FabSwingers.com forum: So what if it's shallow?

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would think that is how it should be ...

I won't lay down with someone unless I find them attractive - hardly shallow

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

No it seems perfectly reasonable to me!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *Ryan-Man
over a year ago

In Your Bush

Nope

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

No. Perfectly reasonable to me.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

beauty is as close as a light switch!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

no we all have our like and dislikes after all.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *Ryan-Man
over a year ago

In Your Bush

"I would think that is how it should be ...

I won't lay down with someone unless I find them attractive - hardly shallow

No that would be deep

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riendly foeWoman
over a year ago

In a crisp poke on the A814

Im not shallow.....

But I will never shag someone I consider to be an ugly fkr

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Although in most part I stick to matching my preference,,,,, I don't necessarily need to fancy someone to shag/have some sort of sex with them!!!!

Is that shallow?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *rightonsteveMan
over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

No it seems perfectly reasonable to me!

JINX!!!!!

That means you have to quack like a duck and spin round 3 times.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ames blackMan
over a year ago

Middlesbrough

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Who said it is shallow?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *iewMan
Forum Mod
over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

yes, it is an outrage.

this site is for the sexually liberated and that is penetrate any orifice that is warm and moist and belonging to a human

anyone who wants more words than 'get your gums around this beauty' is just plain fucking needy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ucsparkMan
over a year ago

dudley

"I would think that is how it should be ...

I won't lay down with someone unless I find them attractive - hardly shallow

Is bending over out of the question

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *riendly foeWoman
over a year ago

In a crisp poke on the A814

Dont need to fancy someone to shag them...

But I would prefer my skin not to crawl when they touched me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Not shallow at all

what do they want....you being honest or a sad old pity shag....

I prefer the "shagging those you fancy"

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Not shallow at all.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"yes, it is an outrage.

this site is for the sexually liberated and that is penetrate any orifice that is warm and moist and belonging to a human

anyone who wants more words than 'get your gums around this beauty' is just plain fucking needy."

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ucsparkMan
over a year ago

dudley

"yes, it is an outrage.

this site is for the sexually liberated and that is penetrate any orifice that is warm and moist and belonging to a human

anyone who wants more words than 'get your gums around this beauty' is just plain fucking needy."

God that made me laugh

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

That's not shallow I could only and will only ever play with someone I am attracted to just because I might get on with someone or be looking for the same things it does not mean I will find that person attractive I am all about someone's face and I have to like it to want to have sex with that person.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Dont need to fancy someone to shag them...

But I would prefer my skin not to crawl when they touched me

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Who said it is shallow?"

It comes up a lot in various threads.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *he_original_poloWoman
over a year ago

a Primark shoebox in Leicester

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

It depends if it a man or woman asking.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

on the flip side I wouldn't want someone I met to shag me if they didn't find me attractive just because they was afraid of being branded shallow if they turned me down, I do have some pride

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *r Mahogany70Man
over a year ago

Leicester

"Although in most part I stick to matching my preference,,,,, I don't necessarily need to fancy someone to shag/have some sort of sex with them!!!!

Is that shallow?

No, not shallow. Just not fussy

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

No, not shallow.

I can fancy someone I don't find physically attractive, sometimes, for other reasons, (Grisom from CSI is an example).

However not being attracted to someone based on their looks is simply how it is. I don't consciously decide who I fancy.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"on the flip side I wouldn't want someone I met to shag me if they didn't find me attractive just because they was afraid of being branded shallow if they turned me down, I do have some pride

this

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Define shallow ? For me a shallow person is in this for their needs only but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Basically attraction is all part of the game and we should all choose suitable meets,not just any old meet.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I admit I'm very shallow

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I'm deep

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *B9 QueenWoman
over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Those who use the 'shallow' argument are simply bitter because they can't shag all those they would like to shag. They, essentially, are selfish in that they do not consider the feelings/attractions of a potential partner. If you are on here to shag then you should shag them - otherwise you are shallow - rather than discerning.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Good point.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

There is more to a book than just a pretty dust cover, however, it is the dust cover that attracts me to read the book in the first place.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

Having a relationship based on someone's looks probably would be a bit shallow, but for sex, then, no, most definitely not!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Having a relationship based on someone's looks probably would be a bit shallow, but for sex, then, no, most definitely not!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

'Shallow' is the cry of the rejected.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Why do people ask questions to which they already know the answer?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *umpleteazerWoman
over a year ago

Flintshire

"There is more to a book than just a pretty dust cover, however, it is the dust cover that attracts me to read the book in the first place.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *umpleteazerWoman
over a year ago

Flintshire

"There is more to a book than just a pretty dust cover, however, it is the dust cover that attracts me to read the book in the first place.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *uby0000Woman
over a year ago

hertfordshire

nowt wrong with going by looks ive been swayed many a time by a handsome bloke

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Attraction important... But, have you ever fucked someone because you get on well with them? I have, and it was incredible because we were so relaxed with each other... But I prefer hot girls haha

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"So it's apparently shallow if you don't fancy someone. Basing your preferences on looks is shallow.

Why? If I don't fancy someone I just don't. I might like them as a person, I just don't want to shag them.

Is that really so bad?

Why do people ask questions to which they already know the answer? "

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's very shallow, but I think it's going to be ok, if you come round to mine, have sex with me, and post a verification then people will no longer say you are shallow I don't just do this for any one, but for you as you are in need, I will be unselfish as long as you bring some kind of pudding lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago

"It's very shallow, but I think it's going to be ok, if you come round to mine, have sex with me, and post a verification then people will no longer say you are shallow I don't just do this for any one, but for you as you are in need, I will be unselfish as long as you bring some kind of pudding lol"

I was getting my sexiest lingerie on and heading out the door. But then I saw it....

I don't share pudding!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I was getting my sexiest lingerie on and heading out the door. But then I saw it....

I don't share pudding!

Is it shallow that I wouldn't sleep with someone who won't share pudding? Lol

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

To be shallow would be to make a judgement on another person based on their looks if you don't look beyond their appearance. Just because you need to find someone attractive before you will sleep with them does not make you shallow..

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

"Having a relationship based on someone's looks probably would be a bit shallow, but for sex, then, no, most definitely not!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread