Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" yerrrrrr us swingles rule " Besides, i aint got a wife to swap and if i had, can i have a bike | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" yerrrrrr us swingles rule Besides, i aint got a wife to swap and if i had, can i have a bike " LOL... love it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only single i simply don't and likely never will see as swingers, are the ones only interested in meeting a single of the oposite sex.. Call it what you like, but in my mind if you are say a single male/female who only is interested in another single male/female.. then your just fucking or having a one night stand." I meet with couples and femms as well so I can call myself a swingle, thanks for clearing that up. I thought that one night stands and just fucking WAS what swinging was all about, NSA fun? I don't want a relationship. Dating vanillas can mean the risk of one falling in love with the other which most singles on here don't want. Hence we swing. I don't understand how playing with a femme or a couple makes me more of a swinger than if I just fuck guys? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some seem to think that "swinging" is solely a pleasure for those married or in a longterm relationship. And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of. Well think again .im certainly not and ITS certainly not. " Thank you, I thought I was the only one thinking some would suppose we are here to be picked up and used as 'toys' Many couples seek single guys and bi-femms but continue to play exclusively with each other, should I say if you have each other why play with singles? find another couple to play with and leave them all for me? LMAO! xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some seem to think that "swinging" is solely a pleasure for those married or in a longterm relationship. And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of. Well think again .im certainly not and ITS certainly not. " i most certainly wont be use as a toy or picked up when ever ppl think before that happen's they be wearing there balls for earings | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some seem to think that "swinging" is solely a pleasure for those married or in a longterm relationship. And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of. Well think again .im certainly not and ITS certainly not. " My mindset was in agreement with your first sentence. When we started playing, we never even thought about, or even considered the very existence of single players. We had enjoyed a totally monogamous relationship ever since we met, so couples were always going to be where our "head" was. We have been enjoying "the scene" for nearly two years now and have enjoyed playing with singles, both ladies and gents, but it wasn't until after yesterdays forum debate with Femme, that I have really thought about the role that singles actually play in our lives. Ahhhh I'm at peace with myself now lol, | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of." "And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of." I do detest that attitude, I really do. Fortunately I don't think it is a huge recurring theme, just some who think that way. Don't get me wrong, I do appreciate the fact I'm entering into a couples sex life and for them that requires huge levels of trust etc etc... all the sorts of things I don't have to worry about at the moment, but it doesn't mean we should be treated like the shit on the bottom of their shoe... and at that point I refuse to be | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've been re-evaluating my mindset about couples, singles, and what "swinging" actually means. I said yesterday, and on previous occaisions, that swinging, to me, means swapping partners, and since singles don't have partners, then how can they possibly be swingers? Well, folks, life evolves over time, and as such, lifestyles, fashions, trends, demography and all the things that dictate how we live our lives change too. My mindset was stuck in "the swinging sixties" era, where I assume "wife swapping" became popular to the "swinging set"......well I've changed my mind and can see it from a different perspective. OF COURSE SINGLES CAN BE SWINGERS....see I've said it now " well darlin im glad ya saw the light Actually i can see your point of view and was happy to agree to disagree....but do understand el ninos point about the usage of .....still want that drink btw ya dont getawat that easy!!! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've been re-evaluating my mindset about couples, singles, and what "swinging" actually means. I said yesterday, and on previous occaisions, that swinging, to me, means swapping partners, and since singles don't have partners, then how can they possibly be swingers? Well, folks, life evolves over time, and as such, lifestyles, fashions, trends, demography and all the things that dictate how we live our lives change too. My mindset was stuck in "the swinging sixties" era, where I assume "wife swapping" became popular to the "swinging set"......well I've changed my mind and can see it from a different perspective. OF COURSE SINGLES CAN BE SWINGERS....see I've said it now well darlin im glad ya saw the light Actually i can see your point of view and was happy to agree to disagree....but do understand el ninos point about the usage of .....still want that drink btw ya dont getawat that easy!!! " I have no intention of renaging on my promise to buy you guys a couple of beers. Just make sure you turn up | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I've been re-evaluating my mindset about couples, singles, and what "swinging" actually means. I said yesterday, and on previous occaisions, that swinging, to me, means swapping partners, and since singles don't have partners, then how can they possibly be swingers? Well, folks, life evolves over time, and as such, lifestyles, fashions, trends, demography and all the things that dictate how we live our lives change too. My mindset was stuck in "the swinging sixties" era, where I assume "wife swapping" became popular to the "swinging set"......well I've changed my mind and can see it from a different perspective. OF COURSE SINGLES CAN BE SWINGERS....see I've said it now well darlin im glad ya saw the light Actually i can see your point of view and was happy to agree to disagree....but do understand el ninos point about the usage of .....still want that drink btw ya dont getawat that easy!!! I have no intention of renaging on my promise to buy you guys a couple of beers. Just make sure you turn up" we will be there if we can....... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only single i simply don't and likely never will see as swingers, are the ones only interested in meeting a single of the oposite sex.. Call it what you like, but in my mind if you are say a single male/female who only is interested in another single male/female.. then your just fucking or having a one night stand." So you wouldn't want to play with a single female then? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only single i simply don't and likely never will see as swingers, are the ones only interested in meeting a single of the oposite sex.. Call it what you like, but in my mind if you are say a single male/female who only is interested in another single male/female.. then your just fucking or having a one night stand." Not the popular mindset I know but I sort of agree with what you say, although as I have said before when this comes up that so long as folks are happy they can call themselves anything they want. If my son goes out to the pub or a club and meets a girl and they enjoy an evening of uncomplicated NSA fun there is no way either of them would wake in the morning and consider themselves swingers. IMHO and I do stress IMHO "swinging" in what ever scenario anyone can suggest only takes place when a combination of men and women comprising of 3 or more folk enjoy uncomplicated sexual fun together. Are singles swingers? In the above context yes they most certainly are. Are singles who only look for other singles to play with on a 1 to 1 basis swingers? Looks as if some of us will have to agree to disagree on that one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"The only single i simply don't and likely never will see as swingers, are the ones only interested in meeting a single of the oposite sex.. Call it what you like, but in my mind if you are say a single male/female who only is interested in another single male/female.. then your just fucking or having a one night stand. So you wouldn't want to play with a single female then?" Only one answer to that lol | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"We play with females, couples and we used to play with guys too. Have no problem with any of them in the scene at all. Can't understand all this label hanging. BUT... I must say that one thing really pisses us off! It has happened twice and is one of the reasons (apart from the no shows we have had) we rarely play with single guys. We played with a guy probably a dozen times and we had a load of fun. He was quite happy to come into our bedroom and play with Mrs R... Then he met a female swinger! She was quite happy to play and even emailed us to say as much, but when I mailed him, he replied that he won't lend HIS woman to anyone else. OK... So he is the jealous sort and that is a warning to took notice of, but reading to the bottom of the mail, he asked if Saturday was OK for him to come play on his own............... I know that is not perhaps what all singles would be like, but I suspect that loads are! Like I said it has happened to us twice in slightly different circumstances, so now we don't play with single guys... Funny how BOTH of the women were more than happy to play! That said.... I love the term Swingles if ya gotta put a name on it! " Over the course of me bieng involved with "swinging" I find its the guys who have most hang ups when meeting.. I have met several "swinging" fellas and as soon as i have met and we have got on...... They suddenly want to change things to suit them. HENCE...he can do as he pleases and i have to stay faithful. to only him. Like fuck,.... whats good for him is good for me. As a partner. they dont last long | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only say double standards as they are willing to let a single into there bedroom for a night of fun, but we singles cant allow another single into our bedroom without it being just a one night stand! " I would agree with it being a double standard thing. 3 or 4 people are swingers but 2 aren't? So does double penetration or female on female have to happen to make it a swinging act? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only say double standards as they are willing to let a single into there bedroom for a night of fun, but we singles cant allow another single into our bedroom without it being just a one night stand! " There is no double standards being applied there, it's nothing more than interpretation. For some of us the term "swinging" implies more than 2 folk playing, not saying we are right but it's just an opinion. For some folk only 2 people playing is no different from a vanilla night out, not saying we are right, it's just an opinion | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only say double standards as they are willing to let a single into there bedroom for a night of fun, but we singles cant allow another single into our bedroom without it being just a one night stand! I would agree with it being a double standard thing. 3 or 4 people are swingers but 2 aren't? So does double penetration or female on female have to happen to make it a swinging act? " Since when was DP or Bi a pre requisite for swinging fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only say double standards as they are willing to let a single into there bedroom for a night of fun, but we singles cant allow another single into our bedroom without it being just a one night stand! " Who has the double standards if you think a one night stand deserves "just" putting in front of it? Doesn't that imply a hierarchy of sexual activity and one being the lesser or more superior to the other. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I only say double standards as they are willing to let a single into there bedroom for a night of fun, but we singles cant allow another single into our bedroom without it being just a one night stand! I would agree with it being a double standard thing. 3 or 4 people are swingers but 2 aren't? So does double penetration or female on female have to happen to make it a swinging act? Since when was DP or Bi a pre requisite for swinging fun " It doesn't it was a question that's why there is a ? mark at the end. I take it you and your husband wouldn't be swingers if it was a pre requisite. (No ? mark so i wasn't asking i was making a broad statement without any facts behind it) | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would seem if a couple was to have 'casual sex' with another couple then that is 'swinging'. However, if a single was to have 'casual sex' with another single, then that would be 'casual sex'. So, am I right in saying, couples have a special label for having 'casual sex', that being 'swingers'?. We don't care for any labels really, it all comes down to casual sex in the end, if we want anyone in particular joining us in bedtime antics then they are welcome, regardless of label. " Yep looks like it according to some. And if a couple has sex with a single the couple are having a half swing but the single is still having casual sex. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, I quite like this special label, being one half of a couple. Makes me feel, erm, Special. " awwww you are special hun *pats condescendingly on head* | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Yep looks like it according to some. And if a couple has sex with a single the couple are having a half swing but the single is still having casual sex. " So what? Why does that matter? I consider myself a swinger because of my beliefs about recreational sex. It’s been a handy label to quickly and simply explain I am more than open to additional people being introduced into parts of a sexual relationship…. ie when I have a partner (be that a traditional one or a fuck-buddy) I’ll be interested in us sharing the sexual enjoyment of other people. I don’t consider most of the sex I have to be swinging… I wouldn’t even try to call a 1-2-1 meets swinging so I have no problem whatsoever with people saying it’s not swinging, as I agree with them. I do have a problem with people thinking one type of recreational sex is superior to the other. It’s ALL ‘just’ recreational sex. I don’t need to call it swinging to make me feel less ashamed or less guilt or for any other reason. I also have a problem with people who come onto swinging sites thinking everyone is an easy lay… but that’s a different matter all together. Well it’s not actually… they will never be swingers in my book as they are the ones who do tend to have double standards… “yeah I’ll fuck your wife, but no way would a bird of mine get fucked by any of you lot!” type thing. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, I quite like this special label, being one half of a couple. Makes me feel, erm, Special. awwww you are special hun *pats condescendingly on head* " I know, my mum always assured me of that, god rest her soul. Thanks for that, now I feel even more special. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, I quite like this special label, being one half of a couple. Makes me feel, erm, Special. " Just because you travelled to school on a 'special bus' ... | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Yep looks like it according to some. And if a couple has sex with a single the couple are having a half swing but the single is still having casual sex. So what? Why does that matter? I consider myself a swinger because of my beliefs about recreational sex. It’s been a handy label to quickly and simply explain I am more than open to additional people being introduced into parts of a sexual relationship…. ie when I have a partner (be that a traditional one or a fuck-buddy) I’ll be interested in us sharing the sexual enjoyment of other people. I don’t consider most of the sex I have to be swinging… I wouldn’t even try to call a 1-2-1 meets swinging so I have no problem whatsoever with people saying it’s not swinging, as I agree with them. I do have a problem with people thinking one type of recreational sex is superior to the other. It’s ALL ‘just’ recreational sex. I don’t need to call it swinging to make me feel less ashamed or less guilt or for any other reason. I also have a problem with people who come onto swinging sites thinking everyone is an easy lay… but that’s a different matter all together. Well it’s not actually… they will never be swingers in my book as they are the ones who do tend to have double standards… “yeah I’ll fuck your wife, but no way would a bird of mine get fucked by any of you lot!” type thing. " Exactly, it doesn't take a couple to become swingers, it takes the right mind set to become a swinger. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Actually, I quite like this special label, being one half of a couple. Makes me feel, erm, Special. Just because you travelled to school on a 'special bus' ... " Too special for that, I had a special teacher visit me. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would seem if a couple was to have 'casual sex' with another couple then that is 'swinging'. However, if a single was to have 'casual sex' with another single, then that would be 'casual sex'. So, am I right in saying, couples have a special label for having 'casual sex', that being 'swingers'?. " No! Wrong!... the label would be swinging. Swinging - implying there are more than 2 people involved and in most cases a connection of sorts between two of them. Swinger = the person Swinging = the activity | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Yep looks like it according to some. And if a couple has sex with a single the couple are having a half swing but the single is still having casual sex. So what? Why does that matter? I consider myself a swinger because of my beliefs about recreational sex. It’s been a handy label to quickly and simply explain I am more than open to additional people being introduced into parts of a sexual relationship…. ie when I have a partner (be that a traditional one or a fuck-buddy) I’ll be interested in us sharing the sexual enjoyment of other people. I don’t consider most of the sex I have to be swinging… I wouldn’t even try to call a 1-2-1 meets swinging so I have no problem whatsoever with people saying it’s not swinging, as I agree with them. I do have a problem with people thinking one type of recreational sex is superior to the other. It’s ALL ‘just’ recreational sex. I don’t need to call it swinging to make me feel less ashamed or less guilt or for any other reason. I also have a problem with people who come onto swinging sites thinking everyone is an easy lay… but that’s a different matter all together. Well it’s not actually… they will never be swingers in my book as they are the ones who do tend to have double standards… “yeah I’ll fuck your wife, but no way would a bird of mine get fucked by any of you lot!” type thing. Exactly, it doesn't take a couple to become swingers, it takes the right mind set to become a swinger. " Spot on with both replies | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would seem if a couple was to have 'casual sex' with another couple then that is 'swinging'. However, if a single was to have 'casual sex' with another single, then that would be 'casual sex'. So, am I right in saying, couples have a special label for having 'casual sex', that being 'swingers'?. No! Wrong!... the label would be swinging. Swinging - implying there are more than 2 people involved and in most cases a connection of sorts between two of them. Swinger = the person Swinging = the activity" Bloody pedant, you know what I mean. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact." I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact." . . . . . | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe " Why do you when you read back what you put? | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? " Calm down, it's just a forum. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"It would seem if a couple was to have 'casual sex' with another couple then that is 'swinging'. However, if a single was to have 'casual sex' with another single, then that would be 'casual sex'. So, am I right in saying, couples have a special label for having 'casual sex', that being 'swingers'?. No! Wrong!... the label would be swinging. Swinging - implying there are more than 2 people involved and in most cases a connection of sorts between two of them. Swinger = the person Swinging = the activity Bloody pedant, you know what I mean. " It's why I think so many get confused.... they gat all their verbs and nouns mixed up | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just as a matter of interest maybe the site owners do class single as swingers as they have both single male, single female and couples singles status available. Also you play with a couple one night on your own MMF, a single the next MF then you play with your FB and a couple MMFF do you have to change your status each time form swingle, to swinger to vanilla? Ok rant over! " Awwwww - if you are so keen to have a swinger label you can have mine.... it will mean fuck all by the time everyone else has demanded one | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? Calm down, it's just a forum. " I'm not lol. I just think that some Bi females in couples get very possessive on here and a little stuck up if i am allowed to say so. Not i did say some not all! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? Calm down, it's just a forum. I'm not lol. I just think that some Bi females in couples get very possessive on here and a little stuck up if i am allowed to say so. Not i did say some not all!" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? Calm down, it's just a forum. I'm not lol. I just think that some Bi females in couples get very possessive on here and a little stuck up if i am allowed to say so. Not i did say some not all! " If the cap fits lady your welcome to wear it. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? Calm down, it's just a forum. I'm not lol. I just think that some Bi females in couples get very possessive on here and a little stuck up if i am allowed to say so. Not i did say some not all! If the cap fits lady your welcome to wear it." Bloke here you goon | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Encarta Concise 2. somebody with unconventional lifestyle: somebody who lives an unconventional and hedonistic life, especially somebody who exchanges sexual partners with others ( slang ) Exchanges PARTNER - this does not say spouse by marriage.... Anyway.... All you couples that say singles aren't swingers stop asking them to join you. " but wouldn't they be swingers then if they are joining a couple? Confused | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Encarta Concise 2. somebody with unconventional lifestyle: somebody who lives an unconventional and hedonistic life, especially somebody who exchanges sexual partners with others ( slang ) Exchanges PARTNER - this does not say spouse by marriage.... Anyway.... All you couples that say singles aren't swingers stop asking them to join you. " No but it does imply there are more than 2 folk involved | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Sometimes and I mean only sometimes and not all. It looks to me as though some couples try and lay claim to singles and other couples etc. Often they feel threatened by the single men wanting them only to play with couples and not with single women! God forbid they do that and deprive the true swinger THE COUPLE the chance of plating with the elusive bi female. That’s why they try and say “oh no no no your not a swinger because your single” It is at times a little insulting, but I think the ones saying it are well aware of that fact. I think that when you read that back you are going to really cringe Why do you when you read back what you put? Calm down, it's just a forum. I'm not lol. I just think that some Bi females in couples get very possessive on here and a little stuck up if i am allowed to say so. Not i did say some not all! If the cap fits lady your welcome to wear it. Bloke here you goon " Look if your going to put up a woman's picture people will make assumptions wont they. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was that to Nazrat ?" yip, a humourous reply to this "Look if your going to put up a woman's picture people will make assumptions wont they" but polo posted at the same time. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Was that to Nazrat ?" I'm guessing so as they didn't say "tit head" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Well if we gonna give out labels... Im a big bird having fun...swinging or otherwise " I think Sesame St. beat you to that name | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just had a thought..... Bare with me. As far as I am aware swinging was once commonly known as 'wife swapping', the reason being that couples swapped partners, and the term penned together as 'wife swapping'. Then, as more singles were invited into this scene the term changed to accommodate them, term changed to 'swingers', because if sharing with a single then 'wife swapping' didn't come into it. So, it's possible that singles helped pen together the term 'swingers' as without them we would simply be 'wife swappers'. Just a thought. " We wouldn't be playing these games without the single people I don't care what people want to label us, as long as we have fun | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Without the singlys... it would still be "wife swapping" so US swingles made it what it is today... I thank you......... " | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Without the singlys... it would still be "wife swapping" so US swingles made it what it is today... I thank you......... " Absolutely, when more than 2 singles or singles and couples play together it definitely makes it what it is today | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some seem to think that "swinging" is solely a pleasure for those married or in a longterm relationship. And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of. Well think again .im certainly not and ITS certainly not. " Well I dont mind being there for their pleasure lol. If thats their bag fine !!!!! but just who is using who lmao | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Some seem to think that "swinging" is solely a pleasure for those married or in a longterm relationship. And that us singles are there purely for their pleasure and the usage of. Well think again .im certainly not and ITS certainly not. Well I dont mind being there for their pleasure lol. If thats their bag fine !!!!! but just who is using who lmao " Exactly, that's why state of mind deems one a swinger, and another a chancer/user or whatever term anyone would like to use, state of mind rather than status. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Just as a matter of interest maybe the site owners do class single as swingers as they have both single male, single female and couples singles status available. " Good point fabswingers.com does so they see singles as swingers. We do too as we meet both couples and singles on here. too much tunnel vision spoils your fun u know | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |