Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
 | Back to forum list |
| Back to The Lounge |
| Jump to newest |  |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about." Really? So if a disease started to kill children in England you wouldn't want GKS to worry about a vaccine, you would be happy with the reduction in population. You would watch your friends and families lives destroyed by death and grief? Is the implication to what you say, that population growth is ok, as long as it's here and not in "bongo bongo" land? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " too much sex thats the problem. Too many with lots of time on their hands breading another generation who want to to sit at home watching tv using electricity rather then go out and do something to improve things. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about. Really? So if a disease started to kill children in England you wouldn't want GKS to worry about a vaccine, you would be happy with the reduction in population. You would watch your friends and families lives destroyed by death and grief? Is the implication to what you say, that population growth is ok, as long as it's here and not in "bongo bongo" land?" No, I'm not in favour of population growth anywhere. The difference between the UK and bongo bongo land is that, despite politicians' protestations, Britain isn't a poor country and could, if need be cope with a major epidemic. Bongo bongo land couldn't and would find itself holding out the begging bowl, yet again, to first world charities - the ones with CEOs being paid more than the Prime Minister. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about. Really? So if a disease started to kill children in England you wouldn't want GKS to worry about a vaccine, you would be happy with the reduction in population. You would watch your friends and families lives destroyed by death and grief? Is the implication to what you say, that population growth is ok, as long as it's here and not in "bongo bongo" land? No, I'm not in favour of population growth anywhere. The difference between the UK and bongo bongo land is that, despite politicians' protestations, Britain isn't a poor country and could, if need be cope with a major epidemic. Bongo bongo land couldn't and would find itself holding out the begging bowl, yet again, to first world charities - the ones with CEOs being paid more than the Prime Minister." Malaria is an epidemic, that has no cure, even this new vaccine is ineffective and years away. If malaria came to the UK people would die as they do elsewhere. The question was would you be as happy to let your friends, family and neighbours children die as you are about letting strangers children die. Those children aren't the government of their country or the CEO's of NGO's.? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"wonder if GSK will after they have covered their development costs of the new drug and made a reasonable profit etc allow the countries directly effected by malaria to produce their own generic brand of the drug...? Ordinarily you wouldn't think so but there's Gates money in this project so perhaps. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"wonder if GSK will after they have covered their development costs of the new drug and made a reasonable profit etc allow the countries directly effected by malaria to produce their own generic brand of the drug...? Ordinarily you wouldn't think so but there's Gates money in this project so perhaps. ta, did wonder if he may have had some involvement given his record.. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " If you want green energy, then surely a few power cuts is a small price to pay. Bearing in mind the price of energy has risen to subsidise all those windmills and solar panels that were supposed to power the UK. When (not if) when the lights go out, it will be interesting to see if people are so keen on renewables then. As to your general point, as a 47 year old, it does seem like we are in a decline. Concorde gone. We went to the moon 44 years ago, and couldn't go now. You could post a letter in the morning London and have it delivered in Scotland in the evening. Average traffic speed in London is slower than 100 years ago. It's entropy I tell you ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"wonder if GSK will after they have covered their development costs of the new drug and made a reasonable profit etc allow the countries directly effected by malaria to produce their own generic brand of the drug...? GSK are selling the drug at cost +5%, the 5% will be used to research improvement and new drugs. Bill & Melinda Gates foundation have invested in this vaccine too to get it to were it is now. They will want it available as cheaply as possible. " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Malaria is an epidemic, that has no cure, even this new vaccine is ineffective and years away. " I'm not sure how you know it's ineffective but, leaving that aside. " If malaria came to the UK people would die as they do elsewhere. The question was would you be as happy to let your friends, family and neighbours children die as you are about letting strangers children die. Those children aren't the government of their country or the CEO's of NGO's.?" If they were dying of malaria and, as you suggest, the vaccine is ineffective, we (I)'d have no choice. That said, I'm not dewy eyed and sentimental about people dying. It is, or ought to be, a natural process. Some countries are unable to support (feed) their population and seem unable or unwilling to take measures (like contraception) to control the size of that population. Where that happens, flood, famine disease etc tend to take over. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " Just to clarify, UK in title then "modern day England", what's it to be, England or are the poor hangers on included? So many are keen to slate the UK, are they all Daily Mail readers? For once let us look at the positives. Go on, give it a try  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! too much sex thats the problem. Too many with lots of time on their hands breading another generation who want to to sit at home watching tv using electricity rather then go out and do something to improve things." Thank god this site promotes safe sex then  | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Hello SWCH, "he solution to the power outage problem is for everyone to use less power. This latest scaremongering by the National Grid is more a response to the threat of energy price caps than anything else." This is a problem that has been forecast for ten years or more, nothing to do with Mr Milliband's promise. Exacerbated by EU dictat to shut down perfectly good high capacity power stations and Government's procrastination in doing anything effective to increase capacity. Wind farms are not effective and are a huge expense for very little capacity. Education has been dire for many years now and when serious proposals are made to try and remedy that problem the teachers say that it won't work, leave it to the professionals. Well we had, for too long and a very poor result we've had from their ideas. Alec" Whether its a 10 year old problem or not part of the solution is to use less, using less benefits everyone, your bill reduces, carbon emmissions are reduced and the strain is taken off the system. I didn't mention how power should be generated and I didn't mention the problems with education in my response. However as only 2% of the worlds energy is currently sourced from renewables it doesn't seem we have made much progress in getting away from fossil fuels. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Malaria is an epidemic, that has no cure, even this new vaccine is ineffective and years away. I'm not sure how you know it's ineffective but, leaving that aside. If malaria came to the UK people would die as they do elsewhere. The question was would you be as happy to let your friends, family and neighbours children die as you are about letting strangers children die. Those children aren't the government of their country or the CEO's of NGO's.? If they were dying of malaria and, as you suggest, the vaccine is ineffective, we (I)'d have no choice. That said, I'm not dewy eyed and sentimental about people dying. It is, or ought to be, a natural process. Some countries are unable to support (feed) their population and seem unable or unwilling to take measures (like contraception) to control the size of that population. Where that happens, flood, famine disease etc tend to take over. " for once, _nny, you and i stand shoulder to shoulder | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Malaria is an epidemic, that has no cure, even this new vaccine is ineffective and years away. I'm not sure how you know it's ineffective but, leaving that aside. If malaria came to the UK people would die as they do elsewhere. The question was would you be as happy to let your friends, family and neighbours children die as you are about letting strangers children die. Those children aren't the government of their country or the CEO's of NGO's.? If they were dying of malaria and, as you suggest, the vaccine is ineffective, we (I)'d have no choice. That said, I'm not dewy eyed and sentimental about people dying. It is, or ought to be, a natural process. Some countries are unable to support (feed) their population and seem unable or unwilling to take measures (like contraception) to control the size of that population. Where that happens, flood, famine disease etc tend to take over. " All the press articles clearly state the vaccine is effective in less than 50% of cases, that's how I know that. thanks for answering the question too, you don't get dewy eyed about anyone's kids dying as long as it reduces population growth. That's now clear too. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Might be worth looking at population density. That will give you a different perspective as to which countries are the real problem. It's impossible for the UK to sustain itself anymore - there aren't enough resources!" There are enough resources, we are just greedy, we waste millions of tons of food, we grow food to feed millions of animals so we can eat their best bits, we have millions of pets that consume food, we use too much fuel on short or unnecessary journeys, we consume electricity and water like they were a human right. We consume clothing and electrical products like they are disposable and we want all that for less than we paid for it last year. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Might be worth looking at population density. That will give you a different perspective as to which countries are the real problem. It's impossible for the UK to sustain itself anymore - there aren't enough resources! There are enough resources, we are just greedy, we waste millions of tons of food, we grow food to feed millions of animals so we can eat their best bits, we have millions of pets that consume food, we use too much fuel on short or unnecessary journeys, we consume electricity and water like they were a human right. We consume clothing and electrical products like they are disposable and we want all that for less than we paid for it last year." if you want to live like it, why dont you move to Africa? lol. we arent a 3rd world country for a reason. if you dont want to live in a 1st world country, and you seem to resent it, then move to a less developed one and live off the land. trust me, you will love it | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"wonder if GSK will after they have covered their development costs of the new drug and made a reasonable profit etc allow the countries directly effected by malaria to produce their own generic brand of the drug...? GSK are selling the drug at cost +5%, the 5% will be used to research improvement and new drugs. Bill & Melinda Gates foundation have invested in this vaccine too to get it to were it is now. They will want it available as cheaply as possible. "  ty | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Might be worth looking at population density. That will give you a different perspective as to which countries are the real problem. It's impossible for the UK to sustain itself anymore - there aren't enough resources! There are enough resources, we are just greedy, we waste millions of tons of food, we grow food to feed millions of animals so we can eat their best bits, we have millions of pets that consume food, we use too much fuel on short or unnecessary journeys, we consume electricity and water like they were a human right. We consume clothing and electrical products like they are disposable and we want all that for less than we paid for it last year." No - there actually aren't enough resources! All those things will help - but ultimately there are too many people in too small a space far too dependant on too much stuff - that largely comes from out of this country. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's the definition for poverty and severe poverty? As I understand they're actually based on relative poverty. There's about 11.7 million children in the UK - so about a quarter of the kids you see every day are in poverty. And 2 out of every 10 kids are in severe poverty... according to those stats. No doubt there are kids & families that really struggle - but those kinds of bullshit sensationalist stats used by charities to draw attention to their funding interests don't help. " Do your research yourself then ! Work at the sharp end with britains most vulnerable and poor families and see if the sensationalist stats stack up Sit there with your head in the clouds and pretend its all bullshit so charities can keep going Talk about misguided! Wow | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's the definition for poverty and severe poverty? As I understand they're actually based on relative poverty. There's about 11.7 million children in the UK - so about a quarter of the kids you see every day are in poverty. And 2 out of every 10 kids are in severe poverty... according to those stats. No doubt there are kids & families that really struggle - but those kinds of bullshit sensationalist stats used by charities to draw attention to their funding interests don't help. Do your research yourself then ! Work at the sharp end with britains most vulnerable and poor families and see if the sensationalist stats stack up Sit there with your head in the clouds and pretend its all bullshit so charities can keep going Talk about misguided! Wow" And yet you haven't managed to answer the question. You will struggle to. I know this because I have done the research. When you have the definition for severe poverty we can discuss just how much this country is regressing and which one of has their head in the clouds. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"What's the definition for poverty and severe poverty? As I understand they're actually based on relative poverty. There's about 11.7 million children in the UK - so about a quarter of the kids you see every day are in poverty. And 2 out of every 10 kids are in severe poverty... according to those stats. No doubt there are kids & families that really struggle - but those kinds of bullshit sensationalist stats used by charities to draw attention to their funding interests don't help. Do your research yourself then ! Work at the sharp end with britains most vulnerable and poor families and see if the sensationalist stats stack up Sit there with your head in the clouds and pretend its all bullshit so charities can keep going Talk about misguided! Wow And yet you haven't managed to answer the question. You will struggle to. I know this because I have done the research. When you have the definition for severe poverty we can discuss just how much this country is regressing and which one of has their head in the clouds." Bet you are lots of struggling families in the Cotswolds ! | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bet you are lots of struggling families in the Cotswolds !" Your implication being? You began the debate. If you can't back it up at least have the grace to admit so instead of resorting to childish diversions. I'll help you out a little. The method by which poverty is calculated in the UK means that when people are worse off there are actually less people defined as being in poverty. That's why they're so wishy washy about the definitions - they don't make too much sense. There is very little actual poverty in the UK. What there is is massive inequality. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bet you are lots of struggling families in the Cotswolds ! Your implication being? You began the debate. If you can't back it up at least have the grace to admit so instead of resorting to childish diversions. I'll help you out a little. The method by which poverty is calculated in the UK means that when people are worse off there are actually less people defined as being in poverty. That's why they're so wishy washy about the definitions - they don't make too much sense. There is very little actual poverty in the UK. What there is is massive inequality." What the public suggest is for a socially acceptable standard of living is this a single working-age adult needs a budget of £200 per week; a pensioner couple need £240; a couple with two children need £470; and a lone parent with one child needs £285 Cuts and changes to the welfare system mean more people than ever are reliant upon food banks , more people are scared of turning on their heating , approx 2 children in every classroom go to school without a breakfast Reality is that most of the poorest families in the uk have less than 12 quid pp per day to live on ... If you choose to ignore that fact That's up to you | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bet you are lots of struggling families in the Cotswolds ! Your implication being? You began the debate. If you can't back it up at least have the grace to admit so instead of resorting to childish diversions. I'll help you out a little. The method by which poverty is calculated in the UK means that when people are worse off there are actually less people defined as being in poverty. That's why they're so wishy washy about the definitions - they don't make too much sense. There is very little actual poverty in the UK. What there is is massive inequality. What the public suggest is for a socially acceptable standard of living is this a single working-age adult needs a budget of £200 per week; a pensioner couple need £240; a couple with two children need £470; and a lone parent with one child needs £285 Cuts and changes to the welfare system mean more people than ever are reliant upon food banks , more people are scared of turning on their heating , approx 2 children in every classroom go to school without a breakfast Reality is that most of the poorest families in the uk have less than 12 quid pp per day to live on ... If you choose to ignore that fact That's up to you " Are you seriously say that a family can't give their child(ren) a couple of slices of toast for breakfast? Don't believe you. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Bet you are lots of struggling families in the Cotswolds ! Your implication being? You began the debate. If you can't back it up at least have the grace to admit so instead of resorting to childish diversions. I'll help you out a little. The method by which poverty is calculated in the UK means that when people are worse off there are actually less people defined as being in poverty. That's why they're so wishy washy about the definitions - they don't make too much sense. There is very little actual poverty in the UK. What there is is massive inequality. What the public suggest is for a socially acceptable standard of living is this a single working-age adult needs a budget of £200 per week; a pensioner couple need £240; a couple with two children need £470; and a lone parent with one child needs £285 Cuts and changes to the welfare system mean more people than ever are reliant upon food banks , more people are scared of turning on their heating , approx 2 children in every classroom go to school without a breakfast Reality is that most of the poorest families in the uk have less than 12 quid pp per day to live on ... If you choose to ignore that fact That's up to you Are you seriously say that a family can't give their child(ren) a couple of slices of toast for breakfast? Don't believe you." Do some research Or some voluntary work with these families | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"So we've moved to debating socially accepted standards of living rather than severe poverty? Throwing figures about doesn't help much either. £12 per person per day to cover what? How many are on that and what needs do they have? And if you're to backup your original point how does that compare with previous generations?" It's quite obvious your ignorant to it and in complete denial I work with these families and see the children and how their lives are affected first hand My point all along has been that for one of the richest countries in the world we seem to be going backwards That's my opinion like it or not | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It's quite obvious your ignorant to it and in complete denial I work with these families and see the children and how their lives are affected first hand My point all along has been that for one of the richest countries in the world we seem to be going backwards That's my opinion like it or not " It's rather more ignorant to assume that others don't have the same or more experience than you on an anonymous forum. But at least you concede now that it's your opinion rather than fact. My point was that the tactics of charities that commission these pieces of 'research' and the subsequent high publicity campaigns probably do more damage to gaining support needed for those who really are in need. Based on the Save the Children figures 2 out of every 10 children you see tomorrow will be in extreme poverty. One of those probably won't have a mobile phone. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not got £12 pp per day to live on? a family of 2 adults and 2 kids, thats nearly £50 a day? who the hell needs £50 to get through a day? food wise a loaf of bread and 3 tins of beans can do breakfast a tes (school dinners taking care of the rest) yes there isnt as much money around as there was when the labour party were spending like a d*unken sailor home on leave, but get real, there are families in india living on less than a quid a day. poverty in britain is not having an iphone, the latest trainers, or having to shop in morrisons rather than sainsburys. and thats MY opinion, based on no more fact than yours" You have no idea ! Get your head out if the clouds | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"not got £12 pp per day to live on? a family of 2 adults and 2 kids, thats nearly £50 a day? who the hell needs £50 to get through a day? food wise a loaf of bread and 3 tins of beans can do breakfast a tes (school dinners taking care of the rest) yes there isnt as much money around as there was when the labour party were spending like a d*unken sailor home on leave, but get real, there are families in india living on less than a quid a day. poverty in britain is not having an iphone, the latest trainers, or having to shop in morrisons rather than sainsburys. and thats MY opinion, based on no more fact than yours You have no idea ! Get your head out if the clouds" no thanks. i like it here. smells of geraniums (according to QI) listen, the country is a rich country. in places like india there is massively grotesque inequality where money is everything, whereas here, everyone has the chance of a decent start in life. if people have chosen to waste that chance and not made enough of their life to make a reasonable life for themselves, well thats no one elses fault but their own. you say get your head out of the clouds? i say, if more people had their heads in the clouds, they would be spending less time in the gutter | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
 | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" ......... in places like india there is massively grotesque inequality where money is everything, whereas here, everyone has the chance of a decent start in life. .........." That's not the case. Your postcode at birth is the single most important factor in determining almost everything from life expectancy to income. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Looks in - sees trouble - backs out of thread closing door shut firmly " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about." That quote from the very same person who only last week was on here complaining bitterly that certain vaccinations had been delayed in Scotland.   | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " Kinda makes ya wonder about the word GREAT in Great Britain! "Great Britain my arse" As Ricky Tomlinson aka Jim Royale would say | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Meanwhile .............. "Young adults in England have scored among the lowest results in the industrialised world in international literacy and numeracy tests. A major study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shows how England's 16 to 24-year-olds are falling behind their Asian and European counterparts. England is 22nd for literacy and 21st for numeracy out of 24 countries. The OECD's Andreas Schleicher warned of a shrinking pool of skilled workers. Unlike other developed countries, the study also showed that young people in England are no better at these tests than older people, in the 55 to 65 age range."" This has been building up since the 60's. While the rest of the world have valued and built excellent education systems Britain has slowly but surely dismantled what was arguably the best in the world. New teaching methods spawned in the 60's have developed into the "child centred" nonsense we have today. Very few kids (if any) are put under pressure to succeed, and schools have become nothing more than child processing centres. The real rot started with the abolition of Grammar schools, while they were not equal, they did give brighter kids a chance to achieve something, which sadly the comprehensive system is unable (or unwilling) to do. Think about this. How many top politicians (of all party's) came from a Grammar school background in the past? and the same people that supported the abolition of them are the first to start moaning that politicians (of all party's) are now from private schools. Ever wondered WHY?!?!? As a contrast I would look at Germany (and even they are only 11th on the list) My stepson is currently doing the equivalent of A levels here. he HAS to do 11 subjects, not pick 3 soft ones just so he can swan off to uni at the end of 2 years. He has to do 3 years of core subjects at a very high level or nothing. The German system has another little surprise for kids who want to spend their school days pissing about round the back of the bike shed. Fail your end of year exams, so do the WHOLE YEAR AGAIN. Until Britain starts pushing kids to achieve and putting them under a bit (lot) more pressure to succed we will just carry on falling downwards until we hit the bottom. Bringing back the Grammar schools would be a very good start. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about. That quote from the very same person who only last week was on here complaining bitterly that certain vaccinations had been delayed in Scotland. "Never underestimate the value of being able to give a bunch of incompetents a good verbal kicking and, if I may say so, the fact you remembered proves it works. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Too many people? Absolutely. Only this morning the Welcome Foundation and GSK announced a malaria vaccine which 'may save hundreds of thousands of lives'. No mention of how all these 'saved' souls are going to be fed, watered or housed. I suppose that's someone else's problem - one that GSK don't have to worry about. That quote from the very same person who only last week was on here complaining bitterly that certain vaccinations had been delayed in Scotland.
Never underestimate the value of being able to give a bunch of incompetents a good verbal kicking and, if I may say so, the fact you remembered proves it works."So that begs the question. Do you really believe in anything at all? Or is it that you just get off on giving someone a "verbal kicking" on whatever side of whatever subject? | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"......... So that begs the question. Do you really believe in anything at all? Or is it that you just get off on giving someone a "verbal kicking" on whatever side of whatever subject?" Absolutely. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " Very true. With all the cuts, we're still spending more. The government is taking long term risks. Will it pay off? No idea. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"......... So that begs the question. Do you really believe in anything at all? Or is it that you just get off on giving someone a "verbal kicking" on whatever side of whatever subject? Absolutely." Oh well, at least you are honest. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! Very true. With all the cuts, we're still spending more. The government is taking long term risks. Will it pay off? No idea." Judging by the latest IMF report on the British economy it seems to be. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in Ball's office when that one hit his desk | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"......... So that begs the question. Do you really believe in anything at all? Or is it that you just get off on giving someone a "verbal kicking" on whatever side of whatever subject? Absolutely. Oh well, at least you are honest." An Officer and a Gentleman. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"............ My brother told me there were businessmen getting out of mercs and BMW's going to a foodbank he was working on to get their fill. That disgusted me. I hope they're doing the rounds for somebody else that needs it, not collecting it like tax returns." This was shown an a tv documentary (maybe not BMW/ Mercedes) back when food banks/ Trussell Trust were just beginning to appear. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! Very true. With all the cuts, we're still spending more. The government is taking long term risks. Will it pay off? No idea. Judging by the latest IMF report on the British economy it seems to be. I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall in Ball's office when that one hit his desk "Lol
The IMF is influenced by British authority so, a bit sketchy atm. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We are our own worst enemy. We consume, we waste, we're selfish and then when something goes wrong we point the finger at a group of people who will then point the finger at various social groups to take the blame. The reality is as families, as communities, as society, as a nation, we need to look in the mirror and ask ourselves: "What did I do or what can I do to make things better?" " | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Get your candles and flashlights in, get a portable gas stove and stock up on butane and if you have a bbq, get the last of the charcoal in. Or just bitch about it IF it happens. My brother told me there were businessmen getting out of mercs and BMW's going to a foodbank he was working on to get their fill. That disgusted me. I hope they're doing the rounds for somebody else that needs it, not collecting it like tax returns." Probably to balance out losing their child benefits! There was a programme on them a while back on which they said they never check people's circumstances. It's another measurement that can't really be considered reflective of the actual situation. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the international organisations need the financial contributions of their larger members to keep going so the IMF, World Bank, NATO, UN etc are usually reluctant to criticise their members and may even say nice things about them from time to time "Speaking of which, Christine Lagarde (sp?) seems to excel at this, creepy. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Get your candles and flashlights in, get a portable gas stove and stock up on butane and if you have a bbq, get the last of the charcoal in. Or just bitch about it IF it happens. My brother told me there were businessmen getting out of mercs and BMW's going to a foodbank he was working on to get their fill. That disgusted me. I hope they're doing the rounds for somebody else that needs it, not collecting it like tax returns. Probably to balance out losing their child benefits! There was a programme on them a while back on which they said they never check people's circumstances. It's another measurement that can't really be considered reflective of the actual situation." Well it would make sense to be a benefit that needs to be claimed for rather than just hand it out willy nilly. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" National Grid have warned the risk of power shortages this winter is highest in seven years Around half a million families reliant upon food banks 3.6 million children living in poverty 1.6 million living in severe poverty Modern day England !!! We are going backwards not forwards! " But dont worry, "call me we'er all in it together Dave" and his mates have been able to give those earning over £150,000 pa a 5% tax cut (that's £50,000 per million for all their multimillion annual directors emoluments Tory backers), so its not all doom and gloom. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"All the international organisations need the financial contributions of their larger members to keep going so the IMF, World Bank, NATO, UN etc are usually reluctant to criticise their members and may even say nice things about them from time to time
Speaking of which, Christine Lagarde (sp?) seems to excel at this, creepy. "
You beat me to that one, and don't forget the other soppy Brazilian bird from the UN slagging Britain off the other week. | |||
| Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| Post new Message to Thread |
| back to top |  |
