Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is used in other countries in Europe and gives younger players league experience. The B teams cannot progress beyond league1. If the A team is relegated to league 1 the B team cannot play in that division and must be relegated. It allows 10 more conference teams into the football league. " So you expect me to go and watch Stoke City B vs Chesterfield in front of about 100 home fans plus whatever we'd bring away? On your bike son, no chance of that happening. Germany are looking like they're getting rid of their B teams btw, due to fan's hatred of them. Spain have Barca B who have the lowest attendence in Liga BBVA and Castilla who have the second lowest (and are about to get relegated). Also, if teams can't get promoted above League 1 this creates the possibility of a build up in teams - in theory, 7 Prem B teams could finish in 1st place down to 7th and the "normal" team in 8th place would win promotion. Now tell me again how great this idea is? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is used in other countries in Europe and gives younger players league experience. The B teams cannot progress beyond league1. If the A team is relegated to league 1 the B team cannot play in that division and must be relegated. It allows 10 more conference teams into the football league. " Disaster has struck in the Netherlands as well. This season for the first time B teams from Ajax, PSV and FC Twente have entered the Jupiler League, which is the second tier in Dutch football. It has not been a success. These teams have nothing to play for (they cannot get promoted, nor relegated) and have had completely different line-ups from one week to the other, as squads are created from players that are not part of the first team. This has had a negative influence on the fairness of the league, as there was a significant difference if you played a Jong (=Young) team before or after the first team had played. If the Jong team played earlier in the weekend managers were not allowed to take any risks with players that might make the first, whereas you might find yourself playing against all players that did not make the starting eleven of the first team if you played the Jong team later in the weekend. In total the three Jong teams used 136 (!!) different players. Attendances have been really poor as well. As soon as the novelty wore off they dropped to well below 1,000 in a league that averages 4,000. One Monday night when all three Jong teams played at home their combined attendance was only 800. Comment on 08-05-2014 10:18:29 by DangerousPie#909852 In Germany most of the B teams average less than 400 fans, and even this number is bulked up by away fans who get to cheer on their team in an empty stadium. What's telling is that since this article was published, the German lower leagues have been reformed TWICE to accommodate the B teams and another reform could be in the offing. If the commission looked at how the system was working in Germany, they can't have looked very closely. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I would like to see a requirement implemented where at least 5 of the match day squad for every team was brought through their OWN youth system." still wouldnt make a difference, as the 'home grown' rule merely states that a youth player has to have been with them for a certain amount of years, rather than actually born in this country. its a shite idea. how is a player supposed to get better playing against conference teams? this will be stopping them playing for other premier/championship/league 1 teams, and instead sit them in the lowest tier of league football. suppose it will ready them for playing internationally against san morino, but not too sure the likes of brazil. the problem ies at the feet of clubs bringing in average foreign players. is demichelis really better than lescott? is luciano better than dawson (west brom) for every bergkamp, there has been 2 marco boogers, and thats just bloody wrong. maybe there should be a set minimum value of a foreign player, say if he costs less than £10 mill then he is worse than anything you can buy locally, as it were. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No idea in reality if it's a good or bad idea and frankly I don't care but it will clearly have nowhere near the affect of the carving up of the railway network. Yes lots of people might be a bit annoyed but it will affect very few people's livelihood or lead to so towns and villages stagnating." Cheers. Got nothing to do with this but a truly fascinating insight. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is used in other countries in Europe and gives younger players league experience. The B teams cannot progress beyond league1. If the A team is relegated to league 1 the B team cannot play in that division and must be relegated. " thats the way it works in spain... in Germany "B" teams aren't allowed above the 3rd division... and must always be 1 division below the senior team... as the idea... I actually like it.... 1 would split league 2 and make it regional... then you could have league 2 and have 3 leagues of league 2, Conference and B teams.... How many clubs are going to be able to sustain a fully competative "B" team... I would say no more than about 10-15 teams max anyway.... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It is used in other countries in Europe and gives younger players league experience. The B teams cannot progress beyond league1. If the A team is relegated to league 1 the B team cannot play in that division and must be relegated. thats the way it works in spain... in Germany "B" teams aren't allowed above the 3rd division... and must always be 1 division below the senior team... as the idea... I actually like it.... 1 would split league 2 and make it regional... then you could have league 2 and have 3 leagues of league 2, Conference and B teams.... How many clubs are going to be able to sustain a fully competative "B" team... I would say no more than about 10-15 teams max anyway...." i refer to my earlier post In Germany most of the B teams average less than 400 fans, and even this number is bulked up by away fans who get to cheer on their team in an empty stadium. What's telling is that since this article was published, the German lower leagues have been reformed TWICE to accommodate the B teams and another reform could be in the offing. If the commission looked at how the system was working in Germany, they can't have looked very closely. + many of the german teams are now disbanding there "B"teams as they see no benefit . also who are the 10-12 teams allowed a "B " team and who decides whats the criteria what haapens to the other 8 teams who are cast adrift are there young players deemed not good enough ? are only the select few allowed to take on youngsters fit for the England team ? or is this another way for the gree sorry premier league to squeeze even more money for themselves at the expense of lower division clubs ? as stated sits back and awaits an announcement that its been cancelled and the FA have "listened " to the fans etc and along will come feeder teams and and under 23 league thats televised and given as much publicity as the prem . lets look at when we had teams largley full of home grown talent you know the late seventies early eights when british teams dominated europe didnt exactly set the world alight then did we ? maybe if like europe we had proper qualified youth coaches rather than gary from the dog and duck teaching kids ball skills positioning passing movement and tactics playing a shortend game on smaller pitches rather than the hoof it to the freakishly large kid to smash it past a four foot keeper tin a full size goal we have now | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Maybe Ritchie Humphreys backs the idea?" That's what I was hinting at. In which case he wants to fuck off out the club he'd be screwing over should this "plan" *spit* came to fruition | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All of Fabio's ideas still don't address the concerns of lower league fans. Just throwing us in regionalised leagues of League 2 teams, Conference teams and B teams. Would never work, there'd be a huge revolt from all lower league fans, attendances would be destroyed and football at that level would die, I promise you. " sorry... but I don't see what the difference would be between a "league 2" and a "league 2 north/south" would be... up until 1958... the 3rd tier use to be regional (division 3 north/south) and I am guessing your team... heck.. wolves were once a division 3 north team.. so were derby.... regional leagues would actually cut travelling costs for both clubs and supporter.... its regionalised at the level below the conference and football at that level has survived for a long time.. and have some famous old clubs I wouldn't take away football league membership away from those clubs... I would actually extend membership to those teams that would actually be in the conference clubs would find ways of making the "b" team proposal work... for example.... make entry to those games a lot cheaper | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So you're happy with people who have followed their clubs home and away for all their lives to travel to Stoke City B in front of a couple of hundred fans in the worst atmosphere imaginable and they should either be happy with that or just not go or find something better to do on a Saturday? Not to mention the huge differences between conference/league 2/b teams budget wise. Speaking of budget, these youngsters will be on wages per week that would blow the conference/league 2 teams out of the water. Yet another unfair facet of this pathetic regime. " if you think there is a huge difference between league 2 and the top half of the conference I think you are kidding yourself.... most of the teams in the conference are properly professional and full time... for example... since luton went down to the conference their average attendance has been 8,000 I had a chance to go to the conference play off game between gateshead and grimsby last week... almost 10000 were there...... as for the budgets of "b" teams... they would be under 23 players already in the system of the club, fully home grown, not eligable for the 1st team squad.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I love my away days down South. I've got mates down there who I can go and see when my team plays Dagenham and Redbridge, Leyton Orient etc. and I'd lose that. But it doesn't matter - I'm a lower league football fan, my opinion doesn't matter. " funny you should mention Dagenham and Redbridge... because they are a great example of a team that came up to the national league via Regional football... conference, the old southern league... and leyton orient have spent most of their life playing in the old 3rd division south anyway....... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So you're happy with people who have followed their clubs home and away for all their lives to travel to Stoke City B in front of a couple of hundred fans in the worst atmosphere imaginable and they should either be happy with that or just not go or find something better to do on a Saturday? Not to mention the huge differences between conference/league 2/b teams budget wise. Speaking of budget, these youngsters will be on wages per week that would blow the conference/league 2 teams out of the water. Yet another unfair facet of this pathetic regime. if you think there is a huge difference between league 2 and the top half of the conference I think you are kidding yourself.... most of the teams in the conference are properly professional and full time... for example... since luton went down to the conference their average attendance has been 8,000 I had a chance to go to the conference play off game between gateshead and grimsby last week... almost 10000 were there...... as for the budgets of "b" teams... they would be under 23 players already in the system of the club, fully home grown, not eligable for the 1st team squad.. " Alfreton vs Southend... That'll show you the difference between a League 2 club and a Conference club mate. And for the thing that really matters... Fan enjoyment watching their team play in grounds full of fans? Not even necessarily full even, but in front of more than 200 home fans? Surely that matters? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I love my away days down South. I've got mates down there who I can go and see when my team plays Dagenham and Redbridge, Leyton Orient etc. and I'd lose that. But it doesn't matter - I'm a lower league football fan, my opinion doesn't matter. funny you should mention Dagenham and Redbridge... because they are a great example of a team that came up to the national league via Regional football... conference, the old southern league... and leyton orient have spent most of their life playing in the old 3rd division south anyway......." Which addresses my concern not a jot... Regionalised leagues haha, yet another dire idea. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. " No, I'm not. But I do know players 18-21 from Man U etc will trump what bloody Alfreton earn, hilariously. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. No, I'm not. But I do know players 18-21 from Man U etc will trump what bloody Alfreton earn, hilariously. " but if you are loaning "18-21 from man united" to alfreton, which is what happens at the moment to get playing experience... alfreton aren't the one, for the most part, paying his wages.... there is nothing to stop loans which happen at the moment, going on as they do now...... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. No, I'm not. But I do know players 18-21 from Man U etc will trump what bloody Alfreton earn, hilariously. but if you are loaning "18-21 from man united" to alfreton, which is what happens at the moment to get playing experience... alfreton aren't the one, for the most part, paying his wages.... there is nothing to stop loans which happen at the moment, going on as they do now...... " So why change it? They're working now. Look at Barkley. He went to Sheff Wed and is now on his way to a World Cup most likely. Why shit on us when you already have a loan system you can use? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"But how are players going on loan from Man United and playing against other conference/league 2 teams going to get to the standard required to start Prem games and then get into the England national team?" pssst..... david beckham was loaned from man united to preston at the beginning of his career... they were in league 2 at the time..... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. No, I'm not. But I do know players 18-21 from Man U etc will trump what bloody Alfreton earn, hilariously. but if you are loaning "18-21 from man united" to alfreton, which is what happens at the moment to get playing experience... alfreton aren't the one, for the most part, paying his wages.... there is nothing to stop loans which happen at the moment, going on as they do now...... So why change it? They're working now. Look at Barkley. He went to Sheff Wed and is now on his way to a World Cup most likely. Why shit on us when you already have a loan system you can use?" it's not working, 29% English players last season 23% this season. Only one English player made his debut in the prem this season and that was in Man Utd's last match. This system definitely doesn't work | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. No, I'm not. But I do know players 18-21 from Man U etc will trump what bloody Alfreton earn, hilariously. but if you are loaning "18-21 from man united" to alfreton, which is what happens at the moment to get playing experience... alfreton aren't the one, for the most part, paying his wages.... there is nothing to stop loans which happen at the moment, going on as they do now...... So why change it? They're working now. Look at Barkley. He went to Sheff Wed and is now on his way to a World Cup most likely. Why shit on us when you already have a loan system you can use?it's not working, 29% English players last season 23% this season. Only one English player made his debut in the prem this season and that was in Man Utd's last match. This system definitely doesn't work" Then focus on ways of resolving things in your own league rather than ruining it for those of us who support lower league teams. Sort your own fucking garden out instead of chucking your shit into ours. We don't deserve it. Can EITHER of you explain how it's fair or acceptable that I should have to lose the pleasure of going to watch my team in nearly every away game in front of passionate crowds with fans in who support their local clubs (not Man United fucking B or Stoke City fucking B) who support a club with a boardroom, wage budget, a history etc. JUST for a stupid plan that will most likely not work any way? Please, one of you or anyone else explain how that's is acceptable - how it's acceptable to deface the envy of every single country with a football team in the world because The FA fucked up by creating a Premier League with no restrictions and they didn't foresee the problems. Please tell me, I'm all ears. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last time I looked league 2 was the bottom. " Sigh. No. There are leagues below League 2... Y'know, like the ones we've mentioned in this discussion? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"No idea in reality if it's a good or bad idea and frankly I don't care but it will clearly have nowhere near the affect of the carving up of the railway network. Yes lots of people might be a bit annoyed but it will affect very few people's livelihood or lead to so towns and villages stagnating. Cheers. Got nothing to do with this but a truly fascinating insight. " What exactly did you think Dr Beeching was famous/infamous for? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last time I looked league 2 was the bottom. Sigh. No. There are leagues below League 2... Y'know, like the ones we've mentioned in this discussion?" league 2 is the bottom. Anything below that is "non league" so called because it is not in the football league. That is why teams relegated from the football league are said to have "lost their league status" the conference is "non league football" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Last time I looked league 2 was the bottom. Sigh. No. There are leagues below League 2... Y'know, like the ones we've mentioned in this discussion?league 2 is the bottom. Anything below that is "non league" so called because it is not in the football league. That is why teams relegated from the football league are said to have "lost their league status" the conference is "non league football"" The person you replied to mentioned "football pyramid" not "football league". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Also, I love my away days down South. I've got mates down there who I can go and see when my team plays Dagenham and Redbridge, Leyton Orient etc. and I'd lose that. But it doesn't matter - I'm a lower league football fan, my opinion doesn't matter. funny you should mention Dagenham and Redbridge... because they are a great example of a team that came up to the national league via Regional football... conference, the old southern league... and leyton orient have spent most of their life playing in the old 3rd division south anyway......." They are actually 2 teams that merged about 20 years ago; Dagenham and Redbridge Forrest. And they used to be in the old conference before being relegated and dropping down to the isthmian league(now the Ryman league), and then climbing upto to the football league. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"People are under the illusion that everyone from the star striker to the tea lady at prem clubs are on £50k per week. The extra division also allows 10 more conference sides into the league and the extra money/exposure that comes with that. Regionalised leagues would cut travelling costs for both clubs and travelling supporters. " iirc when kidderminster first went into the football league, when they were managed by Jan Molby, he said that first season lost them a couple of hundred thousand, so no, i dont buy into the fact that bottom league clubs are better off than conference clubs. the income is not as much as some would imaigne | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |