FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Charles at 65

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

I should point out that I am a republican and see no real merit in the Royal Family but reading an article the other day on Charles now he qualifies for a pension and bus pass it struck me how mixed up the man is. The article delved into his mind set and the man who seems to have a social conscience but still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money. He was, it seems intensely jealous of the firs Mrs Windsor and does not spend a lot of time with the current one. A true enigma!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oh oh ! What about the homeopathic stuff ... The guys mental

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Private Eye have pointed out a lot of inconsistencies in the chap's approach to things.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Yes he is a bit of a weather cock!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Can't stand the guy

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

He's the only Royal I really have no opinion about. Seems a bit blah to me.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think hes gorgeous.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Pompous Prick

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Steady on, you'll have all the monarchists on the forum foaming at the mouth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

When you look at the in-breeding in his background, it's hardly surprising he's a bit weird.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Pompous Prick "

I hadnt noticed, i always thought he seemed down to earth.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"Pompous Prick

I hadnt noticed, i always thought he seemed down to earth."

Aye, you can tell by the uniforms.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Pompous Prick "

how can you tell?

have you seen it?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

It can't be much of a life, waiting around for your mother to die.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?"

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone "

Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?"

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally"

Its a vehicle to ingratiate royalty into society and the figure head has little to do with the work the organisation does. As a matter of interest who actually funds the Trust?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iss_tressWoman
over a year ago

London


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?"

If I were to give him any thought this pretty much sums it up.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

"

Ena

Voluntary income represented the largest source of funding for organisation, totalling £18 million in 2009–10 (representing a very small increase on 2008–09. Public Sector income (contracts and grants to deliver support to young people from statutory bodies) fell from £17 million to just under £14 million.

Charles does not put any money into it. I would much rather Dennis Skinner as the figure head!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

Ena

Voluntary income represented the largest source of funding for organisation, totalling £18 million in 2009–10 (representing a very small increase on 2008–09. Public Sector income (contracts and grants to deliver support to young people from statutory bodies) fell from £17 million to just under £14 million.

Charles does not put any money into it. I would much rather Dennis Skinner as the figure head!"

and would it have gotten that level of donation if it were headed by Dennis Skinner?

who are these donators?

how do you know they arent people involved with Charlie?

figures without fact can be used to state anything

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

Ena

Voluntary income represented the largest source of funding for organisation, totalling £18 million in 2009–10 (representing a very small increase on 2008–09. Public Sector income (contracts and grants to deliver support to young people from statutory bodies) fell from £17 million to just under £14 million.

Charles does not put any money into it. I would much rather Dennis Skinner as the figure head!

and would it have gotten that level of donation if it were headed by Dennis Skinner?

who are these donators?

how do you know they arent people involved with Charlie?

figures without fact can be used to state anything"

The facts are on the web site and in their published accounts.

The Prince had 12 official engagements on the trust one of which was a garden party funded from the privy purse again freely available from official web sites and companies house.

I am not doubting the work the trust carries out is laudable and seeks to help but Royal patronage is..........medieval in my humble, short sighted, republican opinion!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *hoosy_strumpetCouple
over a year ago

W S AREA


"Steady on, you'll have all the monarchists on the forum foaming at the mouth. "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

Ena

Voluntary income represented the largest source of funding for organisation, totalling £18 million in 2009–10 (representing a very small increase on 2008–09. Public Sector income (contracts and grants to deliver support to young people from statutory bodies) fell from £17 million to just under £14 million.

Charles does not put any money into it. I would much rather Dennis Skinner as the figure head!

and would it have gotten that level of donation if it were headed by Dennis Skinner?

who are these donators?

how do you know they arent people involved with Charlie?

figures without fact can be used to state anythingThe facts are on the web site and in their published accounts.

The Prince had 12 official engagements on the trust one of which was a garden party funded from the privy purse again freely available from official web sites and companies house.

I am not doubting the work the trust carries out is laudable and seeks to help but Royal patronage is..........medieval in my humble, short sighted, republican opinion! "

patronage gives something a little credence with those that have money to donate.

as said, do you think the fund would get the donations if it wasnt what it is?

of course not, people would just moan about it being the governments job to fund small business start ups.

as i asked before, do you know WHO donated this money?

you cannot be certain they arent people from Charlies circle of friends and contacts, rather than just millions of members of the general public.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Steady on, you'll have all the monarchists on the forum foaming at the mouth. "
Viva L' Republic

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"He has not really made a mark on society given his privileged life. He seems the most irrelevant of the irrevelence?

have to agree.

the POW trust has done fekk all for anyone Save for providing an ego foe a guy I suspect would rather be a cobbler?

really?

the prince of wales trust has done nothing for anyone other than give aul Charlie an ego boost?

i know republicans can be pretty short sighted but jesus, even i can see its done a lot for a lot of people, including some i know personally

Ena

Voluntary income represented the largest source of funding for organisation, totalling £18 million in 2009–10 (representing a very small increase on 2008–09. Public Sector income (contracts and grants to deliver support to young people from statutory bodies) fell from £17 million to just under £14 million.

Charles does not put any money into it. I would much rather Dennis Skinner as the figure head!

and would it have gotten that level of donation if it were headed by Dennis Skinner?

who are these donators?

how do you know they arent people involved with Charlie?

figures without fact can be used to state anythingThe facts are on the web site and in their published accounts.

The Prince had 12 official engagements on the trust one of which was a garden party funded from the privy purse again freely available from official web sites and companies house.

I am not doubting the work the trust carries out is laudable and seeks to help but Royal patronage is..........medieval in my humble, short sighted, republican opinion!

patronage gives something a little credence with those that have money to donate.

as said, do you think the fund would get the donations if it wasnt what it is?

of course not, people would just moan about it being the governments job to fund small business start ups.

as i asked before, do you know WHO donated this money?

you cannot be certain they arent people from Charlies circle of friends and contacts, rather than just millions of members of the general public."

The accounts record donations from private individuals totalling £3m mostly from estate bequeaths. Additionally the accounts show income from founding partners who seem to be large businesses (so its a tax relief issue) And ok you have sussed me I do not think that Charlie has any concept of the work his trust does and Dennis Skinner by the way has done more for the working classes of this country than the last 20 generations of the Royal family.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money."
Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. "
I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources."
Are you suggesting that HRH The Prince of Wales takes an income from the charity he set up to help the young?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think he is totally bland and seems uncomfortable in his role

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources.Are you suggesting that HRH The Prince of Wales takes an income from the charity he set up to help the young?"
No that's not what I am suggesting. Read the narrative!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources.Are you suggesting that HRH The Prince of Wales takes an income from the charity he set up to help the young?No that's not what I am suggesting. Read the narrative!"
I've read the narrative, and its the standard inaccurate and just plain wrong mudslinging spread by envious republicans in order to damage our royal family.

And in the usual way when pulled up on fact you then deny what you have already said.

Rather than coming up with all this shit to justify your political aims why dont you grow a pair and say "I want to remove the monarchy by any means and replace it with a politician".

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"It can't be much of a life, waiting around for your mother to die."

Well, he can hardly use the car crash in a Parisian underpass, 'guise' again, can he?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aveandSue1Couple
over a year ago

Doncaster

Any guy who'd rather go to bed with Camilla than Diana is obviously not the full shilling.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

Any guy who'd rather go to bed with Camilla than Diana is obviously not the full shilling."

camilla, for all her shortcomings, is still alive.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Any guy who'd rather go to bed with Camilla than Diana is obviously not the full shilling.

camilla, for all her shortcomings, is still alive."

that, my friend is very questionable!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Love the royals

God bless great britain!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Love the royals

God bless great britain!"

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Just one - in an exhaustive list of parasites!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Just one - in an exhaustive list of parasites! "

mmm jealous are we.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If I too were an inbred leech - maybe so!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources.Are you suggesting that HRH The Prince of Wales takes an income from the charity he set up to help the young?No that's not what I am suggesting. Read the narrative!I've read the narrative, and its the standard inaccurate and just plain wrong mudslinging spread by envious republicans in order to damage our royal family.

And in the usual way when pulled up on fact you then deny what you have already said.

Rather than coming up with all this shit to justify your political aims why dont you grow a pair and say "I want to remove the monarchy by any means and replace it with a politician". "

I would remove all of them and replace them with a house brick or a wire coat hanger. Something of some meaning and relevance to the majority of people in this country.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"still takes £19m from various sources of public and private money.Just a quick correction. The heir to the throne does not get any public money. Price Charles being the heir to the throne became the Duke of Cornwall at birth and all his income is from the Duchy. As soon as he becomes King that title will pass to William and his Royal income will stop and he will then live on the income from the duchy. I didn't say he gets money from the civil list. The charity receives funding from public and private sources.Are you suggesting that HRH The Prince of Wales takes an income from the charity he set up to help the young?No that's not what I am suggesting. Read the narrative!I've read the narrative, and its the standard inaccurate and just plain wrong mudslinging spread by envious republicans in order to damage our royal family.

And in the usual way when pulled up on fact you then deny what you have already said.

Rather than coming up with all this shit to justify your political aims why dont you grow a pair and say "I want to remove the monarchy by any means and replace it with a politician".

I would remove all of them and replace them with a house brick or a wire coat hanger. Something of some meaning and relevance to the majority of people in this country."

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"..............

I would remove all of them and replace them with a house brick or a wire coat hanger. Something of some meaning and relevance to the majority of people in this country."

Or, as is popular on Not the Nine o'Clock News, a packet of lard.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Aaaaaaaagh - they just don't make them like they used too!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Don't mention him being best friend with Savile either.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I feel kinda sorry for him. His whole life he has been spent in waiting for a role i very much doubt he will ever take up. I always think he's very troubled. Big cuddle here for him ....if he wants it...lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Don't mention him being best friend with Savile either."

Now then now then uuah uuah uugh!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By *illwill69uMan
over a year ago

moston

Anyone notice that the OP is no longer on the site?

Guess that rather than growing a pair of balls and being honest about his agenda he has just slithered back under his stone!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top