to get to the guns and ammunition. I think I can safely say I could have used a gun against a person or two when I was growing up if they had been second nature to me even though I'm not a violent person. The problem with teaching children all that stuff is because they're not fully developed and the safest thing would be to take guns out of the way. Everyone is raised differently (which is great) but until a child's brain is fully developed I don't think they should be taught all that stuff about guns. You could easily give 110% safety lessons but the problem would be the child's lack of development. You don't know how they'll behave as they grow older so isn't it a big risk teaching them all that while they're still growing up? I know we all take risks but shouldn't they decide on what risks to take when they're adults?" If they're stored in the correct manner then there's no way they can access them without either the keys or industrial metal cutting equipment. My large hunting/target rifle is kept in 3 separate cabinets, the ammunition in another and the tool for attaching the barrel in another. Each cabinet has two locks and also need a numerical code, I also have the keys with me 24/7 and there are no spares. It takes the best part of an hour to get that gun in a shootable state (my others slightly less). I'm also subject to random inspections and any advice is acted upon with immediate effect. A young child's brain is like a sponge, they absorb information much better than an adult. Teaching them values from an early age has a far higher rate of success than waiting until their hormones kick in and they start trying to impress their peers or the opisite sex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable Mate, come on. You cannot justify giving a child a sub machine gun. I'm pro-gun but even I cannot defend that decision." Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. But I will defend to the end letting a Child learl how to shoot | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
Reply privately |
"This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain. Safe storage? But if anyone was pissed off enough, child or adult, they'd find a way to get to the guns and ammunition. I think I can safely say I could have used a gun against a person or two when I was growing up if they had been second nature to me even though I'm not a violent person. The problem with teaching children all that stuff is because they're not fully developed and the safest thing would be to take guns out of the way. Everyone is raised differently (which is great) but until a child's brain is fully developed I don't think they should be taught all that stuff about guns. You could easily give 110% safety lessons but the problem would be the child's lack of development. You don't know how they'll behave as they grow older so isn't it a big risk teaching them all that while they're still growing up? I know we all take risks but shouldn't they decide on what risks to take when they're adults? If they're stored in the correct manner then there's no way they can access them without either the keys or industrial metal cutting equipment. My large hunting/target rifle is kept in 3 separate cabinets, the ammunition in another and the tool for attaching the barrel in another. Each cabinet has two locks and also need a numerical code, I also have the keys with me 24/7 and there are no spares. It takes the best part of an hour to get that gun in a shootable state (my others slightly less). I'm also subject to random inspections and any advice is acted upon with immediate effect. A young child's brain is like a sponge, they absorb information much better than an adult. Teaching them values from an early age has a far higher rate of success than waiting until their hormones kick in and they start trying to impress their peers or the opisite sex." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain. Safe storage? But if anyone was pissed off enough, child or adult, they'd find a way to get to the guns and ammunition. I think I can safely say I could have used a gun against a person or two when I was growing up if they had been second nature to me even though I'm not a violent person. The problem with teaching children all that stuff is because they're not fully developed and the safest thing would be to take guns out of the way. Everyone is raised differently (which is great) but until a child's brain is fully developed I don't think they should be taught all that stuff about guns. You could easily give 110% safety lessons but the problem would be the child's lack of development. You don't know how they'll behave as they grow older so isn't it a big risk teaching them all that while they're still growing up? I know we all take risks but shouldn't they decide on what risks to take when they're adults? If they're stored in the correct manner then there's no way they can access them without either the keys or industrial metal cutting equipment. My large hunting/target rifle is kept in 3 separate cabinets, the ammunition in another and the tool for attaching the barrel in another. Each cabinet has two locks and also need a numerical code, I also have the keys with me 24/7 and there are no spares. It takes the best part of an hour to get that gun in a shootable state (my others slightly less). I'm also subject to random inspections and any advice is acted upon with immediate effect. A young child's brain is like a sponge, they absorb information much better than an adult. Teaching them values from an early age has a far higher rate of success than waiting until their hormones kick in and they start trying to impress their peers or the opisite sex." I'm sure your method is working for you but the same values can be taught without the use of guns. There's no guarantee that those values will remain with them once they're adults so the best thing would be to keep them away from guns (some of the worst serial crimes involving guns were committed by people who seemed to have been brought up well and had some of the best education). You might have the keys on you 24/7 but all it takes is that one time where you forget them cause I'm sure you forget like the rest of us. That one time could coincide with an angry child/teen then we'd have a killing spree to read about. You mentioned teaching your kids where their food comes from, personally I think that's a good idea depending on how old they are but you also mentioned them shooting as a hobby which is a bad idea. That's just my opinion on it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. I understand all that but wouldn't teaching children be a big risk. I mean they'll have guns in their life from an early age and they'll know how to use them. Who's to say they won't be unfortunate enough to suffer bullying and go on a killing spree and who's to say they won't act on psychopathic tendencies as they grow older. Wouldn't it be safer to not let them come into contact with the guns until they're adults so they can decide for themselves? Have to agree, making deadly weapons second nature just doesn't seem a wise move " o.k I am appalled that a nine year old was give an uzi. Children can be brought up with guns and how to use them safely (farmers daughter here) As for deadly weapons being second nature? as you are a smoker are you telling me you have never indulged in your deadly hobby in front of anyone under the age of 18? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"This is where safety is of the highest priority. Safe storage of the weapons and ammunition is an area that seems to be lacking in America. The reason I taught my kids so young is that they learn without the bravardo that many older kids/young adults have. It removes many of the glorified taboos of shooting a gun and they simply become tools for a hobby or source of putting food on the table. Whenever I teach someone to shoot I start them off with a BB gun, I drill them on trigger control and safe handling before I even consider moving on to something like an air rifle. People should respect that a gun is not a toy and that they're the most dangerous part of the chain. Safe storage? But if anyone was pissed off enough, child or adult, they'd find a way to get to the guns and ammunition. I think I can safely say I could have used a gun against a person or two when I was growing up if they had been second nature to me even though I'm not a violent person. The problem with teaching children all that stuff is because they're not fully developed and the safest thing would be to take guns out of the way. Everyone is raised differently (which is great) but until a child's brain is fully developed I don't think they should be taught all that stuff about guns. You could easily give 110% safety lessons but the problem would be the child's lack of development. You don't know how they'll behave as they grow older so isn't it a big risk teaching them all that while they're still growing up? I know we all take risks but shouldn't they decide on what risks to take when they're adults? If they're stored in the correct manner then there's no way they can access them without either the keys or industrial metal cutting equipment. My large hunting/target rifle is kept in 3 separate cabinets, the ammunition in another and the tool for attaching the barrel in another. Each cabinet has two locks and also need a numerical code, I also have the keys with me 24/7 and there are no spares. It takes the best part of an hour to get that gun in a shootable state (my others slightly less). I'm also subject to random inspections and any advice is acted upon with immediate effect. A young child's brain is like a sponge, they absorb information much better than an adult. Teaching them values from an early age has a far higher rate of success than waiting until their hormones kick in and they start trying to impress their peers or the opisite sex. I'm sure your method is working for you but the same values can be taught without the use of guns. There's no guarantee that those values will remain with them once they're adults so the best thing would be to keep them away from guns (some of the worst serial crimes involving guns were committed by people who seemed to have been brought up well and had some of the best education). You might have the keys on you 24/7 but all it takes is that one time where you forget them cause I'm sure you forget like the rest of us. That one time could coincide with an angry child/teen then we'd have a killing spree to read about. You mentioned teaching your kids where their food comes from, personally I think that's a good idea depending on how old they are but you also mentioned them shooting as a hobby which is a bad idea. That's just my opinion on it" Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole" So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"?" Sorry but that comment is lost on me? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The real issue here is parenting. We all know people who let there children have a small amount of alcohol, say as a toast at a wedding, but there are people who let their kids drink to excess. We all know people who have dogs who the children are around and are respectful to, but there are people with pitbulls who teach there kids as a weapon. We will all as parents at some stage teach our children how to use a kitchen knife to chop veg, some parents teach their kids that knives are weapons Its the same with guns, every pro gun person on this thread has said that the 9 year old should not have had an uzi in hers hands. Its not society and it's rules that hurts and damages children, it is sadly those who are happy enough to bring children into this world and yet cannot be bothered to educate and care for them as they should. " excuse grammar and typo's was in rant mode | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me?" Use google | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK" How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? " Our gun laws Thats why... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable " Why is a question a soapbox? You have stated your _iews (a statement might be seen as more soapboxy than a question) and a question followed. It's a discussion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... " I wish I were as confident as you appear to be that there are no illegal guns in the UK N | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... " Laws can be broken. Like I said, since gun owners are required to have all these cabinets and stuff, all it'd take would be to forget your keys just once and then something like that would happen. I'm sure there's a lot of positives to guns but a comment which is that daft is making me seem like I'm anti guns | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable Why is a question a soapbox? You have stated your _iews (a statement might be seen as more soapboxy than a question) and a question followed. It's a discussion." At what point did I Justify giving a 9 year old an Uzi | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... " Hungerford happened. Dunblane happened. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Typical Something happens in the states and the UK anti gun lobbyist's come out about how Guns are evil etc etc So justify teaching a 9 year old how to fire an Uzi? Wow your soapbox your stood on must be really comfortable Why is a question a soapbox? You have stated your _iews (a statement might be seen as more soapboxy than a question) and a question followed. It's a discussion. At what point did I Justify giving a 9 year old an Uzi" Why such antagonistic responses? As to things not happening in the UK, I remember Dunblane. An adult with a gun and not a child but the effect was the same. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Laws can be broken yes but for someone to get the key then to know what place the other parts plus ammunition is kept your talking of odd s of Millions upon millions to one" If you're teaching your kids about guns I'm sure they'd know where they are kept unless you have some secret lair where you keep them (which you only go into when they're not around or sleeping) | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me?" Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Laws can be broken yes but for someone to get the key then to know what place the other parts plus ammunition is kept your talking of odd s of Millions upon millions to one If you're teaching your kids about guns I'm sure they'd know where they are kept unless you have some secret lair where you keep them (which you only go into when they're not around or sleeping)" Actually my cabinets are very well hidden away. You can be within a few feet of them and not know they're there. As for forgetting my keys, yes, there's a risk of that happening, which is why my cabinets also have a numeric lock (as I stated earlier) and I am the only person who knows the code, so the chances of my guns getting into the wrong hands are exceedingly low. I know many people who take the same precautions. Sadly this incident happened in the US where safe storage often seems to be an afterthought. Have a look at Switzerland, they actually have the highest percentages of gun ownership in the world yet they also have the lowest crime rate in the world, especially firearms offences. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? " Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... Hungerford happened. Dunblane happened. " Sadly they did and our laws were rightly altered in the wake of these events. I'd actually like stricter regulations for gun ownership in this country, even for things like air weapons. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Laws can be broken yes but for someone to get the key then to know what place the other parts plus ammunition is kept your talking of odd s of Millions upon millions to one If you're teaching your kids about guns I'm sure they'd know where they are kept unless you have some secret lair where you keep them (which you only go into when they're not around or sleeping) Actually my cabinets are very well hidden away. You can be within a few feet of them and not know they're there. As for forgetting my keys, yes, there's a risk of that happening, which is why my cabinets also have a numeric lock (as I stated earlier) and I am the only person who knows the code, so the chances of my guns getting into the wrong hands are exceedingly low. I know many people who take the same precautions. Sadly this incident happened in the US where safe storage often seems to be an afterthought. Have a look at Switzerland, they actually have the highest percentages of gun ownership in the world yet they also have the lowest crime rate in the world, especially firearms offences." I hope it's one where you punch in the code not like briefcases where you roll until you have the right number and if they haven't followed you when you were taking them out or putting them back in then it's safer. I'd say the mentality of Swiss gun owners is different to that of American ones which in turn is different to that of British owners. I was only stating that one mistake could be detrimental especially where kids are involved. I don't see the big love of guns in America. South Africa only got it's independence in 1994 and guns are still a huge part of their lives. Safety can be the most important thin of all when it comes to guns but all it takes is one mistake which is why I still think guns shouldn't be second nature to kids | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... Hungerford happened. Dunblane happened. Sadly they did and our laws were rightly altered in the wake of these events. I'd actually like stricter regulations for gun ownership in this country, even for things like air weapons." I'd also like to see stricter laws on those found owning an illegal weapon | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... Hungerford happened. Dunblane happened. Sadly they did and our laws were rightly altered in the wake of these events. I'd actually like stricter regulations for gun ownership in this country, even for things like air weapons. I'd also like to see stricter laws on those found owning an illegal weapon" Me too... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened" A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"?" A "crypt"? It's Crip. Maybe you should use google yourself. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead." So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Sorry but this could NEVER happen collibine in the US plus other horror stories can not happen in the UK How can you be so sure that it'll "NEVER" happen? Our gun laws Thats why... Hungerford happened. Dunblane happened. Yes they did, then after Hungerford which was a major police cock-up assault rifles were banned, then dunblane happened, this meant a total ban on guns altogether. What happened after Columbine ? Absolutely nothing. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying??" No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Laws can be broken yes but for someone to get the key then to know what place the other parts plus ammunition is kept your talking of odd s of Millions upon millions to one If you're teaching your kids about guns I'm sure they'd know where they are kept unless you have some secret lair where you keep them (which you only go into when they're not around or sleeping) Actually my cabinets are very well hidden away. You can be within a few feet of them and not know they're there. As for forgetting my keys, yes, there's a risk of that happening, which is why my cabinets also have a numeric lock (as I stated earlier) and I am the only person who knows the code, so the chances of my guns getting into the wrong hands are exceedingly low. I know many people who take the same precautions. Sadly this incident happened in the US where safe storage often seems to be an afterthought. Have a look at Switzerland, they actually have the highest percentages of gun ownership in the world yet they also have the lowest crime rate in the world, especially firearms offences." Switzerland is also very law-abiding about just about everything. Try hanging your washing out on a Tuesday. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying??" Before I am accused of calling you anything I will state up front that I am not. Your comments illustrate how easily things are misunderstood. Holding guns when such easy misunderstandings happen is what scares me. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi." Firstly an Uzi isn't that powerful it is a machine pistol that shoots normal 9mm rounds.. fast shooting yes but not powerful secondly if she didn't shoot the instructor on purpose then it was An unfortunate accident | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. Firstly an Uzi isn't that powerful it is a machine pistol that shoots normal 9mm rounds.. fast shooting yes but not powerful secondly if she didn't shoot the instructor on purpose then it was An unfortunate accident" Not all accidents are unfortunate and some are easily avoided. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. Firstly an Uzi isn't that powerful it is a machine pistol that shoots normal 9mm rounds.. fast shooting yes but not powerful secondly if she didn't shoot the instructor on purpose then it was An unfortunate accident" An Uzi may not be ' that powerful' but at 600+ rounds a minute they're bloody difficult to control even for an experienced shooter. A one second squeeze of the trigger fires 10 rounds, that's 10 times the recoil of a normal semi automatic pistol. Definitely NOT something anyone with an ounce of sense would seem appropriate. When my son fired a 9mm Sig in the States a couple of years ago I only loaded 1 round in the magazine at a time and before he fired it he fired a .22RF pistol so I could assess his abilities. Pro-gun or anti-gun, there's no justifying putting an Uzi into the hands of a 9yr old. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse." The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. Firstly an Uzi isn't that powerful it is a machine pistol that shoots normal 9mm rounds.. fast shooting yes but not powerful secondly if she didn't shoot the instructor on purpose then it was An unfortunate accident Not all accidents are unfortunate and some are easily avoided. " So it's NOT unfortunate that some guy died... Ok thats a nice _iew to have | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Hope I'm not being rude but what's "shooting properly?" Exactly what it says. Shooting properly starts with safety. In this case safety never entered the equation. A sub machine gun capable of firing 600 rounds a minute has no place in any civilians hand, let alone the hands of a child. The poor kid is going to be traumatised for life. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I don't think that being incredulous at America's utterly ridiculous gun culture necessarily equates to bein 'anti-gun'. And I don't think that questioning the wisdom of widespread gun ownership is a bad thing. Guns for sport and/or hunting I have no problem with but when inner city gangs are carrying them I fail to see how that is anything other than to the detriment of society as a whole So the 9 year old was she a "blood or a Crypt"? Sorry but that comment is lost on me? Ok I understand the reference but fail to see the point you are making? Well you pertty much called this girl a gang member just for shooting s machine pistol down a range she wasn't "busting caps in some homies ass"... An unfortunate accident happened A 9 year old firing an Uzi is many things but it is not an 'unfortunate accident'. I didn't imply she was in a gang. See my first paragraph - America's gun laws are ridiculous. No one needs to own many of the weapons that are legal in America. The instructor is dead due to his own stupidity, her parents stupidity and America's gun laws. And the end result is a child potentially traumatised for lifecand a 1 person dead. So she meant to shoot him, is that what your saying?? No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. Firstly an Uzi isn't that powerful it is a machine pistol that shoots normal 9mm rounds.. fast shooting yes but not powerful secondly if she didn't shoot the instructor on purpose then it was An unfortunate accident Not all accidents are unfortunate and some are easily avoided. " I am trying to think what a fortunate accident might be | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse. The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse." Actually the Uzi has a switch that can turn the weapon from semi to full automatic.. be it stupidity or what ever but it's definitely not child abuse. I have shot an Uzi on a number of times it's recoil isn't much to speak of its not this monster weapon you people speak of, a darling of Hollywood it's a price of shit usles in combat there are alot faster more effective more powerful weapons out on the shelves | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"its bad enough the parents allowing this girl to go shooting but why on earth were they using live rounds " Can't exactly Shoot without them or it wouldn't be shooting.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse. The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse. Actually the Uzi has a switch that can turn the weapon from semi to full automatic.. be it stupidity or what ever but it's definitely not child abuse. I have shot an Uzi on a number of times it's recoil isn't much to speak of its not this monster weapon you people speak of, a darling of Hollywood it's a price of shit usles in combat there are alot faster more effective more powerful weapons out on the shelves" You're getting way off the point. I've fired an Uzi too and I wouldn't call it an appropriate weapon to give to a nine year old. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse. The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse. Actually the Uzi has a switch that can turn the weapon from semi to full automatic.. be it stupidity or what ever but it's definitely not child abuse. I have shot an Uzi on a number of times it's recoil isn't much to speak of its not this monster weapon you people speak of, a darling of Hollywood it's a price of shit usles in combat there are alot faster more effective more powerful weapons out on the shelves You're getting way off the point. I've fired an Uzi too and I wouldn't call it an appropriate weapon to give to a nine year old." I didn't say it was... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi." You hadn't then but you seem to be now. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I haven't been able to read though the entire thread, so I'm sorry if mr who or others already addressed this. Being from not only the United States, but the southern united States, i know that this act of idiocy is far from the norm there. No child should be given a weapon like that. Most children at that age are only allowed low power things like air rifles or 22s. Unfortunately, whikst everyone is arguing the idiocy of these parents and instructor, thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill people they once loved and called friend or family. Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. And to the argument that not exposing them to guns until they are adults: in the circumstances you describe of being victim of bullying etc, a perpetrator would only find another weapon be that an archery bow or a car or an i.e.d. , which you can learn to make on the internet. " Most of those countries wouldn't be teaching kids if they weren't getting the resources from countries like America though | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" No I am saying that no right minded individual would allow a child to fire a gun that powerful. Even the most basic of risk assessments would raise the concern that a 9 year old girl would not be physically strong enough to control an Uzi. Pro-gun or anti-gun, there's no justifying putting an Uzi into the hands of a 9yr old." this.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"safety is key only the other day id placed my water pistol on top of my sunday papers not realising there was a leak. sunday papers soaked,,fuck! See. Had it been a real gun this wouldn't have occurred because they don't spontaneously leak bullets!.... Good idea maybe we should get all our kids having real gun fights when the weather's nice My post was tongue in cheek. My first rule when teaching someone to shoot is to NEVER point a gun at a person. Whether it's a toy gun or not. It may surprise you that none of my kids have ever owned or played with a toy gun or water pistol as they go against my principles." Nope,not surprised at all | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start " But the kids you talk off are not being given guns to teach them gun safety. Also America is less prone to violent civil wars than these countries. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse. The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse. Actually the Uzi has a switch that can turn the weapon from semi to full automatic.. be it stupidity or what ever but it's definitely not child abuse. I have shot an Uzi on a number of times it's recoil isn't much to speak of its not this monster weapon you people speak of, a darling of Hollywood it's a price of shit usles in combat there are alot faster more effective more powerful weapons out on the shelves You're getting way off the point. I've fired an Uzi too and I wouldn't call it an appropriate weapon to give to a nine year old. I didn't say it was..." I stand by my quote. The anguish this child must feel having killed someone is awful. How any parent can justify putting a child in charge of a weapon such as this in any circumstance is beyond me, the child could have quite as easily killed itself. Tragic and totally avoidable. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"To allow a child the use of a semi automatic weapon is child abuse. The Uzi is fully automatic. It's stupidity not child abuse. Actually the Uzi has a switch that can turn the weapon from semi to full automatic.. be it stupidity or what ever but it's definitely not child abuse. I have shot an Uzi on a number of times it's recoil isn't much to speak of its not this monster weapon you people speak of, a darling of Hollywood it's a price of shit usles in combat there are alot faster more effective more powerful weapons out on the shelves You're getting way off the point. I've fired an Uzi too and I wouldn't call it an appropriate weapon to give to a nine year old. I didn't say it was..." Maybe it's just your tone or 'it's nothing' opinion but what you wrote implied that an Uzi is little more than a toy. It's not, it's an assault weapon with virtually a single purpose......killing people quickly, something it's very effective at. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start." Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? " I hadn't considered the middle east. But you may be correct. I meant in some African countries for the last couple of decades. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Doesn't sound like a very good instructor" Not any more.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Doesn't sound like a very good instructor Not any more...." I wonder if he will get nominated for a 2014 Darwin Award? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? I hadn't considered the middle east. But you may be correct. I meant in some African countries for the last couple of decades. " Yes many parts of africa aswel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Doesn't sound like a very good instructor Not any more.... I wonder if he will get nominated for a 2014 Darwin Award? " He's extinct now anyway. I have little sympathy for him. IMO he ought not to have tried to teach a child how to use a deadly weapon. Stupid is as stupid does. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? " Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. " Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? " In most of those places the arms are funded by some of the richer countries in the world. Instead of giving them the resources to continue an eternal cycle of power using firearms, the aid can be given in other ways which are more peaceful but I'm not a politician in any of the richer countries so my _iews and opinions won't matter. But I'm happy with our neutral Ireland and the peace keeping | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. " You're right on that. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. " I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? " This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was." It's about 1 child being given 1 gun which resulted in a terrible accident due to neglegence on the part of the parents, the instructor and the range staff. While children being armed and used as 'soldiers' (in loathed to use the word) is abhorrent it's a whole different subject albeit tenuously linked to this particular story. Personally I feel it's best left out of this thread and maybe a new discussion started, otherwise this one will end up messy. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was." If there is no link why mention them? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was. If there is no link why mention them? " As i pointed out already to you there was no link to white paedophiles or white extremists on the rotherham thread or the jihadi thread but you and others felt the need to bring those topics into those debates on those threads. You seem to think its ok to take other threads off on other tangents but when i do it here you bitch and moan about it...is there one rule for you and another rule for everyone else on these forums? #doublestandards | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Guns don't kill people, rappers do" Apparently not A young child given an Uzi ?? Makes you wonder what goes through people's minds " In the case of this instructor it was 9mm's of copper jacketed lead! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What business does a 9 year old girl have shooting a fully automatic device intended to kill people, exactly?" if you live in Rotherham I can think of 1400 reasons | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I found this on the ABC News site. "Instructor Charles Vacca, 39, was standing next to the girl Monday at the Last Stop range in White Hills, Arizona, about 60 miles south of Las Vegas, when she squeezed the trigger. The recoil wrenched the Uzi upward, and Vacca was shot in the head. Investigators said they do not plan to seek charges. Gerry Hills, founder of Arizonans for Gun Safety, a group seeking to reduce gun violence, said that it was reckless to let the girl handle such a powerful weapon and that tighter regulations regarding children and guns are needed. "We have better safety standards for who gets to ride a roller coaster at an amusement park," Hills said. Referring to the girl's parents, Hills said: "I just don't see any reason in the world why you would allow a 9-year-old to put her hands on an Uzi." The identities of the girl and her family have not been released. Sam Scarmardo, who operates the outdoor range in the desert, said Wednesday that the parents had signed waivers saying they understood the rules and were standing nearby, video-recording their daughter, when the accident happened. Investigators released 27 seconds of the footage showing the girl from behind as she fires at a black-silhouette target. The footage, which does not show the instructor actually being shot, helped feed the furor on social media and beyond. "I have regret we let this child shoot, and I have regret that Charlie was killed in the incident," Scarmardo said. He said he doesn't know what went wrong, pointing out that Vacca was an Army veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2008, an 8-year-old boy died after accidentally shooting himself in the head with an Uzi at a gun expo near Springfield, Massachusetts. Christopher Bizilj was firing at pumpkins when the gun kicked back. A former Massachusetts police chief whose company co-sponsored the gun show was later acquitted of involuntary manslaughter. Two gun experts said Wednesday that what types of firearms a child can handle depend largely on the strength and experience of the child — though the notion of giving a 9-year-old a fully automatic Uzi made some queasy. "So much of it depends on the maturity of the child and the experience of the range officer," said Joe Waldron, a shooting instructor and legislative director of the Washington State Rifle and Pistol Association. Dave Workman, senior editor at thegunmag.com and a spokesman for the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said it can be safe to let children shoot an automatic weapon if a properly trained adult is helping them hold it. After _iewing the video of the Arizona shooting, Workman said Vacca appeared to have tried to help the girl maintain control by placing his left hand under the weapon. But automatic weapons tend to recoil upward, he noted. "If it was the first time she'd ever handled a full-auto firearm, it's a big surprise when that gun continues to go off," said Workman, a firearms instructor for 30 years. "I've even seen adults stunned by it." The video report has someone quoting that their firing range has those as young as five handling such guns. " Any instructor with any knowledge of firing fast firing weapons such as an Uzi knows that the barrel starts to climb with recoil (it's why many are fitted with compensators). Why he put his hand under the foregrip is beyond me, unless he wasn't competent in instructing himself. Personally I'd be calling for charges to be brought on the range, it's owners and possibly the parents for their negligence. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"What business does a 9 year old girl have shooting a fully automatic device intended to kill people, exactly?if you live in Rotherham I can think of 1400 reasons " And there we have it, all of the Fab circles finally squared. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A nine year-old girl in the US has killed her shooting instructor by accident while being shown how to use a high-powered automatic weapon. The instructor was giving the girl a lesson at a shooting range in Arizona when the recoil from the first shot caused her to lose control of the Uzi. " mr.... Only 1 thing wrong with Americans Yup fuckin Americans | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. " Seriously deluded | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I was brought up with guns (dad is a gentleman farmer and has paid to join syndicates for 50 years and now runs his own shoot). We (brother and I) were always taught to respect the guns and I used to strip and clean them every weekend during the season. I was not allowed to fire a gun until I was about 9 and started with a .22 (I think, it was about 100 years ago). I had very few opportunities to do this and have never shot at anything, the only reason I was shown was The Fox was about and we lived very close to one of his victims, knew them and dad was going away. Christ only knows what my dad was thinking!!! Even now I wont go near any of my dads guns until they are open/broken for cleaning. I cannot see any reason why a child should need to fire an automatic weapon in any context." Maybe... She wanted to, she was old enough by law so what is the problem | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I was brought up with guns (dad is a gentleman farmer and has paid to join syndicates for 50 years and now runs his own shoot). We (brother and I) were always taught to respect the guns and I used to strip and clean them every weekend during the season. I was not allowed to fire a gun until I was about 9 and started with a .22 (I think, it was about 100 years ago). I had very few opportunities to do this and have never shot at anything, the only reason I was shown was The Fox was about and we lived very close to one of his victims, knew them and dad was going away. Christ only knows what my dad was thinking!!! Even now I wont go near any of my dads guns until they are open/broken for cleaning. I cannot see any reason why a child should need to fire an automatic weapon in any context. Maybe... She wanted to, she was old enough by law so what is the problem" The problem is she fatally shot a man in the head. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I was brought up with guns (dad is a gentleman farmer and has paid to join syndicates for 50 years and now runs his own shoot). We (brother and I) were always taught to respect the guns and I used to strip and clean them every weekend during the season. I was not allowed to fire a gun until I was about 9 and started with a .22 (I think, it was about 100 years ago). I had very few opportunities to do this and have never shot at anything, the only reason I was shown was The Fox was about and we lived very close to one of his victims, knew them and dad was going away. Christ only knows what my dad was thinking!!! Even now I wont go near any of my dads guns until they are open/broken for cleaning. I cannot see any reason why a child should need to fire an automatic weapon in any context. Maybe... She wanted to, she was old enough by law so what is the problem" The problem is she was given a fully automatic Uzi, which was unsuitable (for any civilian) and impossible for her to control and a man lost his life as a result. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded" Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was. If there is no link why mention them? As i pointed out already to you there was no link to white paedophiles or white extremists on the rotherham thread or the jihadi thread but you and others felt the need to bring those topics into those debates on those threads. You seem to think its ok to take other threads off on other tangents but when i do it here you bitch and moan about it...is there one rule for you and another rule for everyone else on these forums? #doublestandards" I'm really not sure why you are trying to make this personal. I've already responded to your comments refering to the other pthreads and I'm not repeating myself. From what I can see you are the only person on this thread that sees any comparison between a 9 year old girl om a shooting range with an uziand child soldiers. Both are abhorrent. Neither have a place in a civilised world. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was. If there is no link why mention them? As i pointed out already to you there was no link to white paedophiles or white extremists on the rotherham thread or the jihadi thread but you and others felt the need to bring those topics into those debates on those threads. You seem to think its ok to take other threads off on other tangents but when i do it here you bitch and moan about it...is there one rule for you and another rule for everyone else on these forums? #doublestandards I'm really not sure why you are trying to make this personal. I've already responded to your comments refering to the other pthreads and I'm not repeating myself. From what I can see you are the only person on this thread that sees any comparison between a 9 year old girl om a shooting range with an uziand child soldiers. Both are abhorrent. Neither have a place in a civilised world. " Actually, crystal, it was me that introduced the topic into the thread. And I've noted a few others who saw the point that i was making when i made the original comment. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use" You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it" I don't think that point is being argued. The point being argued is that an Uzi is unsuitable for a 9yr old. I saw the footage for the first time this morning and there's numerous errors I can see with the way she was being taught, even in a 20 second clip. Firstly, the Uzi should have had the stock extended/fitted, this would have helped control of the weapon, especially when it's a new/young shooter firing fully automatic. Second, her stance was totally wrong and the 'instructor' made it worse! Third, she only fired one round on semi auto before the instructor switched it to full auto. How on earth could he have assessed her competence after 1 round? Fourth, he put his hand UNDER the foregrip on a weapon that is renowned to climb when firing fully automatic, his hand should have been above the foregrip (on an Uzi the safest place would have been over the front sight so his hand wasn't hit but the charging handle). Finally, an Uzi is not a suitable weapon for a child! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it I don't think that point is being argued. The point being argued is that an Uzi is unsuitable for a 9yr old. I saw the footage for the first time this morning and there's numerous errors I can see with the way she was being taught, even in a 20 second clip. Firstly, the Uzi should have had the stock extended/fitted, this would have helped control of the weapon, especially when it's a new/young shooter firing fully automatic. Second, her stance was totally wrong and the 'instructor' made it worse! Third, she only fired one round on semi auto before the instructor switched it to full auto. How on earth could he have assessed her competence after 1 round? Fourth, he put his hand UNDER the foregrip on a weapon that is renowned to climb when firing fully automatic, his hand should have been above the foregrip (on an Uzi the safest place would have been over the front sight so his hand wasn't hit but the charging handle). Finally, an Uzi is not a suitable weapon for a child!" I haven't seen the footage. If what you're describing is in the footage I'm left wondering why that instructor had a job. As for the girl wanting to shoot, is probable that you're right. However i personally am all for children learning gun safety and all but i and most Americans i know would've said a big loud oh f€&k no! To an uzi for a child. Where i come from, guns are a way of life for safety against animals, as well as hunting and other recreational uses and safety against humans. Uzis aren't useful for safety against animals or hunting and I've always personally looked down my nose from a great height on the few people who used them for hunting. The tragedy in this instance is all pervasive. That instructor shouldn't have been instructing. That range shouldn't be offering an uzi to any beginner, let alone children. Those parents should've said no or at least 'not yet' to that child. Full stop. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it" Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi " I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis " Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being" See what happend was... I have been shooting since I was 13 with my dad FF to me leaving the army meeting my now Exwife.. still shooting having kids still shooting did a few sleet shoots one was video taped yes vhs, I was in a competition I came 2nd I was showing the tape to the ex-wife my eldest who was 14 he was watching it with us he then asked if he could try it... So after a long discussion between the 3 of us we decided he could try it but only if he did Exactly what the instructor told him to do if he once didn't listen then it would be the end of his time . From that he joined ACF Army Caddet Force and has been shooting ever since and his younger brothers are following in his footsteps I'm a proud dad to watch them shoot. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A nine year-old girl in the US has killed her shooting instructor by accident while being shown how to use a high-powered automatic weapon. The instructor was giving the girl a lesson at a shooting range in Arizona when the recoil from the first shot caused her to lose control of the Uzi. " She shouldn't have been having the lessons in the first place shes 9 for heavens sake. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"kids should stick to water pistols I disagree. Teaching kids to shoot properly (emphasis on the word properly) teaches them many valuable lessons. Soaking people with water pistols doesn't... Well I beg to differ,,no one needs a gun never mind a child" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being See what happend was... I have been shooting since I was 13 with my dad FF to me leaving the army meeting my now Exwife.. still shooting having kids still shooting did a few sleet shoots one was video taped yes vhs, I was in a competition I came 2nd I was showing the tape to the ex-wife my eldest who was 14 he was watching it with us he then asked if he could try it... So after a long discussion between the 3 of us we decided he could try it but only if he did Exactly what the instructor told him to do if he once didn't listen then it would be the end of his time . From that he joined ACF Army Caddet Force and has been shooting ever since and his younger brothers are following in his footsteps I'm a proud dad to watch them shoot." There's a difference between 14 and 9 and the way you phrased that she wanted to and wasn't under duress suggests that her parents didn't make the decision. She must have been shooting since she was 3/4 for her parents to let her try an Uzi which means her parents brought shooting into her life. If she's been shooting that long it becomes second nature. You discussed letting him shoot at 14 but I'm sure he wasn't shooting an Uzi. Your comment suggests that she decided that she wanted to shoot an Uzi then went ahead and did it | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"A nine year-old girl in the US has killed her shooting instructor by accident while being shown how to use a high-powered automatic weapon. The instructor was giving the girl a lesson at a shooting range in Arizona when the recoil from the first shot caused her to lose control of the Uzi. " Funny the same thing happened yesterday! What a country! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being See what happend was... I have been shooting since I was 13 with my dad FF to me leaving the army meeting my now Exwife.. still shooting having kids still shooting did a few sleet shoots one was video taped yes vhs, I was in a competition I came 2nd I was showing the tape to the ex-wife my eldest who was 14 he was watching it with us he then asked if he could try it... So after a long discussion between the 3 of us we decided he could try it but only if he did Exactly what the instructor told him to do if he once didn't listen then it would be the end of his time . From that he joined ACF Army Caddet Force and has been shooting ever since and his younger brothers are following in his footsteps I'm a proud dad to watch them shoot. There's a difference between 14 and 9 and the way you phrased that she wanted to and wasn't under duress suggests that her parents didn't make the decision. She must have been shooting since she was 3/4 for her parents to let her try an Uzi which means her parents brought shooting into her life. If she's been shooting that long it becomes second nature. You discussed letting him shoot at 14 but I'm sure he wasn't shooting an Uzi. Your comment suggests that she decided that she wanted to shoot an Uzi then went ahead and did it " What I meant to say was clearly not forced to shoot the Uzi. So if she has been shooting since she was young it makes no odds my younger boys have been shooting since they were 11.. Because they asked if they could they don't shoot shotguns but they have fired numerous other weapons from airpistols to a crossbow... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being See what happend was... I have been shooting since I was 13 with my dad FF to me leaving the army meeting my now Exwife.. still shooting having kids still shooting did a few sleet shoots one was video taped yes vhs, I was in a competition I came 2nd I was showing the tape to the ex-wife my eldest who was 14 he was watching it with us he then asked if he could try it... So after a long discussion between the 3 of us we decided he could try it but only if he did Exactly what the instructor told him to do if he once didn't listen then it would be the end of his time . From that he joined ACF Army Caddet Force and has been shooting ever since and his younger brothers are following in his footsteps I'm a proud dad to watch them shoot. There's a difference between 14 and 9 and the way you phrased that she wanted to and wasn't under duress suggests that her parents didn't make the decision. She must have been shooting since she was 3/4 for her parents to let her try an Uzi which means her parents brought shooting into her life. If she's been shooting that long it becomes second nature. You discussed letting him shoot at 14 but I'm sure he wasn't shooting an Uzi. Your comment suggests that she decided that she wanted to shoot an Uzi then went ahead and did it What I meant to say was clearly not forced to shoot the Uzi. So if she has been shooting since she was young it makes no odds my younger boys have been shooting since they were 11.. Because they asked if they could they don't shoot shotguns but they have fired numerous other weapons from airpistols to a crossbow..." They started at a later age than what she did and I'm sure you wouldn't have let them shoot a gun at 9 let alone an Uzi. She might not have been forced to do it but to her it was like school. You finish one grade and move on to the next and her parents shouldn't have made the decision to let her use it and your comment implies that it was all her decision | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Not once have I justified giving this poor girl an Uzi. You hadn't then but you seem to be now. Seriously deluded Err how am I deluded? You have argued constantly with myself and others who are critical of her using it that it's not that powerful a weapon. The implication therefore being that it was a suitable wfor her to use You can't force someone to shoot, I saw the video of the girl shooting on BBC news channel she looked like She wanted to shoot the Uzi. Not once did she look like She was under duress. Here it is she was shooting Because she likes it and SHE wanted to do it Typo in the last one. I hope you are being sarcastic by saying she wasn't under duress or anything. If you're not I certainly hope you don't have kids because saying she wasn't forced is a bit silly. If guns have become second nature to her then she'll obviously enjoy it but if she legally can't make decisions regarding her well being then she shouldn't have been using the Uzi I have kids no Im not sarcastic my boys & I shoot on a regular basis Do the boys run the house? Cause that comment about her wanting to shoot and not being under duress suggests that she didn't need parents to make decisions for her which in turn implies that your boys say "I want to do this" or "I want that" and you just let them do it or have it without considering their well being See what happend was... I have been shooting since I was 13 with my dad FF to me leaving the army meeting my now Exwife.. still shooting having kids still shooting did a few sleet shoots one was video taped yes vhs, I was in a competition I came 2nd I was showing the tape to the ex-wife my eldest who was 14 he was watching it with us he then asked if he could try it... So after a long discussion between the 3 of us we decided he could try it but only if he did Exactly what the instructor told him to do if he once didn't listen then it would be the end of his time . From that he joined ACF Army Caddet Force and has been shooting ever since and his younger brothers are following in his footsteps I'm a proud dad to watch them shoot. There's a difference between 14 and 9 and the way you phrased that she wanted to and wasn't under duress suggests that her parents didn't make the decision. She must have been shooting since she was 3/4 for her parents to let her try an Uzi which means her parents brought shooting into her life. If she's been shooting that long it becomes second nature. You discussed letting him shoot at 14 but I'm sure he wasn't shooting an Uzi. Your comment suggests that she decided that she wanted to shoot an Uzi then went ahead and did it What I meant to say was clearly not forced to shoot the Uzi. So if she has been shooting since she was young it makes no odds my younger boys have been shooting since they were 11.. Because they asked if they could they don't shoot shotguns but they have fired numerous other weapons from airpistols to a crossbow... They started at a later age than what she did and I'm sure you wouldn't have let them shoot a gun at 9 let alone an Uzi. She might not have been forced to do it but to her it was like school. You finish one grade and move on to the next and her parents shouldn't have made the decision to let her use it and your comment implies that it was all her decision " They were shooting my .177mm Webley air pistol at 6/7 I think but they wer kept seperate (twins) when shooting I instructed them on propper safe sensible environment my friends personal 10m range.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"My eldest daughter has been shooting since she was 5. Started out with a BB gun, then an air rifle and then on to a .22rf rifle then as shegot better moved on to .410 shotguns and12 bore shotguns. she also shoots my .223 at a range but I'm still deciding to let her behind the .338 even with reduced loads. There's no reason a child can't be taught to shoot safely and sensibly if given correct instruction and appropriate firearms." | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" thousands of children of this age group in countries outside the u.s. are being armed with these very weapons and taught to kill Wanna stop teaumatising kids with guns, America isn't the place i would start. Its a common sight on the many different news channels lots of kids being given guns like AK47's by Hamas in Palestine, and IS in syria and Iraq, why is no one condemning that? Yet as soon as there is an incident like this in america the PC mob come out the woodwork to slate america any way they can. What happened in america was an accident, but these kids in palestine are being given guns with full intent to kill other people. Why are the PC brigade not as vocal in their condemnation of arab children being given guns in the middle east i wonder? Maybe because this is a thread about a completely unnecessary death in America. Which isn't really comparable to the middle east But for the record I think anyone that is anti-war and anti-violence as most of 'the PC lot' tend to be is going to find the idea of child soldiers abhorrent. Well the rotherham thread yesterday and the jihadi thread a few days ago was not about white paedophiles or christian extremists but you saw it necessary to bring those topics into the debate when they were completely unrealated to it. I'm assuming that 'you' is 'the pc lot' as I personally don't recall directly taking either topic in that direction and certainly didn't discuss Christian extremists. And I think to counter some of the bigotry on those threads it was perfectly valid to point out that not all mislims are extremists and not all paedophililes are Muslim. Which is why i and countless others did so. But I'm not seeing the link between those threads and this. Or how a child on a shooting range os comparable to a child soldier? This is a thread about children being given guns (go back and read the OP) so children being given guns in africa and the middle east by the likes of Hamas and IS is relevant to this thread. On your other point...There is no link to those threads and this one, i never said there was. If there is no link why mention them? As i pointed out already to you there was no link to white paedophiles or white extremists on the rotherham thread or the jihadi thread but you and others felt the need to bring those topics into those debates on those threads. You seem to think its ok to take other threads off on other tangents but when i do it here you bitch and moan about it...is there one rule for you and another rule for everyone else on these forums? #doublestandards I'm really not sure why you are trying to make this personal. I've already responded to your comments refering to the other pthreads and I'm not repeating myself. From what I can see you are the only person on this thread that sees any comparison between a 9 year old girl om a shooting range with an uziand child soldiers. Both are abhorrent. Neither have a place in a civilised world. Actually, crystal, it was me that introduced the topic into the thread. And I've noted a few others who saw the point that i was making when i made the original comment." Thankyou for clearing that up earnmenow. Its obvious i did'nt bring the topic into the debate crystal wheels as the very 1st post i made on this thread i quoted earnmenow from her post when she introduced this into the debate. Go back and read my 1st post on this thread again, the quote is in grey and what i wrote is in black so its glaringly obvious! You seem to have developed a bad case of selective reading, missing out earnmenow's posts and others posts along similar lines to mine before i even posted anything on the thread. As for making things personal its you who seems to be doing that as you quoted me to pull me up on it, when others had already mentioned before along the lines of what i said. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |