Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Staying out of this one "hmmmm gota be a story there somewhere  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Staying out of this one
hmmmm gota be a story there somewhere "I think we all have a horror story to tell I know I have. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Staying out of this one
hmmmm gota be a story there somewhere
I think we all have a horror story to tell I know I have."have very true  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Staying out of this one
hmmmm gota be a story there somewhere
I think we all have a horror story to tell I know I have."Ain't that the truth!! After the horror story I tried my best for my kids to have some contact with their dad.. but he wouldn't accept any way that would be safe for me! I truly believe it isn't any parents right to have control or access to their kids. It's the kids that have the right to get to know their parents.. for better or worse, but in a safe environment. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. " Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bravo and well said! one side always forgets about what is best for the child and instead uses the child to hurt or inconvenience the othef parent. it is just evil if ya ask me." Big difference between evil and selfish. I have experienced evil (think Fred west does occult, minus murders). Feel relieved now? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bravo and well said! one side always forgets about what is best for the child and instead uses the child to hurt or inconvenience the othef parent. it is just evil if ya ask me. Big difference between evil and selfish. I have experienced evil (think Fred west does occult, minus murders). Feel relieved now? "It is evil if it is premeditated . | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. " No drama then  .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. " without going into too much detail the first day I walked into court with my ex, she hadbt bothered with the child and made no effort,my barrister told me that expect to lose custody today as it doesn't matter what ur ex is like or done the judges seem to favour the mums,I was heartbroken but I never stopped fighting for what I believed in and never gave up on what I thought was best my lad, and mine in the end was a success story 
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?"I'll just say that my father had to move out because he was an asshole to my mum. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. without going into too much detail the first day I walked into court with my ex, she hadbt bothered with the child and made no effort,my barrister told me that expect to lose custody today as it doesn't matter what ur ex is like or done the judges seem to favour the mums,I was heartbroken but I never stopped fighting for what I believed in and never gave up on what I thought was best my lad, and mine in the end was a success story
"Didn't you post your victory fairly recently? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. without going into too much detail the first day I walked into court with my ex, she hadbt bothered with the child and made no effort,my barrister told me that expect to lose custody today as it doesn't matter what ur ex is like or done the judges seem to favour the mums,I was heartbroken but I never stopped fighting for what I believed in and never gave up on what I thought was best my lad, and mine in the end was a success story
Didn't you post your victory fairly recently? "no dont think so as I don't really talk about it, bad times, think it was another guy to be honest | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?"It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. without going into too much detail the first day I walked into court with my ex, she hadbt bothered with the child and made no effort,my barrister told me that expect to lose custody today as it doesn't matter what ur ex is like or done the judges seem to favour the mums,I was heartbroken but I never stopped fighting for what I believed in and never gave up on what I thought was best my lad, and mine in the end was a success story
"I am extremely pleased to say my two wonderful children have an excellent relationship with their father and things are as good as can be expected with their mum too. The acrimonious family law system in this country has got a lot to answer for though. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children. "very true, people need to put the bitterness of the break up behind them or atleast not use the children in it, too many do and its the children who lose out, such a shame sometimes | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. without going into too much detail the first day I walked into court with my ex, she hadbt bothered with the child and made no effort,my barrister told me that expect to lose custody today as it doesn't matter what ur ex is like or done the judges seem to favour the mums,I was heartbroken but I never stopped fighting for what I believed in and never gave up on what I thought was best my lad, and mine in the end was a success story
" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children.
"Children spell love T.I.M.E. And whist perhaps not 100% this what the vast majority of dads want to give. For the good of children everywhere It's about time the system stopped working against them | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. " Where does PC come in to this? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children.
Children spell love T.I.M.E. And whist perhaps not 100% this what the vast majority of dads want to give. For the good of children everywhere It's about time the system stopped working against them "If you have ever had to deal with the family court system you will have hit the gender bias that is built in. Mum would have to strangle the kids in front of the judge for anything to happen. The CRAPCAS person still wouldn't see it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that" Without knowing the full circumstances when I see a post like that, with the acromony and bitterness so transparent towards your ex, I can't help but think that there are 2 sides to every story. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children.
Children spell love T.I.M.E. And whist perhaps not 100% this what the vast majority of dads want to give. For the good of children everywhere It's about time the system stopped working against them
If you have ever had to deal with the family court system you will have hit the gender bias that is built in. Mum would have to strangle the kids in front of the judge for anything to happen. The CRAPCAS person still wouldn't see it."CRAPCAS are the biggest waste of space | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this?" Feminism. A few snotty middle-class Guardian reading, radio 4 listening people telling everyone else how they should live their lives. And unfortunately for children they've got the power to do so atm. Ann Oakley is 30 - 40 years out of date. For the good of children it's about time they dropped their crusade in favour of common sense. For further reinforcement of this see OP's post on judge CAFCASS (more like KAFKASS). Fortuitously my children's CO wasn't too bad. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that" Bloody hell 
I had exactly the same thoughts about my ex last week.
Don't know why they do it but grit your teeth, absorb it all and do it for the kids.
In the long run they'll see her for what she is just as mine have.
Good luck pal | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that Without knowing the full circumstances when I see a post like that, with the acromony and bitterness so transparent towards your ex, I can't help but think that there are 2 sides to every story. " I am very angry and very bitter because she is using my son to exact revenge. And that is evil. I can take being abused etc but he doesn't deserve it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. Absolutely. It's the blindness to the harm they are doing. It's child abuse under another name. No drama then .
From blueeyes post one cannot tell whether mum was cause of no dad or dad was cause, or if both were at fault. So how can you agree then label it abuse?
It doesn't matter whose "fault" the separation was. The only thing that matters are children.
Children spell love T.I.M.E. And whist perhaps not 100% this what the vast majority of dads want to give. For the good of children everywhere It's about time the system stopped working against them
If you have ever had to deal with the family court system you will have hit the gender bias that is built in. Mum would have to strangle the kids in front of the judge for anything to happen. The CRAPCAS person still wouldn't see it.
CRAPCAS are the biggest waste of space "When their mum was saying their dad should only see them in a contact centre my CO's first words to me were: 'there's absolutely no reason why any time you spend with you children should be supervised' it went a long way at the time. So I have mixed feeling about CAFCASS. One of the biggest problems is the PC gone mad system encourages mums to say such things. More generally and digressing slightly as this is an adult site I fear the moderates may step in on such a children focused thread. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that Without knowing the full circumstances when I see a post like that, with the acromony and bitterness so transparent towards your ex, I can't help but think that there are 2 sides to every story. " The only side is the side of the children and it is part of UN human rights that every child is entitled to a full and meaningful relationship with both its parents. And still some people insist in defending the indefensible!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"this is the lounge forum tho so I always thought anything in general can be discussed? maybe im wrong??? " I agree but They can get a bit shirty about mentioning children though for, and I quote: 'obvious reasons'. And maybe I should stop criticising the moderators? I find it difficult not to contribute to such a thread though because I cannot stand ideally by and let such injustice go unchallenged | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Couldn't of put it better myself, luckily for me my ex got to the point she had no choice but to let the kids live with me as she got to the stage where she couldn't look after them. I however take the kids to seey ex as often as I can and don't scrimp on the length of visits. Years I fought her for some kind of access drove me insane!!! " Now you're a good man!! It's about the kids rights.. not the parents 3 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"this is the lounge forum tho so I always thought anything in general can be discussed? maybe im wrong??? " I bloody well hope you're not wrong!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse." wow thats terrible | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed if a parent wants nothing to do with the child/ren the custodial parent will rant and rave wanting the absent parent to step up. Conversely, a parent wanting to be a presence in the child/ren life is thwarted st every turn. My ex husband and I loved our children more than we disliked each other. I only moved four miles away so he could pick our daughter up from school and cook her tea like he always did. Every weekend the girls would stay with him, in fact they could come and go as they pleased. We never missed an open evening together, college visit or graduation. When our youngest was studying in Derby we travelled down together. When our eldest moved to Portsmouth for work we travelled down together. August bank holiday we spend together with our daughters and son-in-laws by the coast. This year would have been our 32nd wedding anniversary. We loved each other once, he fathered my four children and we vowed to make sure they never felt anything but love from both of us. Think we did a pretty good job, and still have love and respect for each other. I daresay my ex has bitten his tongue over the years,I know I have, but it has always been about our kids happiness: as simple as that. I can't imagine using my kids as a tool to spite their dad."
Got my two's parent evenings on Tuesday. As usual all four of us will be there. There are definitely times when separated parents should put aside their differences and you, and your ex, seem to have done an excellent job. What a shame it can't always be like this | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this?" I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing... | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that" It's like I wrote this myself...!! Thank you .... I now know I'm not not alone & somebody out there feels exactly as I do in knowing the pure frustration, anger,feeling of helplessness and pain that is involved in being in this situation. I wish you well my friend and remember never allow yourself to sink to their level..... Be strong | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Think we did a pretty good job, and still have love and respect for each other. I daresay my ex has bitten his tongue over the years,I know I have, but it has always been about our kids happiness: as simple as that. I can't imagine using my kids as a tool to spite their dad."
"The good (ex) the bad (ex) and the ugly"... I really don't need to complete the trio with the ugly | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Think we did a pretty good job, and still have love and respect for each other. I daresay my ex has bitten his tongue over the years,I know I have, but it has always been about our kids happiness: as simple as that. I can't imagine using my kids as a tool to spite their dad.
"The good (ex) the bad (ex) and the ugly"... I really don't need to complete the trio with the ugly "  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing... "Please refer to my previous posts | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've noticed if a parent wants nothing to do with the child/ren the custodial parent will rant and rave wanting the absent parent to step up. Conversely, a parent wanting to be a presence in the child/ren life is thwarted st every turn. My ex husband and I loved our children more than we disliked each other. I only moved four miles away so he could pick our daughter up from school and cook her tea like he always did. Every weekend the girls would stay with him, in fact they could come and go as they pleased. We never missed an open evening together, college visit or graduation. When our youngest was studying in Derby we travelled down together. When our eldest moved to Portsmouth for work we travelled down together. August bank holiday we spend together with our daughters and son-in-laws by the coast. This year would have been our 32nd wedding anniversary. We loved each other once, he fathered my four children and we vowed to make sure they never felt anything but love from both of us. Think we did a pretty good job, and still have love and respect for each other. I daresay my ex has bitten his tongue over the years,I know I have, but it has always been about our kids happiness: as simple as that. I can't imagine using my kids as a tool to spite their dad." My mum and dad were the same.. good on both of you xxx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that It's like I wrote this myself...!! Thank you .... I now know I'm not not alone & somebody out there feels exactly as I do in knowing the pure frustration, anger,feeling of helplessness and pain that is involved in being in this situation. I wish you well my friend and remember never allow yourself to sink to their level..... Be strong "What I'm glad to see in this post is that it is not Mums against Dads.. its parents for children.. refreshing xx | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that It's like I wrote this myself...!! Thank you .... I now know I'm not not alone & somebody out there feels exactly as I do in knowing the pure frustration, anger,feeling of helplessness and pain that is involved in being in this situation. I wish you well my friend and remember never allow yourself to sink to their level..... Be strong
What I'm glad to see in this post is that it is not Mums against Dads.. its parents for children.. refreshing xx"For sure | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and controloraccess to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that Without knowing the full circumstances when I see a post like that, with the acromony and bitterness so transparent towards your ex, I can't help but think that there are 2 sides to every story. The only side is the side of the children and it is part of UN human rights that every child is entitled to a full and meaningful relationship with both its parents. And still some people insist in defending the indefensible!! " I just find it telling that the opening rant merely focuses on what a bad person the ex is rather than expressing anger or sadness at a situation that denies you time with your child. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts "Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and controloraccess to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that Without knowing the full circumstances when I see a post like that, with the acromony and bitterness so transparent towards your ex, I can't help but think that there are 2 sides to every story. The only side is the side of the children and it is part of UN human rights that every child is entitled to a full and meaningful relationship with both its parents. And still some people insist in defending the indefensible!! I just find it telling that the opening rant merely focuses on what a bad person the ex is rather than expressing anger or sadness at a situation that denies you time with your child. " sometimes you do rant and say stuff, doesnt mean the op isnt trying his best have you experienced this type of situation yourself to give us ur experience of it,? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts
Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC"I fail to see how you know what I do and don't understand. You really do need some explanation, please | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse." For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. " PR means jack. Being invited to parents evenings is about it. You're absolutely correct. Dads are the most discriminated against minority group in society atm. As you so rightly point out they have NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER! I reiterate the PC gone mad brigade need to loosen their controlling fascistic grip on the situation regarding children post separation. Things will change but as with everything else in this dogma ridden country far too late. The struggle carries on. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. " I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. " I seen this and thought this will help me, but my barrister told me straight away dont believe in this fathers have rights thing, the courts are still in the dark ages | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. " The fact that such a law (as wishy-washy as it is) should need to passed demonstrates how crazy the whole situation is. It should be the given right of each child that both its parents automatically have EQUAL rights. Unless their is very good reason to show it should be otherwise | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. I seen this and thought this will help me, but my barrister told me straight away dont believe in this fathers have rights thing, the courts are still in the dark ages " or really should be With judges scared to death to upset the apple cart and thus release the wrath of the PC gone mad brigade and put their comfortable fat retirement pension at risk | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PC Brigade (Noun) (Abbr. Political Correctness Brigade) (Chiefly British) A smug, knee-jerk, ill-defined catch-all word that is overused by closet racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots to describe anyone who dares to challenge their hate speech with the values of respect and common human decency. "Yes but the PC gone mad brigade are far more authoritarian, fascistic and controlling than the types of power they claim to oppose. Thinking their distorted take on 'how we should all live our lives' can remain unchallenged simply by throwing in the odd knee-jerk reaction phase like 'homophobic, bigot or racist. Allowing children to be taken away from loving fathers an not being allowed to see them for no reason whatsoever than mum doesn't want them to is a scandal of their doing which we should all be ashamed of | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts
Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC
I fail to see how you know what I do and don't understand. You really do need some explanation, please "AS you've used both terms totally out of context I thinl my assumption that you don't understand the terms is fair emough | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts
Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC
I fail to see how you know what I do and don't understand. You really do need some explanation, please
AS you've used both terms totally out of context I thinl my assumption that you don't understand the terms is fair emough
"never try and be clever if you cant even spell it properly haha | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PC Brigade (Noun) (Abbr. Political Correctness Brigade) (Chiefly British) A smug, knee-jerk, ill-defined catch-all word that is overused by closet racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots to describe anyone who dares to challenge their hate speech with the values of respect and common human decency.
Yes but the PC gone mad brigade are far more authoritarian, fascistic and controlling than the types of power they claim to oppose. Thinking their distorted take on 'how we should all live our lives' can remain unchallenged simply by throwing in the odd knee-jerk reaction phase like 'homophobic, bigot or racist.
Allowing children to be taken away from loving fathers an not being allowed to see them for no reason whatsoever than mum doesn't want them to is a scandal of their doing which we should all be ashamed of "What exactly is fascistic? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PC Brigade (Noun) (Abbr. Political Correctness Brigade) (Chiefly British) A smug, knee-jerk, ill-defined catch-all word that is overused by closet racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots to describe anyone who dares to challenge their hate speech with the values of respect and common human decency.
Yes but the PC gone mad brigade are far more authoritarian, fascistic and controlling than the types of power they claim to oppose. Thinking their distorted take on 'how we should all live our lives' can remain unchallenged simply by throwing in the odd knee-jerk reaction phase like 'homophobic, bigot or racist.
Allowing children to be taken away from loving fathers an not being allowed to see them for no reason whatsoever than mum doesn't want them to is a scandal of their doing which we should all be ashamed of
What exactly is fascistic? "Sure you should have a dictionary somewhere? What's the point of nip-picking one word out of a clear cut case of PCness creating gross inequality? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"PC Brigade (Noun) (Abbr. Political Correctness Brigade) (Chiefly British) A smug, knee-jerk, ill-defined catch-all word that is overused by closet racists, sexists, homophobes and bigots to describe anyone who dares to challenge their hate speech with the values of respect and common human decency.
Yes but the PC gone mad brigade are far more authoritarian, fascistic and controlling than the types of power they claim to oppose. Thinking their distorted take on 'how we should all live our lives' can remain unchallenged simply by throwing in the odd knee-jerk reaction phase like 'homophobic, bigot or racist.
Allowing children to be taken away from loving fathers an not being allowed to see them for no reason whatsoever than mum doesn't want them to is a scandal of their doing which we should all be ashamed of
What exactly is fascistic?
Sure you should have a dictionary somewhere? What's the point of nip-picking one word out of a clear cut case of PCness creating gross inequality? "Plenty of synonyms via a few clicks of your thesaurus: totalitarian, despotic, undemocratic. The latter perhaps being the closest to the way the PC gone mad brigade operates in our country today | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure a swinging site is best place to discuss parenting skills" As others have said this is the lounge: the place for general chit-chat. This was in response to me raising the issue that the moderators aren't always too happy about discussing children on a adult site | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. " Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. " go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!!" No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. " I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"This thread has made me realise how lucky I am my ex and I argued and sniped at each other for about three months but then got on with the job of raising our child all be it from different addresses but we did it and even though I say so my self we are doing a great job, the arguments have been replaced by communication and the sniping has been replaced by banter it's a pleasure to pick my daughter up and we ask how things are going in each others lives, that's the way it should be I think" Initial acrimony is pretty standard but time and the maturity of two adults singing from the same hymn sheet for their children's sake should be how we evolve from a broken relationship. Pain, fear, jealousy, spite and other emotions will prevent this. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong." Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ........ The judge will always favour the person who is being messed around as its in the best interests of the child" The judge will always have the best interest of the child on mind when making an order. It's almost inevitable one parent or the other wont see things in that light. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not sure a swinging site is best place to discuss parenting skills As others have said this is the lounge: the place for general chit-chat. This was in response to me raising the issue that the moderators aren't always too happy about discussing children on a adult site " If this was the case your thread you started about your child would have been taken off. Stop causing division where there isn't any and let people discuss what you did. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I hate when people use kids as weapons. You're only hurting the child. Growing up they need both parents. I had to grow up without a dad from 10 years old. Mum did what she could, but I needed a father figure to talk about man stuff to. " I wrote this on a previous thread and got attacked for being a believer of the Jeremy Kyle show.Good luck with this one. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...... Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. " Moving from the fact that most decisions seem to place the main responsibility for the child on the mother to "family courts are anti father" is a big leap. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? Feminism. A few snotty middle-class Guardian reading, radio 4 listening people telling everyone else how they should live their lives. And unfortunately for children they've got the power to do so atm. Ann Oakley is 30 - 40 years out of date. For the good of children it's about time they dropped their crusade in favour of common sense. For further reinforcement of this see OP's post on judge CAFCASS (more like KAFKASS). Fortuitously my children's CO wasn't too bad. " Not that you have a biased, bigotted _iewpoint at all. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"...... Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. Moving from the fact that most decisions seem to place the main responsibility for the child on the mother to "family courts are anti father" is a big leap." | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. " I'll second that for sure. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts
Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC" | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. " To them The worst mother is better than the best father. Hold on in there your children need you. You are and always will be their dad !! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I'll second that for sure. "I'd be upset if you didn't .
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. " There's really no throng of women interested in your parenting skills , your masculinity or fighting you for any feeble reason. We are not thick simply because we are politically active. I do know that generally insults come from those who wish to blame shift and abrogate any responsibility for the situation they find themselves in. I don't want you to stop insulting your partner , the courts or feminists. I feel you wouldn't handle the vision when the veil came down. Mind you ...... removing the veil could lead to something far more productive for you in getting your children back. The hatred you ooze really is sapping your strength. You just don't see it yet. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that" Going through the misery do feel your pain. Chin up guys & think of your little one | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" .........think of your little one "If only more people kept this at the forefront of their minds. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Please note. This is a rant. WTF is it that makes an ex think that they should monopolise and control access to a child? Where do they get the insane belief that what is best for mummy is automatically best for the child? Can't they park their anger for 10 minutes and think just what it is they are doing? It would appear not. FFS IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE CHILD. PARK YOUR *UCKING EGO YOU LOON thanks I feel better for that" I do sympathise with you however my ex committed the ultimate in usinv the child as a pawn by moving 5000 miles away after she said she was going away for a break......... Unfortunatey not all can behave like adults and keep tight lipped for the better of the child, not all men lack reasoning skills  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. To them The worst mother is better than the best father. Hold on in there your children need you. You are and always will be their dad !!" It is so much easier for people to blame the system than actually look at their own behaviour contributing to the battle between themselves and their exes. Of course I don't expect those blinkered to accept a little common sense even if I stress the word contributing. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. To them The worst mother is better than the best father. Hold on in there your children need you. You are and always will be their dad !! It is so much easier for people to blame the system than actually look at their own behaviour contributing to the battle between themselves and their exes. Of course I don't expect those blinkered to accept a little common sense even if I stress the word contributing. " Family Court was the best thing that happened for me, and I am the Father... the court was ONLY interested in the best outcome for my son. So the courts are not biased towards the mother in my experience. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? I wondered too, but as people use pc for every thing...
Please refer to my previous posts
Your previous explanation merely shows that you fail to understand the term feminism as well as the term PC "And five thumbs up make all the difference? Please, please some explaination! I fully understand feminism (s few snooty women telling trying to everyone how to live) and PC. Read some Nitzschia and Foucault. I like many others blaim the Frankfurt school | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. Simple test. Go to court as a father and demand to see your child. You will be told initially in a polite but legally correct way to f**k off. Try to exercise your right ( singular) and you will be arrested. Until the feminazi's get it in their thick ignorant heads that not all men are swines we are screwed. go to court and try and protect your daughter from more REAL abuse. Not some label bandied about by parents on the receiving end of others using the children as pawns!!!! No offence but you don't really seem to understand the issue being discussed. I guess in your world there is only one side to a coin. I'm sharing an actual experience where the legal system has bent over backwards to accommodate a father's rights of access over and above the safety of the child. You believe that every court in the land is biased towards the mother whereas I have evidence you are wrong. Look at the stats. Family courts are anti father. It really is that simple. There's really no throng of women interested in your parenting skills , your masculinity or fighting you for any feeble reason. We are not thick simply because we are politically active. I do know that generally insults come from those who wish to blame shift and abrogate any responsibility for the situation they find themselves in. I don't want you to stop insulting your partner , the courts or feminists. I feel you wouldn't handle the vision when the veil came down. Mind you ...... removing the veil could lead to something far more productive for you in getting your children back. The hatred you ooze really is sapping your strength. You just don't see it yet. " I've just realised I've missed you posting granny. So eloquently put. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? Feminism. A few snotty middle-class Guardian reading, radio 4 listening people telling everyone else how they should live their lives. And unfortunately for children they've got the power to do so atm. Ann Oakley is 30 - 40 years out of date. For the good of children it's about time they dropped their crusade in favour of common sense. For further reinforcement of this see OP's post on judge CAFCASS (more like KAFKASS). Fortuitously my children's CO wasn't too bad. Not that you have a biased, bigotted _iewpoint at all." Everything I have posted on this thread is for the benefit of children who are being denied a relationship with their father. Well done PCness. History will be the judge. Not a bunch of cyber bullies | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Barrister to mother of abused 3 year old says to her " mr x could be serving a life sentence for murder, he'd still have rights to see child". Barrister says to mother of said child - "what right have you to stop mr x seeing child he abused?" Be careful on what you label abuse. For the avoidance of doubt a father has NO rights to see his child. He has parental responsibility but NO rights. I quote: What are My Rights as a Father? You have rights as the father of your child if:If the child was born on or after December 1st 2003 and you are named on the Birth Certificate as the child’s birth father If a Parental Responsibility Agreement is signed If the birth certificate for the child held no father’s name but was later renewed to show yours If a Magistrate or Justice of the Peace (JP) at the Family Court has granted you parental responsibility or an Order Of Residency. Visiting My Child If you are named on the birth certificate as the father of the child, you have a legal right to see your children. The fact that such a law (as wishy-washy as it is) should need to passed demonstrates how crazy the whole situation is. It should be the given right of each child that both its parents automatically have EQUAL rights. Unless their is very good reason to show it should be otherwise " But the issue is one person's 'good reason' is often seen by the others as a vengeful vendetta. I don't know anything about the individual stories here and even if any person went into detail there would still only be one, biased, side of the story presented. Whilst I agree a child should be able to see both their parents the child's safety is equally, if not more, important. I hate seeing children used as a weapon in petty rows, but at the same time I wouldn't want a child put at risk just because of parental rights...if a parent wants to claim parental responsibility then they should be responsible!! (Note...That last bit is a little more personal and not linked to the OP or anyone else before the lynch mob take action!) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ........ The judge will always favour the person who is being messed around as its in the best interests of the child The judge will always have the best interest of the child on mind when making an order. It's almost inevitable one parent or the other wont see things in that light." The judge will always have his own interests in mind. It's called being human. And won't put his fat pension on the line by upsetting the PC gone mad brigade | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? Feminism. A few snotty middle-class Guardian reading, radio 4 listening people telling everyone else how they should live their lives. And unfortunately for children they've got the power to do so atm. Ann Oakley is 30 - 40 years out of date. For the good of children it's about time they dropped their crusade in favour of common sense. For further reinforcement of this see OP's post on judge CAFCASS (more like KAFKASS). Fortuitously my children's CO wasn't too bad. Not that you have a biased, bigotted _iewpoint at all. Everything I have posted on this thread is for the benefit of children who are being denied a relationship with their father. Well done PCness. History will be the judge. Not a bunch of cyber bullies " Cyber bullies ? Where ? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"i would never stop my ex seeing my wee girl. but off late he has only seen her 2 or 3 times in the past 4 months. lets her down last minuite. and its me has to deal wit the tears. " Know nothing of your circumstances (see I admit it) but the system doesn't make it easy for dads post separation. And great you're so good re. Contact. Your daughter will always appreciate you for it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Way people have been conditioned at this point in time I'm afraid. On the radio only yesterday a new government campaign (wow!) to involve young dads more coz atm they're invisible to the system. Things will swing more in favour of dads eventually coz ultimately that's what's best for the child. PC gone mad needs to have it's iron grip loosened somewhat first though. Where does PC come in to this? Feminism. A few snotty middle-class Guardian reading, radio 4 listening people telling everyone else how they should live their lives. And unfortunately for children they've got the power to do so atm. Ann Oakley is 30 - 40 years out of date. For the good of children it's about time they dropped their crusade in favour of common sense. For further reinforcement of this see OP's post on judge CAFCASS (more like KAFKASS). Fortuitously my children's CO wasn't too bad. Not that you have a biased, bigotted _iewpoint at all. Everything I have posted on this thread is for the benefit of children who are being denied a relationship with their father. Well done PCness. History will be the judge. Not a bunch of cyber bullies Cyber bullies ? Where ?" Right here. Right now | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"W Not a bunch of cyber bullies Cyber bullies ? Where ? Right here. Right now" don't start that again please as it caused mayhem last time. People disagreeing what you is not bullying. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter " Talking of bullies...this comment in his post really doesn't help his cause in my eyes: 'If you visit hell on our homes, don’t be surprised if angry parents visit yours.' That's a thinly veiled threat...not sure how that is mean to help his cause  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter Talking of bullies...this comment in his post really doesn't help his cause in my eyes: 'If you visit hell on our homes, don’t be surprised if angry parents visit yours.' That's a thinly veiled threat...not sure how that is mean to help his cause "Its not thinly veiled. It's clear and direct. F4J will stage protests out side judges houses. Playing by the rules doesn't work. Direct action does. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter Talking of bullies...this comment in his post really doesn't help his cause in my eyes: 'If you visit hell on our homes, don’t be surprised if angry parents visit yours.' That's a thinly veiled threat...not sure how that is mean to help his cause
Its not thinly veiled. It's clear and direct. F4J will stage protests out side judges houses. Playing by the rules doesn't work. Direct action does."And how does that help prove anything? A number of women get their way in the courts by claiming their ex is violent/aggressive...whether he is or he isn't. Taking a protest to a judges home is an act of aggression and so helps to prove these women right. Not only that...what about the children of said judges? Or does their safety and welfare not come into it? Two wrongs do not make a right and trying to bully judges into doing what F4J want will only hinder the cause further | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"............ Its not thinly veiled. It's clear and direct. F4J will stage protests out side judges houses. Playing by the rules doesn't work. Direct action does." Sitting outside judge's homes isn't the brightest idea. Other judges, the ones you might well be appearing before, don't like it. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter " Bless his little white cotton socks .
Oh that's another thread | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter " is that his definition of himself? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bravo and well said! one side always forgets about what is best for the child and instead uses the child to hurt or inconvenience the othef parent. it is just evil if ya ask me." sorry, sometimes its both sides that cant remember its whats best for the kids that should be remembered, not just one or the other parent. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"http://father4justice.wordpress.com/ If you want to know what the family courts are like towards dads...follow the link above. Matt O'connor is a freedom fighter is that his definition of himself?" Its actually what 1000's of dads think about him | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"............ Its not thinly veiled. It's clear and direct. F4J will stage protests out side judges houses. Playing by the rules doesn't work. Direct action does. Sitting outside judge's homes isn't the brightest idea. Other judges, the ones you might well be appearing before, don't like it." Well, I for one would rather Terrorists protested in this way rather than for killing people...and IMO Religion is complete fiction... children needing parents is all too real!! F4J - don't condemn them until you have walked in their shoes!! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"............ Its not thinly veiled. It's clear and direct. F4J will stage protests out side judges houses. Playing by the rules doesn't work. Direct action does. Sitting outside judge's homes isn't the brightest idea. Other judges, the ones you might well be appearing before, don't like it. Well, I for one would rather Terrorists protested in this way rather than for killing people...and IMO Religion is complete fiction... children needing parents is all too real!! F4J - don't condemn them until you have walked in their shoes!!" Only a father or mother denied access can have any idea of the pain involved. I am lucky. I have access but when you find out that he hasn't been getting anti bios as the dr prescribed or that rather than him see his father some one has to drive 130 miles to look after him. Well u can understand how pissed off I get | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Anyone in need is far better off with Families Need Fathers than F4J. Far far better. Have a look at their website, including free legal resources, it's very good. Be warned though, don't expect the Courts to actually apply the law consistently. There may be some hope, as somewhere in there, there's news of a very recently allowed Appeal, where for the first , the Judge actually states that the shite judicial process ( although more eloquently )is in breach of the Children and Father's Article 8 Rights. Bear in mind, in theory, it is the CHILDS Right to contact with both parents, All that is required is that the Govt passes legislation stating that Childs contact with both parents is mandatory. Even so with grandparents. Such a bill should also include a clause to the effect that "intentionally" denying contact, harming the child is a criminal offence. That should sort a few evil women out. How hard can it be, yet the Govt(s) would rather legislate againts petty offensiveness on such as Facefook or Twatter. Finally, bear in mind, whilst the losers are always the children, the winners are always the "professionals" who thrive on the choas and delays. THAT is why matters won't change in any given hurry. " Some brilliant points ( doffs cap) | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
