FabSwingers.com forum: Too much, too young (?)

By *ldestswingerintown OP Man
over a year ago

Lancaster

This posting will probably generate a lot of negative response, but I have to say I'm just a bit - well, perturbed? - by the young ages of some of this site's users. I've just read a listing by a young woman saying that she'd "just turned 18" and was looking for men to shag her. Now, I know I'm an old crumbly and a sad old fart and all those other things, but when I was 18 I was a 6th Former at Grammar School and thinking myself lucky to get a kiss and a bit of a grope with a girl from the Girls' Grammar up the road. I cannot possibly imagine any of those girls being like that. How things have changed! But somehow I can't help wondering if it's all a bit - well, sad? As Jerry Dammers of the Specials sang, "Too Much, Too Young!".

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

you're looking for 18 - 99

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"you're looking for 18 - 99

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *eminiman61Man
over a year ago

mansfield

It still went on trust me. I was in the army at 17.5 and we were sex maniacs all over the world

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I personally never go that young, 18 is just waaaaaay too young for me.

I'm 29 and the youngest I'd go is 25. I have gone younger a couple of times but that was going some.

25 generally is the youngest I would go.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iamondsmiles.Woman
over a year ago

little house on the praire

If I knew sites like this existed when I was 18 I might not of got into as much trouble as I did and would of been safer

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/05/14 13:33:59]

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"you're looking for 18 - 99

Oops

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"you're looking for 18 - 99

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *dwalu2Couple
over a year ago

Bristol

Considering that the percentage of eighteen year olds on this site that are real is probably less than 1% of the number of profiles that claim to be eighteen, it's not worth worrying about really.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

"This posting will probably generate a lot of negative response, but I have to say I'm just a bit - well, perturbed? - by the young ages of some of this site's users. I've just read a listing by a young woman saying that she'd "just turned 18" and was looking for men to shag her. Now, I know I'm an old crumbly and a sad old fart and all those other things, but when I was 18 I was a 6th Former at Grammar School and thinking myself lucky to get a kiss and a bit of a grope with a girl from the Girls' Grammar up the road. I cannot possibly imagine any of those girls being like that. How things have changed! But somehow I can't help wondering if it's all a bit - well, sad? As Jerry Dammers of the Specials sang, "Too Much, Too Young!".

Any chance you coulp pm me her username.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If they're old enough to vote, drink and shoot people then why is it a problem?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

i used to like having sex with different men when i was 18 because i could get the better looking ones.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

First off, jerry Dammers did not sing too much too young, it was terry Hall backed by Lynval Golding and Neville Staples.

Secondly, there is nothing stating it is compulsory that you have to shag 18 yr olds. Set your filters higher.

There will still be plenty of wet behind the ears teenagers like there always was. Same as there was sexually active 15 year olds back then too. The only difference now is that the internet means that knowledge is more available.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sadly, I think I must have gone to the same school. Mind you, it has left me with a lasting fondness for Catholic girls.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

For me there has to be some form of mental connection, and anyone in there 20's (however attractive etc) would not have that with me. I just wouldn't know what was number one in the download chart

So 30's upwards is good for me...

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *reelove1969Couple
over a year ago

bristol

i dont think 18 year old women looking for nsa sex is 'sad' at all ..same as i dont think 18 year old men looking for it is either ...the fact that you chose not to do it whilst at your grammar school really doesnt change that but dont be disillusioned to think it wasnt going on ...oh yes ..even in the 50's !!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Considering that the percentage of eighteen year olds on this site that are real is probably less than 1% of the number of profiles that claim to be eighteen, it's not worth worrying about really."

Having done a quick search using the 18-19 age I only I can whole heartedly agree with this comment. Profiles read like a classic pic collecters template. No veris etc... The genuine 1% however............Down boy!!!!!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ldestswingerintown OP Man
over a year ago

Lancaster

I think this illustrates what I'm talking about - I didn't "choose not to have sex" - it just wasn't available! All the research shows that age at first sexual encounter has dropped considerably over the last 30 years or so - yes it was going on in the 1950's , but not to anywhere like the same extent as now.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *entaur_UKMan
over a year ago

Cannock

"I think this illustrates what I'm talking about - I didn't "choose not to have sex" - it just wasn't available! All the research shows that age at first sexual encounter has dropped considerably over the last 30 years or so - yes it was going on in the 1950's , but not to anywhere like the same extent as now."

Thats because the internet, mobile phones and social media did not exist in the 1950's. Its much easier now for people to communicate, or find like minded people much easier than it used to be years ago.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod
over a year ago

East Sussex

Times change and with them what is sexually acceptable changes too. I'm pleased to say that the enjoyment of sex and experimentation is no longer the sole preserve of men and although there are still people who think that nice girls don't they are fewer than they used to be. I think it's great if young women feel they can experiment safely, consensually and sanely but if there's a whiff of coercion or manipulation that's plain wrong.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ce WingerMan
over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

"For me there has to be some form of mental connection, and anyone in there 20's (however attractive etc) would not have that with me. I just wouldn't know what was number one in the download chart

So 30's upwards is good for me...

Surely you would rather shag a busty blonde nymphomaniac than swap ipod playlists

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So 30's upwards is good for me...

Surely you would rather shag a busty blonde nymphomaniac than swap ipod playlists

Oh, I like swapping ipod playlists.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread