Join us FREE, we're FREE to use
Web's largest swingers site since 2006.
Already registered?
Login here
Back to forum list |
Back to The Lounge |
Jump to newest |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is if you dont write a will" The law must be different in England diamond. In Scotland a common law spouse,has the same rights as being married. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If someone lives with someone doesn't matter how many years and there are children by a former relationship then the children inherit but the common law partner has reasonable grounds to contest" I'm thinking it's pretty much the same,if it's a second Marriage. Not a hundred per cent though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didn't realise that children took preference over a long term partner .. that's an interesting point to raise " nor did I till we found out this year | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin" dear oh dear .. this is getting scarier by the moment ! I cant understand how a couple can live together for X amount of years and yet a 2 year old for example or even worse their parent who has had nothing to do with the relationship has a bigger claim than the deceased persons partner .. seems like madness to me | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didn't realise that children took preference over a long term partner .. that's an interesting point to raise And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin" Crystal,how does it differ,if it's the spouse in a second marriage. Do they have more rights than a common law partner,in the same situation. Genuine interest,not argumentative. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Are there any real benefits to being married these days or are we pretty much on an even playing field if we choose to just live together with a long term partner ?" Probably not for some when alive: a royal pain in the arse when you die. The person left behind usually finds out what a difference that "piece of paper" makes. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin dear oh dear .. this is getting scarier by the moment ! I cant understand how a couple can live together for X amount of years and yet a 2 year old for example or even worse their parent who has had nothing to do with the relationship has a bigger claim than the deceased persons partner .. seems like madness to me " Easily solved though isn't it: if it's important and you profess to love each other get married! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Easily solved though isn't it: if it's important and you profess to love each other get married!" Yes I do hear what you are saying and it does make sense. I, however have always viewed marriage as a religious ceremony, (whilst realising you can marry in registry offices) and as neither of us are religious, have taken the view, maybe naively, that everyone left after one of us passes away would respect what they know to be our wishes, which is obviously that the surviving partner would be next of kin | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin dear oh dear .. this is getting scarier by the moment ! I cant understand how a couple can live together for X amount of years and yet a 2 year old for example or even worse their parent who has had nothing to do with the relationship has a bigger claim than the deceased persons partner .. seems like madness to me " Getting married or completing a will removes the issue though. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Getting married or completing a will removes the issue though. " we will .. it has been quite illuminating reading that I never anticipated to be honest | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Easily solved though isn't it: if it's important and you profess to love each other get married! Yes I do hear what you are saying and it does make sense. I, however have always viewed marriage as a religious ceremony, (whilst realising you can marry in registry offices) and as neither of us are religious, have taken the view, maybe naively, that everyone left after one of us passes away would respect what they know to be our wishes, which is obviously that the surviving partner would be next of kin " Sorry, very, very naive. Where money is concerned some people change, sadly seen it too often. If I remarried I'd also ensure I made a will so my estate went to my kids and not my new husband hoping he'd do the decent thing and look after my kids and not run off to Vegas with my money and waste it in titty bars and prostitutes: seen that too! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Sorry, very, very naive. Where money is concerned some people change, sadly seen it too often. If I remarried I'd also ensure I made a will so my estate went to my kids and not my new husband hoping he'd do the decent thing and look after my kids and not run off to Vegas with my money and waste it in titty bars and prostitutes: seen that too! " yes again you are absolutely right and I think we will probably do the same .. it does seem a shame that you cant trust everyone to respect your wishes however I'm sure there are examples in abundance when greed has took over and the rightful recipient of an estate has been denied it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didn't realise that children took preference over a long term partner .. that's an interesting point to raise And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin Crystal,how does it differ,if it's the spouse in a second marriage. Do they have more rights than a common law partner,in the same situation. Genuine interest,not argumentative." It get's messy! Husband/wife or anyone named in a will get's priority. If unmarried and no will then it's children. If those children are under 16 then it's their parent or guardian. If someone has children from 2 or more relationships than those children have equal claim to be next of kin. If non of the above apply and the deceased has surviving parents they are next of kin. And then it get's down to common law partner in the event of no will and no kids. I deal with this at work and it can cause a lot of upset to say the least! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Celebrate our 17th wedding anniversary tomorrow...had up and downs, very happy tho. We got married cos we wanted to, no other reason " Congratulations! Yep, I married the first time for love, will do so again...one day! | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Getting married or completing a will removes the issue though. we will .. it has been quite illuminating reading that I never anticipated to be honest " I work with it every day and have never got round to writing a will. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Celebrate our 17th wedding anniversary tomorrow...had up and downs, very happy tho. We got married cos we wanted to, no other reason " Well done and congratulations. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Are there any real benefits to being married these days or are we pretty much on an even playing field if we choose to just live together with a long term partner ?" For some its a security thing, others the big party bur equally many others see it as not that important Its a traditional thing though don't you think and many of us still like traditions. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" For some its a security thing, others the big party bur equally many others see it as not that important Its a traditional thing though don't you think and many of us still like traditions." absolutely .. we are neither religious or insecure however it has crossed my mind how my other half would manage if I was to pass away as nothing is in his name .. not the house.. the gas bill.. the water rates etc .. actually .. on paper it would be tricky to prove that we have lived together for 15 years yet everyone does know that we have strangely .. if a couple got married tomorrow and one of them died the day after then they would have more rights than we do to each others estate | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"If you have children out of marriage you don't have the same rights as a married couple the man loses out lol he can adopt his own children to get the rights " This was what spurred us on to get married...... Not sure we would have got round to it if we didn't have kids. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didn't realise that children took preference over a long term partner .. that's an interesting point to raise And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin Crystal,how does it differ,if it's the spouse in a second marriage. Do they have more rights than a common law partner,in the same situation. Genuine interest,not argumentative. It get's messy! Husband/wife or anyone named in a will get's priority. If unmarried and no will then it's children. If those children are under 16 then it's their parent or guardian. If someone has children from 2 or more relationships than those children have equal claim to be next of kin. If non of the above apply and the deceased has surviving parents they are next of kin. And then it get's down to common law partner in the event of no will and no kids. I deal with this at work and it can cause a lot of upset to say the least! " Thank you. The people making law,really have lost touch with reality,and common sense. | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
" Getting married or completing a will removes the issue though. we will .. it has been quite illuminating reading that I never anticipated to be honest I work with it every day and have never got round to writing a will. " I had a will done when my ex and I split to protect my kids and my estate so that my ex didn't get anything in the event of my death as he was an alcoholic and would have lost everything and made their life hell. Not a problem now as he is long gone and they are in their 20's so hopefully my estate would be split between the two of them | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"I was in a 17 year relationship. .. three children, nice house in surrey but never married. I wasnt on the mortgage as he wanted to buy another in my name! I wasnt allowed to work as I would earn peanuts compared to him and he worked 24/7 (child care issues) Anyway after years of misery and abuse I built up the courage to leave. In a nutshell I am entitled to a percentage of the house ... but is not automatic as it would be if we were married. Also was told. . Oh yes you have a claim on the property but had nothing sustainable in Court to prove i had contributed. I e no standing Orders no joint bank accounts no utilty bills in my name. Doesn't count that i was bringing up his three young children for 15 years. Ohh a mess for sure. .. all because i loved and trusted him. Things change. ... marry the bastard lol" your right just living together can cause massive problems for either person if you are to split up, either one has to prove they contributed to to the possessions, just having you name on a utility bill does not always go in your favour, if you can't prove you contributed any funds to the to the purchase of the house and its contents | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"didn't realise that children took preference over a long term partner .. that's an interesting point to raise And if that child is under 16 their surviving parent, or in other words the deceased's ex becomes next of kin Crystal,how does it differ,if it's the spouse in a second marriage. Do they have more rights than a common law partner,in the same situation. Genuine interest,not argumentative. It get's messy! Husband/wife or anyone named in a will get's priority. If unmarried and no will then it's children. If those children are under 16 then it's their parent or guardian. If someone has children from 2 or more relationships than those children have equal claim to be next of kin. If non of the above apply and the deceased has surviving parents they are next of kin. And then it get's down to common law partner in the event of no will and no kids. I deal with this at work and it can cause a lot of upset to say the least! Thank you. The people making law,really have lost touch with reality,and common sense. " Well not really because there are people like Anna Nicole Smith who thought that marrying her 90+ billionaire husband would guarantee her his estate. Thing was you don't get to be a billionaire by being stupid and he only verbally promised her a share and didn't include her in the Will. Nevertheless she did fight a legal battle with his children and was awarded a share in his estate. Sadly there are men and women fooled by the golddiggers and do marry and make a will leaving all their estate to their spouse. A will can become void if it's proven that the testator was not of sound mind or was coerced in any way. Or if the testator left all their worldly goods to the cats home leaving spouses who would suffer financial hardship under the terms of the will. Then the people really benefitting from this are the lawyers because contentious probate is very expensive. But Wills can, in some circumstances, become void. Personally I would never go to a will writing company or buy a will writing kit and do it myself, I made my Will with a reputable firm of solicitors. Of course when you aren't married then the legal ground you stand on is certainly shakier | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ain't getting married about 2 people inove wanting to spend the rest if their lives together, or are we missing the point and its all about what you will be left if something happens to either, if it's the latter I can't see a marriage lasting long" | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
| |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"Ain't getting married about 2 people inove wanting to spend the rest if their lives together, or are we missing the point and its all about what you will be left if something happens to either, if it's the latter I can't see a marriage lasting long " to that....I certainly don't see it as a gimmick as someone has called it | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
"There is if you dont write a will The law must be different in England diamond. In Scotland a common law spouse,has the same rights as being married." Yes the scottish law is different when it comes to this & child support. I kicked my partner out after living together for 2 years. I had to call the police because he refused to leave. All I had to do was show a bank statement to prove I paid the utility bills & that I owned the house. Job done he was escorted away from my house by the police. He had no rights at all. xx | |||
Reply privately | Reply in forum | Reply +quote |
Post new Message to Thread |
back to top |