FabSwingers.com mobile

Join us FREE, we're FREE to use

Web's largest swingers site since 2006.

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

JFK

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Do you think Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No someone else planned it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

why, what had he done that was soo bad he had to be publicly assassinated??

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"why, what had he done that was soo bad he had to be publicly assassinated?? "

Who knows they dont tell you everything.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Do you think Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone?"
No. I don't think he did, but there will be speculation as long as people can make a buck or two about it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

interesting theory, not so much the cover up of his murder but the cover up of what he had done to deserve it!! Blimy...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It was colenel mustard in the billiard room

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Of course he didn't act alone, Kevin Costner was in that movie too lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There was a JFK thread the other day so I've copied and pasted my reply from that here..

I believe Oswald was part of the assassination but I don't believe he was a lone gunman. I'm a trained marksman and given the rifle he used, number of shots fired, number of shots on target, the fact that the scope he had fitted to the rifle was defective/poorly doped, the target was moving and he was shooting at a downward angle suggest to me he was either: A) an incredible marksman B) extremely lucky C) not the only shooter.

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *RYBBWCouple
over a year ago

Leeds.


"There was a JFK thread the other day so I've copied and pasted my reply from that here..

I believe Oswald was part of the assassination but I don't believe he was a lone gunman. I'm a trained marksman and given the rifle he used, number of shots fired, number of shots on target, the fact that the scope he had fitted to the rifle was defective/poorly doped, the target was moving and he was shooting at a downward angle suggest to me he was either: A) an incredible marksman B) extremely lucky C) not the only shooter.

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though..."

We were heavily criticised and ridiculed for posting our opinion on this in the other thread, but we stand by our opinion.

We believe the shot that actually killed Kennedy was fired from the front. Why ? At the time the fatal shot was fired Kennedy is seen sitting back in his seat leaning to his left (toward his wife). When the bullet hits Kennedy's head is forced backwards with the impact of the bullet. Had the fatal shot been from behind (allegedly Oswald) Kennedy's head would have been pushed forward. It's common physics.

So we don't think Oswald was a lone gunman, if he was even involved at all.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Short of me looking rather fetching in a skirt if seen in bad light from a funny angle with your eyes half shut, I've not known a secret be kept for very long at all. If there was a conspiracy someone would have talked.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Just make anyone who knows disappear. Just look at the moon landings!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"......

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though..."

I had assumed the shot had been taken from behind so that (almost) everyone was looking in the wrong direction.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a JFK thread the other day so I've copied and pasted my reply from that here..

I believe Oswald was part of the assassination but I don't believe he was a lone gunman. I'm a trained marksman and given the rifle he used, number of shots fired, number of shots on target, the fact that the scope he had fitted to the rifle was defective/poorly doped, the target was moving and he was shooting at a downward angle suggest to me he was either: A) an incredible marksman B) extremely lucky C) not the only shooter.

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

We were heavily criticised and ridiculed for posting our opinion on this in the other thread, but we stand by our opinion.

We believe the shot that actually killed Kennedy was fired from the front. Why ? At the time the fatal shot was fired Kennedy is seen sitting back in his seat leaning to his left (toward his wife). When the bullet hits Kennedy's head is forced backwards with the impact of the bullet. Had the fatal shot been from behind (allegedly Oswald) Kennedy's head would have been pushed forward. It's common physics.

So we don't think Oswald was a lone gunman, if he was even involved at all."

Actually its not as simple as that. A bullet dumps a huge amount of kinetic energy into whatever it hits, this causes cavitation within the target. Head shots are particularly difficult to ascertain where the shot has come from because the brain is inside the skull and the effects of cavitation combined with the brain being encased in the skull causes an almost explosive effect. It's perfectly possible that the shot did actually come from behind. The only way to be sure would have been to examine the brain, which was missing from the official autopsy, so we'll never know.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"......

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

I had assumed the shot had been taken from behind so that (almost) everyone was looking in the wrong direction."

Everyone would still have been watching the president regardless of where the shot came from.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"......

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

I had assumed the shot had been taken from behind so that (almost) everyone was looking in the wrong direction.

Everyone would still have been watching the president regardless of where the shot came from.

"

I doubt the President was planning to shoot anyone.

Those tasked with his protection tend to look forward and to the sides. The attitude seems to be that once you've passed any point on the route, the threat from that point has gone.

Foolish even at the time yet, if you watch motorcades, it still works that way.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

Of course the shot was improved after the body guards were told to get off the car...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Isn't there a new (well backed up) theory that the kill shot was a fed agent that fell over and discharged his weapon for the unluckiest shot ever that hit JFK?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Am i alone in not giving a shite its all so long ago.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lubPartyPeepsCouple
over a year ago

London

No, and I don't even think he fired the rifle.

it's already been proven that there were about six rounds fired.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Isn't there a new (well backed up) theory that the kill shot was a fed agent that fell over and discharged his weapon for the unluckiest shot ever that hit JFK?"

The smoking gun

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Am i alone in not giving a shite its all so long ago."

Oh come on! We all love a good cover up!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a JFK thread the other day so I've copied and pasted my reply from that here..

I believe Oswald was part of the assassination but I don't believe he was a lone gunman. I'm a trained marksman and given the rifle he used, number of shots fired, number of shots on target, the fact that the scope he had fitted to the rifle was defective/poorly doped, the target was moving and he was shooting at a downward angle suggest to me he was either: A) an incredible marksman B) extremely lucky C) not the only shooter.

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

We were heavily criticised and ridiculed for posting our opinion on this in the other thread, but we stand by our opinion.

We believe the shot that actually killed Kennedy was fired from the front. Why ? At the time the fatal shot was fired Kennedy is seen sitting back in his seat leaning to his left (toward his wife). When the bullet hits Kennedy's head is forced backwards with the impact of the bullet. Had the fatal shot been from behind (allegedly Oswald) Kennedy's head would have been pushed forward. It's common physics.

So we don't think Oswald was a lone gunman, if he was even involved at all."

It has been proven that a shot from the rear could make the head go back.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Oh come on! We all love a good cover up!"

I don't love a cover up , I like a slow striptease

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"There was a JFK thread the other day so I've copied and pasted my reply from that here..

I believe Oswald was part of the assassination but I don't believe he was a lone gunman. I'm a trained marksman and given the rifle he used, number of shots fired, number of shots on target, the fact that the scope he had fitted to the rifle was defective/poorly doped, the target was moving and he was shooting at a downward angle suggest to me he was either: A) an incredible marksman B) extremely lucky C) not the only shooter.

Given his position in the book repository he picked the worst shot he possibly could anyway. Any marksman who knows what they're doing would have taken the shot as the motorcade was approaching, making the deflection far easier to quickly calculate.

That being said, he could have just been lucky, I can't see it though...

We were heavily criticised and ridiculed for posting our opinion on this in the other thread, but we stand by our opinion.

We believe the shot that actually killed Kennedy was fired from the front. Why ? At the time the fatal shot was fired Kennedy is seen sitting back in his seat leaning to his left (toward his wife). When the bullet hits Kennedy's head is forced backwards with the impact of the bullet. Had the fatal shot been from behind (allegedly Oswald) Kennedy's head would have been pushed forward. It's common physics.

So we don't think Oswald was a lone gunman, if he was even involved at all.

It has been proven that a shot from the rear could make the head go back. "

This is true, given the nature of headshots. Cavitation+high water content of the brain+enclosure by the skull can create some very strange and unexpected results. It's possible that there was enough force from the exit wound to force his head backwards. If you watch the video of the assassination the kill shot is pretty explosive.

Having said that, the shots could easily have come from the front too, I guess we'll never know as the brain would have given the answers but it was missing...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Anyone else watching on ITV?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

you can play the game, JFK reloaded, its a free simulation

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Im left uninformed and unfulfilled,I know no more than did as an 8 yr old when it first fascinated me

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

No I don't think he was.

Watch the Zappruder (sp) enough times and You see the bullet hit him in the face."Back and to the left"

Anymore seen Bill Hicks on this?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There are so many groups and individuals who felt that they had been screwed by the kennedys it is almost impossible to know who was involved. I dont believe there was a single plot against jfk but that a number of groups who probably didnt know all of the others involved, bit like the cell system used by terrorist groups.

and lets face it with the public feeling on jfk i dont see anyone admitting being involved.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Perhaps I haven't been paying attention, but I never understood how Oswald was identified as JFK's shooter, as the former was only apprehended by officer Tippit because Oswald matched the description that was put out FIFTEEN minutes after the shooting*. Oswald subsequently shot Tippit.

That was the only murder he was charged with at the time. Jack Ruby shot Oswald before the latter could be tried in court.

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Tippit Where the hell did they get that incredibly precise description of Oswald from?!

Something is very smelly in the State of Denmark.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

If you were to attach probabilities to each of the events that happened and represented that into an accumulator bet it would be a very unlikely event to occur -so it must have involved a great deal oif organising with all the parties possibly involved . I still think it was the CIA - JFK probably became an uncontrollable risk to national security and had to be removed

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago

Masked and Distant

Aoparently the first episode if Dr Who was aired on the BBC the same day.

Perhaps that was a cover up and the UK government really had developed time and space travel.

and it was the daleks that did it.

The whole Dr Who series us just a cover up, anyone reporting they hsd seen a dalek in Dallas was told they were confused and that they were really watching a new scifi programme.

Conspiracy theory no. 1743(b)

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"No I don't think he was.

Watch the Zappruder (sp) enough times and You see the bullet hit him in the face."Back and to the left"

Anymore seen Bill Hicks on this?"

If you watch it frame by frame its really obvious that the last shot 100% comes from the rear. I watched one show where they claim that the fatal shot was accidentally fired from an AR15 by a secret service agent. I was beginning to think it was plausible until they said that it was loaded with explosive fragible ammunition.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Jackie Kennedy kept in touch with Officer Tippetts widow for years afterwards.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I also seen that TV program and it looked to me that the fatal shot was accidentally fired from an AR15 inside the following car by a secret service agent so then there had to do a massive cover up but still its a bit fishy how it all want down

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I also seen that TV program and it looked to me that the fatal shot was accidentally fired from an AR15 inside the following car by a secret service agent so then there had to do a massive cover up but still its a bit fishy how it all want down "

This but that would have to be the unluckiest sequence of events in the world

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I also seen that TV program and it looked to me that the fatal shot was accidentally fired from an AR15 inside the following car by a secret service agent so then there had to do a massive cover up but still its a bit fishy how it all want down

This but that would have to be the unluckiest sequence of events in the world "
oh yea I wonder what he said " oops "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I think they used Oswald to cover up the secret service shot

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I think they used Oswald to cover up the secret service shot "
true then having him shot dead a couple of days later

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"I also seen that TV program and it looked to me that the fatal shot was accidentally fired from an AR15 inside the following car by a secret service agent so then there had to do a massive cover up but still its a bit fishy how it all want down "

It was almost convincing until they got into ballistics and the type of ammunition the rifle was loaded with, the 'experts' also claimed that the AR15 is a fully automatic weapon, which it isn't.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Wasn't it stated that there was a "probable conspiracy" in 1974 by a house select committee on his assasination?

I think there was 1 person involved, therefore by definition it's a conspiracy.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Conspiracy Theory W/ Jesse Ventura: JFK Assassination. look this up on YouTube very good documentry

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Wasn't it stated that there was a "probable conspiracy" in 1974 by a house select committee on his assasination?

I think there was 1 person involved, therefore by definition it's a conspiracy. "

There should be a greater than sign in front of the 1 there. Always preview your posts kids!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top