FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Nigela Lawson.

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Since when does having a drug habit mean someone deserves to be assaulted?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Maybe she needed one....did you see her hubby

and he was a "shit" to boot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Since when does having a drug habit mean someone deserves to be assaulted?

"

maybe the drug problem is a result of the abuse, there's a thought!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

[Removed by poster at 27/11/13 10:38:03]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

None of this has been proved! Its allegations by Charles Saatchi!! Of course there's going to be mud slinging there's a divorce coming up!!!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It was self raising flour ffs she was baking a cake it's what she does

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"None of this has been proved! Its allegations by Charles Saatchi!! Of course there's going to be mud slinging there's a divorce coming up!!!! "

this....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It was self raising flour ffs she was baking a cake it's what she does "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

"

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 27/11/13 10:45:22]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atietvsheffTV/TS
over a year ago

Sheffield

She is still a horny MILF

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they."

Regardless of "what he had to put up with" you DON'T put your hands round a woman's throat, or anyone's for that matter, unless your life depends on it, his clearly didn't.

Let's consider what she may have had to put up with too, we already know he physically assaulted her, maybe that is just the tip of the iceberg...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There is no valid excuse for any male to physically and mentally abuse any female.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'd still let her cook my tea

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There is no valid excuse for any male to physically and mentally abuse any female. "

Anyone of any sex.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they.

Regardless of "what he had to put up with" you DON'T put your hands round a woman's throat, or anyone's for that matter, unless your life depends on it, his clearly didn't.

Let's consider what she may have had to put up with too, we already know he physically assaulted her, maybe that is just the tip of the iceberg...

"

What if it was the other way round though, her putting her hands around his throat, people would of probably said she was just fooling around, like married couples do.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Some things are best left private.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Seems to me the word of a violent man is paramount these days. It's just another of his nasty ploys to besmirch the character of the gawjus nigella lawson.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they.

Regardless of "what he had to put up with" you DON'T put your hands round a woman's throat, or anyone's for that matter, unless your life depends on it, his clearly didn't.

Let's consider what she may have had to put up with too, we already know he physically assaulted her, maybe that is just the tip of the iceberg...

What if it was the other way round though, her putting her hands around his throat, people would of probably said she was just fooling around, like married couples do."

Read the comment again... You don't put your hands round the neck of anyone!

Its about time DV was recognised both ways!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I'd still let her cook my tea "

^ this

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *essiCouple
over a year ago

suffolk


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they.

Regardless of "what he had to put up with" you DON'T put your hands round a woman's throat, or anyone's for that matter, unless your life depends on it, his clearly didn't.

Let's consider what she may have had to put up with too, we already know he physically assaulted her, maybe that is just the tip of the iceberg...

"

this... and there are always 2 sides to a story to...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Oh dear lawd words escape me......how judgmental one person can be...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick"

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh dear lawd words escape me......how judgmental one person can be... "

are we surprised though??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence....."

says more about them then it does about her if the allegations are true...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

Ok attack the post not the poster.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ugby 123Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

O o O oo

To the OP....it is allegations, not proven.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they.

Regardless of "what he had to put up with" you DON'T put your hands round a woman's throat, or anyone's for that matter, unless your life depends on it, his clearly didn't.

Let's consider what she may have had to put up with too, we already know he physically assaulted her, maybe that is just the tip of the iceberg...

What if it was the other way round though, her putting her hands around his throat, people would of probably said she was just fooling around, like married couples do."

I said "anyones neck".

Domestic violence, regardless of the victims gender is appalling and no one should have to suffer it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

says more about them then it does about her if the allegations are true..."

well they pleaded not guilty....

so many people put 2 and 2 together in this thread and got 5......

if you read the case the pa's are accused of defrauding BOTH of the couple, and there defence is that she gave them permission, and the drug use (cocaine, other class b drugs and medically prescribed medicines....) mean she is not a fit witness

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Seems to me the word of a violent man is paramount these days. It's just another of his nasty ploys to besmirch the character of the gawjus nigella lawson."

of course.

because she is more attractive, her word is more valid than his.

god i do hope you arent on the jury i rely on for my innocence

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence....."

sorry, yes i know, but its all running towards the same thing, and no doubt will be used when the divorce comes to court.

still not in the public interest, imo

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

says more about them then it does about her if the allegations are true...

well they pleaded not guilty....

so many people put 2 and 2 together in this thread and got 5......

if you read the case the pa's are accused of defrauding BOTH of the couple, and there defence is that she gave them permission, and the drug use (cocaine, other class b drugs and medically prescribed medicines....) mean she is not a fit witness"

Well, drug use or not, it doesn't give someone the right to theft.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

sorry, yes i know, but its all running towards the same thing, and no doubt will be used when the divorce comes to court.

still not in the public interest, imo"

Definitely not in the public interest. It should be a private matter, as should divorce.

Typical tabloid reporting at its worst..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"really really dislike public mudslinging when divorces happen.

its NOT in the public interest, so why is it being reported?

i for one dont care at all and neither should anyone else.

it really should be private, but no, they each have to make themselves look like the victim.

makes me sick

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

sorry, yes i know, but its all running towards the same thing, and no doubt will be used when the divorce comes to court.

still not in the public interest, imo

Definitely not in the public interest. It should be a private matter, as should divorce.

Typical tabloid reporting at its worst.."

if only this kind of crap were only in the tabloids

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

So she's taken a few drugs, doesn't mean she's got a drug problem and it's all only speculation at the moment, it wouldn't change my opinion of how sexy she is. Also anybody with a serious drug habit wouldn't look that voluptuous, I can tell you, it's just tabloid bullshit

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

this didn't come out because of the Divorce case.... This came out because of a fraud trial where two of Nigella's Personal assistants are accused of stealing money over a 10 year period.....

it is part of their character defence.....

says more about them then it does about her if the allegations are true...

well they pleaded not guilty....

so many people put 2 and 2 together in this thread and got 5......

if you read the case the pa's are accused of defrauding BOTH of the couple, and there defence is that she gave them permission, and the drug use (cocaine, other class b drugs and medically prescribed medicines....) mean she is not a fit witness

Well, drug use or not, it doesn't give someone the right to theft."

again... they deny all the charges and say they were given permission.....

this was going to come out during the trial anyway... and apparently there is a programme being shown in australia and the US that will make further allegations against nigella later this week.... so the judge was probably right to allow this to be out there before the trial starts.....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon

Well they are all innocent until proven otherwise....excluding the abuse as that was documented....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I do hope all the journalists and people slagging her off have got a squeaky clean interior. Because as we know people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adja_lazloCouple
over a year ago

Solihull


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *adja_lazloCouple
over a year ago

Solihull


"None of this has been proved! Its allegations by Charles Saatchi!! Of course there's going to be mud slinging there's a divorce coming up!!!! "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *abioMan
over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Definitely not in the public interest. It should be a private matter, as should divorce.

Typical tabloid reporting at its worst.."

lots of words that mean nothing...

again...

a) it was going to come out in the trial anyway.....

b) its not the tabloids... it was THE JUDGE in this trial that allowed it to be reported...

now... if you want to argue they are sensationalising it, then that is a different conversation...

they would never have been allowed to report it and would have been held in comtempt of court if, again "the judge" had not allowed it...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Seems to me the word of a violent man is paramount these days. It's just another of his nasty ploys to besmirch the character of the gawjus nigella lawson.

of course.

because she is more attractive, her word is more valid than his.

god i do hope you arent on the jury i rely on for my innocence"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't know the details of the fraud case, or the divorce case, only heard through the press of an act violent behaviour, have no real knowledge of it's true or one of many that happened to get witnessed, but she has a seductive smile and he doesn't. So now she is single my chances have increased from 0 to 0.000,000,000,000,1%

Will even clean the coffee table if she fancies doing a line.

After all it's her life not our's or the media's.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *isscheekychopsWoman
over a year ago

The land of grey peas and bacon


"So she's taken a few drugs, doesn't mean she's got a drug problem and it's all only speculation at the moment, it wouldn't change my opinion of how sexy she is. Also anybody with a serious drug habit wouldn't look that voluptuous, I can tell you, it's just tabloid bullshit "

in fairness my dear Watson she has lost a lot of weight recently though I've not seen her in the past few months....now Im not saying that is down to drug use it could be many factors such as stress, dieting and excersise...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

show me a TV star that hasnt got a drug problem

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Ok attack the post not the poster."

What do you expect on here?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

may be wrong but the initial accusation on drugs use seems to have come from her husband,who has lots to gain financially in the long term if he can make her seem less of a victim in their divorce

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"Shock horror..

folk on the TV are not perfect??!!

well well..

Her husbands not perfect either, people expect him to be though.

Nobody knows what he had to put up with do they."

so is your thread about her husband or the allegations by him about her..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]"

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it "

Really? That's disgusting.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it "

Far more people know of Nigella than this musician person.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it

Far more people know of Nigella than this musician person."

That's my point, its people who make news now days not the crime, people are far more interested in a trivial crime by a well known person than a big offence by a nobody

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it

Far more people know of Nigella than this musician person."

But that doesn't make it right. Then again, when has the tabloids ever given a shit about that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Oh Jesus she's done and ! We must tell the world!

How about covering the horrible women who helped ian watkins get access to the baby? Or is that no longer important?

[/rant]

haha I was reading the paper today, Nigella gets front page and a story inside for suspected drug use Ian Watkins got a tiny section about 5 lines long 10 pages in, funny what makes make's head line news now days isn't it

Far more people know of Nigella than this musician person.

That's my point, its people who make news now days not the crime, people are far more interested in a trivial crime by a well known person than a big offence by a nobody "

Plus the fact there's no ongoing mileage on the musician's trial, at least until sentencing.

The Nigella trial will continue to sell papers for days and days. People take great delight in the misfortune of others.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise. "

That information came from a biased source - the man she is divorcing.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

That information came from a biased source - the man she is divorcing. "

must be true then, no one ever lies in a divorce

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"show me a TV star that hasnt got a drug problem

"

Harry Secombe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *atasha_DavidCouple
over a year ago

Slough


"On the front pages of all the newspapers

must be true then, no one ever lies in a divorce "

Yeah but the Sun knows its true, they did her phone! Oops probably shouldn't have said that

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise. "

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emmefataleWoman
over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville


"show me a TV star that hasnt got a drug problem

Harry Secombe. "

I would hope he hadn't hes been dead 12 years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? ..... "

Where's the fun in that?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud! "

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise. "

I'd still tag doll her all over the kitchen xx

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense."

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!"

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense."

I do wonder when he sent the email, if it was after his episode with the hand on her throat and subsequent acceptance of Police caution it looks rather contrived..

seems like hell hath no fury like a domestic abuser outed..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

I do wonder when he sent the email, if it was after his episode with the hand on her throat and subsequent acceptance of Police caution it looks rather contrived..

seems like hell hath no fury like a domestic abuser outed.. "

Exactly, stinks of a smear campaign to me...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"show me a TV star that hasnt got a drug problem

Harry Secombe. I would hope he hadn't hes been dead 12 years. "

Ok then, Flora Hurd

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about."

Because they worked for satchi and Nigella. Perhaps a computer was left on and they went snooping when they were 'allegedly' committing fraud? Perhaps Satchi left it lying about after printing it in the hope they would notice it? Any number of reasons could be the cause of how they got hold of it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about.

Because they worked for satchi and Nigella. Perhaps a computer was left on and they went snooping when they were 'allegedly' committing fraud? Perhaps Satchi left it lying about after printing it in the hope they would notice it? Any number of reasons could be the cause of how they got hold of it. "

convienient timing that this has come out though? And that that type of conversation was used in an email? Im not convinced, I think he's probably sat at home pretty pleaaed with himself that it's his email that has smeared her character.

All the while Nigella has kept a dignified silence. He couldnt even accept he was in the wrong when he put his hand round her throat in public! What an arrogant man he is thinking he could do that let alone in public and not be called up on it. I think he had everything to do with that email coming out but time will tell the truth always outs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about.

Because they worked for satchi and Nigella. Perhaps a computer was left on and they went snooping when they were 'allegedly' committing fraud? Perhaps Satchi left it lying about after printing it in the hope they would notice it? Any number of reasons could be the cause of how they got hold of it.

convienient timing that this has come out though? And that that type of conversation was used in an email? Im not convinced, I think he's probably sat at home pretty pleaaed with himself that it's his email that has smeared her character.

All the while Nigella has kept a dignified silence. He couldnt even accept he was in the wrong when he put his hand round her throat in public! What an arrogant man he is thinking he could do that let alone in public and not be called up on it. I think he had everything to do with that email coming out but time will tell the truth always outs."

Hey, don't get me wrong! I totally agree with you. Satchi is a prick who is using this as a smear campaign. All i said was that it's the two women who are bringing it up in court. So what if she DID take cocaine! Is that any reason to publicly throttle the woman? Or any excuse for these women to 'allegedly' commit fraud against her? No. As you say, it's a smear campaign against her character.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about.

Because they worked for satchi and Nigella. Perhaps a computer was left on and they went snooping when they were 'allegedly' committing fraud? Perhaps Satchi left it lying about after printing it in the hope they would notice it? Any number of reasons could be the cause of how they got hold of it.

convienient timing that this has come out though? And that that type of conversation was used in an email? Im not convinced, I think he's probably sat at home pretty pleaaed with himself that it's his email that has smeared her character.

All the while Nigella has kept a dignified silence. He couldnt even accept he was in the wrong when he put his hand round her throat in public! What an arrogant man he is thinking he could do that let alone in public and not be called up on it. I think he had everything to do with that email coming out but time will tell the truth always outs.

Hey, don't get me wrong! I totally agree with you. Satchi is a prick who is using this as a smear campaign. All i said was that it's the two women who are bringing it up in court. So what if she DID take cocaine! Is that any reason to publicly throttle the woman? Or any excuse for these women to 'allegedly' commit fraud against her? No. As you say, it's a smear campaign against her character."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Interesting approach to a defence from a criminal trial... I didn't defraud my victim, I blackmailed him instead!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

Whatever happened to "Innocent until proven guilty"? These drug allegations haven't been proven in any way whatsoever! And they weren't made by Satchi. They were made by two women who were working for the couple and are now up in court accused of fraud!

They were made by satchi, its his email to nigella slating her drug use as the reason the two women are going to get away with stealing the money which is being used as evidence by the defense.

My point was, it's the two women who are bringing this up in court! Not Satchi! As part of their defence!

Well how did they get hold of that email? Id be interested to know how that came about.

Because they worked for satchi and Nigella. Perhaps a computer was left on and they went snooping when they were 'allegedly' committing fraud? Perhaps Satchi left it lying about after printing it in the hope they would notice it? Any number of reasons could be the cause of how they got hold of it.

convienient timing that this has come out though? And that that type of conversation was used in an email? Im not convinced, I think he's probably sat at home pretty pleaaed with himself that it's his email that has smeared her character.

All the while Nigella has kept a dignified silence. He couldnt even accept he was in the wrong when he put his hand round her throat in public! What an arrogant man he is thinking he could do that let alone in public and not be called up on it. I think he had everything to do with that email coming out but time will tell the truth always outs.

Hey, don't get me wrong! I totally agree with you. Satchi is a prick who is using this as a smear campaign. All i said was that it's the two women who are bringing it up in court. So what if she DID take cocaine! Is that any reason to publicly throttle the woman? Or any excuse for these women to 'allegedly' commit fraud against her? No. As you say, it's a smear campaign against her character.

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lack_BoltMan
over a year ago

oxford

Mmmmmmmmmm?

I think it's interesting how many people are so willing to take sides, despite the evidence that contradicts their opinions, particularly with regard to Nigella. We still don't know many aspects of the case in terms of timeline and "cause and effect".

Saatchi may not be the most handsome man on the planet, but that doesn't automatically make him the baddie. Nor do the photographs of his "assault" on Nigella condemn or vindicate his behaviour. What's missing is context, and with some aspects of what we've been told context is missing.

Equally just because Nigella is "attractive" doesn't make her an angel and I'm surprised at how eagerly people have lept to her defence. Her part in the whole drama should be taken into account, and she should be treated just like everyone else regardless at how "gorgeous" she is.

There may be many more unpleasant titbits to be exposed, some involving Nigella, but it's interesting how it is not Saatchi bringing this all to air, and I do not believe in heroes and villains in such sad events, but maybe we might have to accept that all is not what we thought it to be.

Just a thought.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *uckyinlustMan
over a year ago

manchester

ALL...............IS NEVER what we thought it to be .......................everything

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" but maybe we might have to accept that all is not what we thought it to be.

Just a thought."

Nope you are wrong, never given any thought to either of them being good bad criminal or legit.

They both enjoy a good life that they have worked hard for and deserve. both of them will continue to enjoy a great life after the divorce.

The details concern them, maybe they concern a few others, but they don't concern me.

If there is criminal behaviour then the police will handle it accordingly, they will do it with proper evidence gathering not speculating on here-say and headlines.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think people are more jumping to the defense of Nigella in response to the op's first post where she states "not quite the innocent victim she claims to be"

First of Nigella has stayed silent so has claimed nothing and second of all, regardless as to whether she is a drug user or not that does not excuse a man (or woman for that matter) laying their hands on someone, let alone in public and be photographed. The pictures are there for all to see that it happened and how visibly shaken she was in the pics after, and witnesses saying they were having a heated argument therefore this was not some kinky foreplay etc. It happened and regardless of what went on in their marriage that act is inexcusable, anything else is just speculation at the moment and none of us will really know what goes on behind closed doors but there is never an excuse for DV even if she is a drug user.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Mmmmmmmmmm?

I think it's interesting how many people are so willing to take sides, despite the evidence that contradicts their opinions, particularly with regard to Nigella. We still don't know many aspects of the case in terms of timeline and "cause and effect".

Saatchi may not be the most handsome man on the planet, but that doesn't automatically make him the baddie. Nor do the photographs of his "assault" on Nigella condemn or vindicate his behaviour. What's missing is context, and with some aspects of what we've been told context is missing.

Equally just because Nigella is "attractive" doesn't make her an angel and I'm surprised at how eagerly people have lept to her defence. Her part in the whole drama should be taken into account, and she should be treated just like everyone else regardless at how "gorgeous" she is.

There may be many more unpleasant titbits to be exposed, some involving Nigella, but it's interesting how it is not Saatchi bringing this all to air, and I do not believe in heroes and villains in such sad events, but maybe we might have to accept that all is not what we thought it to be.

Just a thought."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollie_JCouple
over a year ago

London

Nigella silent?

#teamnigella

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind. "

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got."

People are all different and around her I bet a lot of people into this and lot escaping from things that get them down people find different ways to cope and some maybe not the best things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got.People are all different and around her I bet a lot of people into this and lot escaping from things that get them down people find different ways to cope and some maybe not the best things."

I know people are all different, but why would i feel sorry for someone who if she didnt have so much money she wouldnt be able to afford drugs anyway and she should know better at her age.

I feel more sorry for homeless people who have drink problems and a lot of people dont give a damn about them.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got.People are all different and around her I bet a lot of people into this and lot escaping from things that get them down people find different ways to cope and some maybe not the best things.

I know people are all different, but why would i feel sorry for someone who if she didnt have so much money she wouldnt be able to afford drugs anyway and she should know better at her age.

I feel more sorry for homeless people who have drink problems and a lot of people dont give a damn about them."

Money don't make no difference if you have very bad depression ... Its like a very BIG black hole each day you cope with it and a lot on the outside never see just how bad you maybe feeling not sure OP if you ever had this bad as if you had you would know ..... some find it hard to just get up face the day why a lot end up doing silly things to themselves as cant cope.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

nigella is a proper filthy dirty whore....well she is in my visions anyway.

Oh well rehab for her but i guess admitting it is the first step...i wish her luck on getting clean and then she can get all dirty again...but in a good way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lack_BoltMan
over a year ago

oxford


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lack_BoltMan
over a year ago

oxford


" She suffered depression she had this for years . She was 41 years old and she had already lost her mother and younger sister to cancer at 48 and 32 , and now her husband at 47. If Nigella did turn to painkillers or drugs at this point, all one can say is that she had an awful lot of pain to kill ....... I think she may have been covering up a lot of pain in her life. I know how it feel to lose a person so close and it's hard even after a year some days for me to cope but I have never thank god hit drugs just had family and friends there. I for one will not be put off liking her, As there always loads of sides to the stories you read and its her life.They said in the paper her husband was mad saying look at what you're doing to your body with the drugs and her face in them pics we see him mad at her was not only around her neck he was feeling around her nose on some too. We will see I just hope she holds it together and some good come out of all this and she find a peace of mind.

All very sad but lots of people lose loved ones in the same way only they dont all go on about it and take drugs though do they.

She had a husband and has got three kids, more than what some people have got.People are all different and around her I bet a lot of people into this and lot escaping from things that get them down people find different ways to cope and some maybe not the best things.

I know people are all different, but why would i feel sorry for someone who if she didnt have so much money she wouldnt be able to afford drugs anyway and she should know better at her age.

I feel more sorry for homeless people who have drink problems and a lot of people dont give a damn about them."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise. "

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Do i have sympathy for either nigella or hubby do i hell. They both court publicity for own ends when it suited so now when things have gone bad they and anyone else cannot really complain about the press.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rank69redMan
over a year ago

Galway

All I know is that she is one babe and a hell of a nice one at that. Living with a prat like that i wouldn't blame her to be high. She is without doubt my fantasy woman maybe I should ask her over for some tlc ? Gorgeous is gorgeous however you read it

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room."

not just in the sun though was it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollie_JCouple
over a year ago

London

I suppose unless you are friends with both of them nobody has a clue how these people are in real life.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

not just in the sun though was it."

my point is that what you have insinuated is not proven fact and you base this on the evidence of two women charged with fraud and theft by deception, perhaps they might be saying this hoping to avert the gaze away from them.

i just wonder if the sun will publish the headline on the front page if the story is untrue my bets is they don't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

not just in the sun though was it.

my point is that what you have insinuated is not proven fact and you base this on the evidence of two women charged with fraud and theft by deception, perhaps they might be saying this hoping to avert the gaze away from them.

i just wonder if the sun will publish the headline on the front page if the story is untrue my bets is they don't."

Not just in the sun, it was front page of all the papers and on the news.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

not just in the sun though was it.

my point is that what you have insinuated is not proven fact and you base this on the evidence of two women charged with fraud and theft by deception, perhaps they might be saying this hoping to avert the gaze away from them.

i just wonder if the sun will publish the headline on the front page if the story is untrue my bets is they don't.

Not just in the sun, it was front page of all the papers and on the news."

so do you believe that she is a drug addict and that these women are telling the truth

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

not just in the sun though was it.

my point is that what you have insinuated is not proven fact and you base this on the evidence of two women charged with fraud and theft by deception, perhaps they might be saying this hoping to avert the gaze away from them.

i just wonder if the sun will publish the headline on the front page if the story is untrue my bets is they don't.

Not just in the sun, it was front page of all the papers and on the news.

so do you believe that she is a drug addict and that these women are telling the truth "

Yes it is possible.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *unPeteMan
over a year ago

Near Bristol

So OP you believe everything you read in the papers?

Her innocence or otherwise does not excuse any physical or mental abuse aimed at her. Don't you agree?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham

Does it matter if she had a drug problem? Does it make her achievement in life any less?

I fail to see how this news is relevant to anything. It's not like she told us to bake crack into our mince pies is it??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"On the front pages of all the newspapers, nigela has a drug problem it seems. Not such the innocent victim after all, well theirs a surprise.

you are aware these are allegations being made by two sisters who worked for her ex husband who are currently in court charged with theft by deception and fraud. they claim that nigella said they could spend monies in Louis vuiton etc as long as they didn't tell ex husband she had a drug addict.

and the sun rag makes it front page news.

she lost her ex husband (john diamond) to cancer raised two kids and ended getting assaulted by that Saatchi prick and now this comes out from the court room.

not just in the sun though was it.

my point is that what you have insinuated is not proven fact and you base this on the evidence of two women charged with fraud and theft by deception, perhaps they might be saying this hoping to avert the gaze away from them.

i just wonder if the sun will publish the headline on the front page if the story is untrue my bets is they don't.

Not just in the sun, it was front page of all the papers and on the news.

so do you believe that she is a drug addict and that these women are telling the truth

Yes it is possible."

everything is possible however i don't think its wise to post unfounded allegations because we are innocent till proven guilty in this country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So OP you believe everything you read in the papers?

Her innocence or otherwise does not excuse any physical or mental abuse aimed at her. Don't you agree? "

No i dont believe everything i read in the papers do you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it matter if she had a drug problem? Does it make her achievement in life any less?

I fail to see how this news is relevant to anything. It's not like she told us to bake crack into our mince pies is it??"

i only look at nigellas crack when i bake her pies lol x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Does it matter if she had a drug problem? Does it make her achievement in life any less?

I fail to see how this news is relevant to anything. It's not like she told us to bake crack into our mince pies is it??

i only look at nigellas crack when i bake her pies lol x "

Doesnt matter how much you say how good she looks though, you still wont get to shag her.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just waiting for the home amateur porn film to materialise mmmmm

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Just waiting for the home amateur porn film to materialise mmmmm"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it matter if she had a drug problem? Does it make her achievement in life any less?

I fail to see how this news is relevant to anything. It's not like she told us to bake crack into our mince pies is it??

i only look at nigellas crack when i bake her pies lol x

Doesnt matter how much you say how good she looks though, you still wont get to shag her. "

:-

its no different to many of the women on here lol x

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollie_JCouple
over a year ago

London

[Removed by poster at 28/11/13 21:50:48]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Does it matter if she had a drug problem? Does it make her achievement in life any less?

I fail to see how this news is relevant to anything. It's not like she told us to bake crack into our mince pies is it??

i only look at nigellas crack when i bake her pies lol x

Doesnt matter how much you say how good she looks though, you still wont get to shag her. :-

its no different to many of the women on here lol x

"

as i won't get to shag them

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ollie_JCouple
over a year ago

London

This has all been bubbling around for ages.

I advise you to search google for

Richard hillgrove blog lawson

Now that really opens a can of worms

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This has all been bubbling around for ages.

I advise you to search google for

Richard hillgrove blog lawson

Now that really opens a can of worms"

i will however is any of it proven facts or just hearsay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"This has all been bubbling around for ages.

I advise you to search google for

Richard hillgrove blog lawson

Now that really opens a can of worms

i will however is any of it proven facts or just hearsay "

Richard hillgrove independent PR consultant, however he once worked for who ?

i believe he has been issued with the threat of libel over his blog (the guardian,2013)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Who cares?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Who cares? "

Indeed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

One is an ex-advertising executive whose propaganda is widely considered instrumental in bringing the tories into power at the end of the seventies, giving us the hideous age of Thatcherism, the other is the daughter of a Chancellor in Thatcher's cabinet, who now appears on television employing tired double-entendres and saucy facial expressions whilst making indulgent tidbits for fake friends in a fake kitchen.

(Bitter, moi?)

I'm very happy for their lives to implode away from my gaze.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"One is an ex-advertising executive whose propaganda is widely considered instrumental in bringing the tories into power at the end of the seventies, giving us the hideous age of Thatcherism, the other is the daughter of a Chancellor in Thatcher's cabinet, who now appears on television employing tired double-entendres and saucy facial expressions whilst making indulgent tidbits for fake friends in a fake kitchen.

(Bitter, moi?)

I'm very happy for their lives to implode away from my gaze. "

i thought you didn't care when really your all heart

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

i thought you didn't care when really your all heart

"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"One is an ex-advertising executive whose propaganda is widely considered instrumental in bringing the tories into power at the end of the seventies, giving us the hideous age of Thatcherism, the other is the daughter of a Chancellor in Thatcher's cabinet, who now appears on television employing tired double-entendres and saucy facial expressions whilst making indulgent tidbits for fake friends in a fake kitchen.

(Bitter, moi?)

I'm very happy for their lives to implode away from my gaze. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Now I know why her cakes are so addictive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im not for one minute condoning his actions...but have you lived with someone with a drug addiction...they drive you scatty and insane and push you to your absolute limits, I could have quite easily been driven to commit murder with an ex of mine and his stupidity and lack of awareness of his actions

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just a bunch of people With more Money than sense.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Im not for one minute condoning his actions...but have you lived with someone with a drug addiction...they drive you scatty and insane and push you to your absolute limits, I could have quite easily been driven to commit murder with an ex of mine and his stupidity and lack of awareness of his actions "

Yes and its not the sort of stress an old man needs.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman
over a year ago

evesham


"Im not for one minute condoning his actions...but have you lived with someone with a drug addiction...they drive you scatty and insane and push you to your absolute limits, I could have quite easily been driven to commit murder with an ex of mine and his stupidity and lack of awareness of his actions "

That's if she even had a drug problem.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *teveanddebsCouple
over a year ago

Norwich


"Im not for one minute condoning his actions...but have you lived with someone with a drug addiction...they drive you scatty and insane and push you to your absolute limits, I could have quite easily been driven to commit murder with an ex of mine and his stupidity and lack of awareness of his actions "

This is the most sensible post on this thread.

Been there, done that. It was a nightmare.

On the other hand I've heard that Nigella is really missing him. She was heard sobbing "Where's my fucking Charlie?"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Today is a Big day in court ... Even sky news is going to cover this story on and off all day and say now it going . I myself think she is big into drugs .. But it was a way to escape her depression and when you're not in control of life things can go very wrong and this is what you're seeing . There staff spending money covering up for her and finding it easy so maybe helping themselves and they have loads of money .. he has to find something to stick in court and come out smelling of roses and its this.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

When you make your living in the public eye, you will always be scrutinised,

She is good at what she does, that means lots of people will be jealous, yes she has a privileged back ground and when you have money, you have temptation.

Nothing new under the sun, except now the internet.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"When you make your living in the public eye, you will always be scrutinised,

She is good at what she does, that means lots of people will be jealous, yes she has a privileged back ground and when you have money, you have temptation.

Nothing new under the sun, except now the internet."

I for one am not jealous. I see a woman who need some help and real friends and this will sort them out .. real friends will stand by her side and other will run .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"When you make your living in the public eye, you will always be scrutinised,

She is good at what she does, that means lots of people will be jealous, yes she has a privileged back ground and when you have money, you have temptation.

Nothing new under the sun, except now the internet."

Some people will be jealous, just because you dont like someone doesnt always mean you are jealous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ "

Wasnt enough to keep her rich hubby happy though was it.

See he has got a fitter looking bird now, trinny, much slimmer and classier too.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emmefataleWoman
over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ

Wasnt enough to keep her rich hubby happy though was it.

See he has got a fitter looking bird now, trinny, much slimmer and classier too. "

Call me a cynic, but are you deliberately baiting?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ

Wasnt enough to keep her rich hubby happy though was it.

See he has got a fitter looking bird now, trinny, much slimmer and classier too. "

Trinny is no Angel .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ

Wasnt enough to keep her rich hubby happy though was it.

See he has got a fitter looking bird now, trinny, much slimmer and classier too. Call me a cynic, but are you deliberately baiting?"

No, i just speak my mind, and why not.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *emmefataleWoman
over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does.

I agree. Just coz she likes to skin up occasionally (yes I realise it's probably something more classy in her case) doesn't mean the gutter press should hound her or her bloke should hit her.

I know little of her but, typical for a man I suppose, enjoy the pictures of her mouth with some piece of food entering it. Not very closely concealed that it's representative of her giving a BJ

Wasnt enough to keep her rich hubby happy though was it.

See he has got a fitter looking bird now, trinny, much slimmer and classier too. Call me a cynic, but are you deliberately baiting?

No, i just speak my mind, and why not. "

I merely asked a question, I asked it after reading the thread, you gave me your answer....why not indeed.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho.. "

yes I think you're right. Gloating not heard that word for years.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho.. "

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

none of us know that she is an addict as some suggest, if she is she and her family need support which they can fund privately..

even if she is it seems that that makes it acceptable for a bloke to have his hand on her throat..

its not and we all should condemn it regardless of whomever..

DV is wrong, whatever the relationship..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ebsCoupleCouple
over a year ago

Orpington/london


"Drug habit or not she doesn't deserve to be physically abused in public, no one does."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho..

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat."

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho..

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat."

So you saying it's ok for him to do that then and nobody should think anything of it ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So you saying it's ok for him to do that then and nobody should think anything of it ?"

Again - it could have been a kinky moment. You only see a snapshot, not the whole story. Misinterpretation is rife in the media.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"there is certainly an element of the green eyed monster with some in this thread..

a sort of nasty gloating with a bit of 'its ok when some bloke has his hands around a womans throat'..

cos I don't like her..

hey ho..

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..? "

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"So you saying it's ok for him to do that then and nobody should think anything of it ?

Again - it could have been a kinky moment. You only see a snapshot, not the whole story. Misinterpretation is rife in the media."

However I look at it I still think it was totally wrong for it to have been done in public.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"So you saying it's ok for him to do that then and nobody should think anything of it ?

Again - it could have been a kinky moment. You only see a snapshot, not the whole story. Misinterpretation is rife in the media.

However I look at it I still think it was totally wrong for it to have been done in public. "

We all make mistakes.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Nigella Lawson and Charles Saatchi's household spending was £100,000 A MONTH on credit cards.

The extraordinary sum – £1.2m a year .

That's a lot of money but why just his? she has her own money too.? And thay was married .. what's john s is myn also .

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe."

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

"

Head and brick wall springs to my mind

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

Head and brick wall springs to my mind "

Cocaine users can be unpredictably violent and have been known to bite at the faces of people when out of control. The only way to prevent being bitten without backing off is to place one hand at their neck - that way they can't jump forwards or bite downwards. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but the possibility exists. In the pictures I've seen he only uses one hand and his fingers don't appear to be digging into flesh. DV is not acceptable but self-defence is. That's one of the many reasons why cocaine is a dangerous and illegal drug. Again, not saying that's the case here, but suggesting a possible scenario.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

"

And it just wasn't a second snapshot in time the paps caught the whole argument leading up to the hands round the throat and afterwards too not to mention witnesses, all freely available via google, this was not kinky play it was a row and DV, regardless as to whether she has a drug problem it does not excuse that.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"

Cocaine users can be unpredictably violent and have been known to bite at the faces of people when out of control. The only way to prevent being bitten without backing off is to place one hand at their neck - that way they can't jump forwards or bite downwards. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but the possibility exists. In the pictures I've seen he only uses one hand and his fingers don't appear to be digging into flesh. DV is not acceptable but self-defence is. That's one of the many reasons why cocaine is a dangerous and illegal drug. Again, not saying that's the case here, but suggesting a possible scenario."

care to point me to where that technique to restrain someone is used or taught..?

even in acute psychiatric where some service users are what used to be termed 'criminally insane' that is not accepted practise under control and restraint..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

In fairness her husband is probably just creating a story to protect his money!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

Head and brick wall springs to my mind

Cocaine users can be unpredictably violent and have been known to bite at the faces of people when out of control. The only way to prevent being bitten without backing off is to place one hand at their neck - that way they can't jump forwards or bite downwards. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but the possibility exists. In the pictures I've seen he only uses one hand and his fingers don't appear to be digging into flesh. DV is not acceptable but self-defence is. That's one of the many reasons why cocaine is a dangerous and illegal drug. Again, not saying that's the case here, but suggesting a possible scenario."

Next time I end up in a scrap I'm gonna use this technique and claim self defence after I've choked them to death!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

No its not because i dont like her, i just dont see what all the fuss is about, making him out to be a monster just because he had his hands round her throat.

so you would be happy to be treated that way, even once..?

or your children..?

Not my children no way.

But havnt you and your partner ever got a bit rough and nasty once or twice.

I dont mean leaving lots of bruises or braking bones, or people can say very cruel things sometimes in the heat of the moment, only the rest of the time you get on ok maybe.

using your own conclusion 'what's the fuss' if some bloke put his hand on your childs throat..?

lost our tempers with each other yes, never raised a hand though..

not in 30 yrs..

the neck is a very sensitive area, you grab someone there you can do serious damage..

don't buy the line that this was anything other than him losing control..

still stand by my opinion that it probably wasn't the first time, but that's just an opinion..

whatever it was it was wrong and the picture, whomever took it tells a thousand words..

Head and brick wall springs to my mind

Cocaine users can be unpredictably violent and have been known to bite at the faces of people when out of control. The only way to prevent being bitten without backing off is to place one hand at their neck - that way they can't jump forwards or bite downwards. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but the possibility exists. In the pictures I've seen he only uses one hand and his fingers don't appear to be digging into flesh. DV is not acceptable but self-defence is. That's one of the many reasons why cocaine is a dangerous and illegal drug. Again, not saying that's the case here, but suggesting a possible scenario."

sorry have i read this correctly because you post seems to insinuate that she was high on cocaine and he was acting in self defence.

just to get this into perspective the drug abuse claims come from two sources one of which forms part of the defence of two sisters (PA's) who are standing trial from theft and fraud by deception and the second source comes from a personal blog written by another ex employee who was sacked who runs his own PR firm and who in the past as worked with or for her ex.

for everyone likes or dislikes her as far as the law is concerned it matters not one jot who you are.

in this country you are innocent until proven guilty and trial by media or by electronic means is frankly distasteful.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

............

for everyone likes or dislikes her as far as the law is concerned it matters not one jot who you are.

.................

"

If only that were true.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top