FabSwingers.com forum: Man to woman ratio on here

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd say more, but I don't feel sorry for them as options are a good thing.

They can always filter single guys and go looking themselves if they didn't like masses of mail.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unky monkeyMan
over a year ago

in the night garden

I wouldn't be surprised if it were closer to 20:1 bro.

It's a good thing they have three holes yo!!!

(((HIGH FIVE)))

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I wouldn't be surprised if it were closer to 20:1 bro.

It's a good thing they have three holes yo!!!

(((HIGH FIVE)))"

Them bishes need makin airtight dog!

Sorry, thought we were getting all street. Word.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Only those who don't have or only have a few, filters set have loads of messages

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *unky monkeyMan
over a year ago

in the night garden

"I wouldn't be surprised if it were closer to 20:1 bro.

It's a good thing they have three holes yo!!!

(((HIGH FIVE)))

Them bishes need makin airtight dog!

Sorry, thought we were getting all street. Word. "

Innit cuz!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I wouldn't be surprised if it were closer to 20:1 bro.

It's a good thing they have three holes yo!!!

(((HIGH FIVE)))

Them bishes need makin airtight dog!

Sorry, thought we were getting all street. Word.

Innit cuz!"

As my boy Lethal Bizzle would say, Dench.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1"

Ooh, sympathy!

Does this mean I can ask hot hottie blokes for sympathy shags?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think its great

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1"

That's right!

Ignore the couples!

No wonder they're the most marginalised, ignored and under-represented segment on the site!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *emmefataleWoman
over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville

I don't feel sorry for anyone, it is what it is.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1

Ooh, sympathy!

Does this mean I can ask hot hottie blokes for sympathy shags?"

You sure can, not sure I qualify though x

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1

Ooh, sympathy!

Does this mean I can ask hot hottie blokes for sympathy shags?

You sure can, not sure I qualify though x"

Maybe. If you weren't 400 miles away!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1

Ooh, sympathy!

Does this mean I can ask hot hottie blokes for sympathy shags?

I'm sure we can work something out x

You sure can, not sure I qualify though x

Maybe. If you weren't 400 miles away!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't feel sorry for me. I'm having a ball

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

48 women on meet today so far and 300+ guys

Would be interesting to know what the ratio actually is for site numbers

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ob and VixenCouple
over a year ago

Doncaster

"Don't feel sorry for me. I'm having a ball

Only 1, shouldn't it be at least 2? Lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *bi HaiveMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Cheeseville, Somerset

"48 women on meet today so far and 300+ guys

Would be interesting to know what the ratio actually is for site numbers "

I've always felt the ratios are irrelevant.

More choice for single females and couples looking for men.

And motivation to put some effort in and stand out for the single guys.

A good profile, whether single of either sex or couple, will generally do well and enjoy life on site so the numbers don't mean much.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The good news is most of the single guys are not really single they are just after something on the side, total NSA sex. Unfortunately some women think that they might get a Mr. Right here and end up making their chances of meeting that MR. Right 20:1 worse odds than that of a supposedly single man 7:1...take cover

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's an irrelevant question.

The only man that matters is you / so that's one man.

The only women that matter are those that you are interested in, and they you.

Those that worry about the mix are blaming their lack of success on the wrong issue.

If you remove fuck wits from the census it soon evens out.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Whenever I think of men to women ratios, I always think of Dr. Strangelove. Truly, not a geek here.

In terms of a "Mr. Right" I've been told I fit that criteria in different aspects. Much like any other man would depending on the woman's preferences and desires.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd be interested to know what they actually are, this comes on the forum quite a bit. Doesn't affect me either way though, agree with previous threads - good people will generally have a good time if they're respectful and polite etc.

I'm happy as a single guy on here, sure there's plenty of others like that too

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

In a way I don't think it matters, too much. When you look at single guys' profiles, so many are lacklustre, no pics or just pics of their cocks, 1 line of blurb. The ratio between serious contenders for meets is a lot lower than that of men to ladies.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"In a way I don't think it matters, too much. When you look at single guys' profiles, so many are lacklustre, no pics or just pics of their cocks, 1 line of blurb. The ratio between serious contenders for meets is a lot lower than that of men to ladies.

Ha, I bet you that ratio is still inverted!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

10:1 who have logged in in the last day - all the men, just over 30 women.

But as I say, how many of those are the 'unevolved'??

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

37:1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"What does everyone think the man to woman ratio is on here. I do feel sorry for the women they just get mass of messages. I would have a pop at 7:1"

It depends on how you measure as there are men who are really boys and far from being men, there are men who dress in frocks who want to be women there are men who have a woman's profile for what knows reason and there are women who look like men.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

10:1 who have logged in in the last day - all the men, just over 30 women.

But as I say, how many of those are the 'unevolved'??"

Well if you were inclined to go through and sort out the one liner cock pic profiles from the good ones then yes, that ratio will improve. But then you'd have to do the same for the women too so probably not by as much as you imagine.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

10:1 who have logged in in the last day - all the men, just over 30 women.

But as I say, how many of those are the 'unevolved'??

I might actually try that later. Bust out an Excel spreadsheet and make a pie chart. That's how I roll!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

10:1 who have logged in in the last day - all the men, just over 30 women.

But as I say, how many of those are the 'unevolved'??

Yes, but my point is the profile does not maketh the man! Some of the 'best' profiles have been created by the most devious shits, and some of my best meets have been with guys who have one line profiles. You just can't tell!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

Man to women ratio ???

Don't worry guys, I'll take 'em on 3 at a time

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

It's about 100:1

Of those 100, 60 are wanna fuck messages, 20 are how's u or wot u into messages, 9.5 are rambling pornographic fantasies and 0.5 are actually ones who vaguely match your preferences (but about half of those don't flick your switch).

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

I tried this within 20miles

Using the same filters it was

300+ men (looking at the 10pages of men all 300 had been online within the last hour)

112 women (logged in in the last week)

So I decided to check how many women had been on within the last hour and it was 35

Don't have a definite answer to either of the searches for men as the maximum it shows is 300

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago

Bristol

I tried even narrower search parameters, searching for people within 5 miles of my postcode who are the same age as me. I got:

6 men looking for women

1 woman looking for a man (me)

1 woman looking for a woman (also me)

3 MF couples looking for a woman

3 MF couples looking for a man.

From this very small cohort I would surmise that there are 3 times as many couples as single girls, twice as many single men as couples and 6 times more single men than girls.

And yet I'll travel for a guy I want.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would look but I don't want to get depressed.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm not at liberty to reveal the source of this information....

But I can confirm there are 7 women on this site and 23 men.. although some of those 23 men are known to wear frocks...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Don't feel sorry for me. I'm having a ball

Only 1, shouldn't it be at least 2? Lol"

oh if I counted them all up I'd run out of toes

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I tried even narrower search parameters, searching for people within 5 miles of my postcode who are the same age as me. I got:

6 men looking for women

1 woman looking for a man (me)

1 woman looking for a woman (also me)

3 MF couples looking for a woman

3 MF couples looking for a man.

From this very small cohort I would surmise that there are 3 times as many couples as single girls, twice as many single men as couples and 6 times more single men than girls.

And yet I'll travel for a guy I want.

I'm going to do that too

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

I tried this within 20miles

Using the same filters it was

300+ men (looking at the 10pages of men all 300 had been online within the last hour)

112 women (logged in in the last week)

So I decided to check how many women had been on within the last hour and it was 35

Don't have a definite answer to either of the searches for men as the maximum it shows is 300"

If you go to page 10 of the results and keep clicking 'next' you can find out how many more pages there are.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

300+ m/f looking for a woman

243 m/f looking for a man

so far within 5 miles

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

I tried this within 20miles

Using the same filters it was

300+ men (looking at the 10pages of men all 300 had been online within the last hour)

112 women (logged in in the last week)

So I decided to check how many women had been on within the last hour and it was 35

Don't have a definite answer to either of the searches for men as the maximum it shows is 300

If you go to page 10 of the results and keep clicking 'next' you can find out how many more pages there are."

When I got to page 10 there was no 'next' button just 'prev'

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It is probably about 30:1. However, anyone can use situations and planning in their favour. Who is online at any point varies, so if youre interested in football fans, dont come online during world cup games etc. Find out when men are in short supply and women a plenty and you could work odds during those minutes in your favour. Beer, sex, football, everybody has different preferences and interests. Also, if a guy has good emotional literacy and communication skills then he may also be placing himself in a more sought after sub group. If a man's truly bi, then he also has an additional leverage to meet certain females and couples.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's an odd one as statistics in the UK place more women then men in UK, so it's either more men use internet ir they are just kinker and more open minderd (don't believe that) or it could just be the women on here are genuine and a lot of the blokes are time wasters

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It probably gets difficult to do that type of snap survey in a more populated area for the 300+ limits on searches.

but hope the OP has a good idea of the answer now.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

I tried this within 20miles

Using the same filters it was

300+ men (looking at the 10pages of men all 300 had been online within the last hour)

112 women (logged in in the last week)

So I decided to check how many women had been on within the last hour and it was 35

Don't have a definite answer to either of the searches for men as the maximum it shows is 300

If you go to page 10 of the results and keep clicking 'next' you can find out how many more pages there are.

When I got to page 10 there was no 'next' button just 'prev' "

Then you only had 300!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

I tried this within 20miles

Using the same filters it was

300+ men (looking at the 10pages of men all 300 had been online within the last hour)

112 women (logged in in the last week)

So I decided to check how many women had been on within the last hour and it was 35

Don't have a definite answer to either of the searches for men as the maximum it shows is 300

If you go to page 10 of the results and keep clicking 'next' you can find out how many more pages there are.

When I got to page 10 there was no 'next' button just 'prev'

Then you only had 300!"

I don't think so, it definitely said 300+ and those 10 pages were within the last hour! I don't think all the men in my area will have been on in that hour and none been online more than an hour ago!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ScotsmanMan
over a year ago

ayrshire

Too many real women for the real men jobs a good un

x x X

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"I've just done some research based in my local area, because it's lunchtime and I'm bored.

This was for people within 20 miles of IV1.

First, Men looking for women=300+

Second, women looking for men=155

I didn't feel that was useful as a comparison so I checked the boxes to display only those verified and with public pics so we could assume they are somewhat active.

Men=232 (of which only 176 logged in within last week)

Women=30 (of which only 19 had logged in within the last day, then there was a massive jump to 4 months since last login!)

So that looks to be a ratio of around 8:1 in my area for those I would consider active users.

If you've lost the will to live, why not give it a try in your area?

Within 20 miles of my postal code:

Men, 18-99, looking for women, verified and with public photos: more than 300

The first 300 (that's all the search will display) have all logged on within the last 11 hours.

Same search above, but with at least one verification y meeting ticked too: more than 300.

The first 300 of those have all logged on within 3 days.

Women, 18-99, looking for men, verified and with public photos: more than 300: 65

49 have logged on within a week. A further 7 have logged in within a month. 2 last logged in over a year ago.

Same search above, but with at least one verification y meeting ticked too: 58

Of those 51 have been online within the last month with 44 having been online with the last week. Again, 2 have not been online in over a year.

So, in summary....

Since the search for men cuts off at 300, and I can't be bothered to do it by separate age groups at the moment, it's not possible to tell what the local ratio is.

I can conclude there are a fuck of a lot more men looking for women than there are women looking for men locally.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Within 5 miles of my postal code

Single Men looking for Women that have logged in in the last 24 hours 300

Single Women looking for men that have logged in in the last 24 hours = 11

Gives a ratio within 5 miles 27 to 1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

OK, I lied, I can be bothered...

Within 20 miles of my post code:

Men (Verified and with public pics)

18-29: 127 (1 week 86, 1 month 10, over a year 14)

30-39: 196 (1 week 145, 1 month 16, over a year 19)

40-59: 298 (1 week 230, 1 month 20, over a year 17)

60-79: 23 (1 week 16, 1 month 2, over a year 3)

80-99: 0

Men (Verified by a meet and with public pics)

18-29: 63 (1 week 52, 1 month 3, over a year 5)

30-39: 134 (1 week 109, 1 month 11, over a year 8)

40-59: 217 (1 week 176, 1 month 13, over a year 9)

60-79: 14 (1 week 12, 1 month 1, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

Women (Verified and with public pics)

18-29: 12 (1 week 9, 1 month 2, over a year 0)

30-39: 18 (1 week 13, 1 month 1, over a year 1)

40-59: 34 (1 week 25, 1 month 4, over a year 1)

60-79: 1 (1 week 1, 1 month 0, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

Women (Verified by a meet and with public pics)

18-29: 10 (1 week 9, 1 month 1, over a year 0)

30-39: 16 (1 week 11, 1 month 1, over a year 1)

40-59: 31 (1 week 23, 1 month 4, over a year 1)

60-79: 1 (1 week 1, 1 month 0, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

These numbers will exclude hidden profiles, of course.

So,

Active single male profiles can be counted at somewhere between 377 and 644, depending on your criteria.

Active single profiles can be counted at 50-65, again, depending on what you call "active".

The ratio of men looking for women:women looking for men is somewhere between 10:1 and 7:1

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Strewth VV! I thought I was bored but that's incredibly thorough.

Do you have OCD?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Strewth VV! I thought I was bored but that's incredibly thorough.

Do you have OCD?

Er yeah, just slightly

Ask Ryan or Lickety about my books/CDs/DVDs!

I was waiting for computery stuff to happen, and I needed to be on hand to click "yes", "no" and "yes I really am certain" at various points, so I did that at the same time.

It actually didn't take that long.

Plus I encountered a few really scorching hot local guys

Just waiting to hear how they feel about lardyarse stroppy nightowls with chronic OCD

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Strewth VV! I thought I was bored but that's incredibly thorough.

Do you have OCD?

Besides, I had to atone for the error in my first post.

"Women, 18-99, looking for men, verified and with public photos: more than 300: 65"

should, of course, read:

Women, 18-99, looking for men, verified and with public photos: 65

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Be glad I haven't posted all the other "interesting observations" I made after compiling the numbers...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Be glad I haven't posted all the other "interesting observations" I made after compiling the numbers...

Go on, you know you want to....

Besides, I'm intrigued now and yours is rapidly becoming the seminal work in this field. You should publish a paper in Swinger monthly.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Be glad I haven't posted all the other "interesting observations" I made after compiling the numbers...

Go on, you know you want to....

Besides, I'm intrigued now and yours is rapidly becoming the seminal work in this field. You should publish a paper in Swinger monthly.

None of it means anything useful. I'd have to look at how long accounts in each category had existed and the like to draw worthwhile conclusions.

But, for example, for the categories from 18-59, for those verified but not necessarily by a meet, the numbers of men in each category is about 10x the number of women. After 60 the ratio changes dramatically.

Of course, the age divisions I used are pretty arbitrary. I only had to get a result of less than 300 accounts in each. So it's an interesting quirk rather than anything useful.

In the 18-29 category only about half the verified accounts are verified by a meet. That gave me pause for thought. We know from the posts on here that young guys can find it difficult to get meets (for whatever reason - there are lots, as we all know) so it may be that. Or perhaps the site is growing in popularity with younger men and many of the accounts are fairly new.

Naturally there are faaar fewer female profiles and the majority of verified women are meet verified. I doubt anyone finds that surprising

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I just look at women/couples/men I've met (the men socially lol). Then it looks good ad it's about 3 or 4 women for every man..... Works for me!

Lies, damn lies and statistics.....make em say what you want.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lies, damn lies and statistics.....make em say what you want."

Not quite true, I want them to say what next weeks lottery numbers will be, but they refuse! Damn statistics

Bottom line is we don't care, looking for couples who are looking for this couple and in each category for that search the ratio was in our favour.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riskygazMan
over a year ago

birmingham

got to be at least 20 to 1 it would be nice to think you would get a couple of messages a day, but if you got a 20/30 a day, which a lot o women say they do get, well that would be a bit of a pain in the arse, sorting threw all them every day. not that I have that problem lol.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Be glad I haven't posted all the other "interesting observations" I made after compiling the numbers...

Go on, you know you want to....

Besides, I'm intrigued now and yours is rapidly becoming the seminal work in this field. You should publish a paper in Swinger monthly.

None of it means anything useful. I'd have to look at how long accounts in each category had existed and the like to draw worthwhile conclusions.

Of course, the age divisions I used are pretty arbitrary. I only had to get a result of less than 300 accounts in each. So it's an interesting quirk rather than anything useful.

Naturally there are faaar fewer female profiles and the majority of verified women are meet verified. I doubt anyone finds that surprising

No, that's hardly surprising at all. But I think it's an interesting snapshot of the Fab world you've done there, nice effort

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Be glad I haven't posted all the other "interesting observations" I made after compiling the numbers...

Go on, you know you want to....

Besides, I'm intrigued now and yours is rapidly becoming the seminal work in this field. You should publish a paper in Swinger monthly.

None of it means anything useful. I'd have to look at how long accounts in each category had existed and the like to draw worthwhile conclusions.

Of course, the age divisions I used are pretty arbitrary. I only had to get a result of less than 300 accounts in each. So it's an interesting quirk rather than anything useful.

Naturally there are faaar fewer female profiles and the majority of verified women are meet verified. I doubt anyone finds that surprising

No, that's hardly surprising at all. But I think it's an interesting snapshot of the Fab world you've done there, nice effort

Worryingly I am wondering how the trends change with distance from this locus.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *risky_MareWoman
over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

I tightened the age and distance criteria, and verified status, until I got men down within 300 so I could count! So, on men and women between 35 and 55 with pics who've been online within a week:

Men to women generally - 13:1

Verified men to women - 9:1

Verified by meet men to women - 6:1

Start looking at decent profiles are and I bet you the number comes down even lower.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"OK, I lied, I can be bothered...

Within 20 miles of my post code:

Men (Verified and with public pics)

18-29: 127 (1 week 86, 1 month 10, over a year 14)

30-39: 196 (1 week 145, 1 month 16, over a year 19)

40-59: 298 (1 week 230, 1 month 20, over a year 17)

60-79: 23 (1 week 16, 1 month 2, over a year 3)

80-99: 0

Men (Verified by a meet and with public pics)

18-29: 63 (1 week 52, 1 month 3, over a year 5)

30-39: 134 (1 week 109, 1 month 11, over a year 8)

40-59: 217 (1 week 176, 1 month 13, over a year 9)

60-79: 14 (1 week 12, 1 month 1, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

Women (Verified and with public pics)

18-29: 12 (1 week 9, 1 month 2, over a year 0)

30-39: 18 (1 week 13, 1 month 1, over a year 1)

40-59: 34 (1 week 25, 1 month 4, over a year 1)

60-79: 1 (1 week 1, 1 month 0, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

Women (Verified by a meet and with public pics)

18-29: 10 (1 week 9, 1 month 1, over a year 0)

30-39: 16 (1 week 11, 1 month 1, over a year 1)

40-59: 31 (1 week 23, 1 month 4, over a year 1)

60-79: 1 (1 week 1, 1 month 0, over a year 0)

80-99: 0

These numbers will exclude hidden profiles, of course.

So,

Active single male profiles can be counted at somewhere between 377 and 644, depending on your criteria.

Active single profiles can be counted at 50-65, again, depending on what you call "active".

The ratio of men looking for women:women looking for men is somewhere between 10:1 and 7:1"

Hire this woman as a secretary

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread