FabSwingers.com forum: Airport body scanners

By *obbytupper OP Man
over a year ago

Menston near Ilkley

An engineer (ex-NASA project director) has what would seem to be the near perfect solution

for airport security!

Here's a solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports. Have a booth

you step into. It will not X-ray you, it will not rub you down but, it will detonate any explosive

device you may have on you.

This is surely a win-win for everyone, and there would be none of this crap about racial

profiling etc, etc, etc. This device would eliminate a long and expensive trial with swift Justice.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I could be in trouble if it mistakes my blu tac for plastic explosive

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *thwalescplCouple
over a year ago

brecon

"An engineer (ex-NASA project director) has what would seem to be the near perfect solution

for airport security!

Here's a solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports. Have a booth

you step into. It will not X-ray you, it will not rub you down but, it will detonate any explosive

device you may have on you.

This is surely a win-win for everyone, and there would be none of this crap about racial

profiling etc, etc, etc. This device would eliminate a long and expensive trial with swift Justice.

It wouldnt work.

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *umpkinMan
over a year ago

near the sounds of the wimborne quarter jack!

Toungue wedged very firmly in cheek this is a brilliant idea. In reality it won`t work because some of the stuff is mixed together on the plane.

But I can see where you`re coming from!

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By *thwalescplCouple
over a year ago

brecon

It said in the papers yesterday that two people have been banned from their flights for refusing to be scanned......

methinks they probably wish they had gone throught the scanner rather than have to put up with the "intimate" search that they no doubt would have been subject to after lol!!!

I am just wondering, was it perhaps a stunt by people from some "privacy" group to test the rules and make a statement?

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

I would for one rather be scanned than there be a problem at 30,000 feet because some twat has decided that he wants the end it all taking me with him

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

It's not compulsory to fly, so no need for those who don't want to be scanned to be scanned...

If they want to fly safer, then scan it is. Can anyone remember when the luggage scanners were first bought in, all the stories about battery toys showing up and other potentially embarrassing items being shown up

Reply privately

Reply in forum

Reply +quote

Post new Message to Thread