All groups of people develop their own norms, it is the human condition from social influence. How one then interprets and labels those norms - whether 'ignorant' or whatever, will also be influenced by those norms. The internet has developed some styles of more commonplace behaviours, as have swinging and also fab. We can fit in or feck off but by being within we are party to influencing others too. I wouldnt label all that type of behaviour ignorant, but it is likely stupid, based on the senders likely prior lack of success from doing the same thing. And this on top of the recipient's very eloquently constructed profile which indicates the dumb ass sender will get nowhere fast. It is quicker to send FAF style messages than intelligently written personalised mail, so they likely knock them out at a rapid rate, much like any partner may be as quickly left unsatisfied should they meet for 'pleasure'. The higher your standards above average, the likely massive mismatch level between yourself and prospective partners - unless you drop your standards. Down-dating may be great for those getting something above their grade,but not so much in reverse. Is it luck to be well blessed and above average, if this entails spam. The royal family have folk paid to manage their correspondence, but that luxury is not afforded to us fab users. Im guessing a high turnover of singles means that there are always more of the clueless coming on board to overload our inboxes, so its an almost never ending problem, till we marry into the royal family and we get mail help. This past month I have led the Female fancy a fuck quest. Perhaps it should now be joined by something like the telephone preference service, where we sign up to never replying to 1 line type mails for a month or so - and then strictly never reply to any of them, and it may help it die out as a habit. |
5 nights out of 5 I went home with someone, where the normal approach was closer to 2 out of 5. 
