Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
![]() | Back to forum list |
![]() | Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest | ![]() |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He has to be special. I think of my FWB as my Lover ![]() ![]() How long after meeting did the way you thought of him change? ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"He has to be special. I think of my FWB as my Lover ![]() ![]() ![]() About six months.. Its wierd actually because it was him that started to call me it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In the old days a lover would be an extramarital sexual partner. I use it when I think of someone who has moved beyond just a sexual meet and with whom I have 'made love'. These have been people that remain no attachment (except one person who went beyond lover description). The sex is more intimate and satisfying with those people but they don't clutter up my home or life. " ![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the word that's in the word is a clue, for me personally it involves a certain amount of feelings. ![]() Yup. I'd add that whilst there is a feeling there, it needn't be an "attachment". A lover without attachment is a delicate and fine creature. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I think the word that's in the word is a clue, for me personally it involves a certain amount of feelings. ![]() I think so....otherwise they are FWB, shags or the odd fuck or meet. IMHO. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"In the old days a lover would be an extramarital sexual partner. I use it when I think of someone who has moved beyond just a sexual meet and with whom I have 'made love'. These have been people that remain no attachment (except one person who went beyond lover description). The sex is more intimate and satisfying with those people but they don't clutter up my home or life. " The key words here for me are 'intimacy and satisfying'. Those, to me, are descriptions of behaviour rather than the feelings associated with a lover. You can have intimacy and satisfaction with someone with whom you 'click' as you are on a common wavelength, but that doesn't mean (to me) that they are a 'lover'. ted. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
![]() | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top | ![]() |