Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"They are horrendous examples of some of the worst animal cruelty you can find. It's ok if you like the idea of baiting an animal and sticking spears in it while it runs scared through the street and eventually bleeds to death then it's definitely worth seeing "That's not what a bull run is at all a bull run is when bulls are let loose in an inner city with crowds in their path (the people know) and the aim is tu run as long as you dare down the street before jumping out of the way. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The one I saw advertised ( and I've spoken to someone that went ) there were no spears used and the same bulls are used year after year . After all they are only burgers that aren't dead yet . " Shall we take you to a village and have hundreds of people chase you through narrow streets poking and punching and kicking you. After all you're only ant food that isn't dead yet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban "I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The one I saw advertised ( and I've spoken to someone that went ) there were no spears used and the same bulls are used year after year . After all they are only burgers that aren't dead yet . Shall we take you to a village and have hundreds of people chase you through narrow streets poking and punching and kicking you. After all you're only ant food that isn't dead yet. " exactly... the bull isnt thinking "this is fun..I'm loving this" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true ."I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter."a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary. "It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on? "Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
"I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people. I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks. hope that answers both of the above. I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal."If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter."I work within the farming sector I know exactly what happens in a slaughterhouse! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all. "i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one."Actually I am not I put forward an honest logical suggestion but you don't have the conviction to follow your convictions. Saying one thing and doing another Paddy is not a ridiculous argument it just says you will say one thing unless it personally affects you but upon that point you fluster and make ridiculous remarks and just to point out slaughtering animals is not the natural order of things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one.
Actually I am not I put forward an honest logical suggestion but you don't have the conviction to follow your convictions. Saying one thing and doing another Paddy is not a ridiculous argument it just says you will say one thing unless it personally affects you but upon that point you fluster and make ridiculous remarks and just to point out slaughtering animals is not the natural order of things."So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one.
Actually I am not I put forward an honest logical suggestion but you don't have the conviction to follow your convictions. Saying one thing and doing another Paddy is not a ridiculous argument it just says you will say one thing unless it personally affects you but upon that point you fluster and make ridiculous remarks and just to point out slaughtering animals is not the natural order of things.
So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ?"Did I say that? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one.
Actually I am not I put forward an honest logical suggestion but you don't have the conviction to follow your convictions. Saying one thing and doing another Paddy is not a ridiculous argument it just says you will say one thing unless it personally affects you but upon that point you fluster and make ridiculous remarks and just to point out slaughtering animals is not the natural order of things.
So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ?
Did I say that?"It's what I gleamed from your post. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one.
Actually I am not I put forward an honest logical suggestion but you don't have the conviction to follow your convictions. Saying one thing and doing another Paddy is not a ridiculous argument it just says you will say one thing unless it personally affects you but upon that point you fluster and make ridiculous remarks and just to point out slaughtering animals is not the natural order of things.
So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ?
Did I say that?
It's what I gleamed from your post. "Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption. "It appeared you were suggesting it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
"As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?"Yes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes "So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct? "So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ? "you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!" The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice? "Paddy was right you're talking pish. Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists. It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner. Your analogy is complete bollocks. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks. "From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered . "So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks. "I thought it was you who was as you really cannot put into context loss of life you have tried to dress it up you avoided my question. You have tried to be big and clever and ended up looking small and lacking in knowledge. I will leave to to speak bollocks though as you are obviously an expert at it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable. "What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'm not a vegetarian but there is a million miles difference between humane slaughter for food purposes and animal cruelty for fun and sport. I am saddened by your attitude I'm stopping now or I will get a ban
I am not putting forward any attitude , just wanted to find peoples view . But as for humane killing in slaughter houses well in my experience that's not exactly true .
I have to agree with you on the slaughter house experience and also I think people are misguided if they think animals that go to slaughter walk there on their own they are rounded up and driven poked and sometimes nipped at by dogs to make them go into pens often down roads or through villages abroad not a million miles off the situation of a bull run after all that's where it originally came from. I am not saying either is right but if you eat beef then you have to realise its not all fairies and flowers round the field to slaughter.
a slight difference is that it is not made as some spectacle to be enjoyed.Killing anything wont be pleasant, I'd hunt and kill an animal..but I would never accept making it suffer longer than necessary.
It is a slight difference and animal husbandry is very different in other country's to the UK. You are well aware in Spain they still drive cattle through the villages to the slaughter house on the same route as a bull run with people about with noise going on?
Aren't we now told to accept other countries cultures ?
I still feel that its not the same thing as causing unnecessary suffering..if the animals are taken along the same route thats fine, if its the easiest way to do it for those people.
I see nothing respectful or dignified about harassing an animal either mentally or physically for traditional kicks.
hope that answers both of the above.
I love meat btw before anyone asks..and dont mind a bit of fishing, I just lack the want to make some big song and dance about what I do with the animal.
If you feel that strongly why not become a vegetarian after all killing the animal denying it life is the cruellest action of all.
i think your talking pish now.I'm not outwith the natural order of things because I can show compassion, I'm saying there is no need to make a spectacle of an animal or prolong its suffering..that doesnt make me need to be a vegetarian.Ridiculous argument if I've ever heard one." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered . . " “It’s very hard to claim it’s a Spanish tradition,” Ms Henderson added, referring to the amount of tourists that make up a large part of the visiting audience. “The only reason it’s still going as an industry is because of tourism. The vast majority of people who attend this event are tourists who do not understand what happens to the bulls at the end. “You cannot attend this event as a tourist thinking it’s just a bit of fun without lending your support to the way the bulls are treated It’s so unnecessary. It’s archaic.” The running is open to anyone above the age of 18 and its participants are primarily made up of men, though women do take part. Peta isn’t the only charity calling for the end of the tradition. British charity The League Against Cruel Sports has entreated travel firm STA to end its package deals to the festival. The organisation says that supplying tours to the event only keeps the “cruel and barbaric practices” alive. Joe Duckworth, Chief Executive of the League said: “Tourism plays a major part in the continuation of bullfighting and the exploitation of the animals, who are simply being abused and killed for entertainment is truly shocking. “As rightly pointed out by ABTA, travel companies have a responsibility to the welfare of animals in tourism, a responsibility that can no longer be shirked - which is why we want to see 2014 as the last year STA support this abhorrent activity.” Ms Henderson echoed this view and said that the bulls are kept in darkness prior to the race so that they’re blinded by the sunlight when it begins. Peta, which organises a protest each year, also claimed that a recent poll showed that 76 per cent of Spanish people have no interest in bullfights. “I have no doubt that [the tradition] will end given the support. People were crying here today at the protest. It is absolutely driven by passionate Spanish people who want to see this outlawed in this country,” she said. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed! "But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement. "Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
I thought it was you who was as you really cannot put into context loss of life you have tried to dress it up you avoided my question. You have tried to be big and clever and ended up looking small and lacking in knowledge. I will leave to to speak bollocks though as you are obviously an expert at it. "Which questions have I avoided ? Where have I tried to be big and clever ? What knowledge am I lacking in ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish. "You just want to leave it some people love to throw stones from their greenhouse. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish.
You just want to leave it some people love to throw stones from their greenhouse. "Its the bullshit it leaves an acrid taste and those who like to create an issue its all tosh! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish. "The googling and pasting was in answer to question. It made the point more eloquently than I could have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Lets face it ! Would we accept Horse running in this country ? They are both animals ! "True but some people who poo poo that the fact a horses lungs are put to extreme pressure and discomfort and all those people around cheering. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish.
You just want to leave it some people love to throw stones from their greenhouse.
Its the bullshit it leaves an acrid taste and those who like to create an issue its all tosh! "Could you kindly explain why my objection to bull running is bullshit. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish.
The googling and pasting was in answer to question. It made the point more eloquently than I could have.
"Well you are obviously an expert in pish but pish at being eloquent. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" So anyone who is concerned with animal welfare should be a vegetarian ? Did I say that? It's what I gleamed from your post. Is gleamed assumed? If so its an incorrect assumption.
It appeared you were suggesting it.
As I answered your question how about answering mine. Is taking an animals like cruel?
Yes
So in perspective animals that live in the wild in a heard is it not natural for them to run as a heard, do wilder beast not do it antelopes as well as bison rather than cruelty a natural instinct?
So it's instinct that makes the bull run through a Spanish village. And the villagers instinct is to run along side it ?
you mean that running wild they don't do it along side other animals? I could swear I have seen wildebeest run alongside other animals in one of the Attenborough epics. Do you think Bob the wildebeest says to his buddy Oi that's a human that is not a zebra fuck oi you lot look them are humans not zebras!"
The reality is the bulls don't know its a village from a canyon, they don't really differentiate between a person running or a donkey say. I would pun money down though if it was possible to sit the bull down and communicate with it which it would prefer to go through a Spanish village or the slaughterhouse it would choose the village. But this is all hypothetical as that won't happen but I can ask you which would be your choice?
Paddy was right you're talking pish.
Bull running is an archaic activity that wouldn't survive without tourists.
It is not natural for a bull to be forced through streets in front of baying crowds. And before you say it it's also not natural for a bull to be forced into a slaughter house. But there is a massive difference between terrifying an animal for your amusement and killing it for your dinner.
Your analogy is complete bollocks.
From what I've been told the locals out numbered tourists by 20-1 and as was said earlier I'd rather be terrified than slaughtered .
So terrifying animals for amusement is acceptable.
What pish you think they aren't terrified when they are killed!
But they are killed to feed me not for my amusement.
Still talking pish and a lot of it goggling and pasting still doesn't disguise its pish.
The googling and pasting was in answer to question. It made the point more eloquently than I could have.
Well you are obviously an expert in pish but pish at being eloquent. "Eloquently put. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What has not been said in here is that the bulls for this running and bull fighting are bred fir it on proper farms. It's not just daisy the cow take b out of her pasture to run down the road, they are bred to hate and hurt. I do not believe bull fighting or the bull run is still going just because of tourism, get out of the tourist parts of Spain and its still as big as ever with the locals" Dogs are bred for dog fighting. Is this acceptable ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
