FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Are you ready to light up ?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A lawyer has made a controversial claim that a grandad knocked down and killed by a speeding driver could have been saved by reflective clothing.

His comments come after one of his clients, appeared in court and pleaded guilty to causing the death of Hyman Steinberg.

The solicitor, said Mr Steinberg, 82, was ‘invisible’ to his client, who had sent a text message from behind the wheel minutes before the collision.

His client, 24, pleaded guilty to causing Mr Steinberg’s death by careless driving – and a court heard he was driving at up to 42mph on a 30mph road.

But the solicitor believes the grandfather could have been saved by a reflective ‘vest, arm bands or belt’ and called on the government to ‘require’ pedestrians to ‘light up’ at night.

Mr Steinberg was walking to Saturday prayers at a synagogue in Salford at the time.

The solicitor said : “At the time of the accident Mr Steinberg was wearing the traditional dress of many orthodox Jewish men, namely black hat, black suit and black overcoat.

“I’m not suggesting everyone must wear a hi-vis jacket, but something reflective that would give them a visible presence, such as a vest, arm bands or belt.

"Pedestrians along with motorists and cyclists all share road space, and in my view therefore must assume some responsibility to ensure their visibility.

“Sadly, because he was ‘invisible’, Mr Steinberg has lost his life.

Mr Steinberg was walking to the synagogue on a dark and rainy December night in 2012.

He had ‘almost got to the pavement’ when he was hit, Manchester Crown Court heard.

The force of the collision ‘lifted him into the air’ and he died from his injuries.

The driver claimed he had not seen Mr Steinberg until it was too late, then applied his brakes and tried to swerve.

He was jailed for eight months, suspended for two years, and ordered to complete 300 hours of community service. He was banned from driving for 15 months.

----

So ladies and gentlemen, next time you're out on the town on a dark, wet night, don't forget your hi-viz jackets !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

mines pink

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"mines pink "

road safety

the next avatar challenge ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

There is something in this but it needs to be simple and stylish or it won't be worn.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *layfull pairingCouple
over a year ago

Bristol

What, even if your out dogging ???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *athylacyTV/TS
over a year ago

Maidstone


"mines pink "

So is mine but for different reasons...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not unusual on rural roads without lighting or paths. There was a case last year that was blamed on road lights having been turned off late at night to save costs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Would someone see a hi vis jacket if they were driving and texting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Would someone see a hi vis jacket if they were driving and texting?

"

I was thinking that, and speeding, just maybe if he was doing 30 mph the man would still be alive after the accident

accident happen but speeding and texting is a accident waiting to happen, no different to drink driving in my opinion

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ScotsmanMan
over a year ago

ayrshire

I was thinkin more along the lines of a flashing skull cap x x X

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *moothies.Couple
over a year ago

Woodthorpe

glow in the dark condoms gentlemen???

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Whilst I don't think it was the right defence for this case I do think that the lawyer is right to some extent. Every road user is responsible for their own safety but it's always the car drivers fault in any situation.

Where I live it's very rural and many a dark night have i had to swerve to miss a cyclist in dark clothing and no lights or pedestrians walking on the wrong side of the road (with the flow of traffic, not against it!)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"pedestrians walking on the wrong side of the road (with the flow of traffic, not against it!)"

This always gets on my nerves a bit.

Too many think they're the kings of the road once in a car though, oblivious that they have less of a priority than pedestrians, cycles, horses.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Am not getting involved with another driving tread

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Am not getting involved with another driving tread "

Your driving sounds fine - it's the tendency to use your water bottle as an extinguisher that needs work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 06/06/14 09:06:24]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top