Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The free market doesn't work in every case. It didn't with loosening banking regulations and I don't believe it does with loan rates." Depends what you mean by 'work' it 'works' as a medium of exchange that allows those with capital to accumulate lots more of it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The free market doesn't work in every case. It didn't with loosening banking regulations and I don't believe it does with loan rates. Depends what you mean by 'work' it 'works' as a medium of exchange that allows those with capital to accumulate lots more of it. " It doesn't work to regulate itself and loan companies are unlikely to cap their rates voluntarily. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The free market doesn't work in every case. It didn't with loosening banking regulations and I don't believe it does with loan rates. Depends what you mean by 'work' it 'works' as a medium of exchange that allows those with capital to accumulate lots more of it. It doesn't work to regulate itself and loan companies are unlikely to cap their rates voluntarily. " Of course it doesn't. The nearest that free marketeers have got to trying to convince people that the market is somehow benevolent is the straw-clutching excercise that is "the trickle down effect". | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Not everyone understands the terms of the loan. As Lickety pointed out, we're not all numerate. This is particularly the case in the vulnerable section of the population that these companies target." I honestly don't see how say a TV advert for example somehow targets just the "vulnerable section of the population" Is the corner shop keeper also preying on the vulnerable section of the population by selling someone a 100 fags and a bottle of booze ? Companies offer products and services, they don't hold a gun to the head of someone to take them ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just because some people cannot afford them or cannot understand them does that mean no body should be able to utilize them ?" You think anyone but the people who have absolutely no choice (i.e. the ones likely to be unable to afford the repayments) would want to use loan companies that charge 1000%, 2000%, 2500%, or more interest rates? You have to be desperate to use them. That means poor. That means highly unlikely to be able to make the repayments. Even if they can repay, it leaves them even shorter of money and the situation spirals out of control fast. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Money Lenders will always exist in some shape or form, think back to Shylock in the Merchant of Venice and seeking his "pound of flesh". I would focus on educating kids about the need to live within their means. Unfortunately there is such rampant consumerism with everyone wanting their new trainers NOW, their new phone NOW, their new HD TV NOW, that as a society we have forgotten how to save before we spend. I think individuals have to take some responsibility but some regulation is also needed." this, by and large.. was brought up and have raised our kids with the ethos that if you cant afford it you either save or go without for the 'luxuries' in life.. education of how to use credit sensibly and within ones means and regulation as lets be honest some of these companies are no better than the thugs who prey on the vulnerable, the desperate and yes the less than articulate financially.. the nice suits and business logo's does'nt hide the reality.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Nothing to do with the companies ....it's the people who need to stop the borrowing ....that's where the companies get their revenue , people stop borrowing , they drop the rates to entice ..." Not that easy.. The banks wont lend them money they needs as they are a risk, these companies will and make lots of money from them. never ending circle. or more a downward spiral. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just because some people cannot afford them or cannot understand them does that mean no body should be able to utilize them ? You think anyone but the people who have absolutely no choice (i.e. the ones likely to be unable to afford the repayments) would want to use loan companies that charge 1000%, 2000%, 2500%, or more interest rates? You have to be desperate to use them. That means poor. That means highly unlikely to be able to make the repayments. Even if they can repay, it leaves them even shorter of money and the situation spirals out of control fast." and again, thats not the fault of these companies, thats the fault of those that use them. modern soceiety seems to feel the need to remove individual responsibility, rather more fervently target those that provide the service, or other things. look at cases of people going into crime. im sick of hearing it being about their upbringing. its all excuses and, like i said, a lack of self control and responsibility | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah yes, blame the poor and desperate. Of course, how silly of me." its not about blaming anyone. its about taking responsibility for ones own actions. you say the poor and vulnerable, but lets be honest. the real poor cant get loans from even these countries, and why? because they have no address, no home. the 'poor' as you put it, usually use these loan companies to buy things they want, rather than meet a need, and it has been shown. very very few of them use these loan companies to see them through the week, put food on the table, pay the bills, and even then, some of them will be owners of phones on monthly contracts, smoke, drink, have other less socially acceptable habits, and so on. if i knoew someone that lived like a nun/monk, had no vices, and still couldnt meet their financial obligations, then i would be one of the first to lend them a hand until they get straight. but very very few people that live on, or under, the breadline, have things they cant cut out so as to make the situation more bearable. sorry VV, on this we have to disagree | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ok this subject has got dragged into other threads and its an issue in itself. Should the government stop companies lending money at 1000% apr plus interest or even 50% apr. Is it immoral for people to lend a £10 and get back £100 and what should done with these companies? (Who are in the main from the USA where they have banned this sort of thing) Should the government should get involved in stopping them or should it be down to the individual to choose to borrow at exorbitant rates?" They only have those silly percentages because they're meant to be short term loans or a few Weeks but the government regulations require.them.to give the interest in apr which is annual. of you borrow a tenner from a mate and he says ok give me eleven quid tomorrow that's a 3,650% apr loan. But of course you're not keeping it for a year | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ok this subject has got dragged into other threads and its an issue in itself. Should the government stop companies lending money at 1000% apr plus interest or even 50% apr. Is it immoral for people to lend a £10 and get back £100 and what should done with these companies? (Who are in the main from the USA where they have banned this sort of thing) Should the government should get involved in stopping them or should it be down to the individual to choose to borrow at exorbitant rates? They only have those silly percentages because they're meant to be short term loans or a few Weeks but the government regulations require.them.to give the interest in apr which is annual. of you borrow a tenner from a mate and he says ok give me eleven quid tomorrow that's a 3,650% apr loan. But of course you're not keeping it for a year" That's fine, if you can pay it back. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's the story: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gloating-tories-dont-care-people-3022783 He didn't sit at home and moan. He tried to get help. Nobody cares. It's a disgrace the fortunate are blaming the less fortunate for being persecuted, sometimes to death." He died of liver failure because he was a long term alcoholic. That would have happened of he had been homless or the king of England. The DWP didn't kill him, he killed himself | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here's the story: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/gloating-tories-dont-care-people-3022783 He didn't sit at home and moan. He tried to get help. Nobody cares. It's a disgrace the fortunate are blaming the less fortunate for being persecuted, sometimes to death. He died of liver failure because he was a long term alcoholic. That would have happened of he had been homless or the king of England. The DWP didn't kill him, he killed himself" He was a recovering alcoholic. Do you not think being left without food and warmth might have had something to do with his death? He'd worked until a year before. Without the DWP error he could well have lived and continued rrcovering. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So just because some people cannot afford them or cannot understand them does that mean no body should be able to utilize them ? You think anyone but the people who have absolutely no choice (i.e. the ones likely to be unable to afford the repayments) would want to use loan companies that charge 1000%, 2000%, 2500%, or more interest rates? You have to be desperate to use them. That means poor. That means highly unlikely to be able to make the repayments. Even if they can repay, it leaves them even shorter of money and the situation spirals out of control fast." But that's it they don't charge 2000% it's a fixed fee for a fixed time.then it goes to a different contract of you don't pay after so long. if they charged even 20% they'd not even get back the cost it took to have the secretary print the paperwork for the loan | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way to help people... take people trying to recover and get back on track and stop all their money for 14 weeks. That won't cause any stress or impact on their ability to help themselves at all. ![]() Well maybe he should have gone to his meeting instead of going on holiday. My.work tends to stop paying me if I stop.turning up to | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way to help people... take people trying to recover and get back on track and stop all their money for 14 weeks. That won't cause any stress or impact on their ability to help themselves at all. ![]() You noticed the bit that said he was an alcoholic (but missed "recovering") but didn't see the part that explained why he missed the meeting? He didn't know about it because DWP sent the letter to the wrong address, (not the address he gave them)! His fault for being poor, ill and not telepathic? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Recovering alcoholic doesn't mean you're getting better it just means you've reduced your alcohol intake, your liver is still toast from years of poisoning only way he was.going to live was with a transplant and as an old single male who destroyed his liver through drink, he's going to be very low on that list" 51 - hardly old. Recovering could mean he'd given up completely. Possibly a while ago. Can you back up the accusation he was still drinking? Can you provide medical evidence to show he needed a liver transplant? Is there medical evidence to show he only had 14 weeks to live before this happened. Ye gods. The government propaganda machine really is doing its job. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It must be lovely to be in a place where one has no need to know, understand or even care what is happening to those at the very bottom of society's heirarchy. You don't have to be on the streets to be poor but you're usually fighting to survive and not end up there. The media like you to believe that the people using these "services" are doing so because they manage their money irresponsibly and want things they can't afford. The media are a mouthpiece for the government who want to turn ordinary people against one another and hide the reality of what their welfare "reforms" are doing to people. When you have no food and no heat, which is a frequent reality for the poor, not because they manage their money poorly but because they simply don't have enough, where else do you turn? You don't think about next week because you are to desperate to try to survive this week. Recently a man died in a freezing cold flat with no food in at all. He had been left without money for 14 weeks. That's no money at all. The DWP had called him in for an inter_iew but they had sent the letter to the wrong address. It was their mistake. The man missed the appointment and they stopped his benefit. He appealed but appeals take months (and the government are now considering changing people for making an appeal, to cut down the number bring made). 14 weeks later he died, still with his claim unresolved. He'd worked all his life up until that stage. It's not an isolated case and is becoming more common. Now, tell me that nobody is poor if they are not on the streets and anyone else just manages their money badly. The level of ignorance of how some people live (or are trying to live) and wjat it's really like at the bottom of the heap, is as shocking as it is sad. The have-nots aren't in a position to fight for themselves and most of the rest of society doesn't know what's happening or just doesn't care." ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way to help people... take people trying to recover and get back on track and stop all their money for 14 weeks. That won't cause any stress or impact on their ability to help themselves at all. ![]() No I saw the but where he told the dwp he missed because he was on holiday I also noticed the letter went to the wrong address is what his friend says, who'd probably a but of an unreliable narrator. I still don't understand why you think the fact he was a "recovering" alcoholic makes any difference to the fact he'd already done so much damage to his liver it failed. It was dying nothing can fix that. Just like if you take a very big paracetamol OD you can survive heck might even get over your depression but your still going to die in a few months time when your liver finally fails. Stopping drinking will not cute the long term effects of being an alcoholic just like stopping smoking won't cure your lung cancer | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Recovering alcoholic doesn't mean you're getting better it just means you've reduced your alcohol intake, your liver is still toast from years of poisoning only way he was.going to live was with a transplant and as an old single male who destroyed his liver through drink, he's going to be very low on that list 51 - hardly old. Recovering could mean he'd given up completely. Possibly a while ago. Can you back up the accusation he was still drinking? Can you provide medical evidence to show he needed a liver transplant? Is there medical evidence to show he only had 14 weeks to live before this happened. Ye gods. The government propaganda machine really is doing its job." 51 is old on transplant lists. And yes I can provide medical evidence he needed a liver transplant....he died of liver failure | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Recovering alcoholic doesn't mean you're getting better it just means you've reduced your alcohol intake, your liver is still toast from years of poisoning only way he was.going to live was with a transplant and as an old single male who destroyed his liver through drink, he's going to be very low on that list 51 - hardly old. Recovering could mean he'd given up completely. Possibly a while ago. Can you back up the accusation he was still drinking? Can you provide medical evidence to show he needed a liver transplant? Is there medical evidence to show he only had 14 weeks to live before this happened. Ye gods. The government propaganda machine really is doing its job. 51 is old on transplant lists. And yes I can provide medical evidence he needed a liver transplant....he died of liver failure" He died of liver failure after a really traumatic 14 week period. It could have been enough to tip anyone over the edge, never mind someone with health problems. Livers regenerate in time. You have no idea for how long he was an alcoholic or the extent of the damage to his liver. You don't know he would not have survived without a transplant. If he'd been in recovery for a while, his liver would already have been repairing itself. I'm fairly sure that without the actions of the DWP, this guy would have lived more than 14 weeks. Oh, and the DWP claimed he said he didn't go because he was on holiday. It's not like the DWP would lie to try to save their own arses having made a mistake, eh? If the guy had not gone to the appointment because he was on holiday, the sanction would have stood. As it was, it was overturned and the payments backdated. Therefore the DWP made a mistake. They wouldn't reverse the decision otherwise. It's been verified that the letter went to the wrong address and that information is available on sites I am not allowed to link to. It's there for anyone who CARES to look for it. Still, one more dead benefit claimant, it all helps reduce the deficit. Watch out for shower blocks installed by the DWP coming to an area near you soon. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If their hours are cut or costs such as rent go up they then get into serious problems and the £100 monthly loan doesn't get paid back and soon becomes a £600 debt. Then they are sunk. " ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"These lenders are on the high street and advertising on the television. It doesn't feel risky or the same as dealing with the old door knocking loan sharks. I was doing some work with some leading advice centres on what their case load looks like around loan defaults and debt advice. More and more the cases they are seeing are the in-work poor who take these loans out once a month to manage their cashflow. If their hours are cut or costs such as rent go up they then get into serious problems and the £100 monthly loan doesn't get paid back and soon becomes a £600 debt. Then they are sunk. " It's their own fault for being poor apparently, Lickety. And if they aren't on the street begging then they aren't really poor. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ah yes, blame the poor and desperate. Of course, how silly of me." ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"........ It's their own fault for being poor apparently, Lickety. And if they aren't on the street begging then they aren't really poor." Even if the ARE on the streets begging, the Tory press would have us believe they're all being dropped off and picked up by Range Rover and sharing babies to add to the tear jerking effect. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some just need to cut their cloth differently." Some do but it doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people in this country now that simply do not have enough money to live on, even without frills and luxuries. That some of these people actually do work makes it that much worse. The government really are doing a sterling job of setting ordinary people against each other. People are dying from poverty in this country. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"........ It's their own fault for being poor apparently, Lickety. And if they aren't on the street begging then they aren't really poor. Even if the ARE on the streets begging, the Tory press would have us believe they're all being dropped off and picked up by Range Rover and sharing babies to add to the tear jerking effect." In some areas police have been harrassing those living on the streets as a result of orders from above. It's illegal to be homeless now, apparently. They'd better get those shower blocks out quickly. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some just need to cut their cloth differently. Some do but it doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people in this country now that simply do not have enough money to live on, even without frills and luxuries. That some of these people actually do work makes it that much worse. The government really are doing a sterling job of setting ordinary people against each other. People are dying from poverty in this country." I dont disagree, there are very very poor people. but there are also those who claim to be, who are not. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" If their hours are cut or costs such as rent go up they then get into serious problems and the £100 monthly loan doesn't get paid back and soon becomes a £600 debt. Then they are sunk. ![]() ![]() ![]() Yes and that was one of the areas we were looking at on how to record the work being done with those seeking debt advice. The information isn't useful for asking for the government to intervene if every case study can be pulled apart because little Johnny got the most expensive football boots etc. Unfortunately we are in the land of the deserving and undeserving poor rhetoric now. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some just need to cut their cloth differently. Some do but it doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people in this country now that simply do not have enough money to live on, even without frills and luxuries. That some of these people actually do work makes it that much worse. The government really are doing a sterling job of setting ordinary people against each other. People are dying from poverty in this country. I dont disagree, there are very very poor people. but there are also those who claim to be, who are not." Yes, you are right, I don't dispute. Some who use payday loans could manage their money better. Some really don't have much choice. Either way those people need the appropriate help, be that financial assistance or financial education. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Unfortunately we are in the land of the deserving and undeserving poor rhetoric now." Nobody "deserves" to scrape an existence unless they genuinely do not want to work. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some just need to cut their cloth differently. Some do but it doesn't change the fact that there are a lot of people in this country now that simply do not have enough money to live on, even without frills and luxuries. That some of these people actually do work makes it that much worse. The government really are doing a sterling job of setting ordinary people against each other. People are dying from poverty in this country. I dont disagree, there are very very poor people. but there are also those who claim to be, who are not. Yes, you are right, I don't dispute. Some who use payday loans could manage their money better. Some really don't have much choice. Either way those people need the appropriate help, be that financial assistance or financial education." 1000% agree, and the banks/credit card companies didn't help for a long time, you had to default before they would put together a repayment plan. Now they spend a lot focusing on customers who are struggling and frontline people are assessed on whether they picked up on finanacial difficulty signals. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I still hate the claim, or even the implication that everyone has enough to live on, they just need to manage it better. Some people have their head in the sand completely. (Not aimed at you View, because I know you haven't said this. I have heard it multiple times on here and in the "real world" though)" ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"government intervention? perhaps a few minutes on the google machine will show you whos priorities are being looked after. simply look up adrian beecroft, the man behind wonga, large donor to the tory party, friend and backer to david cameron, advisor to him on employment rights and benefit changes, a member of his paid for access dinner club, and the man who recommends that new benefit claimants wait a week minimum before receiving any money.the wonga week! welcome to 21st century de(mock)racy. ![]() But Wonga is run by strange old people who scare and reassure in equal measure. They care about us. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" The government really are doing a sterling job of setting ordinary people against each other." divide and conquer.. some dont wish to see the bigger picture for whatever their reasons.. its easy to scapegoat whichever 'group' when some will choose to be led by certain elements within the media.. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |