Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" I love you Jodie | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc." How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it?" Adverts | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? Adverts" We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? Adverts We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station." Don't agree at all, and I prefer regional radio stations as well. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? Adverts We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station. Don't agree at all, and I prefer regional radio stations as well." You don't mind being intrupted for a repeated advert? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! " Sky movies don't have advert breaks during the film, and On Demand programmes only have breaks of a few seconds. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? Adverts We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station. Don't agree at all, and I prefer regional radio stations as well. You don't mind being intrupted for a repeated advert?" No, not at all. If I'm that into the programme I record it on the sky box and fast forward through the advert breaks. It really isn't a hardship. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it? Adverts We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station." I HATE ad breaks on TV and on the radio. So the death of the bbc services will be a grave shame. I'm gutted they are axing bbc3! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! Sky movies don't have advert breaks during the film, and On Demand programmes only have breaks of a few seconds." Not everyone can justify spending stupid money on Sky or virgin subscriptions. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! Sky movies don't have advert breaks during the film, and On Demand programmes only have breaks of a few seconds. Not everyone can justify spending stupid money on Sky or virgin subscriptions. " Freeview has similar facilities. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! Sky movies don't have advert breaks during the film, and On Demand programmes only have breaks of a few seconds. Not everyone can justify spending stupid money on Sky or virgin subscriptions. Freeview has similar facilities." Do believe u still have ad breaks on Freeview channels. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! Sky movies don't have advert breaks during the film, and On Demand programmes only have breaks of a few seconds. Not everyone can justify spending stupid money on Sky or virgin subscriptions. Freeview has similar facilities. Do believe u still have ad breaks on Freeview channels. " But with the right Freeview box you can record, then fast forward through the ads. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also, don't forget that according to some reports by legitimate news agencies, the amount of compensation paid out to Jimmy Savile's victims will equate to just under £4million which is approximately 27586 license fees." And payments to Sky helped hack Milly Dowlers phone. And Princess Dianas. And Hugh Grants. And Sienna Millers And................well you can look up the list for yourself and the trial continues on how all that was covered up. Advert free TV and Radio is not outdated. It has brought and continues to bring some of the best television and radio to us. And if you're really going to go down the route of "I'm not paying for something I don't use", how about a rebate on your council tax if you don't own a car? Or never call the emergency services? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Also, don't forget that according to some reports by legitimate news agencies, the amount of compensation paid out to Jimmy Savile's victims will equate to just under £4million which is approximately 27586 license fees. And payments to Sky helped hack Milly Dowlers phone. And Princess Dianas. And Hugh Grants. And Sienna Millers And................well you can look up the list for yourself and the trial continues on how all that was covered up. Advert free TV and Radio is not outdated. It has brought and continues to bring some of the best television and radio to us. And if you're really going to go down the route of "I'm not paying for something I don't use", how about a rebate on your council tax if you don't own a car? Or never call the emergency services? " With Sky, you have the choice to pay, and the rebates you mention are an excellent idea. Please forward them to your MP. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" Your last paragraph made me laugh out loud on the bus. They need a Greg Dyke figure back at the beeb. Least he took no shit from politicians. These days the guys at the top are chinless wonders. Yes men. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"That's excellent news. People shouldn't be forced to pay for something they don't want or don't need. The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. The breaks in between are a good opportunity to go to the loo, make a cuppa, discuss the programme etc. How do you they get the money to pay for it? Adverts We all agree its better without, Im sure. It would be such a shame. Imagine the radio on with adverts like a reginal station. I HATE ad breaks on TV and on the radio. So the death of the bbc services will be a grave shame. I'm gutted they are axing bbc3! " We get attrition marketed to death 24 hours a day. It's a haven from being sold shit. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"whoever says the ideology of the beeb is to be completely independant, is way off the mark. the channel pedals its own political agenda every time there is anything happening, both here and elsewhere in the world. very very rarely do i see any reporting thats straight down the middle" *shrug* We live in a country where whoever wants to be PM has to go to Rupert Murdoch and basically beg for his support. The impartiality of the beeb is nothing next to this. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"............. They need a Greg Dyke figure back at the beeb. Least he took no shit from politicians. These days the guys at the top are chinless wonders. Yes men." Like Chris Patten? The guy who gave away Hong Kong? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I'm guessing that de-criminalisation will be followed by the BBC becoming a subscription service." exactly why the big push to digitalise the tv and radio then can only be watched & listened to with a decription code | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"............. They need a Greg Dyke figure back at the beeb. Least he took no shit from politicians. These days the guys at the top are chinless wonders. Yes men. Like Chris Patten? The guy who gave away Hong Kong?" also former chairman of the tory party so the cucoo in the nest | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"............. They need a Greg Dyke figure back at the beeb. Least he took no shit from politicians. These days the guys at the top are chinless wonders. Yes men. Like Chris Patten? The guy who gave away Hong Kong?also former chairman of the tory party so the cucoo in the nest " Good Lord no! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment" not many listening _abio,seems its more fun to rant | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" We are totally with you! This is such a bad move as the BBC is last bastion of decent television and radio without it we will be left with broadcasting designed purely for the likes of Joey Essex. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ We are totally with you! This is such a bad move as the BBC is last bastion of decent television and radio without it we will be left with broadcasting designed purely for the likes of Joey Essex. " And made in America. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment not many listening _abio,seems its more fun to rant " And to be any sort of deterrent, the fine will have to be more than the licence fee. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. " but you watched top gear on sunday night, you must have done to make the comment about the bridge | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. but you watched top gear on sunday night, you must have done to make the comment about the bridge " Nope, watched the video clip from an online news site. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The only BBC programmes we tend to watch are ones that they've sold to Sky. but you watched top gear on sunday night, you must have done to make the comment about the bridge Nope, watched the video clip from an online news site." Oops, forgot the mandatory | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation" Not sure how you draw that conlusion but I disagree completely. BBC4 and Radio4 alone are worth the licence fee for me, both commercial radio and tv are 90% drivel. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"For 40p a day, there must something amongst all the BBC services (tv, radio, online) that everyone uses at least once a day? Nothing else comes close to vale for money. Cbeebies is a lifesaver for those with young kids." We do watch some BBC programmes, because we are forced to pay for it, and some are mildly entertaining. We really wouldn't miss it if it wasn't there, and would enjoy spending the £145 much more on something else. Perhaps avid viewers should pay more, and let those who can do without it pay nothing towards it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation" I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" With Sky, you have the choice to pay, and the rebates you mention are an excellent idea. Please forward them to your MP." Of course. It's so much better to voluntarily give your money to a bunch of unethical bastards. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" With Sky, you have the choice to pay, and the rebates you mention are an excellent idea. Please forward them to your MP. Of course. It's so much better to voluntarily give your money to a bunch of unethical bastards." TV is a multi-billion pound industry - you would have to be very naive to believe that anyone involved in its production isn't a crook in some shape or form. Anyway, why aren't you currently getting your VFM and watching The Great British Sewing Bee instead of posting in a forum? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"............. They need a Greg Dyke figure back at the beeb. Least he took no shit from politicians. These days the guys at the top are chinless wonders. Yes men. Like Chris Patten? The guy who gave away Hong Kong?" Are you having a laugh? He was simply the governor when it was handed over. The results of an agreement made long long before he had anything to do with it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment not many listening _abio,seems its more fun to rant And to be any sort of deterrent, the fine will have to be more than the licence fee." well the maximum fine at the moment for non-payment is £1000.. paying the license is £145 think it is better that it becomes a civil offense... in the last 2 years 107 people have been send to jail for non-payment non-payment of council tax is a civil offence... minor driving things such as parking tickets, speeding, and having no MOT/Insurance on their own are civil offences so I don't see why Non-payment should be a criminal offence where jail time is warrented.... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. " Auntie seems to manage to piss off both sides of a situation in almost equal measure. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. " Lol its on par with fox news. And they are all with the corporate agenda. the dodgy dossier was just a show. what happened exactly? You show me fair balanced on israel, nhs, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, firemen, and they protect paedos. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment not many listening _abio,seems its more fun to rant " It sure is This forum is much more entertaining than the beebosaur. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i dont understand the problem with adverts. people need to relax. the BBC have just announced they are closing my favourite BBC channel, to concentrate on BBC drama, of which i have no interest, so what exactly do i owe to the beeb? nothing. unfortunately, being a resonable human being, i pay my bills, and i pay my licence, without question. however, if it goes up, i may well reconsider this course of action and to hell with the consequences." Let's not let facts get in the way of a perfectly ill informed rant shall we? Most of the BBC 3 content will go on other channels and all of it is moving to Iplayer so you can access it all the time. Even better for you. You do not need to remember to record it etc. Additionally the licence fee pays for Iplayer so it is worth paying for that alone. You are allowed to watch BBC programmes on iplayer after they have been first screened without paying for a tv licence but to use that as an argument is erroneous for a few reasons. 1. The licence fee is needed to pay for the programme in the first place. 2. Saying that you can get it free so why bother paying is basically the argument a child would employ and is selfish and short sighted. 3. The BBC provides public service broadcasting across the world providing unbiased information in countries that toil under opression and censorship. We as a nation have a duty to preserve that. Without these freedoms sites like this would not exist. Channel 4 is also funded by the government and no one moans about that do they? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment" I hear you fella!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i dont understand the problem with adverts. people need to relax. the BBC have just announced they are closing my favourite BBC channel, to concentrate on BBC drama, of which i have no interest, so what exactly do i owe to the beeb? nothing. unfortunately, being a resonable human being, i pay my bills, and i pay my licence, without question. however, if it goes up, i may well reconsider this course of action and to hell with the consequences. Let's not let facts get in the way of a perfectly ill informed rant shall we? Most of the BBC 3 content will go on other channels and all of it is moving to Iplayer so you can access it all the time. Even better for you. You do not need to remember to record it etc. Additionally the licence fee pays for Iplayer so it is worth paying for that alone. You are allowed to watch BBC programmes on iplayer after they have been first screened without paying for a tv licence but to use that as an argument is erroneous for a few reasons. 1. The licence fee is needed to pay for the programme in the first place. 2. Saying that you can get it free so why bother paying is basically the argument a child would employ and is selfish and short sighted. 3. The BBC provides public service broadcasting across the world providing unbiased information in countries that toil under opression and censorship. We as a nation have a duty to preserve that. Without these freedoms sites like this would not exist. Channel 4 is also funded by the government and no one moans about that do they? " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. Lol its on par with fox news. And they are all with the corporate agenda. the dodgy dossier was just a show. what happened exactly? You show me fair balanced on israel, nhs, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, firemen, and they protect paedos. " Good gracious... Fair and balanced means showing both sides to an argument and giving them a chance to be heard. It does not mean only saying what you want to hear and what you think is right. And they do not protect paedos. How moronic is that? Who do you think has given all the evidence to the police to catch the people who did commit crimes in the past? You will see that many if not all the cases that only involve members of the public's word are falling flat. The cases which have stuck have been partly as a result of the BBC seeking and providing evidence. Also plenty people from other channels have been arrested too. However these channels have a financial incentive to keep it quiet and not help the police or sponsors and advertisers would go elsewhere. The licence fee allows the BBC to expose its own wrongdoing where other channels refuse. Your argument suggests, by extrapolation, that organisations who are bribing government officials, bribing the police, hacking the phone of dead schoolgirls etc etc and still seeking to cover all that up are better than an organisation who admits wrongdoing and puts it right? Have a think about your pathological shortsightedness and have the sense to realise when you are bloody lucky to have the bbc and stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. Lol its on par with fox news. And they are all with the corporate agenda. the dodgy dossier was just a show. what happened exactly? You show me fair balanced on israel, nhs, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, firemen, and they protect paedos. Good gracious... Fair and balanced means showing both sides to an argument and giving them a chance to be heard. It does not mean only saying what you want to hear and what you think is right. And they do not protect paedos. How moronic is that? Who do you think has given all the evidence to the police to catch the people who did commit crimes in the past? You will see that many if not all the cases that only involve members of the public's word are falling flat. The cases which have stuck have been partly as a result of the BBC seeking and providing evidence. Also plenty people from other channels have been arrested too. However these channels have a financial incentive to keep it quiet and not help the police or sponsors and advertisers would go elsewhere. The licence fee allows the BBC to expose its own wrongdoing where other channels refuse. Your argument suggests, by extrapolation, that organisations who are bribing government officials, bribing the police, hacking the phone of dead schoolgirls etc etc and still seeking to cover all that up are better than an organisation who admits wrongdoing and puts it right? Have a think about your pathological shortsightedness and have the sense to realise when you are bloody lucky to have the bbc and stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. " I stand by my statement of brainwashed | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. Lol its on par with fox news. And they are all with the corporate agenda. the dodgy dossier was just a show. what happened exactly? You show me fair balanced on israel, nhs, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, firemen, and they protect paedos. Good gracious... Fair and balanced means showing both sides to an argument and giving them a chance to be heard. It does not mean only saying what you want to hear and what you think is right. And they do not protect paedos. How moronic is that? Who do you think has given all the evidence to the police to catch the people who did commit crimes in the past? You will see that many if not all the cases that only involve members of the public's word are falling flat. The cases which have stuck have been partly as a result of the BBC seeking and providing evidence. Also plenty people from other channels have been arrested too. However these channels have a financial incentive to keep it quiet and not help the police or sponsors and advertisers would go elsewhere. The licence fee allows the BBC to expose its own wrongdoing where other channels refuse. Your argument suggests, by extrapolation, that organisations who are bribing government officials, bribing the police, hacking the phone of dead schoolgirls etc etc and still seeking to cover all that up are better than an organisation who admits wrongdoing and puts it right? Have a think about your pathological shortsightedness and have the sense to realise when you are bloody lucky to have the bbc and stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. I stand by my statement of brainwashed" I suggest you do. It will help lend an air of authenticity to the rather exellent levels of lunacy contained therein. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a load of shite. Just pure propaganda bullshit brainwashing the nation I beg your pardon? What exactly are you comparing that to? Sky? Fox News? Give me a break. I agree, the BBC has become a little bit skewed of late, mainly because the government has been on its case since the dirty dossier scandal, but could always be relied on to give a fairly balanced output. I take it you prefer your news with a corporate agenda. Lol its on par with fox news. And they are all with the corporate agenda. the dodgy dossier was just a show. what happened exactly? You show me fair balanced on israel, nhs, Syria, Russia, Iraq, Afghanistan, firemen, and they protect paedos. Good gracious... Fair and balanced means showing both sides to an argument and giving them a chance to be heard. It does not mean only saying what you want to hear and what you think is right. And they do not protect paedos. How moronic is that? Who do you think has given all the evidence to the police to catch the people who did commit crimes in the past? You will see that many if not all the cases that only involve members of the public's word are falling flat. The cases which have stuck have been partly as a result of the BBC seeking and providing evidence. Also plenty people from other channels have been arrested too. However these channels have a financial incentive to keep it quiet and not help the police or sponsors and advertisers would go elsewhere. The licence fee allows the BBC to expose its own wrongdoing where other channels refuse. Your argument suggests, by extrapolation, that organisations who are bribing government officials, bribing the police, hacking the phone of dead schoolgirls etc etc and still seeking to cover all that up are better than an organisation who admits wrongdoing and puts it right? Have a think about your pathological shortsightedness and have the sense to realise when you are bloody lucky to have the bbc and stop looking a gift horse in the mouth. " Eloquent and rational, but wasted on some here unfortunately. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" Quite some time ago I was one of the people saying that the licence fee should be scraped. Now, and with all the channels available, I think the BBC make some of the best programmes (apart from sitcoms which nobody seems to be able to get right at the moment). They also have some very good regional radio shows and they commentate extremely well on whatever sport they have left. They have a great cookery website and all the websites they have seem to be well thought out and displayed. I am also impressed, to a degree, with their news coverage although that does seem to lean in favour of whatever party is in at the time. Their current affairs programmes seem well run also. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"i dont understand the problem with adverts. people need to relax. the BBC have just announced they are closing my favourite BBC channel, to concentrate on BBC drama, of which i have no interest, so what exactly do i owe to the beeb? nothing. unfortunately, being a resonable human being, i pay my bills, and i pay my licence, without question. however, if it goes up, i may well reconsider this course of action and to hell with the consequences. Let's not let facts get in the way of a perfectly ill informed rant shall we? Most of the BBC 3 content will go on other channels and all of it is moving to Iplayer so you can access it all the time. Even better for you. You do not need to remember to record it etc. Additionally the licence fee pays for Iplayer so it is worth paying for that alone. You are allowed to watch BBC programmes on iplayer after they have been first screened without paying for a tv licence but to use that as an argument is erroneous for a few reasons. 1. The licence fee is needed to pay for the programme in the first place. 2. Saying that you can get it free so why bother paying is basically the argument a child would employ and is selfish and short sighted. 3. The BBC provides public service broadcasting across the world providing unbiased information in countries that toil under opression and censorship. We as a nation have a duty to preserve that. Without these freedoms sites like this would not exist. Channel 4 is also funded by the government and no one moans about that do they? " Channel 4 isn't funded by the government. It is funded through their advertising revenue. It does have a public service remit that it has to abide by though. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance?" Don't worry. That won't happen. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Watching TV is a horrible addiction worse than smoking heroin." You go into a room of people watching tv is like a room full of zombies... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Watching TV is a horrible addiction worse than smoking heroin." No it is not. Heroin kills people and funds wars. It tears families apart. Tv is simply mundane. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How much will NOT broadcasting BBC3 save? I'd have thought the expensive bit was making the programmes, and they're going to continue to do that." im sure i read a figure of £30 million somewhere | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance?" the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year." When you say "contribute" do you mean "forced to pay"? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. When you say "contribute" do you mean "forced to pay"?" like the rest of the country im sure there are some who are happy to pay and some who arent. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year." Whereas the SNP Shite Paper says "The SBS will receive licence fee revenue from Scotland, which is of the order of £320 million; £13 million from BBC commercial profits; and around £12 million from the Scottish Government for Gaelic broadcasting - a combined total for publicly-funded public service broadcasting in Scotland of £345 million" Somebody is telling porkies. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. Whereas the SNP Shite Paper says "The SBS will receive licence fee revenue from Scotland, which is of the order of £320 million; £13 million from BBC commercial profits; and around £12 million from the Scottish Government for Gaelic broadcasting - a combined total for publicly-funded public service broadcasting in Scotland of £345 million" Somebody is telling porkies." wheres the lies _nny, doesnt take much to figure out the difference would come from hollyrood, in the same way that westminster subsidises the bbc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. Whereas the SNP Shite Paper says "The SBS will receive licence fee revenue from Scotland, which is of the order of £320 million; £13 million from BBC commercial profits; and around £12 million from the Scottish Government for Gaelic broadcasting - a combined total for publicly-funded public service broadcasting in Scotland of £345 million" Somebody is telling porkies. wheres the lies _nny, doesnt take much to figure out the difference would come from hollyrood, in the same way that westminster subsidises the bbc." So Scottish people will have to pay more? Maybe Holyrood will just use magic beans. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. Whereas the SNP Shite Paper says "The SBS will receive licence fee revenue from Scotland, which is of the order of £320 million; £13 million from BBC commercial profits; and around £12 million from the Scottish Government for Gaelic broadcasting - a combined total for publicly-funded public service broadcasting in Scotland of £345 million" Somebody is telling porkies. wheres the lies _nny, doesnt take much to figure out the difference would come from hollyrood, in the same way that westminster subsidises the bbc. So Scottish people will have to pay more? Maybe Holyrood will just use magic beans." On that rational _nny all UK population currently pay more as the government subsidise the bbc already, is westminster using magic beans. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So what will the position be regarding the BBC and license fees in scotland should they get independance? the scottish government proposes to set up a new scottish broadcaster who would receive the licence fees in scotland. fyi, bbc figures show scotland contribute circa £240 million per year. Whereas the SNP Shite Paper says "The SBS will receive licence fee revenue from Scotland, which is of the order of £320 million; £13 million from BBC commercial profits; and around £12 million from the Scottish Government for Gaelic broadcasting - a combined total for publicly-funded public service broadcasting in Scotland of £345 million" Somebody is telling porkies. wheres the lies _nny, doesnt take much to figure out the difference would come from hollyrood, in the same way that westminster subsidises the bbc. So Scottish people will have to pay more? Maybe Holyrood will just use magic beans. On that rational _nny all UK population currently pay more as the government subsidise the bbc already, is westminster using magic beans." Stop using rational arguments. They don't work here. You need to apply as much partisan sarcasm as possible whilst refusing to listen to any other reason. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"How do the govt subsidise the BBC exactly? Well if you don't want to pay your license fee then don't and you may or may not end up in court. But when the BBC folds or becomes subscription only (and/or ends up like PBS in America and has to have crap telethons to raise cash) you'll have the choice you so desperately claim to want. And that choice will be: pay considerably more than £12 a month to watch lower quality telly, or don't watch telly at all. "Aha but with the BBC gone, other TV networks will spring up and the price will come down! Got you there you uppity tranny!" Well no, not really. You'll get more stations showing the same very low budget repeated dross because no one will be able to afford to make any original programming. So I'm back to bazillions of channels of Ant n fucking Dec. Joy. " the government top up the licence fee(aprox£3.4b) and commercial income(aprox £1.2b) with an annual grant in recent years this has varied between £250m and £300m, there has also been specific additional funds provided for digital switchover and the now abandoned digital project at the bbc. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. " wow way to be melodramtic, it's just going to be handled like parking tickets now. Ie a civil matter not a criminal one. nothing changes just that now 10% of criminal cases costing millions a year wont be non payment of tv licenses. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" How do you suggest they get the money to pay for it?" the massive international business arm of their operations where they commercially sell all their programs and services making billions? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" Well no, not really. You'll get more stations showing the same very low budget repeated dross because no one will be able to afford to make any original programming. So I'm back to bazillions of channels of Ant n fucking Dec. Joy. " if that was true why are american TV shows much more high budget than the uk ones? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"You mean the world service grant? Which is being wound up. " As far as im aware that is part of the grant from government, unless i am being misinformed i believe it also includes funds for bbc alba, s4c, asian network and other projects/services. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"It's a bit OTT having non payment of TV licence as a criminal offence. If that argument was followed through all Utility Bills should be criminal for non payment. I'm glad to pay my TV licence. It's great value, so why should I stop paying it once it becomes a Civil rather than a criminal offence. If you use a service you should pay for it. Simple. " the reason its currently a criminal offence is that the licence fee is classed as a tax, non payment is therefore treated in a similar way to tax evasion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........ I totally agree! I hate films and dramas interrupted by adverts! " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! " Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller." Sorry, I meant to say "dont tell them they're funding ethnic stuff twice". And you probably object to your taxes funding british assets looking for the Malaysian jet because you're not on it. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller. Sorry, I meant to say "dont tell them they're funding ethnic stuff twice". And you probably object to your taxes funding british assets looking for the Malaysian jet because you're not on it. " Of course I don't object - it's money spent to help other humans, not money spent on an unnecessary entertainment medium. I would have thought that you could recognise the intrinsic difference. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"..... BBC Scotland is a total shambles will be glad if it is totally wiped out." Two words. Judith Ralston. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller. Sorry, I meant to say "dont tell them they're funding ethnic stuff twice". And you probably object to your taxes funding british assets looking for the Malaysian jet because you're not on it. Of course I don't object - it's money spent to help other humans, not money spent on an unnecessary entertainment medium. I would have thought that you could recognise the intrinsic difference." You only deem it unnecessary because you don't like it and don't want to pay for it regardless of the fact that you probably watch or listen to content it's had a hand in every day, whether you know it or not. I feel it's an essential entertainment/information medium which serves and is recognised in a large proportion of the world, is a part of our national identity and has enhanced my life over the years if noone elses. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller. Sorry, I meant to say "dont tell them they're funding ethnic stuff twice". And you probably object to your taxes funding british assets looking for the Malaysian jet because you're not on it. Of course I don't object - it's money spent to help other humans, not money spent on an unnecessary entertainment medium. I would have thought that you could recognise the intrinsic difference. You only deem it unnecessary because you don't like it and don't want to pay for it regardless of the fact that you probably watch or listen to content it's had a hand in every day, whether you know it or not. I feel it's an essential entertainment/information medium which serves and is recognised in a large proportion of the world, is a part of our national identity and has enhanced my life over the years if noone elses." and you can feel how you like. We don't have to feel the same way | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"..... BBC Scotland is a total shambles will be glad if it is totally wiped out. Two words. Judith Ralston." she'll never be a match for shereen nanjiani | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"again... people will still have to pay for the licence!!! people will still be fined for non payment! its just they have removed the threat of jail for non-payment not many listening _abio,seems its more fun to rant " this wont harm the BBC much, even wonga wont lend if you have ccj's unpaid. and nobody gets sent to jail for unpaid license anyway. what many seem to forget is without the BBC there wouldnt be Freeview or digital tv and no 3g or 4g phone bandwidth so mobile phones and smartphones would be dying fast in busy places like London. so next time you browse fab on your phone, say thanks to the tv license which has served this country well for many years. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller. Sorry, I meant to say "dont tell them they're funding ethnic stuff twice". And you probably object to your taxes funding british assets looking for the Malaysian jet because you're not on it. Of course I don't object - it's money spent to help other humans, not money spent on an unnecessary entertainment medium. I would have thought that you could recognise the intrinsic difference. You only deem it unnecessary because you don't like it and don't want to pay for it regardless of the fact that you probably watch or listen to content it's had a hand in every day, whether you know it or not. I feel it's an essential entertainment/information medium which serves and is recognised in a large proportion of the world, is a part of our national identity and has enhanced my life over the years if noone elses." On the contrary, I do like some of the content of the BBC. I wouldn't, however, miss those programmes if they were no longer broadcast. My life really isn't that empty. I think there's something else behind your dislike of commercial television stations. Last night, the Mr and I watched a fascinating documentary on Nat Geo. During the first break, I made a cuppa while he checked our ebay sales. In the second break we went out onto the patio and threw dog biscuits down the garden for the foxes. During the third break, we discussed the first parts of the programme, and while we did so, an advert came on for the washing powder we needed on half price at one of our 3 local supermarkets. We shopped there earlier, and saved £5. I think you hate commercial stations with such passion because you don't want to spend the breaks not being bombarded by the thrilling plot of Eastenders in the company of somebody you really don't like. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Let them run adverts then they can do away with the licence fee. " Couldn't agree more! We saved £5 today because of an advert | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"yeah you dont need to pay a license for tv at all. You dont sign a contract or agree to so why pay. The website states you can own a tv and watch dvds,catch up but not live but even thats rubbish, you can watch whatever you want. Never heard of anyone being prosecuted for not paying." there are plenty who get prosecuted, my brother in law is one of the, stupid pratt thought it was a one off payment not an annual one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Fuck sake, dont tell the haters that they're funding ethnic stuff as well! Yes, everyone that doesn't feel the need to watch, and are forced to pay for the BBC, are racist nazis. We're probably also responsible for the Malaysian flight disappearance, the murder of Jesus Christ and creme eggs getting smaller." Cream eggs are getting smaller ??? What is the world coming too !! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh to hell with it....let's stop paying for the NHS, schools and social services as well. I don't go to school anymore so why should I pay for them? I'm not sick so why should I pay for hospitals that I don't use? Right I'm off to watch TOWIE and bitch about it on Facebook - fuck everything/everybody else " Hardly the same is it. You can easily do without a television so subsequently the BBC would be pointless in your life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh to hell with it....let's stop paying for the NHS, schools and social services as well. I don't go to school anymore so why should I pay for them? I'm not sick so why should I pay for hospitals that I don't use? Right I'm off to watch TOWIE and bitch about it on Facebook - fuck everything/everybody else " To compare an advert free entertainment medium to the NHS, schools and social services as a necessity is frankly ludicrous. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Anyone who doubts the value of the BBC need only watch Turks and Caicos (it was on earlier) Pt 2 of the Johnny Worricker story). Simply brilliant, even if it wasn't broken into 12 minute chunks." That's like saying if Tesco closed they'll be no more Cadbury cream eggs | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"yeah you dont need to pay a license for tv at all. You dont sign a contract or agree to so why pay. The website states you can own a tv and watch dvds,catch up but not live but even thats rubbish, you can watch whatever you want. Never heard of anyone being prosecuted for not paying." Positive about this are we ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh to hell with it....let's stop paying for the NHS, schools and social services as well. I don't go to school anymore so why should I pay for them? I'm not sick so why should I pay for hospitals that I don't use? Right I'm off to watch TOWIE and bitch about it on Facebook - fuck everything/everybody else To compare an advert free entertainment medium to the NHS, schools and social services as a necessity is frankly ludicrous." Some people are so engrossed in tv they don't really know the real quality, value of life | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"yeah you dont need to pay a license for tv at all. You dont sign a contract or agree to so why pay. The website states you can own a tv and watch dvds,catch up but not live but even thats rubbish, you can watch whatever you want. Never heard of anyone being prosecuted for not paying. Positive about this are we ?" Good old auntie Beeb, such a caring and thoughtful organisation. The BBC was responsible for more than one in ten criminal prosecutions last year as the number of people taken to court for non payment of their television licence reached a new high. More than 180,000 people – almost 3,500 a week – appeared before the Magistrates Courts, accused of watching television without a valid £145.50 licence. The BBC has come under fire after official figures showed that 107 people had been jailed in just over two years for failing to paying fines for not having a TV licence. The Ministry of Justice revealed the number of people who had been jailed from January 2011 to March 2013 for defaulting on fines for not paying for a TV licence after a Freedom of Information request by the Huffington Post UK. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Oh to hell with it....let's stop paying for the NHS, schools and social services as well. I don't go to school anymore so why should I pay for them? I'm not sick so why should I pay for hospitals that I don't use? Right I'm off to watch TOWIE and bitch about it on Facebook - fuck everything/everybody else To compare an advert free entertainment medium to the NHS, schools and social services as a necessity is frankly ludicrous. Some people are so engrossed in tv they don't really know the real quality, value of life" Missing the point somewhat... | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
""Television viewers who fail to pay the licence fee face having their BBC channels blocked under plans considered by ministers, reports the Times. The move comes as MPs start to debate scaling down the offence to a civil matter." From Saturday Times." Sounds good to me. Don't pay £145 and never see Eastenders again. Where do I sign up. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Just going to offer a perspective from across the pond. You could be a lot worse, and have to deal with the irish license system and rte. A lot of the reasons I see here for nonpayment I share but for the Irish licence, and the government are trying to bring in a broadcast charge (cough tax cough) instead of a licence to cover all mediums not just TV. The worst part is, every household will have to pay even if they can't receive! So if you've no internet, no TV, no phone or radio you still gotta pay! The brainwashing is already starting over here...ads on rte for the licence don't have a single TV in them ( laptops tablets and phones instead) I too would like an opt-out for the Irish system BUT I would gladly pay towards the UK license fee as what you've got is a million times better than what we've got!" How much is the charge going to be ? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Ive started paying my licence this year for the first time in a few years. Living in a block of flats Ive kind of known if I don't let them in they can't prosecute - or at least thats what I wrongly found. I pay £5.60 a week and think that is good value - I don't pay all year round. I don't have sky or cable just a shitty digi box where at the moment only a few channels work" we dont have a tv licence and they cant do us for it either lmao | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"England the only country that puts you away if you don't pay a tv station.. Until now " Not the only one. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally love the attempts at some big budget efforts by the bbc, to take on the likes of game of thrones etc...and they are all fucking SHIT fucking embarrassment is what the BBC are in terms of creative programmes atlantis being one of them.... oh, and I also think Dr who is utter pish" I love you, couldn't agree more with you, they try so hard to copy these huge shows. Spooks trying so hard to be like 24, Atlantis as Game of Thrones (even remember on the news going on about how controversial it is with so many topless men) ha I remember when the BBC aired the first season of 24, wasnt long after Spooks started and 24 wasnt shown anymore. Dr Who is the worst show I've ever seen, writing is terrible, effects even worse, acting is laughable. Robin hood, merlin all terrible. Only decent thing the BBC ever did was Bottom, Only fools & Horses and Red Dwarf. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally love the attempts at some big budget efforts by the bbc, to take on the likes of game of thrones etc...and they are all fucking SHIT fucking embarrassment is what the BBC are in terms of creative programmes atlantis being one of them.... oh, and I also think Dr who is utter pish I love you, couldn't agree more with you, they try so hard to copy these huge shows. Spooks trying so hard to be like 24, Atlantis as Game of Thrones (even remember on the news going on about how controversial it is with so many topless men) ha I remember when the BBC aired the first season of 24, wasnt long after Spooks started and 24 wasnt shown anymore. Dr Who is the worst show I've ever seen, writing is terrible, effects even worse, acting is laughable. Robin hood, merlin all terrible. Only decent thing the BBC ever did was Bottom, Only fools & Horses and Red Dwarf. " still..I'd watch a zombieeastenders special | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Someone on the radio summed it up perfectly yesterday. I don't remember their exact words but it was something to the effect of..... "Imagine a country where you can be sent to prison for refusing to pay for something you don't watch.quite rightly people would be outraged. You currently live in that country"" it's what I said but a bit better but dead on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"Someone on the radio summed it up perfectly yesterday. I don't remember their exact words but it was something to the effect of..... "Imagine a country where you can be sent to prison for refusing to pay for something you don't watch.quite rightly people would be outraged. You currently live in that country"" They SAY they don't watch it but in some (a lot?) of cases, they do. Just like people who don't have motor insurance get pulled over every day. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"the beeb should get off there fat overpaid arses and advertise on there channels like every other broadcaster does.the licence fee is outdated " | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"........... Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. " It's probably more that they just don't like being told what they HAVE to do, so the mount a mini personal revolution, even if doing so isn't in their best interests. At least they can kid themselves they're a bit of an anarchist | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. " spot on | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"I mainly watch sport on TV and the BBC shows very little that I am interested in.Would sooner have the choice to pay or not through sky and Bt sport,rather than be forced to pay the BBC." I'm not a fan of some of what the BBC puts out but, as I've said before, Radio 4 alone is worth the licence fee. In fact, the Shipping Forecast on its own is worth the licence fee. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. spot on " This reminds me of a panel in a Calvin and hobbes cartoon the caption reads "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has bothered to contact us" | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. " You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off? | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off?" Well said!! | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. " Humans are not dumb. They just like to have the right to choose now and again. Your going to have the right to choose in a few months. I'm thinking I might apply your logic should the Scots choose to leave the UK and go it alone | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"The BBC is a world leader in terms of broadcasting. It's programmes are bought by many other channels. It will be a sad loss if all we are left with are commercial channels. We will end up with the dross which is the major diet of a US audience where advertising takes up more time than the actual programmes. " Dross rather succinctly describes the US tv audience. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off?" two points to make, firstly the poster didnt say they are well off, they made a comparison between the cost of the tv licence and the cost of a sky subscription. secondly, anyone who is in the financial position you illustrate is free to make the choice of whether to have not only a tv licence but whether to have a tv at all. If they cant do without something then you need to expect to meet the associated costs. personally i think the bbc has become dysfunctional and requires a root and branch review, but it needs to be funded somehow. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off? two points to make, firstly the poster didnt say they are well off, they made a comparison between the cost of the tv licence and the cost of a sky subscription. secondly, anyone who is in the financial position you illustrate is free to make the choice of whether to have not only a tv licence but whether to have a tv at all. If they cant do without something then you need to expect to meet the associated costs. personally i think the bbc has become dysfunctional and requires a root and branch review, but it needs to be funded somehow." To be honest, I'm fed up with this subject - I just don't see why people are so willing to pay out money for an unnecessary entertainment channel when there is so much more in life to be entertained by, and many other good programmes commercial channels. If the BBC goes, I will rejoice in the fact that I will have an extra £145 per year to do something else more constructive and enjoyable with, but I won't mourn the loss of such a trivial thing from my life. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
| |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"These replies just amuse me. So the argument is thus: you'd rather the choice to not pay £140 per year, but instead pay a MINIMUM of £255 a year for Sky (going on the package price quoted on their website for basic entertainment at £21.50pm, which includes all the free channels that the license fee help fund amongst others) instead? So you're being forcibly beaten with a baseball bat. You'd like the choice of opting out of that as you don't like it and instead be beaten by a bigger baseball bat of your choosing? Humans are dumb. No wonder the aliens fuck off just as soon as they land. You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off? two points to make, firstly the poster didnt say they are well off, they made a comparison between the cost of the tv licence and the cost of a sky subscription. secondly, anyone who is in the financial position you illustrate is free to make the choice of whether to have not only a tv licence but whether to have a tv at all. If they cant do without something then you need to expect to meet the associated costs. personally i think the bbc has become dysfunctional and requires a root and branch review, but it needs to be funded somehow. To be honest, I'm fed up with this subject - I just don't see why people are so willing to pay out money for an unnecessary entertainment channel when there is so much more in life to be entertained by, and many other good programmes commercial channels. If the BBC goes, I will rejoice in the fact that I will have an extra £145 per year to do something else more constructive and enjoyable with, but I won't mourn the loss of such a trivial thing from my life." dont be fooled by thinking that parliament (esp the treasury) woild allow such a lucrative cash cow disappear, they would simply move the goalposts. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
"So the conservatives finally found a way to destroy the BBC and get Rupert Murdoch back on side in time for the election. They're going to decriminalise non-payment of the license fee which basically takes away any fear it may have held for people. And thus more and more will say "fuck it, take me to small claims". It might take a few years but it's a big nail in the coffin. And I know the anti-license fee lot will be on here shortly banging on about how they don't ever ever ever watch any BBC output (bet you do, it's everywhere) and how it's their choice to pay stupid amounts for Sky blah blah fucking blah. But I like the BBC and will be very sad when there's nothing to watch but a bazillion channels of Ant n Decs Saturday night cunt fest and Big Brother does Dancing on the Stars in a Cube. And nothing to listen to but 2 songs-10 adverts-2 songs-10 adverts........" So not only do I already choose to pay a subscription service to Virgin an I don't see why I should pay for the privilege of having a DEVICE in my home that allows me to watch live broadcasts. The license is an outdated mode of collecting revenue and overpaying the people at the top. The TV service doesn't even have HD for local stations! Yes the do produce some excellent progs and I HATE adverts with a passion! But they really do need to look for another method of funding and not criminalizing those who struggle to pay. To be frank I'd be happy to loose a cpl of BBC stations (3 is going)and it's not as if is financially broke thanks to the likes of Top Gear which is the most sold TV Prog in.....the World! it's viewed in over 212 territories around the world from Ghana to Guatemala, Moldova to Myanmar. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" You really can't put your point of view across without being insulting can you? That just shows the mentality of a BBC addict. " And how easily insulted non-bbc viewers are. Must be the big words. "I also think it's quite crass of you to believe that everybody can afford £145 a year for something they can do without. Just because you think the Patagonian Nose Flute Hour on BBC Radio Blah is worth the money alone, to other people, especially financially struggling families, £145 can buy quite a few meals. As I've said before, there should be a choice. Why don't you just pay for your own, and a few other peoples' licences if you're so well off?" I think if you're in such dire financial straits that telly in general should be pretty fucking far down on your list of priorities for any income you do have. And I don't know where I said I was well off. Just that I can afford £140 a year. Is that the measure of a persons solvency now? And scrapping the license fee is hardly going to help hard up telly watchers is it? I've already posted the basic cost of the only alternative and it's a lot more. Sky is a commercial venture and as such would be a better target for any anger on the cost of viewing. They're already charging you again for the freeview channels. That's channels you've already paid to watch through the license fee. How many channels out of those others you recieve from them do you actually watch? Probably a tiny amount. They have the facilities to monitor your viewing and block channels at will as anyone who's dared unplug the phone line from the sky box while under contract will know. Why not ask them if you can only pay for the channels you want then? Because they'll tell you to fuck off, because any choice you think you might have with them is purely an illusion. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
" I personally love the attempts at some big budget efforts by the bbc, to take on the likes of game of thrones etc...and they are all fucking SHIT fucking embarrassment is what the BBC are in terms of creative programmes atlantis being one of them.... oh, and I also think Dr who is utter pish I love you, couldn't agree more with you, they try so hard to copy these huge shows. Spooks trying so hard to be like 24, Atlantis as Game of Thrones (even remember on the news going on about how controversial it is with so many topless men) ha I remember when the BBC aired the first season of 24, wasnt long after Spooks started and 24 wasnt shown anymore. Dr Who is the worst show I've ever seen, writing is terrible, effects even worse, acting is laughable. Robin hood, merlin all terrible. Only decent thing the BBC ever did was Bottom, Only fools & Horses and Red Dwarf. " How dare you not include BLAKES 7! or Morecambe and Wise... oh and Rose colored spectacles! Yes, the good old beeb does produce some fantastic work but it's now time for some adverts between the progs, sad to say.. | |||
(closed, thread got too big) |
Reply privately |
back to top |