FabSwingers.com mobile

Already registered?
Login here

Back to forum list
Back to The Lounge

Is Pres. Obama gay?

Jump to newest
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

A week or so ago he was adamant that the Syrians had crossed his "red line" and , in short, was gonna bomb the shit out of Syria.

Is his red line now a lovely shade of pink? Is he a wuss?

Am i alone in thinking the next time he and Putin meet they should get it on? My monies on Putin to kick the shit out of him.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *lackshadow7Man
over a year ago

Toronto

Wow....the title, the implied homophobic stance in the text, the inability to see the big picture.

Top marks. I'm out.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *livia_KWoman
over a year ago

South London

Erm, whaaaat?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *kywatcherMan
over a year ago

Southwick

So this means he is gay?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *aucy3Couple
over a year ago

glasgow

He may not be gay,but he definitely has a leaning to the orally bi side.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *iewMan
Forum Mod

over a year ago

Angus & Findhorn

so the straights bomb the fuckers

and the gays seek a diplomatic solution

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"

..... Z

Am i alone in thinking the next time he and Putin meet they should get it on? My monies on Putin to kick the shit out of him.

"

In a 'square go' Putin's yer man.

With handlers and chibs, back Obama.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

"

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

..... Z

Am i alone in thinking the next time he and Putin meet they should get it on? My monies on Putin to kick the shit out of him.

In a 'square go' Putin's yer man.

With handlers and chibs, back Obama."

Have to agree.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *un_JuiceCouple
over a year ago

Nr Chester

Are you assuming all batty boys or bit part willy lovers are all weak in decision making and ability to fight their corner.

Oh dear. You might need to change that mindset or someone will for you

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?"

In the title of the post

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/09/13 19:58:46]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?

In the title of the post"

Do the "Is" and the "?" in the title not mean much to you?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire

reads like a cheap tabloid headline..

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood..

cant relate whats going on to the OP's thread title..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

"

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?"

Or Vietnam

Or Iraq

Or Afghanistan

Or Pakistan

Or Libya

Or Cuba

No doubt there are other places.

Maybe some don't wish to actually see the bigger picture nevermind try to understand it.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?"

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

Or Vietnam

Or Iraq

Or Afghanistan

Or Pakistan

Or Libya

Or Cuba

No doubt there are other places.

Maybe some don't wish to actually see the bigger picture nevermind try to understand it.

"

yes there were ..

you missed out Rwanda, Balkans..

and many others..

care to educate me on 'the bigger picture'..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

"

Can i mention the New Yorkers and other yanks, funding the IRA? I seem to recall they slaughtered/murdered a few (and some)innocents along the way ?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *heScotandthegirlCouple
over a year ago

London & Edinburgh

But Syria has oil....

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

Or Vietnam

Or Iraq

Or Afghanistan

Or Pakistan

Or Libya

Or Cuba

No doubt there are other places.

Maybe some don't wish to actually see the bigger picture nevermind try to understand it.

yes there were ..

you missed out Rwanda, Balkans..

and many others..

care to educate me on 'the bigger picture'..?

"

Balkans true.

Rwanda not so much as the West didn't interfere.

Nah, you come across as educated.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

Can i mention the New Yorkers and other yanks, funding the IRA? I seem to recall they slaughtered/murdered a few (and some)innocents along the way ? "

pretty au fait with that ty, Cpl of tours in 70's and 80's think we may have been made aware of the bigger picture of that particular 'conflict'

so by all means do so but your missing the actual question I asked someone else..?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

"

Didn't 9/11 happen?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *livia_KWoman
over a year ago

South London


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

Or Vietnam

Or Iraq

Or Afghanistan

Or Pakistan

Or Libya

Or Cuba

No doubt there are other places.

Maybe some don't wish to actually see the bigger picture nevermind try to understand it.

yes there were ..

you missed out Rwanda, Balkans..

and many others..

care to educate me on 'the bigger picture'..?

Balkans true.

Rwanda not so much as the West didn't interfere.

Nah, you come across as educated. "

Read Shake Hands with the Devil. Makes you wish maybe that the west did 'interfere' in Rwanda.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

Can i mention the New Yorkers and other yanks, funding the IRA? I seem to recall they slaughtered/murdered a few (and some)innocents along the way ?

pretty au fait with that ty, Cpl of tours in 70's and 80's think we may have been made aware of the bigger picture of that particular 'conflict'

so by all means do so but your missing the actual question I asked someone else..?"

Well, consider the Oklahoma bombing ( yank on yank) isn't there a very strong argument that that the root cause of that lies with the US military and their foreign policy?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?

In the title of the post

Do the "Is" and the "?" in the title not mean much to you?

"

Not as much as the obvious inference that if he has backed down then he must be gay. Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up rather than argue on the minutia

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow

I didn't intend this as a 'my atrocities are worse than your atrocities' competition list.

War, international or civil, is a nasty business. Innocent people get hurt just the same as guilty people.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?

In the title of the post

Do the "Is" and the "?" in the title not mean much to you?

Not as much as the obvious inference that if he has backed down then he must be gay. Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up rather than argue on the minutia"

lol just lol. I'm fully aware,ty, that he has a wife, two kids, even a dog and that they seem a very close loving family.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

Can i mention the New Yorkers and other yanks, funding the IRA? I seem to recall they slaughtered/murdered a few (and some)innocents along the way ?

pretty au fait with that ty, Cpl of tours in 70's and 80's think we may have been made aware of the bigger picture of that particular 'conflict'

so by all means do so but your missing the actual question I asked someone else..?

Well, consider the Oklahoma bombing ( yank on yank) isn't there a very strong argument that that the root cause of that lies with the US military and their foreign policy?"

thought Mcvey? was opposed to the federal government, not the state department..

happy to be corrected..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"I didn't intend this as a 'my atrocities are worse than your atrocities' competition list.

War, international or civil, is a nasty business. Innocent people get hurt just the same as guilty people."

agreed and ditto..

no idea what it has to do with one of the 2 main players sexuality..

hey ho..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hold let me get this right

Because he's decided to try and solve the current complicated and awful situation by something other than brute force you're saying he's gay

Where do i say he is a gay?

Should you not credit the Russians for the diplomacy? One that has made the yanks resolution of brute force stand down?

In the title of the post

Do the "Is" and the "?" in the title not mean much to you?

Not as much as the obvious inference that if he has backed down then he must be gay. Sometimes it's better to hold your hands up rather than argue on the minutia

lol just lol. I'm fully aware,ty, that he has a wife, two kids, even a dog and that they seem a very close loving family.

"

Point missed ... it's the negative use of the term gay.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


" .....

article on C4 earlier showing dead pregnant women, 3 month old babies and children butchered in cold blood

......

Where?

Omagh?

New York?

Beirut?

..........?

village called Al Badiyah..

initial estimates by Human Rights Watch are in excess of 165 shot then burnt..

then tipped into a mass grave and the village torched..

when was the last time the residents of New York were butchered in such a way..?

Omagh yes and Beirut have all suffered atrocities in recent decades as i'm sure you well know..

but New York..?

Can i mention the New Yorkers and other yanks, funding the IRA? I seem to recall they slaughtered/murdered a few (and some)innocents along the way ?

pretty au fait with that ty, Cpl of tours in 70's and 80's think we may have been made aware of the bigger picture of that particular 'conflict'

so by all means do so but your missing the actual question I asked someone else..?

Well, consider the Oklahoma bombing ( yank on yank) isn't there a very strong argument that that the root cause of that lies with the US military and their foreign policy?

thought Mcvey? was opposed to the federal government, not the state department..

happy to be corrected.."

No need at all, it would appear to be obvious that he, McVeigh, was opposed to the federal government.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *nnyMan
over a year ago

Glasgow


"I didn't intend this as a 'my atrocities are worse than your atrocities' competition list.

War, international or civil, is a nasty business. Innocent people get hurt just the same as guilty people.

agreed and ditto..

no idea what it has to do with one of the 2 main players sexuality..

hey ho.."

Putin does seem remarkably anti-gay - almost to the point of overkill

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

May he read the articles some sections of the media have written, reminding readers of the use of agent orange in Vietnam, white phosphorous in fallujah and Palestine, depleted uranium in Iraq etc, and he probably realised that crossing the red line is, sadly, a regular occurrence.... It's done well as a sound bite, I must admit.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Hmmm that's some statement to make!!

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really "

yep truly sad.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hmmm that's some statement to make!! "

It's true though, some people are just way too quick to take offence these days even to mild jokes etc

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"Hmmm that's some statement to make!! "

You don't reckon one on one that Putin would win?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

yep truly sad.

"

Agreed, people just love taking the moral high ground. Shame really, we're here for a laugh and fun after all

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"Hmmm that's some statement to make!!

You don't reckon one on one that Putin would win?"

KGB agent and judo practitioner vs suave, b-balling constitutional lawyer .... Wonder what betfred reckons..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really "

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

Oooh these are the threads I avoid posting in...

...ahhh hang on..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

"

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

"

Yeah !!!!

we agree.. but we also Still think the guys an Arse-Bandit...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/09/13 21:32:42]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/09/13 21:33:05]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

Yeah !!!!

we agree.. but we also Still think the guys an Arse-Bandit... "

The OP or Obama

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

"

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

Lol excellent! A return to humour.. well done haha

(Think my computer is having a fit or something!)

Yeah !!!!

we agree.. but we also Still think the guys an Arse-Bandit... "

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

"

Eh no!? Lol I'm saying lighten up a bit hahahah

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icked weaselCouple
over a year ago

Near Edinburgh..


"

The OP or Obama "

No Comment Your Honour..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

"

For clarity, i'm more than happy for this thread to swing both ways. No phobia here.

Everywhich way but loose baby.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

For clarity, i'm more than happy for this thread to swing both ways. No phobia here.

Everywhich way but loose baby."

High 5 lol

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really "

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/09/13 21:48:51]

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums.."

Erm if you check again you'll see this thread is about Putin and Obama. Not horrific war crimes..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

Why should anyone think two or three times before posting their opinion? Humour is quite personal to individuals and what one finds funny another won't, that isn't silly.

That's obvious and I appreciate the counter post. What's also obvious is that this thread isn't a serious one so there really isn't a need for people to weigh in with their noses in the air trying to belittle the OP for trying to have a laugh and lighten up the evening for us guys.

"

whats also obvious is that all threads tend to divert or expand..

that's the forums fella..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Erm if you check again you'll see this thread is about Putin and Obama. Not horrific war crimes.."

see below..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Erm if you check again you'll see this thread is about Putin and Obama. Not horrific war crimes..

see below.."

or above..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums.."

Just had a check take up above and at a quick glance it would appear that you were the first poster to include the "fuckin hilarity" you speak of. Apologies if i'm wrong.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Just had a check take up above and at a quick glance it would appear that you were the first poster to include the "fuckin hilarity" you speak of. Apologies if i'm wrong.

"

no need to apologise..

thought the obvious context of which it was used, would be well err obvious...

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *icecouple561Couple
Forum Mod

over a year ago

East Sussex


"

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

Eh no!? Lol I'm saying lighten up a bit hahahah "

Lol ok,

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By (user no longer on site) OP   
over a year ago


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Just had a check take up above and at a quick glance it would appear that you were the first poster to include the "fuckin hilarity" you speak of. Apologies if i'm wrong.

no need to apologise..

thought the obvious context of which it was used, would be well err obvious...

"

Unlike the thread then?

But hey ho, gung ho.

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple
over a year ago

in Lancashire


"The sad truth is, going on a lot of the silly posts on this thread in response to the clearly humourous intent behind the thread itself, is that there are a lot of people on here that can't take a joke and should think two or three times before posting in future... silly really

ah yes silly me..

humour and dead woman and children, mass rape and torture and several uses of chemical weapons..

oh the fuckin hilarity..

note to self before watching the news, check the forums..

Just had a check take up above and at a quick glance it would appear that you were the first poster to include the "fuckin hilarity" you speak of. Apologies if i'm wrong.

no need to apologise..

thought the obvious context of which it was used, would be well err obvious...

Unlike the thread then?

But hey ho, gung ho."

clearly humour like opinions differs..

each to their own..

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
 
 

By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago


"

So are you saying that this thread should only run one way?

Eh no!? Lol I'm saying lighten up a bit hahahah

Lol ok, "

:*

Reply privatelyReply in forumReply +quote
Post new Message to Thread
back to top