FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

woman has forced ceaserian

Jump to newest
 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

see there is an article in the torygraph claiming an italian woman visiting london was given a seaserian section against her will after social services obtianed an order to sedate her the child was then put into care where she has remained for the last 15 months with the ss refusing to return her to her mother !

shocking !

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"see there is an article in the torygraph claiming an italian woman visiting london was given a seaserian section against her will after social services obtianed an order to sedate her the child was then put into care where she has remained for the last 15 months with the ss refusing to return her to her mother !

shocking !"

For such a drastic measure to hapoen the courts must have sanctioned it and the welfare of the child must have been the priority.

Without knowing all the facts we can only guess and i always look beyond the headlines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Does it say why?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

SS are often dammed if they do, dammed if they don't.

I guess the experts decided it being the correct course of action.

I hope the wee one has a great life

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"SS are often dammed if they do, dammed if they don't.

I guess the experts decided it being the correct course of action.

I hope the wee one has a great life

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"see there is an article in the torygraph claiming an italian woman visiting london was given a seaserian section against her will after social services obtianed an order to sedate her the child was then put into care where she has remained for the last 15 months with the ss refusing to return her to her mother !

shocking !

For such a drastic measure to hapoen the courts must have sanctioned it and the welfare of the child must have been the priority.

Without knowing all the facts we can only guess and i always look beyond the headlines."

One side of the story.....and reported in such a way to sell papers.

Social Services can't and don't take any action without a good reason to, and anything that involves such drastic action will have to be evidenced and justified in a court of law with a judge making the final decision....not the social worker!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple
over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"Does it say why?"
apparently she was bi polar and had an "episode " due to forgeting to take meds just seems a bit drastic to me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

The council had a High Court order.

It rather seems social services departments are going to extreme lengths to cover their arses just in case something goes wrong.

An overreaction to previous bad publicity?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it say why?apparently she was bi polar and had an "episode " due to forgeting to take meds just seems a bit drastic to me "

drastic to you or not.

im guessing you would be the first up in arms if the baby had been born, she had an episode and drowned the kid.

'where we social services? they obviously knew the child was in danger and didnt do anything about it'

i can see it now.

how many threads have been on here about kids being hurt or killed and its often complained that SS dont act quickly enough.

well, damned if you do, damned if you dont

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Why do people always get up in arms about some sensational headlines? Nobody but the parties involved know the exact details. Just give it a rest. Sheeesh.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it say why?apparently she was bi polar and had an "episode " due to forgeting to take meds just seems a bit drastic to me "

sometimes what seems like drastic action, has a history, there are 2 ways to give birth, the safest way was chosen, by professionals who knew the case and reasons. If she was made to abort her baby, that would of been drastic.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top