Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
I have no doubt that a lot of dirty washing will be aired on both sides. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him. "Did he try to strangle her over dinner though? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?" no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who knows what happens behind closed doors! That's the only trouble of being in the media! So many people making judgements about something they know absolutely nothing about! " who really cares anyway? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd certainly think twice about divorcing one of the Saatchi's
I have no doubt that a lot of dirty washing will be aired on both sides."I'm thinking that Nigella will have a load more dirty washing than him though! All those pots n pans won't do themselves you know! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?
no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder."I know you meant his first wife, we're not talking about her though. It doesn't make me wonder at all, there's independent photographic evidence, to say he assaulted Nigella in public. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him. "Is she still getting alimony? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him. "Probably because her larynx was still recovering from a throttling! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I'd certainly think twice about divorcing one of the Saatchi's
I have no doubt that a lot of dirty washing will be aired on both sides.
I'm thinking that Nigella will have a load more dirty washing than him though! All those pots n pans won't do themselves you know! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?
no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder."wonder what? that the picture was staged? you did actually see the picture where he had her by the throat I assume..? that look in her eyes isn't one of 'this is a surprise'.. looks more like 'here we go again'.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Who knows what happens behind closed doors! That's the only trouble of being in the media! So many people making judgements about something they know absolutely nothing about! who really cares anyway?" agree on the first point.. when DV is in the public domain we should all 'care'.. regardless of whom it is.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?
no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder.
wonder what?
that the picture was staged?
you did actually see the picture where he had her by the throat I assume..?
that look in her eyes isn't one of 'this is a surprise'..
looks more like 'here we go again'..
"That look in her eyes isnt one of surprise how can you know that. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?
no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder.
wonder what?
that the picture was staged?
you did actually see the picture where he had her by the throat I assume..?
that look in her eyes isn't one of 'this is a surprise'..
looks more like 'here we go again'..
That look in her eyes isnt one of surprise how can you know that. "to be honest I don't know, that's my opinion.. would also be inclined to think that anyone 'comfortable' enough in placing his hand on another persons throat in public has previous.. what was it you were wondering about in relation to your earlier post on this..? you seem to want to avoid that.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Is she still getting alimony?"Cocaine I think | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didn't have anything bad to say about him.
Is she still getting alimony?
Cocaine I think"Speculation...unlike the photographic evidence of the DV. There is non on the drugs | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"his first wife didnt have anything bad to say about him.
Did he try to strangle her over dinner though?
no his first wife, she said he never hit her, so makes you wonder.
wonder what?
that the picture was staged?
you did actually see the picture where he had her by the throat I assume..?
that look in her eyes isn't one of 'this is a surprise'..
looks more like 'here we go again'..
That look in her eyes isnt one of surprise how can you know that. "Regardless whether it was the first time or the hundredth time domestic violence is abhorrent and unjustifiable and no one should even try to make excuses for it. My opinion is that he should have been charged with common assault at the very least when those pictures came out... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts. "It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything. She's not in the dock here. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here."no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here.
no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it. "Whatever the circumstances its unjustifiable. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"would also be inclined to think that anyone 'comfortable' enough in placing his hand on another persons throat in public has previous.." ...previous what? Laying a hand on someone's throat doesn't necessarily mean DV. Perhaps they were into kinky stuff, just like lots of us on here are. Actually, that scenario I find much more credible than DV acted out in public, certainly when you're so much in the public eye. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here.
no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it. "NO circumstances should lead to a female being publically throttled by a man! Satchi looked menacing and intimidating in the pictures leading up to the throttling. Nigella looked weary and fearful. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here.
no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it. "Are the 'circstances' any of our business? The hand round the throat incident has been dealt with. What more are we entitled to be told? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"would also be inclined to think that anyone 'comfortable' enough in placing his hand on another persons throat in public has previous.. ...previous what? Laying a hand on someone's throat doesn't necessarily mean DV. Perhaps they were into kinky stuff, just like lots of us on here are. Actually, that scenario I find much more credible than DV acted out in public, certainly when you're so much in the public eye. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here.
no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it.
Are the 'circstances' any of our business?
The hand round the throat incident has been dealt with.
What more are we entitled to be told?"exactly my point lol. Thank you for making it for me. No, they aren't. And had it not been for a pap'd picture, neither would that I suspect. But all you close minded idiots just want to jump on a bandwagon without knowing any facts, just what you saw on a photo. But that's fine. I'm much more open minded to the fact things are rarely black and white. Enjoy your evening playing the British Justice System all | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts.
It's worth remembering Ms Lawson isn't actually being accused of anything.
She's not in the dock here.
no, but that doesn't mean she is faultless. All I'm saying is we don't know all the facts, and therefore we are not judge, jury and executioner. We know what we saw in a picture, not the circumstances leading to it.
Are the 'circstances' any of our business?
The hand round the throat incident has been dealt with.
What more are we entitled to be told?
exactly my point lol. Thank you for making it for me. No, they aren't. And had it not been for a pap'd picture, neither would that I suspect. But all you close minded idiots just want to jump on a bandwagon without knowing any facts, just what you saw on a photo. But that's fine. I'm much more open minded to the fact things are rarely black and white.
Enjoy your evening playing the British Justice System all " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK, so its fairly common knowledge on here that I like kinky stuff. My kinky stuff includes being choked.... BUT if any man ever decides to put his hands around my neck in public then he will be doing it without consent. Without consent meaning it is against the law. Regardless of what they are or aren't into - there is no excuse for what he did. " No excuse for what Saatchi did. The fact he accepted a police caution shows even he accept this. The tricky bits are 'consent' and 'public'. Does anyone have an all embracing definition of either that works in everyday life? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK, so its fairly common knowledge on here that I like kinky stuff. My kinky stuff includes being choked.... BUT if any man ever decides to put his hands around my neck in public then he will be doing it without consent. Without consent meaning it is against the law. Regardless of what they are or aren't into - there is no excuse for what he did. No excuse for what Saatchi did. The fact he accepted a police caution shows even he accept this. The tricky bits are 'consent' and 'public'. Does anyone have an all embracing definition of either that works in everyday life?" Consent is a very easy concept to understand! If someone says yes than that means yes, if someone says no that means no. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"OK, so its fairly common knowledge on here that I like kinky stuff. My kinky stuff includes being choked.... BUT if any man ever decides to put his hands around my neck in public then he will be doing it without consent. Without consent meaning it is against the law. Regardless of what they are or aren't into - there is no excuse for what he did. No excuse for what Saatchi did. The fact he accepted a police caution shows even he accept this. The tricky bits are 'consent' and 'public'. Does anyone have an all embracing definition of either that works in everyday life? Consent is a very easy concept to understand! If someone says yes than that means yes, if someone says no that means no. " I did specify 'everyday life'. If two people are planning to have sex, does either of them ever say to the other 'do I have your consent to have sex with you?' If, as is normally argued, there's a 'presumed consent', how can someone know if that consent has been rescinded? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts. "generally I would agree with you however it does beg the question as to why someone with the financial resources that he has to hand chose to accept a Police caution and chose not to fight his case in open court..? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"would also be inclined to think that anyone 'comfortable' enough in placing his hand on another persons throat in public has previous.. ...previous what? Laying a hand on someone's throat doesn't necessarily mean DV. Perhaps they were into kinky stuff, just like lots of us on here are. Actually, that scenario I find much more credible than DV acted out in public, certainly when you're so much in the public eye. "why does an innocent person in that case accept a police caution rather than give an explanation such as you suggest.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, I am not speculating or trying to judge the case, but because the photograph was somewhat damning, maybe it was easier to accept a caution that have a shit flinging match in a court? " I was thinking the same. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"but all you close minded idiots just want to jump on a bandwagon without knowing any facts, just what you saw on a photo. But that's fine. I'm much more open minded to the fact things are rarely black and white. " how ironic someone so 'open minded' refers to others of an opposite _iew in a debate as you just did.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, I am not speculating or trying to judge the case, but because the photograph was somewhat damning, maybe it was easier to accept a caution that have a shit flinging match in a court? " Isn't that what's happening now anyway? Didn't save much face did he really. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, I am not speculating or trying to judge the case, but because the photograph was somewhat damning, maybe it was easier to accept a caution that have a shit flinging match in a court? " Seemed the most logical explanation for me (in as far as I was bovvered about the whole thing) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Again, I am not speculating or trying to judge the case, but because the photograph was somewhat damning, maybe it was easier to accept a caution that have a shit flinging match in a court? I was thinking the same." and the possibility that any previous DV would also come to light.. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here we go again. All speculation. Just give a rest. (I'm the proud wearer of a button saying "I am hated by the Daily Mail")" I almost feel sorry for the old chap, the way people talk, as if he is some sort of monster. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Here we go again. All speculation. Just give a rest. (I'm the proud wearer of a button saying "I am hated by the Daily Mail") I almost feel sorry for the old chap, the way people talk, as if he is some sort of monster. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Seriously, I would never justify domestic violence. But who here actually has a clue what happened? No body. Who is to see she hadn't been battering and mentally abusing him for years, said something that day which made him snap, and that was the result? No one knows the state of their marriage or the circumstances surrounding what he/she is like, so why assume when you know nothing? Leave that to the lawyers and courts. "I agree. No way of knowing which it was. Although it looks................. Also, do they have proof she was taking cocaine or is that just an accusation? If it's not been proven I think it's ridiculous that they can print it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
