Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So first messages to people? Hello or crude? Still not sure what the best way is. Thoughts?" Hate crude, sooner have a polite funny message  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Mr Gimp  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
No copy and paste ones lol | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 . XxxxxxX | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Always Title the message FANCY A FUCK. never fails
Mr Gimp "nail on the head....spot on. lol seriously though most of the comments made are good peices of advice. Follow tgat and you shd get a reply. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So first messages to people? Hello or crude? Still not sure what the best way is. Thoughts?" I block and don't reply to crude messages from men who have never know me.plus willy pics sent first .I just love block button. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Crude messages get deleted no need prefer a nice /funny first message " Same here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Fascinating stuff guys. This is gonna help no end. I prefer non crude. There's plenty of time for that later. Confidence before arrogance right." Drop the arrogance altogether for even better results | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too boring, too arrogant, too crude? I'm gonna use the 3 little bears analogy here. A first message has to be just right!" Spot on. It also has to catch the recipient at the right time and in the right mood.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked" Same here. But for a first message a polite introduction will do. Tell us what you like about our profile and a brief explanation of what you like. Hi how are you or how are you finding the site are a bit tedious and probably won't get answered. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked" Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One line, or one word messages = deleted Crude messages = deleted Text speak or unreadable messages = deleted Messages from cock avatars = deleted" Says the woman with a tits avatar. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female." If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One line, or one word messages = deleted Crude messages = deleted Text speak or unreadable messages = deleted Messages from cock avatars = deleted Says the woman with a tits avatar." Which are actually covered if you look at her avatar. Most cock avatars are not. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile?" And I didnt ask for a profile critique. So dont critique my profile. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Hello or crude? Thoughts?" Neither. Hello is too short and crude to a stranger is just stupid....but guess you knew that. After all no-one is that dumb....surely? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One line, or one word messages = deleted Crude messages = deleted Text speak or unreadable messages = deleted Messages from cock avatars = deleted Says the woman with a tits avatar." And? It's not a close up photo of a naked, sexual organ so it's not comparable. My profile says I delete, unread, messages sent from men with cock avatars. So guess what? I delete, unread, messages from men with cock avatars. It's hardly rocket science. I have never yet mailed anyone whose profile said no messages from women with wet t-shirt avatars. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"A cocks avatar doesn't necesseraly have to feature a penis. " So fucking true!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
I would say though that although I have received messages from both sexes, the only crude ones have been off guys  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile?" Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One line, or one word messages = deleted Crude messages = deleted Text speak or unreadable messages = deleted Messages from cock avatars = deleted Says the woman with a tits avatar. And? It's not a close up photo of a naked, sexual organ so it's not comparable. My profile says I delete, unread, messages sent from men with cock avatars. So guess what? I delete, unread, messages from men with cock avatars. It's hardly rocket science. I have never yet mailed anyone whose profile said no messages from women with wet t-shirt avatars." I just find it incredibly hypocritical. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages." Other headwear, eg Balaclava's , carrier bags, are available. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? And I didnt ask for a profile critique. So dont critique my profile. "
You wicked temptress, you, forcing decent men to lose their minds and send crude, crass and revolting messages against their will.
Yes, it's definitely your fault, not that they are acting like slavering animals at the sight of a photo of boobs.
Evil woman!  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages." It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? And I didnt ask for a profile critique. So dont critique my profile.
You wicked temptress, you, forcing decent men to lose their minds and send crude, crass and revolting messages against their will.
Yes, it's definitely your fault, not that they are acting like slavering animals at the sight of a photo of boobs.
Evil woman! "I know!! I am looking at Burkas online as we speak. I do look good in black. May even get away with flashing an ankle wooooo! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it." The classic rapists defence speech! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it." Seriously? 
This and all your other posts on this thread just show a total lack of respect for women on this site
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it." Have you just appeared from the last century ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it. The classic rapists defence speech!" I must admit the victim blaming mentality struck me too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"One line, or one word messages = deleted Crude messages = deleted Text speak or unreadable messages = deleted Messages from cock avatars = deleted Says the woman with a tits avatar. And? It's not a close up photo of a naked, sexual organ so it's not comparable. My profile says I delete, unread, messages sent from men with cock avatars. So guess what? I delete, unread, messages from men with cock avatars. It's hardly rocket science. I have never yet mailed anyone whose profile said no messages from women with wet t-shirt avatars. I just find it incredibly hypocritical." I find that incredibly clueless because anyone with half a brain can see you're not comparing similar things. To try to get this idea across, again, though I have little hope of success: I ask men with cock avatars not to message me and they message me anyway, I delete the messages unread. I do not and would not message someone who asked women with wet t-shirt avatars not to message them. If I did I wouldn't be surprised if my message was deleted. PLUS my photo is not naked and a clothed photo of boobs is not the same as a close up photo of a naked cock. If you doubt that, ask which of them can be published in certain newspapers. Now, your petulant and pointless bitching about my avatar isn't relevant at all to the thread subject so perhaps you could control yourself. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it."
Are you telling us you actually have that little control over your own behaviour?
And you seriously expect women to modify their behaviour to allow for that fact?
I hear some scary things on here sometimes but if you honestly think that way about women, you need professional help. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it." Quick look! Someone's making themselves look a twat on the forums again | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it. Quick look! Someone's making themselves look a twat on the forums again " thanks, I am building up to it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it. The classic rapists defence speech! I must admit the victim blaming mentality struck me too. " If he actually reads my post he will see that I was talking about a general message to A woman on site not a specific message to me. Unfortunately my tits got in the way (not the first time!) So ladies - the next time you receive an abusive message its YOUR pictures that are asking for it. Not the responsibility of the person sending the message. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message "Ah, the voice of experience. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message "This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unbelievable. Look, I never send rude or crude messages myself, OK? But if I was in the same situation and didn't like women commenting on my bits, know what I'd do? Hide the more revealing photos or delete them. Done, problem solved. Why is that such a despicable thing to say?" Well, since a wet t-shirt with my boobs entirely covered is apparently too revealing to allow me to have an opinion, I guess it's a shroud for me too. Why ever start harping on about women's avatars anyway, since that's not what this thread is about? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female. If you don't like men commenting on your tits, maybe don't plaster them all over your profile? Oh so alluring photos invite men to be crude? I don't think so. Some men seem to be able to avoid behaving like Neanderthal twits so it's clearly not beyond the realms of possibility. Nobody should have to wear a burka to avoid crude messages. It doesn't help though, does it? Come on, you're on a sex website with a ton of red-blooded males, what are you expecting? Every single one of them to be all witty and charming? It is not the woman's fault that some may be rude and crude, but honestly, don't dangle the bait if you don't like it." An avatar is "bait". Tits on here are no different to a male torso picture. A female arse is much the same a male arse picture. A mouth picture sends signals to some. A fully clothed picture sends the same signals to others. Commenting on just the image in front of you as a first message may be enough for some people but not others. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it."A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man. And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject."That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it."Men also have names that I would avoid (spunkyarseripper etc.). I can't filter out those men from contacting me but I can delete their message when it comes in. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Tits on here are no different to a male torso picture." Quite. And mine are even clothed! I don't have any naked boob photos in public or my friends only pics. And yet I'm a hypocrite for deleting messages from cock avatars when I'm quite clear in ny profile that's what I'll do
Some people need to get a grip.
Dear goodness, of all the people to accuse of having overly explicit photos... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject."Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?"I think you'll find that the forum rules state that it 'is not allowed' to comment on a profile unless relevant to the thread | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up."Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?"It was complete irrelevant. The thread topic is what sort of first messages are well received and which are not. I posted to say which first messages I delete. All my comments were general and not aimed at any poster. If you think having a go, specifically, at me and my avatar and calling me hypocritical was warranted, we have a difference of opinion. If you think naked cocks are the same as covered boobs, we have a difference of opinion. That you think women can be held accountable for men not behaving reasonably and being unable to control their red-blooded urges is also something we have a very significant difference of opinion on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple."No it really isn't. What's simple is that certain men need to exhibit a bit more self control and that blaming women for their own inadequacies in that respect is pathetic. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?
It was complete irrelevant.
The thread topic is what sort of first messages are well received and which are not.
I posted to say which first messages I delete. All my comments were general and not aimed at any poster.
If you think having a go, specifically, at me and my avatar and calling me hypocritical was warranted, we have a difference of opinion.
If you think naked cocks are the same as covered boobs, we have a difference of opinion.
That you think women can be held accountable for men not behaving reasonably and being unable to control their red-blooded urges is also something we have a very significant difference of opinion on."You can compare cocks and boobs all you want, fact of the matter is your photo can be deemed suggestive. Not to me, before you start accusing, but to a lot of men on here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple."Or men could learn some respect and not objectify women. You said that this is 'a sex site'. ignoring that swinging is totally different does that mean that women on 'sex' sites not deserve respect? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
No it really isn't.
What's simple is that certain men need to exhibit a bit more self control and that blaming women for their own inadequacies in that respect is pathetic."FFS, I'm not blaming women! I'm just saying they can do what I would do! Jesus. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Men also have names that I would avoid (spunkyarseripper etc.). I can't filter out those men from contacting me but I can delete their message when it comes in. " spunkyarseripper  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
Or men could learn some respect and not objectify women. You said that this is 'a sex site'. ignoring that swinging is totally different does that mean that women on 'sex' sites not deserve respect? "The proverbial nail has been hit on the head | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple."If I want to have an avatar of me bollock naked that is my choice. If I want to show my pictures I will. What I expect is people to have enough self control to not make crude comments. Dare I say it - act in a respectful manner. As I said before the rapist defence attitude says alot about a person's mind set. My last comment on the matter. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So first messages to people? Hello or crude? Still not sure what the best way is. Thoughts?" Definitely as crude as possible, using test speak, with bonus points if you can manage to include poor grammar and some spelling mistakes. A one-liner works well. If contacting a couple, always ignore the male partner as he's not the one looking for a shag. Don't forget to enclose multiple 'cock shots' even if your profile photograph is a 'cock shot'. This is very important , as most encounters are based on what your cock looks like. It's helpful to include items to demonstrate your enormous proportions such as a SKY remote control or drink can (never use those tiny mixer cans); photographs with a lavatory in the background are invariably preferred. If you don't get a reply, it's because they are enticing you; follow-up with another message (copy and paste, maybe some different 'cock-shots), 'winks' and 'friend requests'. If you get blocked, it was a mistake; they simply hit the block button in error. Use the forum to get back in contact with them; they'll appreciate it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?
It was complete irrelevant.
The thread topic is what sort of first messages are well received and which are not.
I posted to say which first messages I delete. All my comments were general and not aimed at any poster.
If you think having a go, specifically, at me and my avatar and calling me hypocritical was warranted, we have a difference of opinion.
If you think naked cocks are the same as covered boobs, we have a difference of opinion.
That you think women can be held accountable for men not behaving reasonably and being unable to control their red-blooded urges is also something we have a very significant difference of opinion on.
You can compare cocks and boobs all you want, fact of the matter is your photo can be deemed suggestive. Not to me, before you start accusing, but to a lot of men on here."I don't necessarily delete messages from people with suggestive avatars though. (If I did, I'd have to delete almost all of my mail). That was your issue. How dare I, with my "suggestive" avatar say I'll delete messages from cock avatars and actually do it? A close up cock avatar is not "suggestive". They are not the same thing. And it's not grounds to be accusing anyone of being hypocritical. Hypocritical is when you slate someone for doing something you happily do yourself. Since having a close up naked cock av and having a "suggestive" clothed boob av are nowhere near the same thing, there's no hypocrisy. Further there was no need to specifically attack my av when I'd made a general comment, not specific to anyone, not insulting anyone and on topic. You, tbh, after previous posts complaining about not getting what you want here, are just sounding bitter towards the women here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
If I want to have an avatar of me bollock naked that is my choice. If I want to show my pictures I will. What I expect is people to have enough self control to not make crude comments. Dare I say it - act in a respectful manner. As I said before the rapist defence attitude says alot about a person's mind set. My last comment on the matter."
Absolutely. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
If I want to have an avatar of me bollock naked that is my choice. If I want to show my pictures I will. What I expect is people to have enough self control to not make crude comments. Dare I say it - act in a respectful manner. As I said before the rapist defence attitude says alot about a person's mind set. My last comment on the matter."You honestly expect ALL men to act in a decent and respectful manner to explicit profiles? (not yours, just in general). I am NOT defending them, and I am NOT saying they should be acting that way, but the fact of the matter is some of them do. All I'm saying is it's an option to hide the photos to sort out the bad from the good. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" FFS, I'm not blaming women! I'm just saying they can do what I would do! Jesus." OK, but it's not really coming across in that way. Only you really know what is your intent. For the rest of us it is interpretation of what you have said/written, in the context you have chosen to say/write it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
Or men could learn some respect and not objectify women. You said that this is 'a sex site'. ignoring that swinging is totally different does that mean that women on 'sex' sites not deserve respect? " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is going well! "Now Top Hat and Tail, that's an admirable style. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
If I want to have an avatar of me bollock naked that is my choice. If I want to show my pictures I will. What I expect is people to have enough self control to not make crude comments. Dare I say it - act in a respectful manner. As I said before the rapist defence attitude says alot about a person's mind set. My last comment on the matter.
You honestly expect ALL men to act in a decent and respectful manner to explicit profiles? (not yours, just in general). I am NOT defending them, and I am NOT saying they should be acting that way, but the fact of the matter is some of them do. All I'm saying is it's an option to hide the photos to sort out the bad from the good."I doubt anyone expects all mean to behave respectfully. But condoning there behaviour makes you just as bad as them in my opinion | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?
It was complete irrelevant.
The thread topic is what sort of first messages are well received and which are not.
I posted to say which first messages I delete. All my comments were general and not aimed at any poster.
If you think having a go, specifically, at me and my avatar and calling me hypocritical was warranted, we have a difference of opinion.
If you think naked cocks are the same as covered boobs, we have a difference of opinion.
That you think women can be held accountable for men not behaving reasonably and being unable to control their red-blooded urges is also something we have a very significant difference of opinion on.
You can compare cocks and boobs all you want, fact of the matter is your photo can be deemed suggestive. Not to me, before you start accusing, but to a lot of men on here.
I don't necessarily delete messages from people with suggestive avatars though. (If I did, I'd have to delete almost all of my mail).
That was your issue.
How dare I, with my "suggestive" avatar say I'll delete messages from cock avatars and actually do it?
A close up cock avatar is not "suggestive". They are not the same thing.
And it's not grounds to be accusing anyone of being hypocritical.
Hypocritical is when you slate someone for doing something you happily do yourself. Since having a close up naked cock av and having a "suggestive" clothed boob av are nowhere near the same thing, there's no hypocrisy.
Further there was no need to specifically attack my av when I'd made a general comment, not specific to anyone, not insulting anyone and on topic.
You, tbh, after previous posts complaining about not getting what you want here, are just sounding bitter towards the women here."I actually had my first meet this week, so it is not bitterness. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This is going well! "It started pretty well then someone decided it would be good to start criticising individuals, off topic, and giving profile critiques that hadn't been asked for. Same old, same old. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
Which is why my user name is chellesterfem not cockhungryslut, avatar pic has boobs covered and importantly single men blocked and not on searches. Apparently that's not enought to get my avatar pic slagged off and i need to cover up.
Do what you want with your profile, put whatever pics up you want, I don't care. I'm just saying IF you don't like men commenting on pictures of you below the neck, then hide them. It's really that simple.
If I want to have an avatar of me bollock naked that is my choice. If I want to show my pictures I will. What I expect is people to have enough self control to not make crude comments. Dare I say it - act in a respectful manner. As I said before the rapist defence attitude says alot about a person's mind set. My last comment on the matter.
You honestly expect ALL men to act in a decent and respectful manner to explicit profiles? (not yours, just in general). I am NOT defending them, and I am NOT saying they should be acting that way, but the fact of the matter is some of them do. All I'm saying is it's an option to hide the photos to sort out the bad from the good.
I doubt anyone expects all mean to behave respectfully. But condoning there behaviour makes you just as bad as them in my opinion"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I do think the profile names 'filthySlut4spunk' alongside gaping fanny pics do attract a certain type of message
This is exactly what I'm trying to get across. Women know that there are 'certain types' of men around on the internet, so all I'm saying is if they wish not to be approached by them, there are ways to avoid it.
A wet t-shirt pic is not the same as a gapung fanny pic or a close up cock pic though and I do not have the sort of username designed to attract "that sort" of man.
And yet you had a go at my avatar, as well as others, even though it's not relevant to the thread subject.
That's because I was replying to your comment, or is that not allowed?
It was complete irrelevant.
The thread topic is what sort of first messages are well received and which are not.
I posted to say which first messages I delete. All my comments were general and not aimed at any poster.
If you think having a go, specifically, at me and my avatar and calling me hypocritical was warranted, we have a difference of opinion.
If you think naked cocks are the same as covered boobs, we have a difference of opinion.
That you think women can be held accountable for men not behaving reasonably and being unable to control their red-blooded urges is also something we have a very significant difference of opinion on.
You can compare cocks and boobs all you want, fact of the matter is your photo can be deemed suggestive. Not to me, before you start accusing, but to a lot of men on here.
I don't necessarily delete messages from people with suggestive avatars though. (If I did, I'd have to delete almost all of my mail).
That was your issue.
How dare I, with my "suggestive" avatar say I'll delete messages from cock avatars and actually do it?
A close up cock avatar is not "suggestive". They are not the same thing.
And it's not grounds to be accusing anyone of being hypocritical.
Hypocritical is when you slate someone for doing something you happily do yourself. Since having a close up naked cock av and having a "suggestive" clothed boob av are nowhere near the same thing, there's no hypocrisy.
Further there was no need to specifically attack my av when I'd made a general comment, not specific to anyone, not insulting anyone and on topic.
You, tbh, after previous posts complaining about not getting what you want here, are just sounding bitter towards the women here.
I actually had my first meet this week, so it is not bitterness."I said that's how you're sounding. Bitter and misogynistic. If you want to be coming across that way, it's up to you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did." Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves!" But some simply won't. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't." Can I splatter my batter on your tongue? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't." That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else." Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND." But have you once commented that the men are to blame for sending such messages? Or just constantly berating women for 'tempting' these poor horny men who are only capable of thinking with their dicks? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. But have you once commented that the men are to blame for sending such messages? Or just constantly berating women for 'tempting' these poor horny men who are only capable of thinking with their dicks?" Yes, the men are to blame. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. But have you once commented that the men are to blame for sending such messages? Or just constantly berating women for 'tempting' these poor horny men who are only capable of thinking with their dicks? Yes, the men are to blame." Jeeeeez give the guy a break, he is not to blame for all the crude and senseless mail we all receive from time to time, if no one had any pics we would still get them, when the blood rush occurs people do the strangest things and from behind a keyboard they are even worse | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND." Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour. 
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. But have you once commented that the men are to blame for sending such messages? Or just constantly berating women for 'tempting' these poor horny men who are only capable of thinking with their dicks? Yes, the men are to blame. Jeeeeez give the guy a break, he is not to blame for all the crude and senseless mail we all receive from time to time, if no one had any pics we would still get them, when the blood rush occurs people do the strangest things and from behind a keyboard they are even worse "No, he's blaming you, and everyone else, except the senders, for the crude messages! It's your fault for being attractive, the poor men can't help themselves. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit."I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. But have you once commented that the men are to blame for sending such messages? Or just constantly berating women for 'tempting' these poor horny men who are only capable of thinking with their dicks? Yes, the men are to blame. Jeeeeez give the guy a break, he is not to blame for all the crude and senseless mail we all receive from time to time, if no one had any pics we would still get them, when the blood rush occurs people do the strangest things and from behind a keyboard they are even worse
No, he's blaming you, and everyone else, except the senders, for the crude messages!
It's your fault for being attractive, the poor men can't help themselves."Please do not include me in this, you are haranguing him for no reason and not listening to what he is trying to say | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prefer a witty ... But nice first message. .preferably showing in some way that they actually read our profile. ...but a crude one isn't going to get anyone to far tbh" Yes we agree, thank you for getting back on topic | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prefer a witty ... But nice first message. .preferably showing in some way that they actually read our profile. ...but a crude one isn't going to get anyone to far tbh" I only heard "I prefer willy" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs."That tongue looks perfect for my arse | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If I weren't about to get ready to go out, I'd take a seat and find some popcorn "Sorry sweet I are most of it an hour ago | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I prefer a witty ... But nice first message. .preferably showing in some way that they actually read our profile. ...but a crude one isn't going to get anyone to far tbh I only heard "I prefer willy"" pmsl!! ... selective hearing? ?  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs.
That tongue looks perfect for my arse "I prefer his torso pics, they make me want to send him a crude message | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs.
That tongue looks perfect for my arse " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs.
That tongue looks perfect for my arse
I prefer his torso pics, they make me want to send him a crude message " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs.
That tongue looks perfect for my arse
I prefer his torso pics, they make me want to send him a crude message
"Yeah you know it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I am not condoning them, but Jesus, they're not rapists! They just have a bad approach. My suggestion is not to all women with explicit photos, just the ones who complain about it. Hide your photos, I did. Saying they are red blooded men and can't be expected to control themselves IS condoning that behaviour. Of course they can be expected to control themselves! But some simply won't. That doesn't make it the fault of the women, for showing their boobs, for showing the outline of their boobs, for having boobs or for existing. Your logic could be extended to say since red blooded males can't resist women, women should be kept locked up. The restriction of freedom should be placed on those who can't control themselves NOT everyone else. Why is this turning into a girl power feminist thread? I am not attacking women's choice for having whatever they want on their profiles. Fuck's sake, I'd be saying the exact same thing to men if they complained about it too. Like I keep saying, it's a SUGGESTION, not a DEMAND. Because you're blaming crude male behaviour on the recipients of that behaviour.
You do realise that some men send crude messages to new female profiles before they even put any photos up?
What would your answer to the women that were bothered by that? Don't join the site?
Men that behave crudely are responsible for their own behaviour, the same as all other men. Blaming women for inciting them to lust is bullshit.
I am talking about messages where the subject is specifically about the lady's photos. I would say the same thing to men too if they had the same problem, it's not about women, it's about receiving messages centred around the recipient's photographs.
That tongue looks perfect for my arse
I prefer his torso pics, they make me want to send him a crude message
Yeah you know it "I'm too young for you, you dirty old man | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just ignore crude messages,they bore the arse off me, but then again so do the ones that just say hello "I;d like to lick and fuck your hot pussy...imagine the scene..I turn up, your husband isnt aware...and i open your legs and start lic mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm king your tasty snatch.aand then I start wqanking and then I start...wait..is anal ok?... fucking u up your hot arse...and then, hubby joins in and we both mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm start licking your cunt and we then both fuck u..and then am really shit at build up sextext | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I just ignore crude messages,they bore the arse off me, but then again so do the ones that just say hello
I;d like to lick and fuck your hot pussy...imagine the scene..I turn up, your husband isnt aware...and i open your legs and start lic mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm king your tasty snatch.aand then I start wqanking and then I start...wait..is anal ok?... fucking u up your hot arse...and then, hubby joins in and we both mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm start licking your cunt and we then both fuck u..and then
am really shit at build up sextext"You have buggered up my phone screen with the mmmmmms | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone sends me a crude message whether its the first or tenth their blocked Me too. I should imagine that the majority of 'women' who appreciate a crude first message are actually men pretending. Maybe wrong but doubt it. Would love to know how many 'corr gorgeous tits darlin' messages result in a meet with a genuine female." This genuinely has worked for me, from the first message sent to meeting was about 3 days, and i didnt even have to send a face pic | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Haha this is all getting a bit out of hand...i bet you wish you never asked now Bosh?! Lol" It's ok we steered it back on course  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Crude messages get deleted no need prefer a nice /funny first message " This, in fact for us we don't like crude messages at any time it just puts us off, | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
