FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Milly Dowler killer gets compensation

Jump to newest
 

By *ichaelangela OP   Couple
over a year ago

notts

seems Levi Bellfield, who murdered Milly Dowler has been given £4500.00 compensation after being attacked by another inmate in Wakefield prison, he plans to send the money to his family to help them buy a caravan

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aceytopWoman
over a year ago

from a town near you

my first thought was WTF,and my second thought is the same

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inkykoupleukCouple
over a year ago

southampton

For real?

First I've heard of someone getting compo for taken a beating in jail.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

What is the world coming to ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Infringement of human rights....prison staff have a duty of care to protect prisoners no matter what they are in there for....BTW I do not like what he did I think he is vile but trying to see it from all angles.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Infringement of human rights....prison staff have a duty of care to protect prisoners no matter what they are in there for....BTW I do not like what he did I think he is vile but trying to see it from all angles. "

indeed.

just because your inside, the punishment is doled out by the courts, not other inmates.

you would expect criminal compensation if you got beaten up outside a nightclub, so why not.

as distasteful as it is, its right

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

if inmates want to dole out their own justice, and not cost the tax payer, then they should do the job properly and not leave a breath in his body.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

He doesn't deserve oxygen, let alone money for a bloody caravan.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

HMP has a vicarious responsibility to all inmates, regardless of what they are in for and so would be liable in tort.

This country is governed by the rule of law and exceptions cannot be made to this, without losing this basis.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I had been on the committee, I would have agreed the compensation but would have insisted that he immediately pay it to the families of those he has murdered.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *erseysideridersCouple
over a year ago

wallasey

total disgrace giving scum money ,,bet he wont share a penny with milly family ,,,inmates do a better job next time ,,doesn't deserve oxygen ,,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

I dont know if this is a premise. But for lifers with no hope or little inclination to get back on the straight and narrow. I am pretty sure one or three of them have just heard cash bells ringing.

Prison fight club and get PAAAIIIIID.

Just fucking wrong. Unbelievable that the amount of money has been paid out

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"total disgrace giving scum money ,,bet he wont share a penny with milly family ,,,inmates do a better job next time ,,doesn't deserve oxygen ,, "

millys family will have already got a payout from the criminal compensation board

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"I dont know if this is a premise. But for lifers with no hope or little inclination to get back on the straight and narrow. I am pretty sure one or three of them have just heard cash bells ringing.

Prison fight club and get PAAAIIIIID.

Just fucking wrong. Unbelievable that the amount of money has been paid out"

While the moral of it is wrong...the law of it is right...like anywhere such as schools,hospitals prisons etc that particular service to protect and safeguard those in their care...we are not in the back in the day mentality any more where prisoners ran the prisons....there are many more of these kind of stories they just don't make the headlines...we are governed by law and not by morals etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uby0000Woman
over a year ago

hertfordshire

so wrong

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency."

The problem with that attitude, is eventually you will lose *your* human rights. Remember a crime is only what the law says it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ucky1Man
over a year ago

a straightjacket


"if inmates want to dole out their own justice, and not cost the tax payer, then they should do the job properly and not leave a breath in his body."

this... I think any child killer should fall into this category!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The only way to protect the weirdos is isolation, a kiddy fiddler is just as likely to cut a child killer as a bank robber is so solitary is the only alternative..

Oh wait thats against their human rights

So just gas the fuckers simples innit

No Dust No Fuss

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

However heinous the crime, under current UK law the punishment is loss of liberty, not continuation of punishment by other means once inside prison.

For people like that scumbag I don't agree and feel a certain sense of justice when they get attacked in prison, but the law is what it is.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency."

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

they probably settled before it costs more tax payer money as he appealed and appealed and the legal bills went through the roof.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality"

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we "

no, we wouldn't, because we don't have capital punishment in this country, and if we did, it would still be decided by the courts and not by a group of bloodthirsty morally outraged Daily Mail readers, thank God

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we "

Only paediatricians.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ndym12Man
over a year ago

Ivybridge

Totally wrong, the other inmate might have had a fight with him for a different reason and not for the crime he's in for, fights happen tough on you Levi and man up, give the money to charity.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *im and the bossCouple
over a year ago

Donny

They should be paying people to batter scum (I could use worse words) like that. Human rights!!!! what about Milly's? or her families human rights? That piece of scum lost his human rights when he killed a child and did an 'in humane' act. He became a monster. Shame we don't have the death penalty here. Yesterday on something with Tony Robinson he said the Uk has more prisoners in prison than any other country in Europe. Why? Because they are too cushy. If it was a really bad place to be more of them would think twice before committing petty crimes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

no, we wouldn't, because we don't have capital punishment in this country, and if we did, it would still be decided by the courts and not by a group of bloodthirsty morally outraged Daily Mail readers, thank God"

Ahh right i apologize, i didnt realise that you knew the people involved personally.

Well heres a heads up for all morally outraged.

The blood thirsty murderer is banged up with other blood thirsty murderers..Shit happens and as the saying goes if you cant do the time then dont do the crime

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andS66Couple
over a year ago

Derby


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?"

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The cunt can't spend it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *im and the bossCouple
over a year ago

Donny

Well said .....he lost his rights when he did that


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *antinnostringsMan
over a year ago

Chesterfield

True he can't spend it but why should he have been allowed to put a claim in. Tough id have said

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl."

Well said

Think on this when you spout your human rights !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

We can use different scenarios of what Ifs...etc however the money was paid out as whoever investigated found that there was a case to answer to...It's life while it's wrong morally we can't live life on the moral high ground. What he did was horrible and inexcusable but people can't go around with a mob mentality..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"We can use different scenarios of what Ifs...etc however the money was paid out as whoever investigated found that there was a case to answer to...It's life while it's wrong morally we can't live life on the moral high ground. What he did was horrible and inexcusable but people can't go around with a mob mentality.. "

people can and do, its a Cat A prison, the inmates live by a different set of rules

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"We can use different scenarios of what Ifs...etc however the money was paid out as whoever investigated found that there was a case to answer to...It's life while it's wrong morally we can't live life on the moral high ground. What he did was horrible and inexcusable but people can't go around with a mob mentality..

people can and do, its a Cat A prison, the inmates live by a different set of rules"

Some do some don't

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Infringement of human rights....prison staff have a duty of care to protect prisoners no matter what they are in there for....BTW I do not like what he did I think he is vile but trying to see it from all angles. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rumCoupleCouple
over a year ago

birmingham

How about we just execute anyone found guilty of any crime ? Whose in favour of that ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *coobyroo218Couple
over a year ago

Guernsey

Could spout off a load of stories of life behind bars, not the namby pamby stroies you hear about how good it is in there and what they get but what really happens in a prison.

Its a different set of rules in there, a guy is in there for murder he does not give a shit about a couple of extra years for causing some one some harm. He might be in for murder but he will still have a heart for kids so the story goes on and on.

What that guy did to that little girl will get many mnay backs up in that prison and he will be a prime target the first chance they get. Its the way it is. You can spout on all you like about duty of care and moral rights and human rights bullshit till the cows come home, a lifer behind bars with no chance of parole does not give a shit about human rights, the shithead killed a kid he is fair game.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl."

Very emotive comment and I agree that in those circumstances I would want the person to go to hell and back. But society has rules in place to protect my daughter from people like him and to protect the perpetrator from the loved ones of the victim.

Once we start to break those rules society will cease to exist and anarchy will rule. Then none of our daughters will be safe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl.

Well said

Think on this when you spout your human rights !!!"

You obviously didn't bother to read my post or could understand what I wrote. Not once did I mention human rights.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl."

I'll be honest that was a bit too detailed for me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency."

Awesome so I can stab people in the face when they don't say thank you for holding the door open?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we "

Lynch mobs arnt that well known for their judicial accuracy.

So what happens when one of your sickos turns out innocent?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Lynch mobs arnt that well known for their judicial accuracy.

So what happens when one of your sickos turns out innocent? "

I agree. the judicial system is there to protect us all from lynch mobs who routinely get things wrong (e.g. that poor paediatrician who was mistaken by a righteous crew for a peadophile).

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Lynch mobs arnt that well known for their judicial accuracy.

So what happens when one of your sickos turns out innocent?

I agree. the judicial system is there to protect us all from lynch mobs who routinely get things wrong (e.g. that poor paediatrician who was mistaken by a righteous crew for a peadophile).

"

That gives a good insight into the IQ of people who form lynch mobs. Mistaking a paediatrician for a paedophile. Frightening

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Duty and care my arse. The prison service is cutting back on staff left right and centre it is not just inmates that need protection from the so called mob mentally you think happens in prison, most incidents are spur of the moment attacks and it can happen at anytime and anywhere. It wouldn't matter if it was someone as high profile as Bellfield or just another con. If the opportunity is there it will happen.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl.

Very emotive comment and I agree that in those circumstances I would want the person to go to hell and back. But society has rules in place to protect my daughter from people like him and to protect the perpetrator from the loved ones of the victim.

Once we start to break those rules society will cease to exist and anarchy will rule. Then none of our daughters will be safe."

Anarchy isn't a lack of rules and the breakdown of society. Could be said to be the complete opposite as it's a society facilitated by the interaction and cooperation of individuals and groups but without government intervention.

Impossible but desirable.

Agree with your sentiment tho.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl.

Well said

Think on this when you spout your human rights !!!

You obviously didn't bother to read my post or could understand what I wrote. Not once did I mention human rights. "

My comment was aimed at the do gooders , not you .

It was my way of using your well written post to think how they would feel if it happened to one of their own .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *andS66Couple
over a year ago

Derby


"Food for thought..............your son or daughter gets locked up for something they didn't do (this does happen)

Whilst in prison the authorities fail to protect them and they get raped in the shower.

Fair or outrageous?

I can see both sides of the argument. However, here's an alternative food for thought.

Imagine a man, a large man, having brutally raped a little girl, with his hands round her throat, squeezing the life out of her, laughing as he's doing so. Imagine the pain and terror that little girl goes through in that time, crying out for her Daddy to come and save her, her eyes bulging as she struggles for breath, what fight she had slowly dieing as she slowly dies. Imagine that man throwing that little girl in a ditch somewhere where she will never be found.

Now imagine that little girl is your little girl.

Very emotive comment and I agree that in those circumstances I would want the person to go to hell and back. But society has rules in place to protect my daughter from people like him and to protect the perpetrator from the loved ones of the victim.

Once we start to break those rules society will cease to exist and anarchy will rule. Then none of our daughters will be safe."

Think you'll find that your daughter wasn't protected, as in ' now imagine that little girl is your daughter'... i.e. she's dead.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Only paediatricians. "

That was proved to be a made up story by the tabloids I'm afraid.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If prisons do not have a duty of care to look after the prisoners, God help us. I know that I do not want to be responsible for the mess and agony that would follow. That is in no way expressing sympathy for that particular prisoner.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex

[Removed by poster at 04/04/14 17:22:22]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Only paediatricians.

That was proved to be a made up story by the tabloids I'm afraid."

Was it? There's an awful lot on google about Dr Cloete even snopes has a bit saying its right

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

The problem with that attitude, is eventually you will lose *your* human rights. Remember a crime is only what the law says it is."

Committing a crime does not, in my opinion, constitute behaving without human decency. It depends on the crime.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If it was an unprovoked attack, then there's not much anyone can do except give financial compensation.

He should count his lucky stars he wasn't killed. But who's to say he'll survive?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

Awesome so I can stab people in the face when they don't say thank you for holding the door open?"

Probably taking things a bit far but there are times I'd like to...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality"

No, it's don't pander to child killing arseholes mentality.

I'm not suggesting I go and wring the bastards neck myself, just that he not be allowed to bleat about his right to be protected when he killed a defenceless child.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/04/14 17:45:11]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Only paediatricians.

That was proved to be a made up story by the tabloids I'm afraid.

Was it? There's an awful lot on google about Dr Cloete even snopes has a bit saying its right

"

The person involved eventually (many years later) gave an inter_iew to a documentary saying what actually happened, it bore no resemblance to the printed story.

The trainee paediatrician had the word paedo sprayed on her house(horrible of course). That was it, she reported it to the police, the police suspected a young lad had done it 12-14 yo. She later moved out of the area. It was a single incident.

The media reported mobs, attacks, and a hounding.

It never happened but of course in the furore it became legendary.

The press couldn't even agree where it happened. Some said Portsmouth, some London and of course South Wales.

It seems in retrospect it was a media exercise in making the working classes look like scum, they do that a lot.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ing and RideCouple
over a year ago

stockport


"if inmates want to dole out their own justice, and not cost the tax payer, then they should do the job properly and not leave a breath in his body."

That is so so true.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Infringement of human rights....prison staff have a duty of care to protect prisoners no matter what they are in there for....BTW I do not like what he did I think he is vile but trying to see it from all angles. "

I kind of agree with this comment. I also think he is a vile excuse of a man, and he certainly deserves to stay locked up for the rest of his life. I am sure I may feel differently, had Milly been my daughter, or close family, but that doesn't make it ok.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"total disgrace giving scum money ,,bet he wont share a penny with milly family ,,,inmates do a better job next time ,,doesn't deserve oxygen ,, "

I am sure Milly's family would rather stick pins in their eyes, than accept a gift from this monster.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"People give up their right to "human rights" when they fail to behave with human decency.

no, they don't. that's lynch mob mentality

Yes and we wouldnt want the Sickos to be lynched would we

Only paediatricians.

That was proved to be a made up story by the tabloids I'm afraid.

Was it? There's an awful lot on google about Dr Cloete even snopes has a bit saying its right

The person involved eventually (many years later) gave an inter_iew to a documentary saying what actually happened, it bore no resemblance to the printed story.

The trainee paediatrician had the word paedo sprayed on her house(horrible of course). That was it, she reported it to the police, the police suspected a young lad had done it 12-14 yo. She later moved out of the area. It was a single incident.

The media reported mobs, attacks, and a hounding.

It never happened but of course in the furore it became legendary.

The press couldn't even agree where it happened. Some said Portsmouth, some London and of course South Wales.

It seems in retrospect it was a media exercise in making the working classes look like scum, they do that a lot."

I see, I didn't know that and I agree the media do do that a lot.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Disgusting! I thought once inside inmates didn't have the same rights as us law abiding citizens?? Apparently, not...

P

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"Disgusting! I thought once inside inmates didn't have the same rights as us law abiding citizens?? Apparently, not...

P"

When in prison there are certain rights they don't have....however even in prison you have to follow the law of the land and beating someone up is against the law....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

ive worked in hmp wakefield one prisoner sued them for dust in his cell due to building work

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ibbyhunterCouple
over a year ago

keighley

bellfield will be looking over his shoulder in wakefield prison for the rest of his life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Disgusting! I thought once inside inmates didn't have the same rights as us law abiding citizens?? Apparently, not...

P"

Why on earth would you think that?

The flip side to this case is that it's likely that the perpetrators got prosecuted for the offence and had time added to their sentences which I'm sure you'd all say is right.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"bellfield will be looking over his shoulder in wakefield prison for the rest of his life."

Yeah because he'll stay there for the rest of his sentence lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

The trouble is by paying out to things they have left themselves wide open to claims for compensation....however that's the minority of prisoners that take it to the extreme....the majority of prisoners keep their head down and do their bird.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lassyandadventurousMan
over a year ago

England and Wales

another example of how this great country is slowly rotting away..

its run by knob heads . civil rights my arse...he killed children...he should have lost his rights the second he layed his filthy despicable hands on a defenceless kid

fucking joke.

the more i think about it the more angry i become

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"If I had been on the committee, I would have agreed the compensation but would have insisted that he immediately pay it to the families of those he has murdered."

this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

We have something that he will never have and that's freedom....when you loose your freedom you loose your identity....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

should have gave the money to the guy that attacked him

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"should have gave the money to the guy that attacked him"

What, the other prisoner? How is that any different to giving it to bellfield

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"should have gave the money to the guy that attacked him

What, the other prisoner? How is that any different to giving it to bellfield "

Because the other guy wasn't a child killing nonse, I think anyone who gives vigilante justice to nonses and rapist should be rewarded

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"should have gave the money to the guy that attacked him

What, the other prisoner? How is that any different to giving it to bellfield

Because the other guy wasn't a child killing nonse, I think anyone who gives vigilante justice to nonses and rapist should be rewarded"

Really? You know that for a fact do you. No other prisoner in a category a prison has done anything along the same lines as bellfield?

Absolutely ridiculous argument!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lassyandadventurousMan
over a year ago

England and Wales

best answer is to open all the cells. .send the warders home and let the killers sort their patch out themselves...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"best answer is to open all the cells. .send the warders home and let the killers sort their patch out themselves...

"

Yep, great idea, and once they've finished guess what happens next..............

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Infringement of human rights....prison staff have a duty of care to protect prisoners no matter what they are in there for....BTW I do not like what he did I think he is vile but trying to see it from all angles. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *my-blackTV/TS
over a year ago

Poole


"The only way to protect the weirdos is isolation, a kiddy fiddler is just as likely to cut a child killer as a bank robber is so solitary is the only alternative..

Oh wait thats against their human rights

So just gas the fuckers simples innit

No Dust No Fuss"

I like your logic, politiclly correct it aint, but I like it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ctaviusStuntMan
over a year ago

plymouth

if you vote you shouldnt have a say in this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Another example of how the press don't report the full story. The compensation was paid as the assault took place before his conviction. He was on remand at the time, and it was decided that there was a duty of care to protect him.

If this guy had been proven innocent, and the attack had happened would you all be so outraged, at the compensation given?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"should have gave the money to the guy that attacked him

What, the other prisoner? How is that any different to giving it to bellfield

Because the other guy wasn't a child killing nonse, I think anyone who gives vigilante justice to nonses and rapist should be rewarded"

How do you know who assaulted him?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"Another example of how the press don't report the full story. The compensation was paid as the assault took place before his conviction. He was on remand at the time, and it was decided that there was a duty of care to protect him.

If this guy had been proven innocent, and the attack had happened would you all be so outraged, at the compensation given?

"

Tsk! Those pesky facts always getting in the way of outrage.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Lets hope he doesn't waste it and buys a nice rope and hangs him fucking self with it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hitevanman812Man
over a year ago

Carlisle

If he was an OAP and going in care it would be used to fund his care, so it should be used to fund his care in prison, I think its disgusting that the taxpayer has funded his claim, he deserves all the pain he gets !!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Lets hope he doesn't waste it and buys a nice rope and hangs him fucking self with it "

He's giving it to his parents so they can buy a caravan, it says so in the OP.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"If he was an OAP and going in care it would be used to fund his care, so it should be used to fund his care in prison, I think its disgusting that the taxpayer has funded his claim, he deserves all the pain he gets !!! "

No it wouldn't. There is never a caveat on what you spend your compensation on. If an oap chooses to spend their compo on care that's up to them.

I don't agree with what he did to get into prison but I do believe that while he is in there the prison service a duty of care over him and every other prisoner. It has been found that they failed in that care and so compensation was owed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top