FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Wanking at GCHQ

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

According to the news, boffins at GCHQ have been perving webcams on yahoo and capturing images secretly. Why bother? they may as well create a fake account and spend a fiver to get 30 days gold membership on fab.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26367781

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"According to the news, boffins at GCHQ have been perving webcams on yahoo and capturing images secretly. Why bother? they may as well create a fake account and spend a fiver to get 30 days gold membership on fab.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26367781 "

Shhhhhh I am sure there are a few of them already on here under cover !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

They know you know

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hyllyphyllyMan
over a year ago

Bradford

My favorite line.....

"Unfortunately … it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman
over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"My favorite line.....

"Unfortunately … it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person"

"

How unfortunate indeed. Thank you for updating us Chilly x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eneral HysteriaMan
over a year ago

Newcastle


"My favorite line.....

"Unfortunately … it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person"

"

They mean it's unfortunate because the geeks have only just found out.

They're gutted.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eneral HysteriaMan
over a year ago

Newcastle


"According to the news, boffins at GCHQ have been perving webcams on yahoo and capturing images secretly. Why bother? they may as well create a fake account and spend a fiver to get 30 days gold membership on fab.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26367781

Shhhhhh I am sure there are a few of them already on here under cover !"

.... under covers

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Wait until the discover kik and skype, they will need a tissue paper delivery on a low loader!

Drs x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The geeks have always known.

The story is the leak.

If they hadnt been watching we would be asking what are we actually paying them to do?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well if anyone from GCHQ is watching the forums, get back to work! Oh and get us Rihanna's phone number please

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ophieslutTV/TS
over a year ago

Central

It's so wrong, when the public have been played by the governments here to allow non-content internet information to be allowed by law, and that any other info, such as content would NEVER be intercepted. All the while they were already soaking up the content, of all people, who had never been suspected of anything.

So don't trust the government reps, Theresa May etc, when they say stuff like 'there's nothing to worry about, we just want the meta data, and your personal intimate details remain private'.

There will have been plenty of browsing of the erotic camming images, as it appears our officials really like wasting our taxpayers' money and resources. And we wonder why we're going down the pan, with such enormous wasting of public funds, for no good reason.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wait until the discover kik and skype, they will need a tissue paper delivery on a low loader!

Drs x "

lol!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Question the authorities before they question you.

Learnt that as a kid lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Well I'm safe, as I can't get a cam to work on my phone or mac. I feel like I'm missing out now.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville

it's 1.8 million worldwide, not that many considering. But WTF are they doing in MY bedroom!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" But WTF are they doing in MY bedroom! "
Wanking lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It has been common knowledge for years that the bad guys have been using the interweb for communication. Apps such as kik, whatsapp IM etc have been used for ages. There are probably over a million conversations going on right now in this county alone, so the numbers that we are talking about are insignificant in the great scheme of things. If for example to terrorist suspects were discussing planting a bomb and the authorities had a chance to capture images of their faces, wouldn't you expect the authorities to capture them if they could ?

Any wanking shots would just be a bonus

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

And in mentioning the word 'bomb' you've just been flagged and they're now checking out your goodies...................

Errr hang on (re reads post)................................bollocks!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ohnny4playMan
over a year ago

Kinross

Is it any surprise that there has been a rise in dark net, tor and free net.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *oodmessMan
over a year ago

yumsville


" But WTF are they doing in MY bedroom! Wanking lol "

with this (flex), you know that computer had a meltdown

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"According to the news, boffins at GCHQ have been perving webcams on yahoo and capturing images secretly. Why bother? they may as well create a fake account and spend a fiver to get 30 days gold membership on fab.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26367781

Shhhhhh I am sure there are a few of them already on here under cover !"

Damn. My cover is blown, unlike my dick.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I met a spy on another site once.

Certainly not what you would have expected

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why pay £5 when they can see all the cams and record them for free.

You can be sure they read all the PMs and emails as well.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It has been common knowledge for years that the bad guys have been using the interweb for communication. Apps such as kik, whatsapp IM etc have been used for ages. There are probably over a million conversations going on right now in this county alone, so the numbers that we are talking about are insignificant in the great scheme of things. If for example to terrorist suspects were discussing planting a bomb and the authorities had a chance to capture images of their faces, wouldn't you expect the authorities to capture them if they could ?

Any wanking shots would just be a bonus"

But that's the point; if they're screening so many people & two terrorists were planning a bombing, they'd more than likely miss it because they're to busy pulling their todgers!

You have to have the intelligence first, not look for it in Fab forums!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Sites like this are perfect for sending covert messages.

Some deviants were caught sending messages via online gaming apps.

Everything has to be looked at.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Weirdly enough it was about 1984 when crime prevention started to change from seeking the criminal, to eliminating the non criminal. In order to eliminate the non criminal all have to be watched.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top